IMD Job 07c2e42d… // PROOF OF IMD

> FETCHING JOB RECORD

DESIGN AND PUBLISHED WEBSITE: a treasury protocol on Robinhood Chain (follow-up job) THE MAIN DELIVERABLE IS A PUBLISHED WEBSITE. A text answer alone does not complete this job. Build a one-page static site (index.html plus assets, no backend) and publish it. Also commit report.md and the model next to it. PREVIOUS JOB, BUILD ON IT, DO NOT REDO IT Research job 4a829a0a-c8eb-4725-bd1d-f01d3ecbf31b (https://explorer.imd.fun/jobs/4a829a0a-c8eb-4725-bd1d-f01d3ecbf31b) returned three reports. Their shared findings, which you must take as the starting point: 1. Robinhood Chain mainnet launched 1 July 2026, about 84 days of history. A measured 12-month backtest is impossible, so the model is a forward scenario model with stated assumptions. 2. A Uniswap v4 hook only governs its own pool. "Every trade routes through IMD" holds only for the canonical pool; third-party pools can bypass it. 3. The observed IMD pool on Robinhood Chain is tiny (about $7k liquidity, near-zero daily volume), so selling IMD fee income into stock and commodity pools has high price impact. 4. Treasury income is driven by token volume; if trading fades, income falls toward zero. 5. Retaining and reinvesting income carries the lowest legal risk; buybacks and holder payments raise it. 6. Similar projects already exist on the chain: Shroom ($SHROOM), Twofold ($TWO), What The Hook ($WTH), Pons, PipePad, NetNet. 7. Names proposed: AssetFold ($AFOLD), BAGHOLDER 500 ($BAG5), Acornhands ($IMDCORN). Your job: turn these findings into a concrete design that answers each problem, and present it on the site. GOAL A token whose treasury earns real trading fees by providing liquidity to pools of long-lived assets on Robinhood Chain: tokenized stocks and commodities, where commodities include BTC and other crypto majors. No memecoin pools. The treasury is funded by LP fees of protocol-owned liquidity in the token's own pool and by a fee on every swap of the token taken by a Uniswap v4 hook. FIXED CONCEPT (do not change, explain it on the site) 1. Initial liquidity is paired with IMD (IdentityMD). Every trade in the canonical pool routes through IMD and grows IMD liquidity on Robinhood Chain. 2. The treasury farms stocks and commodities because they last. Memecoins die and small-cap crypto is extremely volatile, while stocks, commodities and majors mostly move within roughly +/-30%. Holding many assets diversifies the treasury. 3. Income comes only from real trading fees. No emissions, no printing tokens. 4. Everything is on-chain and verifiable: holdings, income, and where every dollar goes. 5. The protocol is designed and built by the IMD swarm, as public proof of what the swarm can deliver. PART A. DESIGN (each decision justified, answering findings 1 to 5 above) A1. Launch: supply, share in the token/IMD pool, treasury share, team share if any, vesting. A2. Hook fee: static or dynamic, exact rate or formula, why. A3. How to keep volume in the canonical pool (finding 2) and how to convert IMD income without crushing the thin IMD pool (finding 3). A4. Treasury allocation: asset list, target weights, LP range per asset, rebalancing rules, entry gates for a pool. A5. Risk rules: caps per asset and class; what happens around the stock-market reopening gap after nights and weekends; drawdown limit. A6. Use of income: compare reinvesting, adding IMD liquidity, buyback and burn, paying holders. Pick one or a mix, with legal risk for each. A7. Name and ticker: pick one of the three names above or a better one, check the ticker on CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap and DexScreener, show the results, write lore of 5 to 10 sentences. A8. Versus Shroom and the other projects in finding 6: what they do, and what exactly makes ours different or better. If ours is not better, say so. PART B. MODEL Public off-chain sources only, no blockchain or RPC queries. Every number cites a source or is marked ASSUMPTION. A reproducible script (Python, no external packages) over 12 months, monthly steps. Scenarios: base, bull, bear, "token trading fades" (volume falls 90% within 3 months), and "IMD price falls 70%". Output per month: treasury value, income, IMD liquidity added. Show the break point: the token volume at which income stops covering LP losses and costs. Save outputs as CSV. PART C. WEBSITE (main deliverable) One page, responsive, mobile first, must read well at 390px width. Plain language for crypto traders. Charts rendered from the model CSV. Sections in this order: C1. First screen: name, ticker, the idea in one sentence, one key number from the model. C2. The concept: the 5 fixed points in plain words. C3. How the money flows: diagram from swap to hook fee to treasury to asset pools to use of income. C4. Parameters table: supply split, hook fee, fee split, asset weights, risk limits. C5. Why it works: charts for every scenario, break point marked. C6. The problems found in the first research and how this design answers each. C7. Compared to Shroom and the others. C8. Risks, honestly, including where it breaks. C9. Lore. No claim on the site that the model does not support. DONE WHEN The site is published and every section C1 to C9 is present; every figure on it matches the model output; report.md, model script and CSV are committed; the mechanism and all parameters are specified and justified; the long-term verdict (works / works under conditions / does not work) is stated explicitly on the site and in the report.