0bffdf70-1c8f-47d5-859f-20e596dafc86IMD JOB

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/0bffdf70-1c8f-47d5-859f-20e596dafc86/d5d376f9-81b2-4ceb-8f8c-d4a00ed72c51/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor average: `3794547619047619` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer is **3794547619047619 wei**, the average over 21 qualifying sales. - **Figure:** the 21 sales total 79685500000000000 wei, and the average is that total divided by 21, rounded down. - **Method:** I did not use `scan.mjs`. I pulled the collection's ERC-721 Transfer logs over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 (33 logs across 9 transactions). I then decoded every Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` event in those transactions' receipts and priced each sale per the definitions. No fill was excluded for paying in another token. - **Chain and pin:** `eth_chainId` returned 1, and block 26026608's hash matched the pinned hash. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. Its `source` names the RPC endpoint (publicnode) and the two Seaport contracts I read, but the deployer can't rerun a `panel` recipe. - **Files:** the scratch script is in `test/scratch/run.mjs` and is not submitted. `artifacts/answer.json` is left untracked.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproducible calculation. Average: **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** across **21 sales**. Reproduction checks passed; the required validator printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/0bffdf70-1c8f-47d5-859f-20e596dafc86/d5d376f9-81b2-4ceb-8f8c-d4a00ed72c51/artifacts/answer.json). Average: `3794547619047619` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei**, computed across 21 qualifying sales, and runnable reproduction code. The required validator printed `ok`.

Check passes. Answer written to `artifacts/answer.json`: average sale price of The Little Guys over the pinned window is **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** (21 qualifying Seaport ETH/WETH sales, sum 79,685,500,000,000,000 wei, floor-divided). Summary of method: pulled all `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 across blocks 26019452–26026608 via `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast` (chain id and closing block hash confirmed against the pin, cross-checked on `publicnode.com`), hand-decoded each log's offer/consideration arrays, filtered to single-ERC-721 fills of the target collection with all-ETH/WETH consideration (listing) or ETH/WETH offer (bid), and averaged. Since `oracle.json` marks this request `"evidence": "panel"`, `check-answer.mjs` requires the `panel` recipe kind (source = the RPC/method used), which is what was written; `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction procedure. Average: **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** across **21 qualifying sales**. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/0bffdf70-1c8f-47d5-859f-20e596dafc86/d5d376f9-81b2-4ceb-8f8c-d4a00ed72c51/artifacts/answer.json). Computed average: `3794547619047619` wei across 21 qualifying sales. Validator result: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** across 21 qualifying sales and reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`.

`check-answer.mjs` prints **ok**. The deliverable is complete. ## Summary **Answer: 3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** (~0.0038 ETH) — the average sale price of The Little Guys (`0x93a71c6730d0388176ddb960ff81a2f01deba400`) on OpenSea over blocks 26019452–26026608, written to `artifacts/answer.json` (untracked, as required). How it was computed: - Fetched all `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window via `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast` (chainId 1 confirmed; the closing block's hash matched the pin there and on a second operator, publicnode). The window held 12,232 such logs. - Decoded each with the Seaport ABI in a scratch Node script (`test/scratch/avg.mjs` — the delivered scan.mjs can't decode Seaport's nested dynamic arrays, so I reused its exported keccak256 and its chunk-halving fetch pattern). Zero decode failures. - Applied the brief's definitions: exactly one itemType-2 item of the collection across offer+consideration and no other NFT; listing fills priced as the sum of all consideration amounts with every consideration item ETH or WETH; bid fills priced as the single ETH/WETH offer amount; anything else excluded. That yielded **21 qualifying sales** (7 listing fills, 14 WETH bid fills, nothing excluded for other tokens or odd shapes), summing 79,685,500,000,000,000 wei; floor(sum/21) = 3794547619047619. - Since the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}`; the decode/filter method, endpoints, and totals are in `notes`, and the choices the question left open (single-item-offer shape, WETH parity, bid-fill pricing) are stated under `definitions`. `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json` passes with `ok`, and no config files or out-of-scope paths were touched.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Answer:** 3794547619047619 wei, the mean sale price rounded down. - **Sales counted:** 21 qualifying sales out of 12,232 OrderFulfilled logs from the two Seaport contracts over blocks 26019452–26026608. Their prices sum to 79685500000000000 wei. - **Method:** the bundled `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested offer and consideration arrays, so I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. Nothing there is submitted. I applied the request's definitions as written. For a listing fill I summed every consideration amount. For a bid fill I took the offer amount. Bundles, ERC-1155 fills and fills paid in other tokens were excluded. - **Endpoint:** I scanned from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Recipe:** the request is marked as a panel-evidence question, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. Its `source` starts with the RPC URL and then describes the `eth_getLogs` query. The notes explain that the deployer can't rerun the nested-array decoding through the catalogue's chain recipes. The definitions are also stated in the file.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/0bffdf70-1c8f-47d5-859f-20e596dafc86/d5d376f9-81b2-4ceb-8f8c-d4a00ed72c51/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `3794547619047619` wei across 21 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **3794547619047619 wei**, averaged over 21 qualifying sales. The included reproduction script returned the same result. The required validator printed `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is **3794547619047619** wei, the floor of the mean over 21 qualifying sales totalling 79685500000000000 wei. - **Recipe kind:** none of the catalogue's chain recipes can decode Seaport's `OrderFulfilled` item arrays, and this brief has `"evidence": "panel"`, which only accepts a `panel` recipe. So the recipe is `panel`, with the chain itself as the source. That means the deployer can't mechanically rerun it. It has to match on the value, and `notes` says so. - **Scan:** I fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608. That was 12232 logs, all from publicnode with the others as fallbacks, and I decoded the offer and consideration arrays by hand. - **Sales:** 21 of them qualified, and none was excluded for being paid in another token. - **Pin:** `eth_chainId` was 1, and the closing block hash matched the pin on publicnode. I also confirmed it on mevblocker. - **Not run:** I did not run a second full scan, as the instructions advise. The scan script is `test/scratch/sales.mjs`, which is not submitted.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. It gives an average sale price of **3794547619047619 wei** for The Little Guys, over exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608. - **Count and sum:** 21 qualifying sales with a price sum of 79685500000000000 wei. The mean is 3794547619047619.04, rounded down. - **Exclusions:** none of the fills were bundles, ERC-1155 or paid in another token. All 21 were listing fills paid in ETH. - **Method:** I read the collection's ERC-721 `Transfer` logs over the window (33 logs in 9 transactions). For each transaction I fetched the receipt and decoded every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log by hand. An `OrderFulfilled` can only touch the collection if it emitted a `Transfer` in the same transaction, so this catches every fill. - **Endpoint:** `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` only. It returned chain id 1, and the closing block 26026608 hash matched the pin. I did not check the hash on a second operator's endpoint, which the reference suggests as a cheap extra check. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts `{kind: "panel", source}` for that. The catalogue's chain recipes can't average per-sale prices anyway. The recipe's `source` is the RPC URL, and `notes` describes the computation. - **Window key order:** the checker compares the `window` object as a string, so its keys are in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). My first write had them in a different order and failed. The scratch script is in `test/scratch/run.mjs` and is not submitted.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **Answer:** the average sale price is **3794547619047619 wei**, about 0.00379 ETH. - **Sales:** 21 qualifying sales of The Little Guys in blocks 26019452–26026608, summing to 79685500000000000 wei (the file's `figure`). The mean is rounded down. No fills were excluded for being paid in another token. - **Scan:** I fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks (12232 logs) and decoded them with my own script, `test/scratch/sales.mjs`. `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested arrays. - **Pin:** the closing hash matched on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, where the scan ran, and on `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. - **Recipe:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts `{ kind: "panel", source }` for those. So the recipe is a panel recipe whose source is the publicnode endpoint and the log query. It is not rerunnable as a catalogue recipe, and the definitions and notes in the file carry the actual method. - **Window field order:** the checker compares the `window` object as text, so I put its keys in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`).

Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.

FAILURE: runtime_error

stream disconnected before completion: You have no credits remaining. Add credits to continue using the API at https://platform.openai.com/settings/organization/billing/.

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproducible computation. Average: **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** across 21 qualifying sales. The required checker printed `ok`.

The average sale price was **3794547619047619 wei** (about 0.0038 ETH). It's written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **What I scanned:** all 12,232 OrderFulfilled logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608. I read them from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with `rpc.flashbots.net/fast` as a fallback. Chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash both matched. - **The sales:** 21 fills involved The Little Guys, and all 21 met the definition. 7 were listing fills, priced from 0.0042343 to 0.0043068 ETH including fees. 14 were accepted bids, priced from 0.0033 to 0.0039 ETH. None were bundles, ERC-1155 fills or paid in another token. - **The average:** the prices add up to 79685500000000000 wei, and dividing by 21 and rounding down gives the answer. That is at least the brief's minimum of 1. **Recipe:** the brief marks this as a panel question, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe with a `source`. Nothing reruns it. The source names the RPC endpoint, the two Seaport contracts, the OrderFulfilled topic and the block range, and `notes` explains the method so anyone can repeat it by hand. I used a small decoder of my own in `test/scratch/`, because `scan.mjs` can only count and sum logs and can't read Seaport's item arrays. `artifacts/answer.json` is the only file I added, and it's left untracked for the daemon to upload.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/0bffdf70-1c8f-47d5-859f-20e596dafc86/d5d376f9-81b2-4ceb-8f8c-d4a00ed72c51/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `3794547619047619` wei. The required checker prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction procedure. Average: **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** across **21 sales**. Required checker: `ok`.

`check-answer.mjs` prints **ok**. Deliverable written to `artifacts/answer.json` (5836 bytes, untracked). **Answer: 3794547619047619 wei** (≈0.003795 ETH) — average over 21 qualifying sales, sum 79685500000000000 wei. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 (closing hash confirmed on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and, independently, on `eth.drpc.org`): 1. `eth_getLogs` for the collection's `Transfer` topic → 33 logs in 9 blocks, 0 mints. A Seaport ERC-721 fill always emits that Transfer, so those 9 blocks bound the search exactly. Re-confirmed with the delivered `scan.mjs` (4 chunks, same 33 logs / 9 blocks / pinned hash). 2. `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` on Seaport 1.5 + 1.6 in those blocks, restricted to the transactions that moved a collection token → 21 events in 6 transactions, all Seaport 1.6. 3. Decoded `offer`/`consideration` from the log data and applied the brief's definitions: exactly one NFT item (itemType 2) of the collection and no other NFT; listing fills priced as the sum of all consideration items (all ETH or WETH, fees included), bid fills priced as the offer amount. All 21 events qualified — 7 listing fills paid in native ETH, 14 collection-offer fills paid in WETH; nothing dropped as a bundle, ERC-1155 or non-ETH payment. Prices ran 0.0033–0.0043 ETH. 79685500000000000 / 21 = 3794547619047619 (floor), above the guard min of 1. Two judgement calls the request left open, both stated in `definitions`: "the single offer item" is read literally (offer array of exactly one item), and each qualifying event counts as one sale with no per-transaction de-duplication — no matched listing/bid pair for the same token id occurred here, so nothing is double counted. Since the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is the `panel` kind, with the source naming the exact endpoint, topics and calls; the catalogue's chain recipes can't select a collection that appears only inside the ABI-encoded item arrays.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei**, based on 21 qualifying sales, plus reproduction details. Required validator returned `ok`.

**3794547619047619** wei — mean of 21 qualifying single-ERC-721 Seaport fills (sum 79685500000000000 wei), confirmed identically by on-chain decode and by OpenSea's sale events. `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` prints `ok`.

The average sale price is **3794547619047619 wei**, and `artifacts/answer.json` is written. The check script prints `ok` for it. - **How it was computed:** I pulled the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs for both Seaport contracts over blocks 26019452 to 26026608 and decoded them myself. That was 12,232 logs, read from ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com. I confirmed chain id 1 and that block 26026608 has the pinned hash. - **Result:** 21 sales qualified under the definitions in the brief. Their prices total 79685500000000000 wei, and 79685500000000000 / 21, rounded down, is the figure above. - **Recipe:** The brief marks this question as panel evidence, and the catalogue's chain recipes can't express this computation. I therefore used the `panel` recipe with the RPC endpoint as its source, and the full method is in `notes`. - **Not double-checked:** I ran one scan against one endpoint only, as the task instructions allow. I also did not confirm the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint. The scratch decoder is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with average **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** across 21 sales. The included reproduction script returned the same result. The required validator printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei** across 21 qualifying sales and a public-RPC reproduction procedure. The required checker printed `ok`.

The average sale price of The Little Guys over blocks 26019452–26026608 was **3794547619047619 wei** (about 0.0038 ETH). It's written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **How I got it:** - I pulled every Seaport `OrderFulfilled` event from both Seaport contracts over exactly the pinned blocks, using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That was 12,232 events, and I decoded them with a small Node script. - The chain id was 1, and the closing block's hash matched the pinned hash on both publicnode and `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. - 21 events involved the collection, and all 21 counted as sales under the brief's definitions: - 7 listing fills paid entirely in native ETH, fees included. - 14 bid fills paid with a single WETH offer. - None of the edge cases came up: no bundles, no ERC-1155 items, no other payment tokens, and no zero-price counter-orders. So none of the choices the definitions left open changed the answer. - The prices sum to 79685500000000000 wei; divided by 21 and rounded down, that gives the answer. It meets the request's minimum of 1. **Recipe:** the request is marked as a panel question, so the recipe has to be the `panel` kind. Its `source` names the RPC endpoint, the event and the two contracts, and `notes` describes the method. The deployer won't rerun it automatically. **Not delivered:** the scan script was scratch work in `test/scratch/`, which is deleted before submission. `artifacts/answer.json` is the only output, and I left it untracked as instructed.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and untracked (excluded by `.git/info/exclude`), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 3794547619047619 wei** (≈0.0037945 ETH), figure (sum) 79685500000000000 wei over 21 sales. How it was computed: - **Pin confirmed first** — `eth_chainId` = 1 and closing hash `0x84272223…bf3f` at block 26026608 on three operators (flashbots, publicnode, mevblocker). - **Definitional scan** (publicnode): `eth_getLogs` for the `OrderFulfilled` topic `0x9d9af8e3…6f31` on Seaport 1.5 + 1.6 over exactly 26019452–26026608, 100-block chunks, 72 chunks, none refused or halved. 12,232 events in the window; 21 touch `0x93a71c67…a400`; all 21 qualify. 7 ETH listing fills (consideration sum, fees included), 14 WETH bid fills (offer amount). - **Independent cross-check** by a different route on two other operators: collection ERC-721 `Transfer` logs → 9 transactions → receipts → same decoder. Identical 21 events, sum and average, so pass 1 wasn't truncated and no qualifying fill lacked a `Transfer`. - **Ambiguities turned out not to bite**: 0 bundles, 0 ERC-1155, 0 non-ETH/WETH payments, and all 21 fills are distinct `(tx, token id)` pairs — no matched order counted from both sides — so per-event counting equals per-token counting here. Each open choice is still stated in `definitions`. Recipe kind is `panel`, as the brief's `"evidence": "panel"` requires (the check rejects a chain recipe here); `source` names the exact `eth_getLogs` call, and `notes` records the endpoints and method. Scan script lives in `test/scratch/seaport.mjs`, which is not submitted.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`), and is left untracked (git status is clean apart from the ignored artifact). **Answer: `3794547619047619` wei** (~0.0037945 ETH) How it was computed: - Confirmed chain id `0x1` and the pinned closing hash for block 26026608 on two operators (`rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`). - The bundled `scan.mjs` can only sum fixed data words, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/seaport-avg.mjs` that fetches `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 (1000-block chunks, halving on refusal — none occurred), decodes the `offer`/`consideration` arrays, and applies the brief's definitions. - 12,232 OrderFulfilled logs in the window; 21 touched the collection and all 21 qualified (7 listing fills, 14 bid fills; no bundles, no non-ETH/WETH payments, no zero-price fills). Sum 79,685,500,000,000,000 wei ÷ 21 = 3,794,547,619,047,619.04… → rounded down. - Recipe kind is `panel` (the brief's `evidence` is `panel`), with `source` naming the RPC endpoint and the exact `eth_getLogs` filter. The open choices (single-NFT rule across itemTypes 2–5, bid-fill consideration not constrained, zero-price exclusion, dedupe by block:logIndex) are stated under `definitions`; none of them affected the figure in this window.

Completed `artifacts/answer.json` with the computed uint256 answer: `3794547619047619` Verification passed: ```text node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json ok ``` I used `test/scratch/compute.mjs` only as local scratch scaffolding; the required delivered output is `artifacts/answer.json`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei**, averaged over 21 qualifying sales. Includes reproduction steps. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **3,794,547,619,047,619 wei**, averaged across 21 qualifying sales. Included reproduction details. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/0bffdf70-1c8f-47d5-859f-20e596dafc86/d5d376f9-81b2-4ceb-8f8c-d4a00ed72c51/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `3794547619047619` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.