> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26020641 to 26027793, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the floor of Non Playable Character (contract 0xa2a6063b910fc7a7a286196f6c9b62b2797fa0ae) as realized on chain over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet: the lowest sale price, in wei, among Seaport OrderFulfilled fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, fees included, as the definitions say? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
[answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json) created and validated successfully (`ok`).
I've read the brief. This is a panel-evidence question whose answer still must be computed on chain: the lowest qualifying Seaport `OrderFulfilled` fill for NPC (`0xa2a6063b910fc7a7a286196f6c9b62b2797fa0ae`) over blocks 26020641–26027793. Let me check the environment and endpoints first.Node 22 and network access confirmed. Let me verify the pinned block hash on two endpoints and get the OrderFulfilled topic0.Pinned hash confirmed on two operators. Now I'll write the floor computation in `test/scratch/` — chunked `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` on both Seaport contracts, ABI-decoded, applying the brief's definitions.Let me simplify the chunk-fetching to a worker pool like the scan script uses — less error-prone.Let me track the bid-fill edge case (multiple ETH/WETH offer items) separately since the definition says "the single offer item" — I want to see if it ever occurs and whether it affects the min.49 qualifying NPC sales, min = 6300000000000000 wei (a bid fill). Let me spot-check completeness on a second operator — count the same logs over a subrange on mevblocker and compare with publicnode.Both endpoints agree exactly: 11247 logs, identical per-range counts — no truncation. Floor = 6300000000000000 wei (0.0063 ETH, a WETH bid fill at block 26024193). Since the brief has `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe must be `panel`. Writing the answer — note `window` key order must match the brief byte-for-byte under `JSON.stringify`.Check passes. Let me confirm no stray files outside the allowed paths.Done. `artifacts/answer.json` passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`), and nothing outside the allowed path was modified. **Answer: `6300000000000000` wei** (0.0063 ETH) How it was computed: - Scanned `OrderFulfilled` on both Seaport contracts (1.5 `0x0000...14dc`, 1.6 `0x0000...b395`) over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 via `eth_getLogs` on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`; confirmed chainId 1 and the pinned `toBlockHash` on it and `mevblocker.io`. - 11247 logs → ABI-decoded offer/consideration arrays → 49 qualifying fills: exactly one itemType-2 NFT of `0xa2a6063b910fc7a7a286196f6c9b62b2797fa0ae`, no other NFT, paid fully in ETH/WETH. - Listing fills priced as the sum of all ETH/WETH consideration (fees included); bid fills priced as the single ETH/WETH offer amount. - Min was a WETH bid fill at block 26024193, tx `0xbe72…eee8`. - Completeness cross-check: per-1000-block log counts matched exactly on a second operator (11247 vs 11247). The brief declares `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `{"kind":"panel","source":"https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com"}` — the checker rejects any chain recipe for this request. All open definitions (NFT itemTypes 2–5, bid/listing pricing rules) are stated in `definitions` and `notes`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Done. The answer is **6300000000000000 wei (0.0063 ETH)**, written to `artifacts/answer.json` and passing `check-answer.mjs` with `ok`. How it was computed: - Fetched every Seaport `OrderFulfilled` log (topic0 `0x9d9af8...6f31`, verified with the scan script's `--keccak`) from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 via `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which confirmed chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash `0xf86e...9b79`; the hash was also cross-checked on a second operator (`rpc.mevblocker.io`). - Decoded each log's offer/consideration arrays with a scratch script in `test/scratch/floor.mjs` (repo-root scratch, avoiding the previous attempt's `.imd/test/scratch/` path violation) and applied the brief's definitions: exactly one itemType-2 item of the collection, no other NFT; listing fills priced as the sum of all-ETH/WETH consideration, bid fills as the ETH/WETH offer amount. - Of 11,247 OrderFulfilled logs in the window, 49 fills carried the collection and all 49 qualified (24 listings, 25 bids). The minimum was 6300000000000000 wei, in tx `0xbe72ae...eee8` — above the `min: "1"` guard. Because the brief pins `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com"}` (the checker rejects chain recipes for panel-evidence briefs); the full log-derived method and counts are in `notes`, and the interpretive choices the request left open (listing vs bid pricing, no-other-NFT meaning any itemType ≥ 2, log dedup) are stated under `definitions`. The answer file is untracked and not added to git, as required.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). The checker reports `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Floor: **6,300,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.0063 ETH), across 49 qualifying sales. The included replay reproduced the result from public RPC data. Validation printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the floor of **6,300,000,000,000,000 wei**, definitions, and public-RPC reproduction code. Required validator printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json) with floor `6300000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.
error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.
FAILURE: runtime_error
Check passes. The answer artifact is written at `artifacts/answer.json`: the floor price is **6300000000000000 wei (0.0063 ETH)**, computed by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020641–26027793, decoding them, filtering to single-ERC-721 fills of the NPC collection paid entirely in ETH/WETH (49 qualifying sales), and taking the minimum — cross-checked identical on two independent public RPCs.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 6300000000000000 wei (0.0063 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I scanned Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, in 1000-block chunks. The chain id and the closing block hash matched the pin. The scan found 11247 `OrderFulfilled` logs, of which 49 were single-NFT fills of this collection. The lowest price among those, under the request's price rules, is the answer. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`. That kind takes a `source` URL and is not rerun by the deployer. My `source` is that endpoint plus the log query and decoding used. - **Only other endpoint check:** I did not check the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint, and I ran only one scan. - **Scratch script:** `scan.mjs` doesn't decode Seaport, so I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. That path is deleted before submission and is not delivered.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 6300000000000000 wei (0.0063 ETH).** How it was computed: - Confirmed `eth_chainId` = 1 and the pinned closing hash for block 26027793 on three independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, merkle). - Scanned `OrderFulfilled` (topic0 `0x9d9af8…6f31`) at Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly 26020641–26027793 in 256-block chunks on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, halving refused ranges and never accepting an empty chunk without a second operator confirming it: **11,247 logs** (2 from 1.5, 11,245 from 1.6). All 56 chunks were re-counted on `mainnet.gateway.tenderly.co` — 56/56 matched, so nothing was truncated. - Decoded each log's `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` with a small local ABI decoder (the stock `scan.mjs` sums and ranks but does not decode dynamic tuple arrays; it supplied the topic0 via `--keccak`). **49 fills** hold exactly one ERC-721 of the collection and no other NFT — 24 listing fills (23 in ETH, 1 in WETH; priced as the fee-inclusive consideration sum) and 25 bid fills (priced as the WETH offer amount). - Minimum: 0.0063 WETH bid fill at block 26024193, log index 120, tx `0xbe72ae34…2eee8`, token id 916. Next lowest are 0.006336 and 0.0064. Two cross-checks that the open definitions didn't move the answer: every log in the window naming the collection is one of the 49 (no bundle, ERC-1155, or foreign-currency fill was excluded), and the collection emitted 48 ERC-721 `Transfer` logs over the same blocks — consistent with 49 fills, since one matched order emitted both sides for a single transfer. Two notes on judgment calls, both recorded under `definitions`: - The brief declares `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is the `panel` kind; none of the chain recipes can express a minimum over decoded dynamic event data. The `source` still names the RPC endpoints and the exact log filter, so the fact is chain-read, as the brief's own `source` definition demands. - Where a matched order emits one `OrderFulfilled` per side, each log is priced on its own. The winning log is the only qualifying log in its transaction, so this reading doesn't change the figure.
The check passes. Summary: scanned Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned block window (26020641–26027793) via public RPC, decoded offer/consideration items, filtered to single-ERC-721-of-collection fills paid entirely in ETH/WETH, and found the floor at **6,300,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.0063 WETH), a bid fill in tx `0xbe72ae34...22eee8`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json) with floor `6300000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passes: `ok`. Computed the NPC floor by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned window (26020641–26027793, hash-confirmed on two independent public endpoints), decoding offer/consideration per the Seaport ABI, filtering to single-ERC721-of-collection fills paid entirely in ETH/WETH, and taking the minimum. Result: **6300000000000000 wei** (0.0063 ETH), from tx `0xbe72ae...eee8` at block 26024193, out of 49 qualifying sales among 11247 total OrderFulfilled logs. Written to `artifacts/answer.json` as a `panel`-kind recipe (required by the brief's `evidence: "panel"`), with the exact reproduction steps in `recipe.source` and `notes`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `6300000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
The check passes. Summary: computed the floor by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020641–26027793, decoding offer/consideration tuples for exactly-one-ERC-721 fills of the collection paid in ETH/WETH. Found 49 qualifying sales; the floor is **6,300,000,000,000,000 wei** (a bid fill in tx `0xbe72ae34...`). Wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, which passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with **6,300,000,000,000,000 wei**, computed from 49 qualifying sales, and a runnable reproduction procedure. Required checker: `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json`. Floor: **6,300,000,000,000,000 wei** across 49 qualifying sales. Embedded reproduction code returned the same result; required validator printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Floor: **6,300,000,000,000,000 wei** across 49 qualifying sales. The included reproduction script returned the same result from public RPC data. Required validator printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Local verifier output: `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 6300000000000000 wei (0.0063 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I got it:** I fetched the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641 to 26027793. All of it came from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and its closing block hash matched the pinned one. `scan.mjs` doesn't decode Seaport, so I decoded the logs myself with a small script in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. - **What qualified:** 11247 logs came back and 49 were sales of exactly one ERC-721 of the collection. All 49 were paid in ETH or WETH, so none were excluded, and the lowest price among them is the answer. - **Recipe:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only allowed recipe kind is `panel`. Its `source` is the RPC URL above. It is a description, not something the deployer can rerun. The method and the definitions are spelled out in `notes` and `definitions`. - **Fix:** my first draft failed the check because the `window` keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. I reordered them. I did not run a second scan or check the hash on a second endpoint.
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: .imd/test/scratch/s.mjs
FAILURE: path_violation
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The floor is **6300000000000000 wei** (0.0063 ETH). - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log across exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, in 500-block chunks. The closing block hash on that endpoint matches the pinned one. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Filtering:** I decoded each fill by hand rather than with `scan.mjs`. Of 11,247 fills, 49 qualify under the request's definitions, and the lowest of those is the figure above. - **Recipe:** the request has `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only recipe kind allowed is `panel`. Its `source` is the RPC URL, and the `notes` field says how the answer was computed. The deployer cannot rerun a `panel` recipe; the panel's agreement on the value is the evidence. - **Scratch script:** it is `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted.
Check passes. The answer: floor = 6,300,000,000,000,000 wei (0.0063 ETH), computed from 49 qualifying Seaport fills across both contract versions, confirmed on two independent public RPCs matching the pinned block hash.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/228ef38c-4695-4415-bdda-930dfff83023/423a3764-d3b8-418a-93a8-7e6ad4d0ea3a/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `6300000000000000` wei. Provided validator result: `ok`.
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.
FAILURE: runtime_error
failed to start git: spawn git ENOENT
FAILURE: internal_error
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.