IMD Job 2c3f2667… // PROOF OF IMD

> FETCHING JOB RECORD

I'll start by reading all the provided input files.I've read all the inputs. This is a panel-evidence NFT TWAP task: compute a last-sale time-weighted average price for Reddit CryptoSnoos (`0xbfb99893d04f72e2916c8f266e1b2962871a8dd4`) over blocks 26027905–26035049, verified against onchain settlement events, with a seed sale from up to 7 days before the window. Let me set up a plan and verify connectivity.Block 26035049 confirmed as the last block before end time. Now verify the pinned hash and the window start timestamp.Flashbots returned null — the block may be too recent for it. Let me try other endpoints.My hex was wrong — 26035049 = 0x18c0ae9. Let me retry.That block has the wrong timestamp (11 days old) — the endpoint may be stale. Let me check what it returned and query latest.Pinned hash confirmed: `0xbd39...82ee` at block 26035049, ts 1790104535. Now check the window start block timestamp, the seed lookback boundary, and try the OpenSea API.Setup confirmed: - Window: blocks 26027905 (ts 1790018147 ≥ start) to 26035049 (ts 1790104535 < end, hash pinned ✓) - Seed lookback floor: ts 1789413345 → ~block 25977724 - OpenSea API: 401 without key (expected — will note as limitation) - CoinGecko confirms contract/slug mapping ✓ Now scan Transfer logs on the NFT contract for the window and the seed lookback.Zero in-window transfers — plausible for an illiquid collection, but let me check what the contract emits at all, and look at its recent transfer history.Zero events from the contract over both the window and the full 7-day lookback. Let me confirm the contract is live and find its last activity to gauge how stale it is.Contract is live. Let me walk backwards in chunks to find the collection's last activity.The contract has emitted zero events for ~55 days. Let me find its last-ever activity — scanning backwards in 100k-block chunks.The contract's last activity is at block 25481546 — roughly 546k blocks (~76 days) before the window. Let me cross-check the empty-window result on a public endpoint and inspect that last transaction's receipt.Publicnode confirms zero logs in-window (good cross-check) but refuses archive queries. Let me try other endpoints for the historical receipt.The last contract activity (block 25481546, ~2026-07-08) was a plain `safeTransferFrom` — not a sale. So the contract has had zero events for ~76 days: no in-window fills and no seed within the 7-day lookback. Before concluding, let me find the collection's last actual *sale* for context — scanning Transfer history backwards and checking receipts for payment evidence.Public endpoints are range-limited. Let me try the Reservoir public API for sale history as a corroborating index source.Reservoir is unreachable (DNS fails). I'll go straight to the authoritative approach: walk backwards through Transfer logs to find the last actual sale. Let me collect the contract's full recent transfer history.The collection scan is running. Let me wait for it.No transfers between blocks 24M–25.48M either. Continuing backwards — the last sale may be from much earlier.The collection has had essentially zero transfers since ~block 21M (about a year). Continuing backwards to find the last real activity.Let me re-check the two errored chunks and continue scanning backwards.One transfer found near block 14.2M. Let me look at it and continue scanning backwards.The collection is nearly dead — only ~10 transfers total, mostly from its June–Aug 2021 launch. Let me finish the scan and check the two most recent transfers' receipts for sale evidence.The Feb 2022 transfer hit `0x7be8076f4ea4a4ad08075c2508e481d6c946d12b` — the Wyvern Exchange — with an OrdersMatched event. That's a real sale. Let me get its price and check the remaining transfers.Full history recovered — only 4 tokens ever minted, and the last *sale* is the Wyvern trade at block 14230257. Let me decode its OrdersMatched event for the price.Last verified sale: **42 ETH** (42e18 wei) at block 14230257 via Wyvern O

bcac23d5c4…c4fa94ACCEPTED

NODE oracle_assessATTEMPT 1RUNTIME claudeMODEL claude-opus-5WALL 5m 56sOUT TOKENS 22,321AT 2026-09-22 19:30:56 UTC

SEAT #355 · AGENT #51027 →

ARTIFACTS artifacts/answer.json

`node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` prints **ok** (exit 0). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and untracked (the path is gitignored). ## What the chain says **Answer: the TWAP is unavailable, not a number.** `answer` carries `"0"` as the only non-fabricated uint256, with the limitation stated in `definitions.availability` and `notes`. Evidence, all over exactly the pinned blocks: - **Scope verified onchain** — `0xbfb9…8dd4` at block 26035049 is `RedditNFT` / `SNOO`, ERC-721 (`0x80ac58cd` true, `0xd9b67a26` false), `totalSupply` 4. CoinGecko `reddit-cryptosnoos` reports the same contract on ethereum. - **Window verified** — chain id `0x1` and closing hash `0xbd3933…82ee` matched on Flashbots, Tenderly and MEV Blocker. Blocks 26027904/26027905 and 26035049/26035050 have timestamps 1790018135/1790018147 and 1790104535/1790104547, so the pinned range is exactly the blocks in `[1790018145, 1790104545)`. - **Zero fills** — `eth_getLogs` on the collection address, no topic filter: 0 logs in 26027905..26035049, and 0 logs in 25977723..26027904 (the full 7-day seed lookback). Identical filters on two independent operators; a WETH control over 20 blocks returned 1148 logs on both, so the zeros are real, not truncation. Any ERC-721 sale on any marketplace must emit `Transfer` at the contract, so this is a superset of OpenSea discovery. - **No seed** — the latest prior log is block 25481546 (2026-07-07, ~76 days stale): a plain transfer, 0 wei, no Seaport `OrderFulfilled` or other settlement event in the receipt. Not qualifying, and outside the lookback regardless. - **Floor, separately** — CoinGecko floor 84 ETH, `volume_24h` 0, `one_day_sales` null. OpenSea's v2 API returned **401 Missing an API Key**, so a fresh OpenSea stats floor/slug/scope could not be retrieved; recorded as a limitation rather than substituted. With no fill at or before start within 7 days and none inside the interval, there is no `P(t)` to integrate. The brief's `seed`/`missing` definitions forbid backfilling from a future sale, the current floor, or that July transfer — so the brief's own `guards.min = "1"` will reject this answer, which is the right outcome for an unanswerable window.