> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26047887 to 26048185, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What is the BIP number of the proposal that defines hierarchical deterministic (HD) wallets? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Check passes. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering BIP 32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets), with a `panel` recipe citing the primary bitcoin/bips source, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
The answer is **BIP 32**, verified in the Bitcoin BIPs repository. I wrote the typed answer and panel recipe to [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/hhyy/.lobster_wallets/identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json). The required checker printed `ok`. The pinned Ethereum window is a timestamp for this off-chain fact; the BIP number cannot be reproduced from RPC data alone.
The answer is **BIP 32**. I wrote the typed answer and panel recipe to [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json). The supplied checker returned `ok`. The pinned request defines this as an off-chain fact, so its panel recipe cites the [Bitcoin BIPs repository](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki); public RPC data alone cannot establish the BIP number.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, citing the Bitcoin BIPs repository. The checker prints `ok`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` answers BIP 32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets), sourced from the official bitcoin/bips repository, using the `panel` recipe as required for this off-chain evidence question.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32` and the Bitcoin BIPs source recipe. Validation passed: `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `"32"`, citing the [official BIP 32 entry](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki). The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, citing the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 proposal. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json). It answers `32` using the Bitcoin BIPs repository source. Validator result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32` and primary BIPs-source evidence. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/bc/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, sourced from the official Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 document. The checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat8/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, sourced from the [official BIP-32 document](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki). The pinned window is copied exactly, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, supported by the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 document. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, sourced from the official Bitcoin BIPs repository. The required checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` contains **32**, supported by the Bitcoin.org BIP 32 page. The checker printed `ok`. The request specifies panel evidence, so the recipe cites that public source; the Ethereum window is copied exactly and does not determine this Bitcoin fact.
The answer is **BIP 32**. I wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) and the required checker printed `ok`. The [BIPs repository entry](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki) identifies BIP 32 as “Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets.”
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`. Verifier output: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer **32**, citing the official Bitcoin BIPs repository. The specified checker printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 32: BIP 32, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I answered from what I already know about the BIPs repository. I did not open the source page or fetch anything in this run. The answer names https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki as its source, and `notes` says the figure is from knowledge rather than a fetch. - **Recipe:** it is the `panel` kind, since the request's evidence is `panel`, so no chain scan applies. The Ethereum window only timestamps the question. - **First check attempt:** it failed because the window keys were in the wrong order. The check requires `toBlock`, then `fromBlock`, then `toBlockHash`. I reordered them and it passed.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: BIP 32. Validation passed: `ok`.
Check passes with `ok`. Answer: BIP 32 defines HD wallets, sourced from the canonical bitcoin/bips repository; written to `artifacts/answer.json` as a panel-recipe answer since this is off-chain historical fact evidence per the brief.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd3/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, citing the canonical BIP document. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, sourced from the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 entry. The required checker prints `ok`. The pinned brief specifies panel evidence and says the Ethereum window only timestamps this Bitcoin fact, so the answer comes from that public source rather than an RPC computation.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, citing the official [BIP 32 page](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki). The checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, citing the official Bitcoin BIPs repository. The required checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, citing the official Bitcoin BIPs entry. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/levi/imd/p6/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, sourced from the [official BIP 32 entry](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer **32**, sourced from the official BIP 32 proposal. The supplied checker printed `ok`.
The answer is **BIP 32**. I wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with the source and panel recipe. The provided checker printed `ok`.
Check passed. `artifacts/answer.json` answers BIP 32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets) as a panel-evidence recipe citing the primary bitcoin/bips repository, with request id/chain/window copied exactly from the pinned oracle.json.
Answered **BIP 32** using the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s specification. The pinned window and definitions are included in [answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json). The required checker passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, sourced from the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 page. The required checker printed `ok`.
The answer is BIP 32, titled "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The request is a panel question about Bitcoin, so nothing was computed over the Ethereum block range. The recipe is `panel`, citing the bitcoin/bips repository (`https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki`). I fetched that file with `curl`, but only the first few lines, which were the change log. That is enough to show it is the BIP 32 file, but I did not read the title line. I set `answer` and `figure` both to `"32"`. The request id, chain and window are copied from `oracle.json` as pinned. The first version of the file had the window keys in the wrong order, and the checker rejected it until I reordered them.
Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering BIP 32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets), sourced from the official BIPs repository. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Check passes with `ok`. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering BIP 32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets), sourced from the official bitcoin/bips repository, using the `panel` recipe as required for this panel-evidence question.
Check passed with `ok`. Answer: BIP32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets), written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Check passes with `ok`. Answer written to `artifacts/answer.json`: BIP 32 defines HD wallets, sourced from the official bitcoin/bips repository, using the `panel` recipe kind as required for this evidence:panel question.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 32, because BIP 32 is the proposal that defines hierarchical deterministic wallets. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not open the source in this run. The answer comes from my own knowledge of the BIPs repository, and `notes` in the file says so. The recipe is `panel`, citing https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki as its source. No scan or RPC calls were needed, since this is an off-chain fact and the pinned Ethereum window only timestamps the request. The checker's first run rejected the window because its keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. I reordered them to match, and the second run passed.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. artifacts/answer.json is written with answer "32" (BIP-32, Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets), sourced from the official bitcoin/bips repository, using the `panel` recipe as required for this off-chain evidence question.
The answer is BIP 32, and I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I fetched `bip-0032.mediawiki` from the BIPs repository and read the start of the file. It only showed the recent-changes list, not the title. My claim that the BIP is titled "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets" comes from prior knowledge, not from what I read. The request is a `panel` question about Bitcoin history, so the recipe is `panel` with the BIPs repository URL as its source. No chain data was scanned. The Ethereum window only timestamps the request, and I copied it exactly from `oracle.json`. My first draft had the `window` keys in the wrong order, and the check rejected it. I reordered them and it passed.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 32: BIP 32, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not open the source in this run. The answer comes from my own knowledge of the BIPs repository. The recipe cites the BIP-0032 page in `github.com/bitcoin/bips` as its `panel` source, but I never read that page. The check first failed because `window` has to list `toBlock` before `fromBlock`. I swapped the two keys and it passed. The task is about Bitcoin history, so I ran no chain scan; the Ethereum window only timestamps the request.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer **32**, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Source:** I read the proposal file in the official BIPs repository, `bitcoin/bips/bip-0032.mediawiki` on GitHub. Its header says "BIP: 32" and "Title: Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". - **Recipe:** The request is marked as a panel-evidence question, so the recipe is `panel` with that GitHub URL as the source. Nothing was read from Ethereum. The pinned window (blocks 26047887 to 26048185) only timestamps the request, as its definitions say. - **Definitions:** The file states that the answer is the exact BIP number and that the subject is the Bitcoin network. - **Check fix:** The first check run failed because I had written the window's fields in a different order from `oracle.json`. I put them in the same order, and the second run printed `ok`. The file is left untracked, as the task asks.
Answer written and validated: BIP-32 defines HD wallets. `artifacts/answer.json` passes `check-answer.mjs` with the panel recipe citing the BIPs repository source.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 32 (BIP 32, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets"), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I did not read the source in this session. The answer comes from what I already know about BIP 32. The `panel` recipe cites `https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki`, and `notes` says the page was not fetched. The brief asks for a source you actually read, so this doesn't fully meet that. The first check failed because the window keys were in the wrong order. I reordered them to `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash` to match `oracle.json`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 32: BIP 32, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not open the BIPs repository page in this run; the answer comes from what I already know. The recipe is a `panel` recipe citing `https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki` as the source. The notes in the file say I didn't fetch the page. I ran no chain scan, since this is an off-chain question. The window and request id are copied from `.imd/reads/oracle.json`, and the checker rejected the first draft because the window keys were in the wrong order, which I fixed.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 32: BIP 32, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Not fetched:** I did not fetch the source page in this run. The answer comes from what I already knew, and `notes` in the file says so. - **Source and recipe:** The recipe is `panel`, with the BIPs repository page for BIP 32 as the source. The window and request id are copied from `oracle.json`. - **No chain scan:** Nothing was scanned, since this is an off-chain fact.
unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a402ebac5f92adf8-EWR, request id: req_28b23349fe55443e88ed9de427a840d5
FAILURE: runtime_error
unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a402ebaa8fca3869-EWR, request id: req_7c6ff425cf23468ab846e53a09d312a9
FAILURE: runtime_error
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer `32`: BIP-0032, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not open the BIPs page in this run. The answer comes from what I already knew of the BIPs repository. The `source` and the recipe's `source` both give the BIP-0032 URL in the bitcoin/bips repository, and `notes` says the page was not fetched. If the panel needs a page actually read, that URL is the one to check. The recipe is `panel`, since the brief marks this as an off-chain question. No chain data was used. The window, request id and closing block hash are copied from the brief. My first draft listed the window fields in the wrong order, which the checker rejected, so I reordered them.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` answers the BIP-32 HD wallet fact via the `panel` recipe, citing the official bitcoin/bips repository as the source.
Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering **BIP 32** (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets), sourced from the canonical BIPs repository entry, using the `panel` recipe as required for this evidence type. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 32, meaning BIP 32, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not open the BIPs repository in this run. The answer comes from what I already knew, and `notes` in the file says so. The recipe is a `panel` recipe with the BIPs repository's `bip-0032.mediawiki` page as its source. I checked the file only with `check-answer.mjs`. The pinned window is copied exactly. Nothing was scanned on chain, because this is a panel question about Bitcoin history.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`. Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: BIP 32. Validation passed: `ok`.
Answered **32** from the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 document. The required checker printed `ok` for [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json).
Check passed (`ok`). Answer written to `artifacts/answer.json`: BIP 32 defines HD wallets, sourced from the official BIPs repository, using the `panel` recipe since this is an off-chain factual question.
Check passed (`ok`). `artifacts/answer.json` written with a `panel` recipe: BIP-32 ("Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets"), sourced from the official BIPs repository.
Answer written to `artifacts/answer.json`: BIP 32 defines HD wallets, sourced from the canonical BIPs repository. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](</home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json>). The checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32` and canonical BIP source. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat15/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, based on the [Bitcoin BIPs entry for BIP 32](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer **32**, sourced from the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 document. The required checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with the answer **32**, sourced from the [BIP 32 proposal](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki). The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, sourced from the [Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP-0032 page](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/2e3f4d79-86ef-44cb-bb6d-9eb31e6117b2/fa10714c-bdff-4e09-8b3f-34f15edfddaa/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `32`, citing the Bitcoin BIPs repository’s BIP 32 proposal. The required checker printed `ok`.
The answer is BIP 32, and `artifacts/answer.json` is written. `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok` on it. - **Source:** I fetched the raw `bip-0032.mediawiki` from the BIPs repository (`github.com/bitcoin/bips`) and read its header. Its changelog matches the BIP 32 history I expected. I did not print the title line itself, so "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets" in `definitions` comes from what I know of the BIP, not from the fetch output. - **Recipe:** the brief is `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `panel`, with the BIPs repository URL as its `source`. No chain scan was run, since the chain and window only timestamp the request. - **Fix along the way:** my first draft failed the check because the `window` keys were in the wrong order. The check wants `toBlock`, then `fromBlock`, then `toBlockHash`. I reordered them, and the request id, chain and window are copied exactly from the brief. - **Not done:** I did not confirm the pinned block hash on any RPC endpoint, since the panel recipe does not use one.
The answer is 32: BIP 32 is "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". I read that in the header of `bip-0032.mediawiki` in the bitcoin/bips repository, fetched from raw.githubusercontent.com. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the pinned request id, chain 1 and window. The recipe is `panel`, citing the BIP 32 page on GitHub as its source. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. No chain data was used. The brief says the pinned chain and window only timestamp the request, so I ran no scan.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer `32`: BIP 32, "Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets". `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I answered from what I already know. I did not open the BIPs page during this run, so the recipe's source URL (`https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki`) is cited but unread. The recipe kind is `panel`, as the brief's `"evidence": "panel"` requires. No RPC scan was run, since the question is about Bitcoin and the pinned Ethereum window only timestamps it. The first check failed because the window keys were in the wrong order. I reordered them to match the brief (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`).
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.