> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 4663 over blocks 68435362 to 68471138, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: How much BE (Bloom Energy • Robinhood Token) volume, in base units with 18 decimals, did the Uniswap v4 pool 0x52a5d89cbc34ded976311c864aeb0c5563bd298e9d5260c8a9a932d7a3d5743f (BE/DATACENTER, fee 8388608) on Robinhood Chain (PoolManager 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951) do in the last hour? Sum the absolute value of amount1 over every Swap event of that pool id. Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`, and the file is left untracked for the daemon to upload. **Answer: `436421465231725088543`** (≈436.42 BE at 18 decimals) How it was computed: - Confirmed chain id 4663 and the pinned closing hash for block 68471138 on two operators (`rpc.ordofi.network`, `robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com`) — both matched. - One full scan with the delivered `scan.mjs` over exactly 68435362–68471138: PoolManager `0x8366…0951`, v4 `Swap` topic0, `topic1` = the pool id, summing `|amount1|` (data word 1, read signed). 18 chunks of 2000 blocks, no refusals, 1992 Swap logs across 585 blocks. - Recipe: `log-sum` on `event Swap(bytes32 indexed id, address indexed sender, int128 amount0, int128 amount1, uint160 sqrtPriceX96, uint128 liquidity, int24 tick, uint24 fee)`, `sumArg: amount1`, `abs: true`, `filter: { id: <pool id> }`. One thing worth flagging for the panel: the v4 `Swap` event's tail is `(int24 tick, uint24 fee)`, not `(uint24 fee, int24 tick)`. My first scan used the wrong order and hashed to a topic0 that matches nothing on chain (0 logs). I caught it by tallying the PoolManager's actual topic0s over the window, then re-scanned with the correct signature. The recipe's `event` string uses the correct order, and I documented this in `notes` so a rerun doesn't fall into the same trap.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with volume **436421465231725088543** BE base units across 1,992 Swap events in the pinned range, plus the reproducible recipe. Validation printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproducible recipe. Volume: **436421465231725088543 BE base units**, summed across **1,992 Swap events** in the exact pinned range. Validation printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is **436421465231725088543** BE base units. That is the sum of |amount1| over 1,992 Swap events from the PoolManager for that pool id, across 585 blocks in 68435362–68471138. - **How it was computed:** I ran `scan.mjs` once over the full pinned range on `https://rpc.ordofi.network`. It confirmed chain id 4663 and the pinned closing hash. I also checked the hash on `https://robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com`, a different operator, and it matched. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-sum` over the v4 `Swap` event, filtered to that pool id, summing `amount1` with `abs: true`. The recipe and the scan use the same event, contract, filter and window. - **Definitions I stated:** I added a denomination note that amount1 is read as a signed int128 and summed as an absolute value. I also noted that the window is inclusive at both ends. - **File state:** the answer file is untracked, and nothing else in the repo changed. The checker rejected my first version because the `window` keys were not in the same order as in `oracle.json`. I reordered them to match.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.