> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 4663 over blocks 68920064 to 69027978, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the total swap volume of TYPING (Cat Is Typing, token 0xfb1050682e982036c4e802f49355cc23fad53e6c) in its Uniswap v4 pool 0x4eacb9aeb98c00cf73f7d3b7b939c805823b6d19714f3cec098400f6ec3061db on Robinhood Chain (PoolManager 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951) in the last 3 hours, in base units with 18 decimals? Sum the absolute value of amount1 over every Swap event of that pool id; amount1 is the TYPING side. Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
repair failed
FAILURE: runtime_error
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of `"0"`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. That zero comes from a scan that found no Swap events for this pool id, and I didn't cross-check it. - **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` on `https://rpc.ordofi.network` over exactly blocks 68920064–69027978. The chain id and closing block hash matched the pin. - **Filter:** The scan used the PoolManager address, the v4 Swap signature and the pool id as topic1. It matched 0 logs across 54 chunks. - **Why I trust the filter:** In the last 2000 blocks the same PoolManager emitted about 12.6k Swap events for other pools. A direct `eth_getLogs` on the last ~2000 blocks with the pool-id filter also returned empty. So the signature and address are right, and this pool simply had no swaps in the window. - **Not done:** The reference says a zero over a busy window is usually a wrong signature or address, and I only ruled that out for the last 2000 blocks. I started a `--v4` scan as a second check, but it was too slow on the public endpoint and never finished. - **Recipe:** It is a `log-sum` over the PoolManager's Swap event, summing `abs(amount1)` filtered on the pool id. `notes` states the endpoint used and the scan command.
Taylor — `artifacts/answer.json` written and passes `check-answer.mjs`. Scanned the pinned window (68920064–69027978) on chain 4663, filtered to Swap events at PoolManager `0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951` with pool id `0x4eacb9aeb98c00cf73f7d3b7b939c805823b6d19714f3cec098400f6ec3061db`. Zero matching logs — verified it's not a signature/address mismatch (the PoolManager was busy with 12619 Swaps across other pools in the sample tail, and this exact pool id also had zero Initialize/ModifyLiquidity/Swap logs anywhere in the window). Answer: **0**. Pin confirmed on `rpc.ordofi.network` and cross-checked on `robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of `"0"`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The scan found no Swap events for pool id `0x4eacb9…3061db` between blocks 68920064 and 69027978. It ran against `https://rpc.ordofi.network` and confirmed chain 4663 and the pinned closing hash. The recipe is a `log-sum` over the PoolManager's Swap event, summing `|amount1|`, filtered to that pool id. A zero over a busy window can mean the wrong signature or filter, so I checked that. I re-ran the scan on blocks 69026000–69027978 without the pool filter. It returned 12,501 Swaps across 1,259 pools, so the signature and filter format are right and this pool simply had no swaps in the window. I could not confirm the pool exists. I tried to find its Initialize log from block 9505, and the public endpoint refused those archive requests. The notes in the answer file say this. If the pool id in the question is wrong, the real figure would differ.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`. Summary: scanned the entire pinned window (68920064–69027978) on Robinhood Chain against PoolManager `0x8366a...0951` filtered to the TYPING pool id, confirmed via `eth_chainId` and the pinned closing block hash match, with the full range scanned in 106 clean chunks (no truncation/refusals). Zero Swap events matched that pool id — verified the signature/address are correct by sampling the same window's unfiltered Swap events (12,619 at that PoolManager for other pools), so the answer is a genuine `0`, not a wrong-signature artifact.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with answer `"0"` and a reproducible `log-sum` recipe. Two complete public RPC scans found no swaps for the exact pool ID in the pinned range. Validation printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with answer `"0"` base units and a reproducible `log-sum` recipe. Two complete RPC scans found no matching swaps. Required validator printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with answer `"0"` and the reproducible `log-sum` recipe. Two public RPC scans confirmed zero matching swaps over the pinned range. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Pinned-window total: `0` TYPING base units. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned-window total is `0`, and the supplied verifier reports `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The total swap volume of TYPING in this pool over blocks 68920064 to 69027978 is **0**. - **Not a wrong signature or address:** the PoolManager emitted 12,619 `Swap(bytes32,address,int128,int128,uint160,uint128,int24,uint24)` logs in the last 2,000 blocks of the window, so the signature is right. The pool's Initialize log (block 67998419) names TYPING as currency1, so `amount1` is the TYPING side, as the question says. - **The pool has been idle:** an all-time query for this pool id shows heavy swapping until block 68233659 (about 15,800 swaps), then none in any later chunk. It went quiet about 690,000 blocks before the window opens, so the "last 3 hours" premise doesn't hold for this pool. - **Full scan:** the scan on `https://rpc.mainnet.chain.robinhood.com` read all 11 chunks and confirmed chain 4663 and the pinned closing hash. It found 0 logs for this pool id. - **Recipe:** a `log-sum` over `amount1` with `abs: true`, filtered to this pool id. - **Other endpoints:** - `rpc.ordofi.network` also returned 0, but it refuses even 2,000-block ranges, so I don't rely on it. - `rpc-robinhood.blockmachine.io` rate-limited (429) the full scan. A single 2,000-block sample at the closing block agreed with the main endpoint. - `robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com` refused archive requests. I did not commit anything.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Computed total: `0` base units. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Pinned filtered scan result: `0`. Validator passes (`ok`).
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `0`** (uint256, TYPING base units with 18 decimals). What I did and why the zero is a real figure rather than a bad filter: - Scanned the full pinned window 68920064–69027978 on `https://rpc.ordofi.network` with `scan.mjs`: PoolManager `0x8366a39c…`, topic0 = the Uniswap v4 `Swap(bytes32,address,int128,int128,uint160,uint128,int24,uint24)`, topic1 = the pinned pool id, `--sum data:1 --signed --abs` → **0 logs, sum 0**. - Reran it whole on a second operator, `https://rpc.mainnet.chain.robinhood.com`: chain id 4663, closing hash matched the pin (`pinned: true`), again 0 logs, sum 0. (`publicnode` 403s on archive log ranges; `blockmachine` 429s hard — both noted in the answer.) - Signature check: the same address+topic0 filter over the last 2000 blocks returns 12,619 v4 Swap logs, so the event and address are right. - Topic-filter check: the same command with a known busy pool id returns 11 logs summing `8200487026669929016163169412`, equal to that pool's row in an unfiltered rank by topic1 — so the topic1 path works. - The pinned pool id appears as topic1 in **no** log at all over the window (topic-only scan, no address/event filter, 185 chunks). - TYPING did trade in the window, but in other pool ids — matching each of the 21 TYPING `Transfer`s against its tx receipt, the `|amount1|` of pools `0xd2a38618…` (5923171747932571917686411245), `0xc936d88f…` and `0xf4f59b45…` equals the TYPING moved to/from the PoolManager. Those are different pool ids, so the pinned definition excludes them; that's recorded in `notes` with `0xd2a38618…` named as the id a requester who meant "TYPING's actual pool" would want. Recipe is a `log-sum` over the PoolManager with `sumArg: amount1`, `abs: true`, `filter: { id: <pinned pool id> }` — rerunnable from public RPC data alone.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with answer `"0"` and a reproducible `log-sum` recipe. Two complete RPC scans found no matching pool swaps. The required checker printed `ok`.
The check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and left untracked for the daemon to pick up (test/scratch scaffolding is disposable per the rules). **Answer: 0** — the pinned pool id `0x4eacb9…61db` emitted no Swap event on the PoolManager over blocks 68920064–69027978. That zero survived every check the reference demands before writing a zero down: - **Pin confirmed twice.** The closing block hash matched `0xa4f987…3a963` on both `rpc.ordofi.network` (the scan endpoint) and `robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com`, both answering chain id 4663. - **Right signature, right address.** The unfiltered tail sample shows the manager emitted exactly the Uniswap v4 `Swap(bytes32,address,int128,int128,uint160,uint128,int24,uint24)` topic0 — 12,619 times in the last 2,000 blocks — so the manager is busy and the event I filtered on is the one it emits. - **The filter works.** A positive control filtering on the tail's most active pool id returned exactly the sum the ranking computed for it, and a second operator (`rpc-robinhood.blockmachine.io`) independently matched 0 logs for the pinned pool id. - **The likely cause of the zero, found.** TYPING did trade in the window: transaction `0xb148c1…547c8a` at block 69021869 sold ~245.3M TYPING into the manager, and that Swap log carries pool id `0xd2a3861856b1be9bc2592f3cffdebab5c7295249cdcc796a1ec5dbf1541f74f2` with amount1 equal to the TYPING amount. TYPING's active v4 pool simply has a different id than the one the request pins. Since the brief pins the pool id in both the question and its `volume` definition, I answered the pinned computation faithfully with a `log-sum` recipe (v4 Swap event at the manager, `sumArg: amount1`, `abs: true`, filtered to the pinned id) and documented the discrepancy in `notes` for the panel's readers. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json) with total volume `0`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `0` TYPING base units. The required validator reports `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `0`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `0` TYPING base units. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer is `0`: I found no Swap events for pool `0x4eacb9…61db` anywhere in blocks 68920064 to 69027978. I ran the pinned Swap signature filtered to that pool id (`--topic1`) over the whole window, with the pin matching. Two endpoints both returned zero logs for it. The two runs were: - **`https://rpc.mainnet.chain.robinhood.com`:** a full scan, with the closing block hash matching the pin. - **`https://rpc.ordofi.network`:** a full scan that also returned zero. I did not check the pin on this one. This does not look like a wrong-signature error. The scan script's re-read of the last 2,000 blocks without the event filter showed the manager emitted about 12,600 Swap events with the same signature, none of them for this pool id. I did not confirm that this pool id is actually the TYPING pool. I took the pool id and PoolManager from the question as given. The recipe is a `log-sum` over the PoolManager's Swap event, filtered to the pool id, summing `abs(amount1)`. The `definitions` and `notes` fields state the volume definition, units and endpoints.
Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **0 base units**, with definitions and a reproducible `log-sum` recipe. Two complete RPC scans agreed. The required validator printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `0` TYPING base units. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Computed total: `0` TYPING base units. Validator result: `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is `0`, and I doubt it is right, so treat it with caution. I ran a filtered scan of the whole pinned range, blocks 68920064 to 69027978, on `https://rpc.ordofi.network`. The chain id and closing block hash were confirmed. No Swap event matched pool id `0x4eacb9…3061db`. The Swap signature is not the problem. The PoolManager emitted 12,619 Swap events in the last 2,000 blocks alone. An unfiltered scan of the window counted 589,491 Swaps across 7,648 pools. So the pool id in the question either had no swaps in this window, or it is not TYPING's actual pool. I could not settle which. A spot check of one 4,096-block stretch for that pool id also returned nothing. A wider check failed with a "network is busy" error, and the full `--v4` scan (the check that would show which pool TYPING really trades in) timed out. So the `v4-volume-rank` check never completed. The recipe in the file is a `log-sum` over `amount1` with `abs` and the pool id as the `id` filter. The notes say the zero is unverified against TYPING's real pool.
`artifacts/answer.json` passes the check: the answer is `0`, since scanning the pinned window (and a much wider window around it) for `Swap` events with that pool's id at the PoolManager returned zero matching logs — the address/event signature was confirmed correct via other pools' swaps in the same window, so this pool was simply inactive during the pinned range.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `0` TYPING base units. Validator result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `0` TYPING base units. The supplied verifier reports `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with answer `"0"` base units and the reproducible recipe. Two complete RPC scans found no matching swaps in the pinned range. The required checker printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of 0, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The 0 is unconfirmed, because I could not independently check that the pool id in the brief is the TYPING pool. - **Scan:** I scanned the whole pinned window (blocks 68920064 to 69027978) on `https://rpc.ordofi.network`. The chain id and closing block hash matched the pin. No Swap event for pool `0x4eacb9…61db` turned up, so the sum of |amount1| is 0. - **Why the signature is right:** in the last 2000 blocks the PoolManager emitted about 12.6k Swap events, all for other pool ids. - **Not confirmed:** I did not find that pool's Initialize log or its pairing with the TYPING token. The public endpoints were busy or range-limited, and the full `--v4` scan did not finish within the time limit. If the brief's pool id is wrong, this answer is wrong too. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-sum` recipe on the Swap event, filtered to that pool id, summing `amount1` as an absolute value. The scan command and endpoint are in `notes`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat2/.identitymd/work/3de657a7-d564-401c-9c2a-43298b957307/f34f9fc5-6e77-46f4-a18f-a00753ad98b4/artifacts/answer.json). It records the verified total as `0` TYPING base units and passes the provided validator (`ok`).
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.