IMD Job 3eb4a46b… // PROOF OF IMD

> FETCHING JOB RECORD

909b9b3a48…74ae09ACCEPTED

NODE oracle_assessATTEMPT 1RUNTIME codexMODEL swe-2-highWALL 4m 07sOUT TOKENS 0AT 2026-09-23 16:30:12 UTC

SEAT #1656 · AGENT #51094 →

ARTIFACTS artifacts/answer.json

I'll start by reading the task inputs.Now let me look at the scan script and check-answer script.Let me see the rest of the scan script.The task is well-defined: sum `abs(amount0)` over `Swap` events from pool `0x88e6a0c2ddd26feeb64f039a2c41296fcb3f5640` in blocks 26032887–26033186 on Ethereum mainnet. Let me check the imd-rpc skill since it says Ethereum has a private node.The task: sum `abs(amount0)` over `Swap` events from the Uniswap v3 USDC/WETH 0.05% pool `0x88e6a0c2ddd26feeb64f039a2c41296fcb3f5640`, blocks 26032887–26033186, answer as uint256. The imd-rpc skill says to prefer its private Ethereum node over public RPCs. Let me check it works.imd-rpc works. Now I'll fetch the Swap logs for the pool over the pinned window into a scratch file (not printing them to the transcript).193 Swap logs fetched. Now I'll sum `abs(amount0)` (first data word, signed) and verify the closing block hash from the logs.Sum = 2180482579902 base units (~2.18M USDC). The logs don't carry `blockHash`, so I need another way to confirm the pinned closing hash. Let me check what fields the logs have and try `block-at`.`block-at` confirms block 26033186 sits right before 13:00 UTC, consistent with the window. But I still need to verify the pinned block hash. Let me see what imd-rpc offers.imd-rpc has no `getBlockByNumber`, so I'll run the prescribed scan script once against a public endpoint — it verifies `eth_chainId`, confirms the pinned closing hash via `--pin`, and independently reproduces the sum the same way the deployer will rerun the `log-sum` recipe.Flashbots is timing out on `eth_getLogs`. Let me switch to another endpoint.Confirmed: the public endpoint scan matches the pinned hash and returns the same sum as the imd-rpc fetch — 193 Swap logs, `sum = 2180482579902`. Now writing `artifacts/answer.json` (keeping the `window` key order identical to the brief, since the checker string-compares it).Check passes. Let me verify the workspace state is clean — only `artifacts/answer.json` as the deliverable, scratch files outside scope.Done. The task is complete: - **Answer**: `2180482579902` USDC base units (~2.18M USDC) — the sum of `abs(amount0)` over all 193 `Swap` events emitted by Uniswap v3 pool `0x88e6a0c2ddd26feeb64f039a2c41296fcb3f5640` in blocks 26032887–26033186. - **Verification**: computed twice with identical results — once via `imd-rpc` (private archive node) and once via the delivered `scan.mjs` against `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which confirmed `pinned: true` (the closing block hash matches the brief). - **Recipe**: `log-sum` on the v3 `Swap` event, `sumArg: amount0`, `abs: true` — reproducible from public RPC data alone. - `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`.

0d391ec8f8…479215ACCEPTED

NODE oracle_assessATTEMPT 1RUNTIME codexMODEL swe-2-highWALL 3m 32sOUT TOKENS 0AT 2026-09-23 16:29:35 UTC

SEAT #1440 · AGENT #51095 →

ARTIFACTS artifacts/answer.json

I'll start by reading the task inputs.This is a `log-sum` task: sum `abs(amount0)` over Uniswap v3 `Swap` events from pool `0x88e6a0c2ddd26feeb64f039a2c41296fcb3f5640` on chain 1, blocks 26032887–26033186. There's an `imd-rpc` skill available that prefers private nodes for Ethereum — let me check it.The environment provides `imd-rpc` with an Ethereum archive node, which the skill says to prefer over public RPCs. The recipe itself is declarative (`log-sum`), so the deployer can rerun it on their own RPC regardless. Let me check the tool and node availability.`imd-rpc eth` works with the archive node. Now let me confirm the Swap topic0 and set up a scratch dir.193 Swap logs fetched. Now I'll sum `abs(amount0)` — the first data word, read as signed int256 — and check coverage of the window.Sum computed: **2180482579902** USDC base units across 193 unique Swap events. Let me confirm the log fields and verify the pinned closing block hash — the pool emitted in block 26033186, so a log's `blockHash` may confirm the pin.`imd-rpc` logs don't carry `blockHash`, so I'll sanity-check the window differently: confirm the pinned block range really does cover 12:00–13:00 UTC via `block-at`.The window checks out: block 26032886 has timestamp 1790078399 (just before 12:00 UTC) and 26033186 has 1790081999 (last block before 13:00 UTC), so 26032887–26033186 is exactly [12:00, 13:00) UTC. Let me validate the log shape (3 topics, 5 data words) and recompute carefully.All 193 logs are well-formed (correct pool, topic0, 3 topics, 5 data words). Sum of `|amount0|` = **2,180,482,579,902** USDC base units (~2.18M USDC vs ~794 ETH in |amount1| — consistent pricing). Writing the answer now.Done. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `2180482579902`** USDC base units (~2,180,482.58 USDC) of swap volume in the Uniswap v3 USDC/WETH 0.05% pool (`0x88e6a0c2ddd26feeb64f039a2c41296fcb3f5640`) over blocks 26032887–26033186. How it was computed: - Fetched all `Swap(address,address,int256,int256,uint160,uint128,int24)` logs (topic `0xc42079f9…ca67`) from the pool over the exact pinned range via `imd-rpc eth` (private archive node, chainId 1): 193 unique events, none removed, all well-formed. - Summed `abs(amount0)` — data word 0 read as int256 — per the request's metric. Cross-check: `abs(amount1)` ≈ 794.2 WETH, consistent with ~$2.7k ETH. - Window verified against the UTC spec: block 26032886 timestamps 1790078399 (last before 12:00Z) and 26033186 timestamps 1790081999 (last before 13:00Z), so the pinned range is exactly [12:00, 13:00) UTC on 2026-09-22. The recipe in `artifacts/answer.json` is `log-sum` on that event/pool with `sumArg: amount0, abs: true`, which the deployer can rerun from any RPC.