43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6dIMD JOB

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproducible computation. Average: **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei** across **50 sales**. Required checker printed `ok`. The output remains untracked.

Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproduction procedure. Average: **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei** across **50 qualifying sales** in the exact pinned window. The required checker printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the validated answer: `4771558231267513` wei The provided checker prints `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price of FROGE 69mg over blocks 26019451–26026607 is **4771558231267513 wei**. - **Sales:** 50 qualifying sales were found, 49 listing fills and 1 bid fill, and none were excluded. - **Sum and rounding:** the prices sum to 238577911563375669 wei. Dividing by 50 gives 4771558231267513.86, rounded down. - **How I scanned:** I scanned Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over exactly the pinned blocks from `https://ethereum-public.nodies.app`. That was 12,231 logs decoded, of which 50 involved the collection. I wrote a scratch decoder for this because the delivered `scan.mjs` can't decode the nested offer and consideration arrays. It lives in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted. - **Pin check:** chain id 1 and the closing block hash `0x8a84…cdec2` matched on `https://ethereum-public.nodies.app` and on `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, a second operator. - **Recipe kind:** it is `panel`, because the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"` and the checker rejects any chain recipe for a panel question. The catalogue has no averaging recipe anyway. So the recipe's `source` is the RPC URL plus a description of the query, and the full method is in `notes`. Nothing in the deployer reruns it automatically. - **Left-open definitions:** these are stated in `definitions`. `figure` is the sum, not the average. - **Other endpoints:** `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` returned 403 under load, so I didn't use it for the scan.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei**, averaged over 50 qualifying sales. Includes reproduction code. Required checker printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 4771558231267513 wei** (≈0.00477 ETH) — the average FROGE 69mg sale price on OpenSea over blocks 26019451–26026607. How it was computed: - Scanned `eth_getLogs` for the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` topic on both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window, from `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast` (chain id 1 confirmed, closing block hash matched the pin; the hash was also cross-checked on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, a second operator). - A scratch decoder in `test/scratch/froge-avg.mjs` applied the brief's definitions: of 12,231 `OrderFulfilled` logs in the window, 50 touched the collection and all 50 qualified — exactly one ERC-721 of `0x6392eb…cfc` and no other NFT per fill. 49 were listing fills paid entirely in native ETH/WETH (price = sum of all consideration amounts, fees included) and 1 was a WETH bid fill (price = the offer amount). Nothing was excluded for shape or payment token. - Sum 238,577,911,563,375,669 wei over 50 sales, floored: 4,771,558,231,267,513. The answer file copies the request id, chain, and window verbatim from the brief, uses the `panel` recipe (the brief pins `"evidence": "panel"`) with the RPC endpoint as its URL source, states the interpretations the request left open under `definitions` (no-other-NFT meaning, fill shapes, per-event counting, WETH counted 1:1, floor rounding), and describes the full reproduction path in `notes`. The file is left untracked for the daemon to upload.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average sale price is **4771558231267513 wei**, about 0.00477 ETH. - **Sales counted:** 50 fills in blocks 26019451–26026607 met the definitions. 49 were listing fills and 1 was a bid fill. None were excluded for bundling or for payment in another token. The prices sum to 238577911563375669 wei. - **How I computed it:** I pulled all 12,231 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over the pinned window from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. I decoded them with a custom script and applied the brief's definitions. - **Pin check:** the closing block hash `0x8a84…cdec2` matched on publicnode and on `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `evidence: panel`, and the checker rejects any other kind for a panel question. So the recipe is `kind: "panel"` with the RPC endpoint as its source URL, even though the figure comes from chain data. `notes` and `definitions` describe the scan, so someone can reproduce it. I did not use the delivered `scan.mjs`, because it can't decode the nested item arrays in `OrderFulfilled`. The script I used is `test/scratch/sales.mjs`, which is not submitted.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the answer **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei**, based on 50 qualifying sales, and a reproducible RPC procedure. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **4771558231267513 wei**. - **Sales:** 50 qualifying sales over blocks 26019451–26026607, summing to 238577911563375669 wei (the `figure`). - **Scan:** I decoded all 12,231 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks. I read them from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned chain id 1 and the pinned hash for block 26026607. - **Pricing rules:** - Listing fills are priced at the sum of all consideration amounts, only when every item is ETH or WETH. - Bid fills are priced at the offer amount, so fees inside the consideration aren't added twice. - Any event with an NFT other than exactly one ERC-721 of the collection is excluded. - These rules are also stated in `definitions`. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"` and the checker requires a `panel` recipe for that. The recipe is therefore `panel`, with the RPC URL and the log query as its source. The catalogue's chain recipes can't express this computation, so the panel can't rerun it. `notes` says the figure came from my own decoder, not a catalogue recipe. - **Second endpoint:** I used one endpoint only and did not cross-check the block hash on a second operator. My scan script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted. Only `artifacts/answer.json` is new and it is untracked.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `4771558231267513` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction procedure. Average: **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei** across **50 sales**. Decoder checks passed; the required validator printed `ok`.

**4771558231267513** wei (50 qualifying Seaport fills, sum 238577911563375669 wei, floor-averaged) — written to `artifacts/answer.json` with a `panel` recipe and the full definitions. `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` prints `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4771558231267513` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei**, averaged across 50 qualifying sales. Included reproduction code and definitions. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproducible calculation. Average: **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei** across **50 sales**. Required checker: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Average: **4771558231267513 wei** across **50 sales**. Embedded reproduction code confirmed the result; required checker printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with average **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei** across **50 sales**, plus reproduction instructions. Required checker printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, untracked (excluded via `.git/info/exclude`, as the daemon expects), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `4771558231267513` wei** (≈0.00477 ETH average sale price). How it was computed: - Confirmed the pinned closing hash `0x8a84f5aa…cdec2` for block 26026607 and `eth_chainId` 1 on two operators (publicnode, flashbots) before scanning. - `eth_getLogs` for the `OrderFulfilled` topic on both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly 26019451–26026607, decoded in-process by a scratch script (`test/scratch/seaport-avg.mjs`) that applies the brief's definitions literally: exactly one itemType-2 item of `0x6392eb…0cfc` and no other NFT; listing fills summed over consideration only when every item is ETH/WETH; bid fills take the offer amount. - Totals: 12,231 OrderFulfilled logs in the window, 50 touching the collection, all 50 qualifying (49 listings, 1 bid, all on Seaport 1.6). Sum 238577911563375669 wei ÷ 50 = 4771558231267513.38 → floored. - A second full scan on flashbots with a different chunk size returned identical counts and sum, ruling out silent truncation. One thing to note: the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `{ kind: "panel", source: "https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com" }` — the checker rejects any chain recipe on a panel brief, and none of the four chain recipes could express the array-decoding filter anyway. The full reproduction method and every definition are spelled out in `definitions` and `notes`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 4771558231267513 wei** (≈0.0047716 ETH) — the floor of 238577911563375669 / 50. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019451–26026607 with the pinned closing hash confirmed on three operators (mevblocker, publicnode, nodereal): - `scan.mjs` over the collection address returned 58 logs (46 transactions); a chunked re-scan on a second operator returned 58 too, so the range was not truncated. - Every Seaport fill of an ERC-721 emits a `Transfer` of that collection in the same transaction, so those 46 transactions are a superset of the candidate sales. Their receipts were decoded for `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5/1.6 (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…`, verified with `--keccak`). `scan.mjs` can't express this — the collection isn't an indexed topic and the reduction is a conditional mean — so a local decoder in `test/scratch/` did it over the same public RPCs. - 50 events touched the collection and all 50 qualified: 49 listing fills in native ETH (price = all consideration, fees included), 1 WETH bid fill (price = the offer amount). No bundles, ERC-1155 fills, or foreign-token fills were dropped. - Cross-checks: no token id repeats inside a transaction, so no `matchOrders` pair was double-counted; `name()`/`symbol()`/`supportsInterface(0x80ac58cd)` confirm the contract is the ERC-721 "FROGE 69mg". The brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `{ kind: "panel", source }` — the checker rejects a chain recipe here, and no catalogue chain recipe could express this filter-and-mean anyway. Every open choice (ETH/WETH at 1:1, one event = one sale, no OpenSea fee-recipient filter beyond the two Seaport addresses, successful transactions only, floor at the end) is stated under `definitions`. The artifact is untracked (`artifacts/` is in `.git/info/exclude`) for the daemon to upload.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and the check script prints `ok` for it. The average sale price over blocks 26019451–26026607 is **4771558231267513 wei**. - **Scan:** I fetched 12,231 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs and decoded them with a scratch script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`). Only `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` was used, and it returned the pinned closing hash for block 26026607. I did not check a second endpoint. - **Result:** 50 sales qualified under the request's definitions. Their prices sum to 238577911563375669 wei, and dividing by 50 and rounding down gives the answer. - **Recipe:** The scan script and the `log-sum` recipe can't express this multi-item decode. The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so I used the `panel` recipe. Its `source` is the RPC endpoint and the exact log filter, and the notes and definitions state the rest. Because the recipe is `panel`, the deployer cannot rerun it mechanically.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4771558231267513` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4771558231267513` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4771558231267513` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

The average FROGE 69mg sale price over blocks 26019451–26026607 is **4771558231267513 wei**, across 50 qualifying sales. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Sales counted:** 50 fills, none excluded by the definitions. The sum of their prices is 238577911563375669 wei, which is the `figure`. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `evidence: "panel"`, so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: <URL>}`, as the catalogue requires. The number itself comes only from chain data. - **How I computed it:** `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested arrays, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/sales.mjs`, which is not delivered. - I pulled the collection's 56 ERC-721 `Transfer` logs over the exact window. - I then pulled Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs in those blocks and kept the ones in those transactions. - I applied the brief's sale and price rules to each. - **Endpoint and checks:** I used only `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. It returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash. I did not cross-check the hash on a second operator's endpoint.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei** across 50 qualifying sales and reproduction code. The required checker prints `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average FROGE 69mg sale price over blocks 26019451–26026607 is **4771558231267513 wei**. That is the total of 238577911563375669 wei across 50 qualifying sales, rounded down. - **How I computed it:** I decoded 12,231 Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs from both contracts (1.5 and 1.6) with my own Node script. The provided scan script can't decode the nested offer and consideration arrays. It's in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which isn't submitted. - **Sale and price rules:** I applied the brief's definitions as written. A sale has exactly one NFT item, and it is an ERC-721 of the collection. Listing fills count the sum of all consideration amounts, and only if every item is ETH or WETH. Bid fills count the ETH or WETH offer amount. - **Pin check:** The closing block hash from the RPC matched the pinned hash. I read from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and had the script fall back to the flashbots and mevblocker endpoints on errors. I did not cross-check the hash on a second operator. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. That recipe carries the source URL and the log filter but can't be rerun mechanically. The reproducible details are in `notes` and `definitions`. - **Key order:** The checker requires `window` keys in the order `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`, so the file uses that order.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei**, averaged across 50 qualifying sales, and reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`; reproduction also matched the cached RPC data.

The average sale price of FROGE 69mg over the pinned window was **4771558231267513 wei**, about 0.00477 ETH. It's written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Sales counted:** 50. That's 49 listing fills paid in ETH or WETH and 1 WETH bid fill. Their prices add up to 238577911563375669 wei, and dividing by 50 then rounding down gives the answer. - **What was scanned:** every OrderFulfilled event from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 in blocks 26019451 to 26026607, 12,231 events in total. The scan used `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` and no range had to be split. I decoded each event and applied the brief's definitions exactly. - **Nothing borderline:** every event involving the collection qualified. There were no bundles, ERC-1155 fills, payments in other tokens, or two-event matched orders that could have counted one sale twice. - **Closing block confirmed:** chain id 1 and the pinned block hash matched on both mevblocker and flashbots. `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` refused these log queries without a personal token, so no data came from it. - **Recipe:** the brief marks this as a `panel` question, so the recipe is `kind: panel`. Its `source` is the exact `eth_getLogs` query I ran, so anyone can repeat it from public RPC data. Two choices the definitions didn't spell out are stated under `definitions`. Each qualifying event counts as one sale, even when several come from the same transaction. Any item with itemType 2 or higher counts as an NFT when checking that a fill holds only one. The script I used is `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which isn't submitted. `git status` doesn't list `artifacts/answer.json`, so it isn't tracked and nothing was committed.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4771558231267513` wei across 50 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `ok`.

I've read the brief and the checks. Now let me verify the environment and get the OrderFulfilled topic0 via the provided scan script.Topic confirmed. Now I'll write a scratch scanner that fetches `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over the pinned window, decodes the offer/consideration arrays, applies the sale/price definitions, and prints only aggregates.Scan complete: 12,231 `OrderFulfilled` logs, 50 qualifying FROGE sales (49 listings + 1 bid), sum 238577911563375669 wei → average 4771558231267513 wei. The pin matched on flashbots' endpoint. Now a cheap cross-check of the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint.I used the wrong hex for the block number. 26026607 = 0x18d226f. Retrying:Pin confirmed on two more endpoints. Writing `artifacts/answer.json` — the brief has `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe must be `panel` with a URL source (the public RPC I scanned).Done. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Result:** average FROGE 69mg OpenSea sale price over blocks 26019451–26026607 = **4771558231267513 wei** (~0.00477 ETH). How it was computed: - `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` (topic `0x9d9a…f31`) on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window — 12,231 logs fetched via `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, pin verified there and cross-checked on publicnode and mevblocker. - Decoded each log's offer/consideration item arrays and applied the brief's definitions: 50 qualifying sales (49 listing fills priced as summed ETH/WETH consideration including fees, 1 bid fill priced as the WETH offer amount). Sum 238577911563375669 wei, floored mean 4771558231267513. - Excluded: other collections, ERC-1155 fills, bundles/multi-NFT fills — all per the pinned definitions; edge cases (criteria item types, multi-item offers) are stated under `definitions` in the answer file. - Recipe is `panel` (required since the brief declares `"evidence": "panel"`), sourced to the public RPC endpoint used.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/43b9c0c9-7989-4a4e-b445-5ff26969ee6d/7544698b-0651-4459-86f2-5a4a79645f22/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4771558231267513` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **4,771,558,231,267,513 wei**, averaged across 50 qualifying sales. Includes definitions and RPC reproduction details. The required checker printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average sale price is **4771558231267513 wei**. - **Result:** 50 sales qualified, 49 listing fills and 1 bid fill. Their prices sum to 238577911563375669 wei, and dividing by 50 and rounding down gives the answer. No fill was excluded for containing another NFT or for being paid in a token other than ETH or WETH. - **Scan:** I pulled the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26019451 to 26026607 (12,231 logs) from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. Chain id 1 and the closing hash matched on that endpoint and on `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`. - **Decoder:** I used my own decoder, `test/scratch/sales.mjs`, because `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested item arrays. It isn't submitted. - **Recipe kind:** The brief is `evidence: "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` requires a `panel` recipe for those. The recipe is therefore `panel`, with the RPC method, event topic, both Seaport addresses and the block range as its source. The catalogue has no recipe that can reproduce this calculation, and the notes say so. The deployer's rerun will need the definitions and notes to reproduce it.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` contains the uint256 answer: `4771558231267513` Verification run: `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` Result: `ok`