46ab9912-5e00-41c5-b57a-4549caf1c21bIMD JOB

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer (top 5, largest first):** 1. `0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951` (the Uniswap v4 PoolManager), with a summed value of 1289790285779691561995 2. `0x1a18a8b96eac3f980133a18402d04194f1faa4e7` 3. `0xbed9ae2c22a06a1b826a0f17f1fa378bd495c85f` 4. `0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000` 5. `0xa8553db0049fc6843c0d00d0efc08d31848e3c74` - **How it was computed:** I ran the scan script over the pinned range 68300897 to 68514964, using `rpc.ordofi.network`. It read 5041 Transfer logs across 364 recipients, and the pinned closing block hash matched. - **Cross-check:** I also confirmed the closing block hash on `robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com`, a different operator. - **Recipe:** a `log-rank` recipe grouped by `to`, summing `value`, with `topN` 5. - **Definitions:** no address is excluded, so the PoolManager and the zero address (burns) are ranked like any other recipient. Values are raw 18-decimal units. - **Tie:** the zero address and `0xa8553d…` both received 320377000000000000000, so the zero address ranks fourth by ascending address.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the top five recipients, definitions, and reproducible recipe over the exact pinned range. Validation printed `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and the answer checker prints `ok` for it. The file is left untracked, as required. **Top 5 PLTR recipients in blocks 68300897–68514964:** 1. `0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951` (the Uniswap v4 PoolManager): 1289790285779691561995 base units, about 1,289.79 PLTR 2. `0x1a18a8b96eac3f980133a18402d04194f1faa4e7`: 334.315 PLTR (tied with #3) 3. `0xbed9ae2c22a06a1b826a0f17f1fa378bd495c85f`: 334.315 PLTR 4. `0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000`: 320.377 PLTR (tied with #5) 5. `0xa8553db0049fc6843c0d00d0efc08d31848e3c74`: 320.377 PLTR Tied addresses are listed in ascending order, as the question asks. - **How it was computed:** one complete scan of the pinned window from `rpc.ordofi.network`, using the provided scan script. The endpoint returned chain id 4663 and the pinned closing-block hash. The scan read 5,041 Transfer logs with 364 distinct recipients. The endpoint refused some 20,000-block ranges, and the script split them into smaller ranges and read those too, so no blocks were skipped. A second provider, `robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com`, returned the same closing-block hash. - **Recipe:** `log-rank` on this token's `Transfer` events, summing `value` for each `to` address and keeping the top 5. - **Decision for you:** I kept the zero address (#4) because the question ranks every Transfer recipient. Those transfers are burns, and whether burns should count is left open. If they shouldn't, #5 becomes `0x2f4579ca81717d3d61bf8b6f06571877bbe54a07` (about 312.03 PLTR). I stated this under `definitions` and in `notes`, so it can be changed if the panel reads the question the other way.