48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadbIMD JOB

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1098900000000000000` wei. The supplied checker prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **1098900000000000000 wei**, definitions, and RPC reproduction code. Found 42 qualifying sales over the exact pinned range. Required validator printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validator check passed (`ok`).

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the floor of **1,098,900,000,000,000,000 wei** and a runnable RPC reproduction procedure. Found 42 qualifying sales over the exact pinned window. The required checker prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `1098900000000000000` wei. The provided verifier reports `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` returned `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **1098900000000000000 wei** (1.0989 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Computation:** I pulled every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793, using `eth_getLogs` on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That was 11,247 logs. I decoded each one and applied the request's definitions for what counts as a sale and its price. - **Result:** 42 sales qualified, and the lowest priced was 1098900000000000000 wei. - **Pin:** I confirmed the closing block hash on that endpoint. I did not check it on a second operator's endpoint. - **Recipe:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only allowed recipe kind is `panel`. I put the RPC URL as its source. The deployer can't rerun a panel recipe, so the panel's agreement is the only evidence. - **Scan script:** I used my own scan script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`) instead of `scan.mjs`, because `scan.mjs` doesn't decode Seaport's nested offer and consideration items. - **Earlier failure:** The rejected attempts failed because `artifacts/` didn't exist; it does now.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The floor is 1098900000000000000 wei (1.0989 ETH). - **How I computed it:** I pulled all 11,247 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020641–26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and decoded them by hand. 42 fills qualified under the request's definitions, and the lowest price among them is that figure. The endpoint's closing block hash matched the pinned one. I did not cross-check on a second endpoint, and the scan script wasn't used. - **Recipe kind:** The recipe is `panel`, because the request says `"evidence": "panel"`. Nothing in it is rerun, so the panel's agreement on the value is the evidence. Its `source` field names the endpoint and the log query. The definitions in the file restate the request's. - **Failed earlier attempts:** They failed because `artifacts/` didn't exist. I created it this time. - **Scratch script:** The decoding script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. It is deleted before submission and is not part of the deliverable.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and the checker prints `ok`. The floor is **1098900000000000000 wei** (1.0989 WETH), a uint256 given as a decimal string. - **How I got it:** I scanned every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 (11,247 logs). I decoded them by hand with the Seaport ABI and applied the definitions in `oracle.json`. That gave 42 fills of the collection, all qualifying (single ERC-721, ETH or WETH). - **Block hash:** the closing block hash matches on publicnode, `rpc.flashbots.net/fast` and `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`. The scan itself ran on publicnode. - **Recipe:** it is `kind: panel`, because the brief says `"evidence": "panel"` and the checker rejects any other kind. `source` is a URL naming the publicnode `eth_getLogs` query. - **Earlier failure:** the earlier `ENOENT` was a missing `artifacts/` directory, which I created before writing the file. The file is untracked and git-ignored, so it isn't force-added. **Judgement call:** the lowest price comes from tx `0x8b51d60c…` in block 26021280. That transaction emits two events: a bid-shaped one at 1.11 WETH and a listing-shaped one at 1.0989 WETH, the seller's net after a 1% fee. Under the definitions each event counts on its own, so the floor is 1.0989. If a panel member counted one event per transaction, the floor would be 1110000000000000000. I put this caveat in `notes`. **Key order:** the checker compares the `window` object's key order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`), so I matched `oracle.json`. My scan script is in `test/scratch/scan.mjs`, which isn't submitted.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Deliverable written. ## Answer **Floor = 1098900000000000000 wei** (1.0989 ETH), from Seaport fills of `0x0000ec93…ec1d` over blocks 26020641–26027793. How it was computed, from chain data only: 1. **Pin confirmed** — `eth_chainId` = 1 and closing hash `0xf86e2872…9b79` for block 26027793 verified on three independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, mevblocker). 2. **Narrowed the search soundly** — 83 ERC-721 `Transfer` logs of the collection in the window, in 71 distinct blocks. Every Seaport fill of the collection must transfer the token, so those blocks are a complete superset. 3. **Fetched and decoded** `OrderFulfilled` (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…6f31`) on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 in those 71 blocks: 300 events, of which 42 carry an item of the collection — all itemType 2, exactly one NFT item each, no bundles, no ERC-1155, and every payment item native ETH or WETH (nothing dropped for a foreign token). 40 listing fills, 2 bid fills, none priced 0, range 1.0989–1.5 ETH. No logs were printed to the transcript. **The one judgement call**, stated in `definitions` and `notes`: the minimum comes from tx `0x8b51d60c…8d58`, which emits two qualifying events for token 647 — a WETH bid (offer 1.11 WETH, consideration = NFT + 1% fee) and the seller's mirror order (offer = NFT, consideration 1.0989 WETH, i.e. the bid net of fee). The brief defines a sale as *an OrderFulfilled event* and gives the listing side and bid side separate price rules, so both sides are priced and the mirror's 1.0989 is the window minimum. Read instead as one merged trade with fees included it would be 1110000000000000000 — the window's second-lowest figure, and the answer a member who merges mirror pairs would report. I noted that alternative explicitly so a disagreement on it is legible rather than mysterious. The brief's `evidence: panel` forces `{kind: "panel", source}`; the chain recipes can't express the Seaport ABI decode this question needs, which the notes say.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written. The check script prints `ok` for it. The floor is **1098900000000000000 wei** (1.0989 ETH). - **How I got it:** I pulled every Transfer log of the collection over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 (72 transactions). I then read each transaction's receipt and decoded the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs by hand, applying the brief's definitions. I did not use `scan.mjs`, because it can't filter Seaport fills by collection. Every Seaport fill of the collection also emits a Transfer, so this covers all fills. - **Result:** 43 fills qualified, and the lowest is in transaction `0x8b51d60ce994f9175e88d5990782c42ac73ead50934fa7c43d7f4bbb42358d58`. - **Pinned window:** the closing block hash was confirmed on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, the only endpoint I used. I did not cross-check it on a second endpoint. - **Recipe:** the brief marks this as a panel question, so the recipe is `kind: panel` with the endpoint and method as its `source`. The deployer can't rerun that recipe mechanically. `notes` describes the computation. - **Earlier failure:** the earlier attempts failed because `artifacts/` didn't exist. I created it and left the file untracked. - **Scratch:** the decoding script is `test/scratch/t.mjs`, which is deleted before submission.

The checker prints `ok`. The deliverable is complete. **Answer: 1098900000000000000 wei (1.0989 ETH)** — the realized floor of identity.md (`0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d`) over blocks 26020641–26027793 on Ethereum mainnet. How it was computed: - Fetched all `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window via `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, confirming `eth_chainId = 1` and the pinned closing hash of block 26027793 there and on a second operator (`ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`). The window held 11,247 OrderFulfilled logs. - Decoded each log's offer and consideration arrays and applied the brief's definitions: exactly one ERC-721 (itemType 2) of the collection across offer + consideration, no other NFT item; listing fills counted only when every consideration item was native ETH or WETH, priced as the sum of all consideration amounts (fees included); bid fills priced at the single ETH/WETH offer amount. 42 fills qualified. - The lowest qualifying price was 1098900000000000000 wei, a listing fill at block 26021280 (tx `0x8b51d60c…358d58`); the next lowest were 1.11 ETH and 1.298 ETH, and the guard `min: 1` is satisfied. `artifacts/answer.json` carries the request id, chain, and window copied exactly from the brief, a `panel` recipe (the brief pins `evidence: "panel"`) whose source names the endpoint read from, the open choices I fixed under `definitions` (NFT itemTypes, listing/bid pricing, zero-price exclusion), and the full reproduction procedure in `notes`. `check-answer.mjs` passes with `ok`, and the file is left untracked for the daemon to upload. My scratch scanner lives in `test/scratch/floor.mjs`, which is deleted before submission.

Created and verified [artifacts/answer.json](</Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). The checker returns `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`. Floor: **1098900000000000000 wei** across 42 qualifying sales. The included reproduction program returned the same result, and the required checker printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **1098900000000000000 wei**. The included reproduction procedure returned the same result across 42 qualifying sales. The required checker prints `ok`. The output remains untracked.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The floor over blocks 26020641–26027793 is **1098900000000000000 wei** (1.0989 ETH). - **Scan:** I used my own script rather than `scan.mjs`, because that script has no Seaport decoder. It pulled `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over exactly the pinned blocks from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The endpoint reported chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash. That script is in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted. - **Result:** 11,247 logs were decoded and 42 qualified as one-ERC-721 sales of the collection paid in ETH or WETH. The lowest is in tx `0x8b51d60ce994f9175e88d5990782c42ac73ead50934fa7c43d7f4bbb42358d58`. - **Recipe:** the request says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`, with the RPC URL as its source. The deployer won't rerun the scan for a panel question, so the panel's agreement is the evidence. - **Earlier rejection:** the previous attempts failed because `artifacts/` didn't exist. I created it this time. The only fix the checker needed was key order in `window`, which it requires to be `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **1098900000000000000 wei** (1.0989 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I got it:** I pulled all 11,247 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs for blocks 26020641–26027793 from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. I decoded the offer and consideration items by hand and kept the fills that match the request's definitions. 42 sales qualified, and the lowest was the answer above. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the catalogue only allows a `panel` recipe. Its `source` is that RPC URL plus the topic and window, and the deployer cannot rerun it the way it would a chain recipe. The catalogue's `scan.mjs` can't filter this event by collection, so I used my own script for the scan. - **Checks:** Chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash matched on that endpoint. I did not check a second endpoint, and I did not run the catalogue's `scan.mjs` on this window. - **Earlier failure:** The previous rejections were missing-directory and login errors, not answer problems. I created `artifacts/` and wrote the file. The scan script is in `test/scratch/`, which is not submitted.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `ok`.

Check passes with `ok`. Computed the floor price by scanning `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over the pinned window, decoding offer/consideration items per the definitions (exactly one ERC-721 of the collection, paid entirely in ETH/WETH), and confirmed the block-hash pin on two independent RPC operators. Found 42 qualifying sales; floor = 1098900000000000000 wei (1.0989 ETH). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validates.

Check passes. Summary: computed the identity.md floor (1098900000000000000 wei) by scanning all Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned block window, decoding per the real Seaport ABI (offerer/zone are indexed topics), and filtering to single-ERC721, all-ETH/WETH fills; wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a `panel` recipe (required since the brief's `evidence` is `"panel"`), and `check-answer.mjs` reports `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat2/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The floor is **1098900000000000000 wei** (1.0989 ETH). - **How I computed it:** I pulled the collection's ERC-721 `Transfer` logs for the pinned blocks 26020641–26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That gave 83 logs across 72 transactions. I read each transaction's receipt and decoded the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` events by hand. I checked the chain id and the closing block hash on that endpoint. - **Qualifying sales:** I applied the request's definitions to those events, which left 42 qualifying sales. I did not use `scan.mjs`, which has no option to filter by the NFT contract inside `OrderFulfilled`. It would have meant scanning every Seaport log in the window. - **Recipe type:** The request is marked `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`, with the RPC endpoint and the methods used as its `source`. A `panel` recipe is not rerun by the deployer, so the answer rests on panel agreement. - **Not double-checked:** I did not scan a second endpoint. - **Earlier failure:** The rejected attempt failed because the `artifacts` directory didn't exist. I created it.

The answer is complete and untracked (artifacts/ is not in git), which matches the delivery instructions. **Result:** floor = 1098900000000000000 wei (1.0989 ETH), found across 42 qualifying single-NFT ETH/WETH Seaport fills in the pinned window, tx `0x8b51d60ce994f9175e88d5990782c42ac73ead50934fa7c43d7f4bbb42358d58`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`. Since the brief pins `evidence: "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: <RPC + method used>}`, with the full decode logic documented in `notes`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb/6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1098900000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd\work\48a2958d-fcb2-47ee-950f-28c04569cadb\6c1bdfd5-c6d6-4b61-9caa-f58a7bf4968f\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3eb47aa3863ea9b-ICN, request id: req_ccf57dee426a47f5b7a92a33686263d5

FAILURE: runtime_error

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error