> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26047886 to 26048184, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: At what block height did the 2010 Bitcoin value overflow incident occur (the transaction that created about 184 billion BTC)? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Completed [answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: block height `74638`. The supplied verifier prints `ok`.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts' the agent stopped (completed, 4 turns); its last message: The incident occurred at block **74638** ([Bitcoin Wiki](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139)). I couldn’t create or validate `artifacts/answer.json`: every local command failed with `bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied`, so I couldn’t read the pinned request or run its checker. I can’t safely supply the required JSON without those exact values.
FAILURE: runtime_error
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts' the agent stopped (completed, 4 turns); its last message: I couldn’t repair the deliverable: every shell command failed before running with `bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied`. That prevented me from reading the pinned request or creating `artifacts/answer.json`, so I couldn’t compute or verify an answer.
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/opt/identitymd/worker2/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, sourced from the [Bitcoin Wiki](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139). Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/var/lib/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `74638`. Local verifier result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `74638` (uint256), supported by the [Bitcoin Wiki incident record](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident). Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height `74638`. The checker printed `ok`. The request specifies panel evidence and says the Ethereum window only timestamps the Bitcoin-history answer, so the recipe names the Bitcoin Wiki source rather than deriving the height from Ethereum RPC data.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](</home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json). The verifier prints `ok`. Answer: block `74638`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height **74638**, based on the [Bitcoin Wiki’s Value overflow incident page](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. The Bitcoin Wiki identifies that as the block containing the overflow transaction ([source](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139)). The answer check printed `ok`. The brief specifies panel evidence and says the Ethereum window only timestamps the request, so the answer uses the required panel recipe rather than an RPC scan.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat12/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. The Bitcoin Wiki identifies block 74638 as containing the overflow transaction. ([source](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139)) The required checker printed `ok`. The request defines the Ethereum window as a timestamp only, so I used the named Bitcoin source rather than scanning Ethereum.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/levi/imd/p7/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height **74638** and the Bitcoin Wiki source. The checker printed `ok`. The brief defines this as an off-chain panel fact and says the Ethereum window only timestamps the request, so the recipe uses the named public source rather than Ethereum RPC data.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with answer `"74638"` and the [Bitcoin Wiki](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident) panel recipe required by the pinned request. Validation printed `ok`. The file explains the conflict with the generic RPC-only criterion.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](</home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json>). Answer: block `74638`. Checker output: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, citing the Bitcoin Wiki incident page. The required checker printed `ok`. The pinned brief specifies panel evidence and says the Ethereum window only timestamps the request, so the answer uses the cited public source rather than an Ethereum RPC recipe.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. Validator result: `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, citing the Bitcoin Wiki source. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/bc/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, citing the Bitcoin Wiki page. The prescribed checker prints `ok`.
The answer is **block 74638**, as stated by the [Bitcoin Wiki’s Value overflow incident page](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139). I wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) and verified it with the required checker; it printed `ok`. The brief specifies panel evidence, so the recipe cites the off-chain source rather than deriving the height from Ethereum RPC data.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` answers block 74638 as the Bitcoin value overflow incident height, using the `panel` recipe with the Bitcoin Wiki as source, per the request's own definitions that this is an off-chain historical fact and the Ethereum window only timestamps the request.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height **74638**, as stated in the [Bitcoin Wiki incident entry](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](</home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json>) with answer `74638`. The supplied checker prints `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height **74638**, based on the [Bitcoin Wiki’s Value overflow incident page](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident). The answer checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height `74638`, citing the [Bitcoin Wiki incident page](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, citing the Bitcoin Wiki incident page. The checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, citing the Bitcoin Wiki’s “Value overflow incident” page. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638` and the Bitcoin Wiki source. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638` and the Bitcoin Wiki source. The required checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height **74638**, citing the Bitcoin Wiki’s value overflow incident page. The required answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with the Bitcoin block height **74638** and the source recipe. The answer check printed `ok`.
The answer is **block 74638**. I read the [Bitcoin Wiki incident page](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident) and recorded it in [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json). The required checker printed `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering the panel question: the 2010 Bitcoin value-overflow incident occurred at Bitcoin block height **74638**, sourced from the Bitcoin Wiki's "Value overflow incident" page, with `definitions.subject` noting the pinned Ethereum chainId/window are timestamps only, not the source of the fact.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd-2/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, sourced from the Bitcoin Wiki. The required checker printed `ok`.
Check passed (`ok`). `artifacts/answer.json` answers the panel question: Bitcoin's value overflow incident occurred at block height **74638**, sourced from the Bitcoin wiki, using a `panel` recipe as required by the request's `"evidence": "panel"` designation.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd2/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, citing the Bitcoin Wiki’s value overflow incident page. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with block height `74638`, based on the [Bitcoin Wiki incident article](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139). The required checker prints `ok`.
Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering block **74638** (the Bitcoin Wiki's documented height for the 2010 value overflow incident), using the `panel` recipe since this is an off-chain historical fact. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `74638`, sourced from the Bitcoin Wiki’s value overflow incident page. The required answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat8/.identitymd/work/52520609-1aab-4242-bab4-540a64a2724a/119d64cc-af89-4e75-85a9-4f95d8e2dd2d/artifacts/answer.json) with the answer **74638**, based on the [Bitcoin Wiki’s Value overflow incident page](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE-2010-5139). The provided checker printed `ok`.
Check passed (`ok`). Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering the Bitcoin value-overflow-incident block height (74638) as a panel-evidence recipe citing the Bitcoin Wiki source.
Check passed. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the panel answer: Bitcoin block **74638**, sourced from the Bitcoin Wiki's "Value overflow incident" page, with the definitions and notes explaining that the Ethereum window only timestamps the request.
Check passes with `ok`. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering block height **74638** (the 2010 Bitcoin value overflow incident, CVE-2010-5139) as a `panel` recipe citing the Bitcoin wiki, since this is an off-chain historical fact about Bitcoin mainnet, unrelated to the pinned Ethereum window (used only to timestamp the request per the brief's `subject` definition).
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with answer `74638` (Bitcoin block height of the 2010 value overflow incident), using the `panel` recipe citing the Bitcoin Wiki as source, per the request's own definition that this is an off-chain fact only timestamped by the Ethereum window.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` answers block 74638 as the panel-evidence fact for Bitcoin's 2010 value overflow incident, citing the Bitcoin Wiki as the source.
The answer is Bitcoin block 74638, written to `artifacts/answer.json`. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I confirmed the figure by fetching the Bitcoin Wiki "Value overflow incident" page (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident). It says block 74638 contained a transaction that created 184,467,440,737.095516 BTC. The request is a panel question about Bitcoin history, so I ran no chain scan. The pinned Ethereum window is only copied into the answer as the timestamp. The recipe is `panel`, with the wiki page as its `source`. `definitions` records that the answer is a Bitcoin block height, not an Ethereum one, and names the wiki as the source.
Check passes with `ok`. The answer is Bitcoin block 74638, the site of the 2010 value overflow incident, sourced from the Bitcoin Wiki, written to `artifacts/answer.json` as a `panel` recipe (this is off-chain historical knowledge; the Ethereum window only timestamps the request, per the brief's own definitions).
The answer is Bitcoin block 74638, and I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I read the Bitcoin Wiki's "Value overflow incident" page (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident). It says block 74638 contained the transaction that created about 184 billion BTC. This is a panel question about Bitcoin history, so nothing was scanned on Ethereum and no RPC endpoint was used. The recipe is `panel` with that URL as its source. The window and request id are copied from `oracle.json`. I did not put the wiki's "August 2010" date in the file.
Check passes. Answer: Bitcoin block **74638** (the 2010 value-overflow incident), computed as a panel-evidence question with source cited (Bitcoin Wiki), since the pinned Ethereum window only timestamps this Bitcoin-history question.
The answer is block 74638, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. I confirmed the figure on the Bitcoin Wiki "Value overflow incident" page (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident). It says block 74638 contained the transaction that created about 184 billion BTC on 15 August 2010. The file uses the `panel` recipe with that URL as its source, since the brief marks this as an off-chain question. The request id, chain and window are copied exactly from `oracle.json`. I did not run a chain scan or use any Ethereum RPC, because the brief says the pinned window only timestamps the request.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer `"74638"`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The Bitcoin Wiki page "Value overflow incident" (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident) says block 74638 contained the transaction that created about 184 billion BTC. I fetched the page and read that line myself. The `panel` recipe cites that URL as its source. This is an off-chain fact, so I ran no chain scan. The pinned Ethereum window only timestamps the request. The window and request id are copied from `oracle.json`. The file is untracked, and `git status` shows it as the only change.
The overflow incident was at Bitcoin block **74638**. I wrote that to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I read the Bitcoin Wiki page "Value overflow incident" (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident). It states that block 74638 contained the transaction that created about 184 billion BTC. The request is a panel question, so the recipe is `panel` with that URL as the source. No chain scan was run, and the pinned Ethereum window only timestamps the request. The file is untracked and not force-added, as required.
The value overflow incident happened at Bitcoin block height 74638, and `artifacts/answer.json` is written with that answer. I read the Bitcoin Wiki's "Value overflow incident" page. It says block 74638 contained the transaction that created about 184 billion BTC, in August 2010. The recipe is the `panel` kind, with that page as its source. I did not scan any chain data. This is an off-chain fact, and the pinned Ethereum window only timestamps the request. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for the file. It first failed because the `window` keys were in a different order than in `oracle.json`, so I reordered them to match.
Check passed. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with answer `74638` (Bitcoin block height of the 2010 value overflow incident), sourced from the Bitcoin Wiki, using the `panel` recipe kind as required by the request's `evidence: "panel"` designation.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` answers 74638 (the Bitcoin value overflow incident block) via the `panel` recipe citing the Bitcoin wiki, and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Check passed. `artifacts/answer.json` reports the 2010 Bitcoin value overflow incident occurred at Bitcoin block **74638**, sourced from the Bitcoin Wiki's "Value overflow incident" page, using the `panel` recipe kind as required for this off-chain historical fact (the pinned Ethereum chain/window only timestamp the request, per the definitions).
The answer is block 74638, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. I read it from the Bitcoin wiki's Value overflow incident page (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident). The page says block 74638 contained the transaction that created about 184 billion BTC (CVE-2010-5139, August 2010). The request is a panel question about Bitcoin history, so the recipe kind is `panel` with that URL as the source. I ran no scan and used no RPC endpoint. The window and request id are copied from `.imd/reads/oracle.json`. My first draft failed the check because the window keys were in a different order than the brief's. I reordered them and it passed.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.