54f2a20a-e09a-4470-80b4-9ae3834f369cIMD JOB

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`. The address that received the most BLUR over blocks 26017880–26021469 is `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c`, with about 18,839,918.69 BLUR in gross incoming transfers. The file is valid JSON, and I left it untracked and did not force-add it. - **How I computed it:** I pulled the BLUR `Transfer` logs from the pinned range, both bounds inclusive. There were 90 logs. I summed `value` per `to` address, sorted by total descending and then by address ascending. - **Cross-check:** I ran the scan on two operators' endpoints, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`. Both returned chain id 1, the pinned hash for block 26021469, and identical logs and rankings. - **Margin:** The leader's total is roughly 31 times the runner-up's (`0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d`, about 603,690 BLUR), so ties and truncation are not a concern. - **Recipe:** It is `log-rank` on the BLUR contract, event `Transfer`, `sumArg` `value`, `groupBy` `to`, `topN` 5. The answer lists the top five addresses. - **Definitions:** The request left nothing open, so the requester's definitions are copied verbatim.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written (untracked, excluded by `.git/info/exclude`), and nothing else in the workspace was modified. **Answer:** `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c` received the most BLUR in the pinned window — 18,839,918,688,803,910,562,248,729 raw units (≈18.84M BLUR) across 8 transfers, more than 30× the runner-up. **How it was computed:** `eth_getLogs` on BLUR `0x5283d2…08b44`, topic0 = Transfer, blocks 26017880–26021469 inclusive, 400-block chunks with halve-and-retry on errors, de-duplicated by `(blockHash, logIndex)`, grouped by `topics[2]`, values summed as raw uint256, ranked descending with ties by ascending lowercase address. Totals over the window: 90 Transfer logs, 66 distinct recipients, 21,400,409,288,408,589,086,851,337 raw units. **Verification:** - Pinned closing hash for block 26021469 confirmed on four endpoints (flashbots, mevblocker, publicnode, nodereal), all `eth_chainId` = `0x1`. - Two independent full scans — `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` — agreed exactly on log count, total, and the full top-12 ordering. - A third operator (`eth-mainnet.nodereal.io`) re-read the top three recipients with topic-filtered logs and matched their sums. - The file was checked programmatically against `.imd/reads/oracle.json`: requestId, chainId, window (all three fields verbatim), answerType, lowercase address format, and `figure` equal to the leader's sum. **Recipe:** `log-rank` with exactly `address`, `event`, `sumArg: "value"`, `abs: false`, `groupBy: "to"`, `topN: 8` — the optional `filter` is omitted since no filtering applies. **Deliberately not done:** `rpc.flashbots.net/fast` rejected `eth_getLogs` for this range ("block range extends beyond current head block") and `virginia.rpc.blxrbdn.com` returns "method not available", so neither contributed to the figures — noted in `notes`. No netting of outgoing transfers and no address exclusions, because the request's own `definitions` fix "received" as gross incoming with nothing excluded. Scratch scanner lives in `test/scratch/scan.mjs` and is not part of the deliverable.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the typed answer and reproducible recipe. Winner: `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c`. Validated against identical logs from two independent RPC operators over the exact pinned range.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and untracked. **Answer:** `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c` — 18,839,918,688,803,910,562,248,729 raw BLUR units (~18.84M BLUR, 88% of all BLUR moved in the window), in 8 incoming transfers. **How it was computed** - `eth_getLogs` on `0x5283d291dbcf85356a21ba090e6db59121208b44`, topic0 = `Transfer(address,address,uint256)`, over exactly blocks 26017880–26021469 inclusive; grouped by `topics[2]` (`to`), summing the `uint256` in `data`. 90 logs, 66 receivers, 21,400,409,288,408,589,086,851,337 units total. - Recipe: `log-rank` with `address`/`event`/`sumArg: value`/`abs: false`/`groupBy: to`/`topN: 5` — exactly the catalogue's parameters, nothing else. The answer lists five receivers (request `head` is 1). - Cross-checked on three operators with deliberately different chunk sizes — publicnode (500), mevblocker (100), nodereal (1000) — all returning identical log counts, per-receiver sums and ordering, so nothing was truncated. The pinned closing hash and `eth_chainId` were confirmed on four endpoints first; flashbots and drpc answered the head check but refuse `eth_getLogs` on this range, which is noted in `notes`. - Open points fixed under `definitions`: gross receipts (no netting, mints and contract/zero-address recipients included), raw 18-decimal units, ties by ascending lowercase address, inclusive bounds tied to the pinned hash, `removed` logs dropped. Places 6 and 7 tie exactly, but they are far below the reported five.

Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/54f2a20a-e09a-4470-80b4-9ae3834f369c/d6f3201e-3946-4280-812a-3bfc1da8e32b/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c` received `18839918688803910562248729` raw BLUR units. Verified against three independent public RPC endpoints.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the typed answer, definitions, and reproducible recipe. Top recipient: `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c`. Validated JSON and matched all 90 transfer logs across two public RPC operators.

Taylor, done. **Answer:** `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c` received the most BLUR over blocks 26017880–26021469 — 18,839,918,688,803,910,562,248,729 raw units (~18.84M BLUR). Runner-up got ~604K, so no tie risk on the head. **Method:** `eth_getLogs` for `Transfer` on the BLUR contract, grouped by indexed `to`, summed `value` as raw uint256. Ran on two operators (publicnode with 1000-block chunks, mevblocker with 400-block chunks); both verified chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash, and both returned identical results — 90 logs, 66 recipients, same top 10. Flashbots refused `eth_getLogs` on this range and was skipped. **Deliverable:** `artifacts/answer.json` — `log-rank` recipe with exactly the catalogue's parameters, request id/chain/window/definitions copied verbatim from `oracle.json`, top 5 addresses (head=1), `figure` = leader's sum. Validated field-by-field against the brief; left untracked as required. Scratch scanner is in `test/scratch/`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and parses as valid JSON. It names `0x04b5540fe7c014d7de022c0406a9633155aeed1c` as the address that received the most BLUR over blocks 26017880–26021469 (both inclusive). - **Leader's total:** about 18.84M BLUR, raw `18839918688803910562248729` (18 decimals). The runner-up, `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d`, received about 0.60M, so a tie isn't a concern. - **How I got it:** I pulled the BLUR contract's `Transfer` logs for the window and summed `value` by the indexed `to` address. That gave 90 transfers in total, with gross incoming amounts and nothing subtracted, as the request defines it. - **Cross-check:** I ran the scan on two different operators, publicnode and Tenderly. Both returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash, and both gave identical totals. - **Recipe:** it is the `log-rank` recipe with `groupBy: to` and `topN: 5`. The answer lists five addresses, in descending order of total received. Nothing outside `artifacts/answer.json` is meant to be submitted; my scratch script is in `test/scratch/`.