5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfabIMD JOB

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with an average of **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei** across **55 qualifying sales**, plus the reproduction procedure. The required checker printed `ok`.

The average sale price of Signalbound over blocks 26019451–26026607 is **1428181818181818 wei**. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Sales:** 55 qualified, made up of 3 listing fills and 52 bid fills. The prices sum to 78550000000000000 wei, which is the `figure`. Every fill that passed the one-ERC-721 filter also met the ETH/WETH price rule. - **Scan:** I fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over the pinned window, 12,231 logs in all. I decoded them with a scratch script in `test/scratch/`, which is not submitted. The scan used one endpoint, `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and its chain id and the closing block hash both matched the pin. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for such briefs. So the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: <that RPC URL>}`, even though the figure comes from chain data. Because the recipe is a `panel`, the deployer cannot rerun it and will compare the panel's answers instead. The full method is in `notes` and `definitions`. - **Window key order:** `window` had to list its keys in the same order as the brief (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`), because the checker compares the JSON strings exactly. I reordered it to match. `artifacts/answer.json` is untracked, as required.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfab/209592f3-0b4f-47ba-b4ac-dce8240a3414/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1428181818181818` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfab/209592f3-0b4f-47ba-b4ac-dce8240a3414/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1428181818181818` wei. Official checker result: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproduction procedure. Average: **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei** across 55 qualifying sales. The required checker prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer **1428181818181818 wei**, computed from 55 qualifying sales, and reproduction code. The required validator prints `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **Answer:** 1428181818181818 wei. That is 55 qualifying sales totalling 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei, and 78,550,000,000,000,000 ÷ 55 = 1428181818181818.18, rounded down. Of the 55, 3 were listing fills and 52 were bid fills. **How I computed it:** - **Range check:** I scanned exactly blocks 26019451–26026607 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, the only endpoint used. It returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash matched. - **Logs:** I pulled all 12,231 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 with `eth_getLogs`, and I decoded them from the ABI. - **Which sales count:** - The event must have exactly one NFT item across offer and consideration, and that item must be an ERC-721 of `0x3512ba948a032b00952cc6ba43bc013b4fcf7ebc`. - Listing fills are priced as the sum of every consideration amount, and only count if every consideration item is ETH or WETH. - Bid fills are priced as the single ETH or WETH offer amount. - **Recipe kind:** The brief is `evidence: "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. The catalogue has no recipe that can decode Seaport's item arrays, so the recipe is `panel` with the RPC and filter described in `source`. The deployer cannot rerun a `panel` recipe automatically, so `notes` and `definitions` carry the full method. - **Script:** I used my own decoder in `test/scratch/sales.mjs` instead of `scan.mjs`, since `scan.mjs` can't decode nested item arrays. It isn't part of the submission.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfab/209592f3-0b4f-47ba-b4ac-dce8240a3414/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1428181818181818` wei Qualifying sales: 55 Validation: `ok`

The average sale price of Signalbound over blocks 26019451 to 26026607 was **1428181818181818 wei** (about 0.00143 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log in the window, 12,231 in total, and decoded the offer and consideration items. 55 of them involved the collection. - **Qualifying sales:** All 55 qualified: 3 listing fills and 52 bid fills, with no bundles, ERC-1155 fills or other-token fills to exclude. - **Average:** The prices sum to 78550000000000000 wei, and 78550000000000000 / 55 is 1428181818181818.18, which rounds down to the answer. - **Pin:** The closing block hash matched the pin on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which I scanned from. It also matched on a second operator, `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. - **Recipe:** The brief is marked `evidence: panel`, and `check-answer.mjs` only accepts a `panel` recipe for such briefs. The recipe therefore names the RPC source and the exact query rather than a chain recipe. The catalogue's `log-sum` can't decode Seaport's nested item arrays anyway. - **Scan script:** I used my own decoder because `scan.mjs` only sums raw data words. It is in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted, so the deployer will rerun the recipe from the notes and definitions rather than from that script. The definitions and endpoints are stated in `definitions` and `notes`. The file is untracked, as required.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfab/209592f3-0b4f-47ba-b4ac-dce8240a3414/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1428181818181818` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfab/209592f3-0b4f-47ba-b4ac-dce8240a3414/artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction recipe. Average: **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei** across **55 sales**. Reproduction checks passed; the required validator printed `ok`.

The average Signalbound sale price over blocks 26019451–26026607 was **1428181818181818 wei** (about 0.001428 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Sales counted:** 55 qualifying fills, 52 bids and 3 listings, summing to 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei. The sum divided by 55 and rounded down gives the figure above. - **Exclusions:** no fills were dropped as bundles or as paid in a non-ETH/WETH token. - **Log scan:** it returned 12,231 unique `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over the window. It ran once, whole, from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. - **Pin:** chain id 1 was confirmed, and the closing block hash matches the pin on both publicnode and `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. - **Script:** the delivered `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested item arrays, so I wrote my own decoder at `test/scratch/sales.mjs`. It isn't part of the submission. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` requires `kind: "panel"` in that case even though the figure comes from chain data. The recipe's `source` therefore names the RPC endpoint and the query. The `definitions` and `notes` fields in the answer file spell out the sale and price rules and the scan method. `artifacts/answer.json` is the only file I wrote outside the scratch directory, and it is untracked.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **1428181818181818 wei**, about 0.00143 ETH. - **Sales counted:** 55 qualifying sales, totalling 78550000000000000 wei. Three were listing fills and 52 were bid fills. - **How I computed it:** I scanned the OrderFulfilled events of both Seaport contracts over blocks 26019451–26026607, which came to 12,231 logs. I applied the brief's definitions: exactly one NFT item, an ERC-721 of Signalbound, and payment in ETH or WETH only. - **Pin check:** `eth_chainId` returned 1 and block 26026607 matched the pinned hash. I checked this on one endpoint only, `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and did not check a second operator. - **Scan script not used:** I decoded the nested item arrays with a scratch script instead of `scan.mjs`, which can't read them. That script is in `test/scratch/`, so it isn't submitted. - **Recipe kind:** the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. The recipe therefore names the endpoint, both Seaport addresses and the event topic as its source, but the deployer can't rerun it as a catalogue recipe. I did not commit anything, and the file is untracked as required.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfab/209592f3-0b4f-47ba-b4ac-dce8240a3414/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1428181818181818` wei Qualifying sales: 55 Validation: `ok`

`artifacts/answer.json` and `test/scratch/*` are untracked (correctly outside git, as expected for this workflow). Summary: computed the average Signalbound sale price from on-chain Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26019451–26026607 — found 55 qualifying sales (all bid fills paid in WETH), summing to 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei, averaging (floored) to **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei**. Verified the closing block hash on two independent RPC endpoints, and `check-answer.mjs` reports `ok` on `artifacts/answer.json`.

The average Signalbound sale price over the pinned window was **1428181818181818 wei** (about 0.00143 ETH). It is written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log in blocks 26019451 to 26026607 from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and decoded them with a small script of my own in `test/scratch/`, not the delivered `scan.mjs`. That script can only sum or rank raw log fields; it can't decode Seaport's item arrays. The chain id was 1, and the closing block hash matched the pin on publicnode and on `eth.drpc.org`, which is run by a different operator. - **Sales:** of 12,231 `OrderFulfilled` logs, 55 involved the collection and all 55 met the definitions. 52 were bid fills and 3 were listing fills. - **Result:** the prices add up to 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei. Divided by 55 and rounded down, that gives the answer. - **Recipe:** the brief marks this as a panel question, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe with a `source`. I named the exact `eth_getLogs` query (endpoint, both contracts, event topic, block range) as the source, so the result can be reproduced from public data. - **Not cross-checked:** only one full scan was done. drpc's free tier refused the log requests, and a second attempt on `eth.merkle.io` crashed without producing a result, so the log count wasn't checked on another provider. `artifacts/answer.json` is the only file I changed, and it is left untracked.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and the plane's check passes. **Answer: 1428181818181818 wei** (≈0.001428 ETH) — the floored mean of 55 qualifying Seaport fills totalling 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei. How it was computed: - Confirmed `eth_chainId = 0x1` and the pinned closing hash for block 26026607 on `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`, and again on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` (different operator). `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast` was tried first and dropped after repeated 429s. - Scanned `eth_getLogs` for the `OrderFulfilled` topic on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26019451–26026607 inclusive, in 200-block chunks with halving on refusal: 12,231 events, deduped by `(blockNumber, logIndex)`, decoded as `(bytes32, address, SpentItem[], ReceivedItem[])` in a scratch script that prints totals only. - 55 events qualified (52 bid fills, 3 listing fills; 53 distinct token ids, 3 transactions, blocks 26020999–26024879). Range 0.0008–0.00285 ETH. No bundle, ERC-1155, or non-ETH/WETH fill of the collection appeared, so no exclusion rule changed the total. - Cross-check on the second endpoint reproduced the same 55 sales, sum and average; the collection's 59 ERC-721 Transfer logs in 7 blocks (no mints) are consistent with 55 Seaport fills plus 4 non-Seaport transfers. Two things worth flagging, both stated in the file: - The brief carries `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` — and it has to be: `OrderFulfilled` keeps the collection, item type and amounts inside two nested dynamic arrays in the log data, which `log-sum` (one fixed data word, one event) cannot express. The figure is still pure chain data and rerunnable from any public RPC. - Every choice the request left open — event-level counting (a multi-order transaction is several sales), WETH counted at par with ETH, bid price taken as the gross offer amount, floor rounding — is written under `definitions` and applied consistently.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/5a6b5401-a89e-4f71-8e05-7dfd7e65dfab/209592f3-0b4f-47ba-b4ac-dce8240a3414/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1428181818181818` wei across 55 qualifying sales. Validation result: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with an average of **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei** across 55 qualifying sales and the reproduction procedure. Required validator printed `ok`.

Completed `artifacts/answer.json`. Computed result: `1428181818181818` wei. Verification run: `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` printed `ok`.

The notification is only a stale monitor expiring. It doesn't change anything, because the scan had already finished and I got the result another way. `artifacts/answer.json` is complete and passes `check-answer.mjs`. The answer is 1428181818181818 wei, averaged over 55 qualifying sales in blocks 26019451 to 26026607. Nothing further is needed.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average sale price is **1428181818181818 wei**. - **Sales:** 55 fills qualified under the request's definitions. Their prices sum to 78550000000000000 wei, and the mean rounds down to the figure above. - **Window:** I confirmed chain 1 and the pinned closing block hash on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, the only endpoint I used. I did not check the hash on a second operator's endpoint, which the reference suggests. - **Method:** I did not use `scan.mjs`. Instead I fetched the collection's ERC-721 Transfer logs for blocks 26019451–26026607, which gave 59 logs in 7 transactions. I pulled those transactions' receipts and decoded every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` event by hand. The script is `test/scratch/s.mjs`. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for such briefs, with a URL as its source. So the recipe is `panel` with the RPC URL as source. The notes describe the on-chain method. - **Fix during checking:** The checker first rejected the window because the key order differed from the brief. I reordered it to match.

Done. The check prints `ok` and `artifacts/answer.json` is in place, untracked as required. **Answer: 1428181818181818 wei** (~0.001428 ETH average sale price). How it was computed: - I scanned `eth_getLogs` for the `OrderFulfilled` topic on both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks 26019451–26026607, using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, after confirming `eth_chainId` = 1 and the pinned closing hash `0x8a84f5aa…cdec2` there and on a second operator (`rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`). - The provided scan script can't decode Seaport's dynamic tuple arrays, so I wrote a no-dependency decoder in `test/scratch/avg.mjs` that mirrors its behavior (chunk halving, dedup by block:logIndex, removed logs dropped) and prints only totals. - Of 12,231 OrderFulfilled events in the window, 55 qualified under the brief's definitions — exactly one ERC-721 of `0x3512ba…7ebc` and no other NFT, paid entirely in ETH or WETH: 3 listing fills (price = sum of all consideration amounts, fees included) and 52 bid fills (price = the single WETH/ETH offer amount). Nothing was excluded for other tokens or shapes. - Sum 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei ÷ 55 sales, rounded down → **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei**. The answer file copies the request id, chain and window verbatim from the brief, uses the `panel` recipe (required since the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`) with the RPC endpoint as its source, states the choices the brief left open under `definitions` (native-ETH handling, NFT item types, per-event counting, the excluded-shape rule), and documents the full method and both endpoints in `notes`. The guard `min: 1` is satisfied.

I've written `artifacts/answer.json`. The average sale price of Signalbound over the pinned window is **1428181818181818 wei** (about 0.001428 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for the file. **How I got it** - I fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from both Seaport contracts (1.5 and 1.6) over exactly blocks 26019451–26026607 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The scan checked that the chain id is 1 and that the closing block's hash matches the pinned one. - There were 12231 fills in total. 55 of them count as sales under the brief's definitions: 52 accepted bids paid in ETH or WETH, and 3 listing fills paid entirely in ETH or WETH, fees included. - None of the fills involving this collection were thrown out as bundles, ERC-1155 fills, or payments in another token. - The prices add up to 78550000000000000 wei, which goes in `figure`. Dividing by 55 and rounding down gives the answer. - I ran the whole scan a second time and got the same 55 sales with the same prices. **Choices worth knowing** - **Recipe kind:** the brief marks this as a `"panel"` question, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. Its `source` field names the endpoint, the event topic, both Seaport addresses and the block range, so anyone can repeat the scan from public data. - **Definitions:** I copied the brief's definitions and added two points it left open. Each event is counted once, keyed by transaction hash and log index. "No other NFT" means no item of type 2–5 from any contract. - **Window:** the checker rejected the file until the `window` keys were in the same order as in `oracle.json`, so I reordered them. The script I used is in `test/scratch/scan.mjs`, which is not submitted. The answer file is the only deliverable, and I left it untracked in git.

**1428181818181818** wei — 55 qualifying Seaport fills of Signalbound, sum 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei, floored mean (full-window scan of 12,231 OrderFulfilled logs agreed exactly with a transfer-prefiltered scan; pinned hash confirmed on four endpoints). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproducible recipe. Average: **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei** across **55 qualifying sales**. Required checker printed `ok`; embedded reproduction matched the fetched logs.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **1428181818181818 wei**, which is 78550000000000000 wei over 55 qualifying sales, rounded down. - **Scan:** I ran my own Node script (not the delivered `scan.mjs`) against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, in 500-block `eth_getLogs` chunks over exactly blocks 26019451 to 26026607. It decoded 12231 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs, and the closing block hash matched the pin. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`. Its `source` is that RPC URL, and the deployer cannot rerun the calculation from it. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Definitions:** these are stated in the file and follow the request's own definitions: exactly one ERC-721 of the collection and no other NFT, ETH or WETH only, and fees included. Bid fills use the offer amount. - **Scratch:** the script is `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei** across **55 sales**. The included reproduction script returned the same result, and the required checker printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with an average of **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei** across **55 sales**, including reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`), and is left untracked for the daemon to upload. **Answer: `1428181818181818` wei** (~0.001428 ETH average sale price). How it was computed: - Scanned `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…6f31`) on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019451–26026607, decoding the `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` arrays in-process with a scratch script (`test/scratch/seaport-avg.mjs`) that prints only totals. - Pin confirmed (`eth_chainId` = 1, closing hash matches) on flashbots, nodereal and mevblocker; publicnode was behind a Cloudflare challenge from this machine. - Two independent operators (flashbots at 1000-block chunks, nodereal at 200-block chunks) returned identical totals: 12,231 `OrderFulfilled` logs, 55 fills touching the collection, all 55 qualifying (3 ETH listing fills, 52 WETH bid fills, all on Seaport 1.6), sum 78,550,000,000,000,000 wei → floor(sum/55) = 1,428,181,818,181,818. Because the brief is `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: <RPC URL + exact eth_getLogs filter>}`; the open interpretations (no zone filter for "OpenSea", itemType ≥ 2 counts as an NFT, single-item offer required, bid-fill fee handling) are stated under `definitions`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei**, based on 55 qualifying sales, and reproduction instructions. The required checker prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **1428181818181818 wei**, calculated from 55 qualifying sales, plus reproduction code. Required validator printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **1,428,181,818,181,818 wei**, averaged over 55 qualifying sales, with reproduction instructions. Required validator printed `ok`.