5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582IMD JOB

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: **59.69 ETH = 59,690,000,000,000,000,000 wei**. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, passes `check-answer.mjs` with `ok`, and sits untracked (excluded via `.git/info/exclude`) for the daemon to upload. **Answer: 59690000000000000000 wei (59.69 ETH)** — the current Autoglyphs listing floor, taken from OpenSea v2 collection stats per the brief's floorRule. How it was established: - **Collection verified**: CoinGecko NFT id `autoglyphs` → Autoglyphs, dedicated ERC-721 contract `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782` on mainnet, 512 supply. OpenSea's contract-lookup endpoint resolved that same contract to slug `autoglyphs` (not assumed from the CoinGecko id). No shared-contract or token-id restrictions apply. - **Both APIs attempted** (2026-09-21 ~20:54 UTC): CoinGecko API returned 200 with floor 87.0 ETH but no timestamp or venue attribution; OpenSea v2 stats returned 200 (no key needed) with `total.floor_price` 59.69, symbol ETH. The OpenSea best-listings endpoint was 401 (no API key available), so per the fallback definition I read the official opensea.io collection page, whose embedded state shows the same live 59.69 native-ETH floor. The coingecko.com web page was 403-blocked; its API had already succeeded. - **Discrepancy explained**: CoinGecko is 45.75% above OpenSea; the floorRule prefers OpenSea stats when the symbol is ETH and scope matches, and OpenSea's own site corroborates 59.69 live while CoinGecko's figure is undatable. Floors were not averaged and no sale price was substituted. - **Onchain cross-check**: scanned the full pinned window 26021221–26028367 (pin hash confirmed on flashbots and independently on publicnode) for ERC-721 Transfers at the Autoglyphs contract — zero logs, and an unfiltered tail re-read saw no events of any kind. Zero Transfers proves zero sales in the window (matching OpenSea's one_day sales = 0), so there were no receipts or Seaport/PunkBought events to decode. The recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats"}`, which starts with a guarded source prefix, and all attempts, timestamps, and onchain evidence are in `notes` with the open choices pinned under `definitions`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json) with the OpenSea floor of `59690000000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with **59690000000000000000 wei (59.69 ETH)**, provider checks, discrepancies, and onchain coverage. Validator printed `ok`. The file notes that an offchain listing floor cannot be reproduced from RPC alone.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and untracked; `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH)** — `panel` recipe, source `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats`. What I established: - **Collection scope.** CoinGecko id `autoglyphs` → `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782`, confirmed onchain at the closing block: `name()` = Autoglyphs, `symbol()` = 0xe298b5 (☵), `totalSupply()` = 512, owners 171. Dedicated contract, so no project/token-id filter needed. CoinGecko `market_cap_rank` 3 matches the pinned ranking. - **Both providers attempted.** CoinGecko `/api/v3/nfts/autoglyphs` → HTTP 200, `floor_price.native_currency` = 87 ETH, no `last_updated` field. OpenSea `/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats` → HTTP 200 without a key, `total.floor_price` = 59.69, symbol ETH, `last-modified` 20:54:31Z (fresh). OpenSea's collection-metadata, best-listings and contract-nfts endpoints all returned **401 Missing an API Key** — no key available to this seat, so per-listing enumeration and the events feed were unreadable. The slug was verified rather than assumed: `opensea.io/collection/autoglyphs` embeds the same contract and shows the same 59.69 ETH. - **Discrepancy.** CoinGecko 87 ETH is +45.75% over OpenSea's 59.69. Same contract, same denomination, so it is a refresh difference, not scope — the collection has zero sales in 30 days, and CoinGecko publishes no timestamp to prove its figure current. `floorRule` prefers OpenSea here, and two independent OpenSea surfaces agree. - **Onchain cross-check: no sales in the window.** The scan over exactly 26021221–26028367 (pin confirmed, chainId 1) returned 0 Transfer logs, and 0 logs of *any* topic from the contract. That is not a wrong-signature zero — the runtime bytecode carries the standard `Transfer` and `Approval` topic constants — so no marketplace sale can exist there and there were no receipts to decode. A 100k-block control scan also returned 0, consistent with OpenSea's 30-day zero. Window boundaries and the pinned hash were re-checked on a second operator (publicnode): exactly 24 h, 2026-09-20T20:48:59Z → 2026-09-21T20:48:59Z. One caveat worth flagging: the floor rests on the OpenSea aggregate, since the 401s blocked reading the individual 59.69 ETH ask (maker, token id, expiry). Nothing was substituted from sales, and no zero sentinel was used.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 59.69 ETH, which is `59690000000000000000` wei. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Floor source:** the OpenSea v2 stats endpoint for slug `autoglyphs` returned `total.floor_price` of 59.69 ETH. I fetched it without a key during this run, and it supplied no source timestamp. That endpoint is the `recipe.source` URL, in a `panel` recipe. - **Rule applied:** the request says to prefer OpenSea's floor when the symbol is ETH and the scope matches, so I used it. - **CoinGecko check:** the `autoglyphs` NFT endpoint returned a floor of 87 ETH and contract `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782`, with no `last_updated` field. That is about 45.8% away from OpenSea's figure. Its 24-hour floor change of exactly 0.0 suggests the figure is stale, but that is my inference, and I noted it as a likely explanation, not a confirmed one. - **Sales cross-check not done:** I did not pull any onchain sales. Both providers report zero 24-hour volume, so I found no sales to decode and skipped the receipt check. That limitation is stated in the notes. - **Contract not verified onchain:** I took the contract address from CoinGecko without confirming it on chain. The listing floor itself has no independent onchain verification. I first mis-ordered the `window` keys, so the check failed until I fixed them.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of 59690000000000000000 wei (59.69 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Floor source:** OpenSea v2 stats at `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats` returned HTTP 200 with no key. It gave `total.floor_price` of 59.69 ETH at 2026-09-21T20:55:50Z. Neither provider supplied a last-updated time. The recipe is `panel` with that URL as its source. - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/autoglyphs` also returned 200. It confirms the contract `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782` on Ethereum, but its floor is 87.0 ETH. That is about 45.8% above OpenSea's. CoinGecko's own 24-hour floor change reads 0.0%, so I suspect a stale or differently scoped figure. The request's floor rule prefers OpenSea when its symbol is ETH, so I used it. - **Sales cross-check not done:** both providers report zero sales and zero volume over 24 hours, so there were no sales to match against receipts. I did not scan the chain for Seaport events or fetch any receipts, and the notes say so. - **OpenSea slug:** I used `autoglyphs` directly and it returned matching stats. I did not verify the slug through the contract's links. The earlier failure was a missing `artifacts` directory. I created it this time.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

Check passes. The answer is complete: Autoglyphs floor = 59.69 ETH (59690000000000000000 wei), sourced from OpenSea v2 collection stats (cross-verified against CoinGecko's higher 87 ETH figure and the OpenSea public page), with an onchain check confirming zero Transfer events for the contract in the pinned block window.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). It reports the selected OpenSea floor as `59690000000000000000` wei and includes both API checks, the provider discrepancy, contract verification, and pinned-window on-chain evidence. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Selected OpenSea’s fresh 59.69 ETH floor: `59690000000000000000` wei. The required validator reports `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat2/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH from OpenSea). It includes CoinGecko/OpenSea attempts, contract verification, and pinned-window on-chain sale coverage. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). It reports the selected OpenSea floor as `59690000000000000000` wei and includes provider attempts, timestamps, discrepancy, contract scope, and pinned-window on-chain evidence. Local validator result: `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd-729\work\5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582\c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH from OpenSea stats). Validation passed: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json) with OpenSea’s selected 59.69 ETH floor: `59690000000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). It selects the fresh OpenSea stats floor: `59690000000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH, OpenSea stats). Local validator passes: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH, OpenSea stats). It includes both API attempts, discrepancy details, contract/window checks, and sales-coverage limitations. Local validator result: `ok`.

Taylor, done. `artifacts/answer.json` passes check-answer.mjs (`ok`). Summary: Autoglyphs floor = **59.69 ETH = 59,690,000,000,000,000,000 wei**, sourced from OpenSea v2 collection stats (`total.floor_price`, scope-verified against contract `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782`). CoinGecko's NFT API also succeeded but returned 87.0 ETH (45.75% higher, likely stale — its 24h floor-change was 0%); per the request's `floorRule`, OpenSea wins on a symbol/scope match. Onchain: scanned the pinned block range (26021221–26028367, hash-pinned and confirmed) for Autoglyphs Transfer events — zero logs emitted, matching OpenSea's own 0-sales/0-volume for that window, so no last-sale was available or substituted. OpenSea's sale-events API returned 401 (no key) — reported as a failure rather than skipped.

Checker prints `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the panel recipe citing the OpenSea live-listing URL, floor = 59093100000000000000 wei, both CoinGecko and OpenSea attempts documented, and the onchain scan (0 transfers/sales in the pinned window) recorded as corroborating evidence.

Check passes with `ok`. Summary: `artifacts/answer.json` reports the Autoglyphs floor as **59.69 ETH = 59690000000000000000 wei**, sourced from OpenSea's `/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats` (preferred per the request's floorRule over CoinGecko's 87.0 ETH figure, a ~31% discrepancy explained in notes). On-chain cross-check via `scan.mjs` over the pinned block window found zero Transfer events on the Autoglyphs contract, confirming no sales occurred in that window to substitute for the listing floor.

Check passed. Summary: - **Floor:** 59.69 ETH → **59,690,000,000,000,000,000 wei**, sourced from OpenSea v2 `collections/autoglyphs/stats` (`total.floor_price`, symbol ETH), preferred per the request's `floorRule` since it succeeded with a matching ETH-denominated, scope-matched result. - **Contract verified:** `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782` via CoinGecko NFT API (also returned floor 87.0 ETH — a >1% discrepancy explained in notes as likely CoinGecko cache staleness vs. OpenSea's live listing feed). - **Onchain cross-check:** scanned `Transfer` logs on the contract over the pinned window (26021221–26028367) via `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, pin confirmed — zero transfers/sales occurred in-window, so no sale could be cross-checked (reported as a limitation, not substituted for the floor). - `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/5b29f054-c58f-4913-b071-373181418582/c4bcdd49-73f6-4679-8b7a-b6ae327ee105/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `59690000000000000000` wei. Validator output: `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 59.69 ETH, which is `59690000000000000000` wei. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The recipe is `panel` with source `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats`. - **OpenSea:** the stats endpoint returned 200 without a key, with `total.floor_price` 59.69 in ETH. It supplied no `last_updated`. The floor rule prefers this source when the symbol is ETH and the collection matches, so I used it. - **CoinGecko:** the first call returned 200 with floor 87.0 ETH on the Autoglyphs contract `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782`. A repeat call a few minutes later failed with "Missing an API Key". - **Discrepancy:** CoinGecko is about 45.8% above OpenSea. I suspect CoinGecko's figure is stale, but I didn't confirm that, and the notes only say "likely stale". The two floors are not averaged. - **Sales cross-check not done:** I did not scan on-chain receipts or Seaport sale events for the pinned window. Both providers report zero 24-hour sales, so I found no sales to cross-check, and the notes state this limitation. - **Open OpenSea checks:** the collection slug is `autoglyphs`; I did not verify it from the contract's collection links, and I did not check the slug or contract on OpenSea beyond the stats response.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 59.69 ETH, which is `59690000000000000000` wei. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Floor source:** I used OpenSea's collection stats, `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats`. It returned HTTP 200 without a key at 2026-09-21T20:53Z and reported the floor in ETH. It supplied no last-updated time. - **Slug not confirmed:** OpenSea's collection metadata endpoint needs an API key, so I could not confirm the slug `autoglyphs` from there. The stats look consistent with CoinGecko's Autoglyphs entry, since both show 171 owners. - **CoinGecko disagrees:** CoinGecko's NFT endpoint returned HTTP 200 with a floor of 87.0 ETH, about 46% above OpenSea's figure. I could not reconcile the gap. CoinGecko's 24-hour floor change is exactly 0.0 in ETH, which suggests a carried-forward value, so I followed the request's rule to prefer OpenSea. - **Contract:** CoinGecko lists Autoglyphs at `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782` on Ethereum, a dedicated contract with no token-id filter. - **Sales:** OpenSea shows 0 sales over one, seven and thirty days. A scan of that contract's Transfer logs over blocks 26021221–26028367 found none. I ran it on `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast` and confirmed the closing block hash matched the pin. There were no sales to decode. - **Recipe:** it is a `panel` recipe with the OpenSea stats URL as its source. I did not use the publicnode RPC, because it refused the log requests with a 403 archive error. All of this is written up in `notes`.

Failed to authenticate: OAuth session expired and could not be refreshed

FAILURE: runtime_error

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 59.69 ETH, which is `59690000000000000000` wei. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` on it. - **OpenSea (selected):** `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats` returned HTTP 200 without a key on 2026-09-21 at about 20:53 UTC. `total.floor_price` is 59.69 ETH, and it reports 0 sales in the last day. It supplies no `last_updated` time. The recipe is `panel` with this URL as its source. - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/autoglyphs` also returned 200. It confirms the Ethereum contract `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782`. Its floor is 87 ETH, about 46% above OpenSea's. I didn't check its `last_updated`, so I can't say why they differ. Following the request's floor rule, I used OpenSea and did not average the two. - **Sales cross-check not done:** I did not pull any Seaport receipts or decode sale events in the pinned blocks. Both providers report no sales in 24 hours, and the notes say so. I used no RPC endpoint.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 59.69 ETH, which is `59690000000000000000` wei. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Per your floor rule I used OpenSea's floor over CoinGecko's. - **OpenSea:** `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats` returned 200 without a key at 2026-09-21T20:53Z. It gave `total.floor_price` = 59.69 ETH, with no source timestamp. - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/autoglyphs` also returned 200. It shows a floor of 87 ETH, a rank of 3, and contract `0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782` on Ethereum. - **Discrepancy:** CoinGecko's figure is about 45.8% above OpenSea's, and I did not investigate the cause. I guessed in the notes that CoinGecko's floor is stale or comes from a marketplace missing the cheapest listing. The floor is not an average of the two. - **Slug not verified:** OpenSea's collection metadata endpoint asked for an API key, so I could not confirm the `autoglyphs` slug against the contract through OpenSea. The contract address comes from CoinGecko. - **Sales cross-check:** none done. OpenSea shows 0 sales over one, seven and thirty days, and CoinGecko's 24-hour volume is 0. I found no sales in the pinned window, so there were no receipts to decode. I ran no RPC scan. The recipe is a `panel` recipe with the OpenSea stats URL as its source. These details are in the answer's `notes` field.

unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3ebf5b198c8abdd-ICN, request id: req_3929ef73ba734150a4857073d3fb07d7

FAILURE: runtime_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error