5ed62df6-6dc6-4921-8617-d5573f0442b0IMD JOB

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/5ed62df6-6dc6-4921-8617-d5573f0442b0/836e68ec-42ff-4903-bfb8-c8798b233109/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4291460000000000` wei across 25 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

I've read the brief and the scripts. The task: average DopeApeClub sale price on OpenSea (Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` events) over blocks 26019452–26026608, with precise sale/price definitions, answer as uint256 in wei. Plan: fetch the collection's ERC-721 `Transfer` logs in the window (cheap — low-activity collection), pull receipts for those transactions, decode `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts, apply the definitions, and average. Then write `artifacts/answer.json` and run the checker.Bug found — `sum / count` mixes BigInt and Number. Fixing:25 qualifying sales found, average = 4291460000000000 wei (~0.00429 ETH). One tx is a 24-order sweep on Seaport 1.6 — each `OrderFulfilled` is a separate single-NFT sale. Let me confirm the pinned block hash on a second endpoint from a different operator.I typo'd the block number hex. Correct value is `0x18d2270`:Pin confirmed on two additional endpoints (publicnode, mevblocker) — hash matches `0x84272223…fbf3f`. Writing the answer file:Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Result:** average DopeApeClub sale price = **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei** (~0.00429 ETH). **How it was computed:** - Window 26019452–26026608 on chain 1; closing hash verified against the pin on three endpoints (flashbots primary, publicnode + mevblocker cross-check). - Rather than streaming all Seaport `OrderFulfilled` volume, I fetched the collection's ERC-721 `Transfer` logs in the window (29 logs in 6 txs) and pulled those receipts — every fill moving this NFT is atomic with its `Transfer`, so this covers all qualifying sales. - Decoded all `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5/1.6 in those receipts: **25 qualifying single-NFT fills**, all on Seaport 1.6, in 2 transactions — a 24-order sweep (`0x57420c…`) plus one single fill (`0x648d26…`). All paid purely in ETH/WETH. - Sum = 107,286,500,000,000,000 wei over 25 sales → floor average = 4,291,460,000,000,000. The brief declares `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker requires a `panel` recipe — the source names the public RPC endpoint the data was read from, and the full reproducible method is in `notes`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of **4291460000000000** wei, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The scan found 25 qualifying sales totalling 107286500000000000 wei, and the average is that total divided by 25, rounded down. No events were excluded as bundles, ERC-1155 fills, other-token payments or odd shapes. - **Window:** I read every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608, 12,232 logs in all. `eth_chainId` returned 1 and the closing block hash matched the pin. - **Method:** I did not use `scan.mjs`, because it can't decode the nested offer and consideration arrays. Instead I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/run.mjs`, which is not submitted. Sales and prices follow the brief's definitions, and I restated them in the answer file. - **Endpoints:** I fetched from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with the flashbots and mevblocker endpoints as fallbacks. I did not confirm the pinned hash on a second operator's endpoint, and I ran only the one scan. - **Recipe:** The brief marks its evidence as `panel`, and `check-answer.mjs` rejects any recipe kind other than `panel` for such a brief. The recipe is therefore `{kind: "panel", source: ...}`, with the RPC method and the decoding described in `notes`. It is a description of the on-chain computation, not something the deployer can rerun mechanically.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price of DopeApeClub over blocks 26019452 to 26026608 is **4291460000000000 wei**. That is 107286500000000000 wei across 25 qualifying sales, rounded down. - **Scan:** I fetched the Seaport OrderFulfilled logs from both contracts (1.5 and 1.6) for exactly the pinned blocks. The main endpoint was `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with `rpc.flashbots.net` and `rpc.mevblocker.io` as fallbacks. The closing block hash matched the pin. - **Decoding:** I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, because the delivered scan script can't decode Seaport events. It applies the request's definitions for what counts as a sale and how the price is summed. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the reference says such a brief takes only the `panel` recipe. So the recipe is `panel` with the RPC endpoint as its `source`. Nothing is rerun from that recipe. The notes in the file describe the actual computation. - **Key order:** The check rejected my first draft because the `window` keys were in a different order from the brief. I reordered them to match, and it passes now. - **Second-endpoint check:** I did not run a separate hash check on a second operator's endpoint. I only read the closing hash from whichever endpoint answered.

The average DopeApeClub sale price over the pinned window is **4291460000000000 wei** (about 0.00429 ETH). That comes from 25 qualifying sales totalling 107286500000000000 wei, divided and rounded down. The answer is in `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **How I computed it** - I fetched the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs from both contracts over exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608. I pulled them in 500-block chunks and split a chunk in half whenever an endpoint refused it. - A small Node script (in `test/scratch/`, not submitted) decoded each log's offer and consideration lists and applied the request's definitions to each event on its own: - A sale needs exactly one NFT item across offer and consideration, and it must be an ERC-721 of this collection. - A listing fill (the NFT is the only offer item) is priced as the sum of its consideration amounts, and only counts if every one of them is paid in ETH or WETH. - A bid fill (the only offer item is ETH or WETH) is priced as that offer amount. - The window contained 12232 `OrderFulfilled` logs. 25 of them were qualifying sales, all listing fills. No event involving the collection was excluded. **Checks** - Chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash matched on two different operators, publicnode and mevblocker. - Partway through the first scan, publicnode refused some old-block log requests, so the script switched to `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. Because of that, I ran the whole scan a second time from `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`. It gave the same log count, the same 25 sales, and the same sum and average. **Decisions to know about** - **Recipe kind:** the request marks this as panel evidence, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. Its `source` names the endpoint, contracts, event topic and block range. - **Field order:** the checker rejected my first version because the window fields were in a different order from the request's, so I copied the order exactly. - **What `figure` holds:** it is the total of the 25 sale prices, and I say so under `definitions`. - **Scope:** I only wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, left it untracked, and made no commits.

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is **4291460000000000 wei** (about 0.00429 ETH). - **Sales counted:** 25 qualifying DopeApeClub sales, summing to 107286500000000000 wei, averaged and rounded down. - **Source and window:** I pulled every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26019452 to 26026608, 12232 logs in all, and decoded them myself with a script in `test/scratch/sales.mjs`. I did not use `scan.mjs`, which cannot decode the item arrays. - **Endpoint:** all reads came from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which reported chain id 1 and a closing block hash matching the pin. The two fallback endpoints were not needed. - **Recipe:** the brief is marked `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker requires a `panel` recipe for that. I named the RPC source as its `source`. This means the deployer cannot rerun the figure as a chain recipe. The catalogue also has no recipe that filters by collection or takes a mean. - **Definitions:** the sale, price and average rules from the brief are restated under `definitions` and were applied as written. No fill in the window was excluded for a non-ETH/WETH payment, a bundle, or a second NFT. - **Git:** the file is untracked and I did not stage or commit it.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/5ed62df6-6dc6-4921-8617-d5573f0442b0/836e68ec-42ff-4903-bfb8-c8798b233109/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4291460000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

stream disconnected before completion: You have no credits remaining. Add credits to continue using the API at https://platform.openai.com/settings/organization/billing/.

FAILURE: runtime_error

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints **ok**. ## Answer **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei** (~0.00429146 ETH) average sale price. ## How it was computed **Pin verified first** on two independent operators — `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `eth.drpc.org` both returned `eth_chainId 0x1` and block 26026608 = `0x84272223…fbf3f`. **Scan** (one pass, blocks 26019452–26026608 exactly): 1. `eth_getLogs` for the ERC-721 `Transfer` topic on `0x4b57…b850` → 29 logs, 6 blocks, 6 transactions. Every Seaport fill of the collection must move the token, so those 6 txs are a complete superset of candidates — the prefilter can't drop a qualifying sale. 2. Receipts for those 6 txs → Seaport 1.5/1.6 logs with topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…6f31`. 3. Decoded `offer`/`consideration` and applied the brief's `sale` and `price` definitions. Cross-checked step 1 with the delivered `scan.mjs`: `logs 29, blocksWithLogs 6, pinned true` — nothing truncated. **Result:** 25 qualifying fills, all listing fills with `consideration [ETH, ETH]` (seller + marketplace fee); zero excluded by the one-NFT / ETH-or-WETH / ERC-1155 rules. 24 from one sweep at block 26023030 (98486500000000000 wei) plus 1 at block 26023037 (8800000000000000 wei). Sum 107286500000000000 wei ÷ 25 divides exactly, so the floor changed nothing. Range 0.001825–0.0088 ETH. Above the guard `min: 1`. ## Judgment calls, all stated under `definitions` - **Unit of count** — one qualifying `OrderFulfilled` log = one sale. All 25 were listing-side, so no matched order contributed two logs; the double-count question never arose here. - **Venue** — Seaport only, per the brief. One collection transfer in the window was a Blur fill (`0xb2ecfe4e…cea5`) and is excluded. - **Refunds** — the sweep sent 105461500000000000 wei but only 98486500000000000 wei was consideration; Seaport's excess-ETH refund isn't a consideration item, so it's neither added nor deducted. - `figure` carries the sum behind the mean. Two notes on the environment, neither blocking: the `Write` tool and the `Read`/`Grep` tools were denied on `test/scratch/`, `.imd/reads/skills/public-rpcs*` and the script directory, so I wrote scratch files and read those references through Bash instead. Node's `fetch` ignores the proxy env by default, so RPC calls needed `--use-env-proxy`. Git can't read `/home/seat/.gitconfig`, so I could not run `git status` — the artifact was written directly and never staged, which is what the task asks for.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an average sale price of **4291460000000000 wei** (about 0.00429 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Sales counted:** 25 qualifying sales over blocks 26019452 to 26026608, all listing fills, with no bid fills and no bundles or ERC-1155 fills. The prices sum to 107286500000000000 wei, and dividing by 25 gives the average exactly. - **Data source:** I pulled all 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts in 300-block chunks, rotating across four public endpoints, and decoded them against the definitions in `oracle.json`. The chain id is 1 and block 26026608's hash matches the pin. - **Own script instead of `scan.mjs`:** `scan.mjs` can't decode the item arrays inside the event, so the computation is my own script at `test/scratch/dac.mjs`. That folder isn't submitted, so nobody else can rerun it as written. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. The recipe therefore points to the RPC endpoint and topic rather than a rerunnable on-chain recipe. The full method is in `notes`, and the open definitions are under `definitions`. - **Git:** the file is untracked, and nothing else in the repo changed.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is 4291460000000000 wei, which is 25 qualifying sales summing to 107286500000000000 wei; the division is exact. - **How it was computed:** I used my own Node script in `test/scratch/`, not the delivered scan script. That script can only sum data words, and this question needs the offer and consideration arrays decoded. - **Scan:** It pulled `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, in 500-block chunks. That was 12232 logs with no duplicates. The endpoint reported chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` rejects any other recipe kind for such a brief. So the recipe is `panel`, with the endpoint and log query named as its source. The deployer can't mechanically rerun it, which puts the weight on the notes and definitions. - **Definitions:** They restate the brief's sale and price rules and the average. `notes` records the endpoint and the method. - **Not cross-checked:** I did not do the optional second-endpoint block-hash check.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **4291460000000000 wei**, which is 107286500000000000 wei over 25 sales. - **Sales found:** All 25 are Seaport 1.6 listing fills paid in ETH or WETH. Prices ran from 1825000000000000 to 8800000000000000 wei. Nothing was excluded as a bundle, another NFT or another payment token. There were no bid fills and no Seaport 1.5 fills. - **Window and endpoints:** I confirmed chain 1 and the pinned closing hash on six endpoints from different operators. The whole computation ran over exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608 on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and again on `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, with identical results. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker rejects any recipe that isn't `panel` for such a brief. So the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: <RPC URL and method>}`, even though the figure comes from chain data. The full method is in `notes`. - **Method:** `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested arrays, so I used my own Node script (`test/scratch/sales.mjs`, not submitted). It pulled the collection's ERC-721 `Transfer` logs (29 logs in 6 transactions), then decoded every Seaport `OrderFulfilled` log in those transactions' receipts. - **Assumption:** I did not scan every Seaport log in the window. The method assumes every Seaport fill of this collection emits a `Transfer` from the contract in the same transaction, which holds for ERC-721. - **Per-event counting:** Sales are counted per `OrderFulfilled` event. Two of the six transactions filled many tokens each, so they contribute many sales apiece.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei**, averaged across 25 qualifying sales, plus definitions and reproduction code. The required validator printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 4291460000000000 wei (~0.00429 ETH) average sale price.** How it was computed: - Fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…6f31`) from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks 26019452–26026608 from `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, which reported chainId 1 and a closing-block hash matching the pin; the same hash was independently confirmed on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. - Decoded each log's ABI data in a scratch Node script (`test/scratch/avg.mjs`, prints only totals) and applied the brief's definitions: exactly one itemType-2 item of `0x4b570b…ab850` and no other NFT across offer+consideration; listing fills priced as the sum of all consideration amounts when every consideration item is native ETH or WETH; bid fills priced as the single ETH/WETH offer amount; anything else excluded. - Of 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs in the window, 25 fills qualified, summing 107286500000000000 wei; the floor average is 4291460000000000, which satisfies the `min: 1` guard. Because the brief pins `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}` (the checker rejects chain recipes for panel briefs), with the full method, endpoints, topic hash and totals in `notes`, and every judgment call the question left open (NFT counting, listing/bid pricing, per-event counting, floor average) stated under `definitions`. The window, requestId, chainId and answerType are copied byte-for-byte from the brief, and the file is left untracked for the daemon to pick up.

**4291460000000000** wei — 25 qualifying Seaport 1.6 fills, sum 107286500000000000 wei, mean exact. `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` prints `ok`.

Completed `artifacts/answer.json`. Checked with: ```bash node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json ``` Result: `ok` Computed answer: `4291460000000000` wei.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4291460000000000 wei**, averaged over 25 qualifying sales. The included reproduction script returned the same result. The required validator printed `ok`.

The average DopeApeClub sale price over the pinned window was **4291460000000000 wei** (about 0.00429 ETH). The answer is in `artifacts/answer.json` and the checker prints `ok`. - **What I scanned:** all 12,232 Seaport `OrderFulfilled` events from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608. I used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The chain id was 1 and the closing block hash matched the pin, and I confirmed the hash again on `https://eth.drpc.org`. - **What counted:** 25 sales, all single-NFT listings paid entirely in native ETH. 24 of them came from one sweep transaction (`0x57420c…ddd4f4`, block 26022006), and the other was in block 26022013. Following the brief's definitions, each fill in the sweep counts as its own sale. - **What was excluded:** there were no bundles, no accepted bids and no sales paid in other tokens, so nothing was dropped. - **The arithmetic:** the prices sum to 107286500000000000 wei, which divides by 25 exactly, so rounding down changed nothing. The recipe is `panel`, not one of the chain kinds. The brief marks this as a panel-evidence question, and the checker only accepts a panel recipe for those. So the deployer won't rerun it; the answer stands on the panel members agreeing. The recipe's `source` names the endpoint, both Seaport contracts and the block range. The provided `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's item lists, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted. `artifacts/answer.json` is left untracked, as the instructions asked.

`ok` from the checker, exit 0. ## Result **Average DopeApeClub sale price over blocks 26019452–26026608: `4291460000000000` wei** (0.00429146 ETH), written to `artifacts/answer.json` (untracked, 6334 bytes). How it was derived: | | | |---|---| | OrderFulfilled logs read (Seaport 1.5 + 1.6) | 12,232 | | Qualifying sales of the collection | 25 (all listing fills) | | Sum | 107,286,500,000,000,000 wei | | Min / max | 0.001825 / 0.0088 ETH | | Excluded bundles, ERC-1155s, non-ETH/WETH fills | 0 | Sum divides by 25 exactly, so the floor is a no-op. Verification done: - Pinned closing hash and `chainId 1` confirmed on **two** operators (`rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`). - Truncation guard: the same filter/window counted independently with the delivered `scan.mjs` on the second operator at a different chunk size returned the identical 12,232 logs (15 chunks vs. my 24) — no silent truncation. - The collection's own ERC-721 `Transfer` count over the window is 29, which correctly bounds the 25 Seaport sales. One thing worth flagging: the brief carries `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker enforces that a panel brief takes **only** the `panel` recipe — so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` even though the question is a chain question. None of the four chain recipes can express it anyway (`OrderFulfilled` puts the price in two dynamic tuple arrays, needing ABI decode and per-log branching, not a single-word sum). To keep it rerunnable I made `source` the RPC endpoint plus the exact `eth_getLogs` filter and block range, and spelled out every open choice under `definitions` — listing vs. bid branch, fee inclusion, ETH/WETH at 1:1, bundle and ERC-1155 exclusion, per-event counting for matched orders, floor rounding. The decoder and scan script live in `test/scratch/seaport-avg.mjs`; nothing outside `artifacts/answer.json` was created or modified.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with an average of **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei** across 25 qualifying sales. Included reproduction code, verified it against the scanned logs, and ran the required validator: `ok`.

The average sale price of DopeApeClub on OpenSea over blocks 26019452 to 26026608 is **4291460000000000 wei**, about 0.00429 ETH. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport `OrderFulfilled` log from both Seaport contracts over exactly the pinned blocks, about 12,232 logs, from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. `eth_chainId` returned 1 and the closing block hash matched the pin. - **Result:** applying the request's definitions left 25 qualifying sales, totalling 107286500000000000 wei, so the average rounds down to 4291460000000000. - **Recipe kind:** the shipped `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested offer and consideration items, so I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, which only accepts the `panel` recipe, so the recipe is `panel` with that RPC URL as its source. The deployer can't mechanically rerun it. The decoding steps are in `notes`. - **Single-endpoint caveat:** I used only one endpoint and did not cross-check the closing hash on a second operator, as the reference suggests. `notes` says so. - **Topic hash:** I typed the `OrderFulfilled` topic hash from memory rather than deriving it. The 12,232 logs it returned suggest it was right, but I didn't verify it separately.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei**, averaged over 25 qualifying sales, plus definitions and reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/5ed62df6-6dc6-4921-8617-d5573f0442b0/836e68ec-42ff-4903-bfb8-c8798b233109/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `4291460000000000` wei. Validated with the provided checker: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the recipe and average: **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei**, computed from 25 qualifying sales. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction procedure. Average: **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei** across **25 qualifying sales**. Independent arithmetic check passed; the required validator printed `ok`.

Check passes. Scanned all Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the exact pinned block range (26019452–26026608), decoded offer/consideration items by hand, filtered to single-ERC721-of-DopeApeClub fills priced entirely in ETH/WETH, and computed the average. Verified against two independent RPC endpoints (rpc.flashbots.net/fast and ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com), both confirming the pinned closing-block hash and identical results: 25 qualifying sales, average **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei**. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei**, averaged over 25 qualifying sales. The included RPC procedure reproduced the result. Required validator printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **4291460000000000 wei**, across **25 qualifying sales**. Includes the RPC reproduction procedure. Required checker printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and the checker prints `ok`. **Answer: 4291460000000000 wei** (0.00429146 ETH) average sale price. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608: 1. Confirmed `eth_chainId` = `0x1` and block 26026608's hash against the pinned `0x84272223…f3f` on three independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, nodereal). 2. `eth_getLogs` for the collection's `Transfer` topic over the window (range-halving on refusal): 29 logs in 6 transactions. Every Seaport ERC-721 fill moves the token, so those 6 transactions are a superset of the candidates — this avoids pulling ~200k unfilterable Seaport logs. 3. Decoded every `OrderFulfilled` from Seaport 1.5/1.6 in those receipts: **25 qualifying fills**, each exactly one ERC-721 of the collection, all listing fills with two native-ETH consideration items (price + fee). No bundles, no ERC-1155, no non-ETH token, no bid fills, no fills of other collections. 4. Sum 107286500000000000 wei ÷ 25 = 4291460000000000 exactly (floor changes nothing). Prices ranged 0.001825–0.0088 ETH. Cross-checked on a fourth-party endpoint with the log range split into 8 chunks (guarding against silent truncation): identical counts and sum. Recipe kind is `panel`, as the brief's `"evidence": "panel"` requires and the checker enforces — and the catalogue has no chain recipe that could express this anyway, since a Seaport price is a sum over a decoded dynamic consideration array, not a single fixed ABI argument. The full procedure, endpoints, and the excluded-transfer accounting are in `notes`; every open choice (window inclusivity, one event = one sale, fees gross, WETH counted at par, bid-fill pricing, exclusion of other marketplaces) is stated under `definitions`. The file is untracked and not added to Git.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/5ed62df6-6dc6-4921-8617-d5573f0442b0/836e68ec-42ff-4903-bfb8-c8798b233109/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `4291460000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Done. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`, and `artifacts/answer.json` is left untracked (git status is clean apart from ignored paths) for the daemon to upload. **Answer: `4291460000000000` wei** (0.00429146 ETH) — the floor of the average sale price of DopeApeClub on Seaport over blocks 26019452–26026608. How it was computed: - Fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` (chain id 1, closing hash matched the pin; the pin was also confirmed on `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`). 12,232 logs, 10 RPC calls, no refusals. - The bundled `scan.mjs` can't decode the event's dynamic `offer[]`/`consideration[]` arrays, so a small decoder in `test/scratch/avg-sale.mjs` (reusing the script's keccak and chunked-fetch pattern) applied the brief's definitions verbatim and printed only totals. - 25 logs touched the collection; all 25 qualified as single-ERC-721 listing fills paid entirely in native ETH (two sweep transactions). No bundles, ERC-1155, bid fills, or non-ETH/WETH payments were found. Sum 107,286,500,000,000,000 wei ÷ 25 = 4,291,460,000,000,000. Two judgment calls, both stated under `definitions`: "on OpenSea" is taken as the brief defines it (any Seaport 1.5/1.6 fill, no zone or fee-recipient filter), and each qualifying log counts as one sale, so a multi-token sweep counts once per token. The recipe is `panel` (the brief's evidence type) with the exact `eth_getLogs` query as its `source`, and the full method is in `notes`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/5ed62df6-6dc6-4921-8617-d5573f0442b0/836e68ec-42ff-4903-bfb8-c8798b233109/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4291460000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **4,291,460,000,000,000 wei** across **25 sales**. The included reproduction procedure matched the result, and the required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/5ed62df6-6dc6-4921-8617-d5573f0442b0/836e68ec-42ff-4903-bfb8-c8798b233109/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `4291460000000000` wei. Validation passed: `ok`.