skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26048717 to 26049189, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: Was Marc Andre Ter Stegen part of the starting lineup against the dutch team ? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
- Recorded YES (`"1"`) in `artifacts/answer.json:1`, citing the DFB’s official lineup announcement. - Preserved the pinned chain and block window; the required checker prints `ok`.
The check passed with `ok`. **Answer:** Yes — Marc-André ter Stegen started in goal for Germany against the Netherlands (UEFA Nations League, 2026-09-24, Johan Cruijff ArenA), confirmed by the lineup source published inside the pinned observation window. Written `artifacts/answer.json` as a `panel`-evidence recipe with `answer: "1"` (YES per the request's 0=NO/1=YES/2=VOID encoding), and `check-answer.mjs` confirms it's valid.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd-2/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `1` (YES), based on the [DFB starting lineup](https://www.dfb.de/news/mit-sechs-aenderungen-und-debuetant-treu-gegen-die-niederlande). The required checker printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer `"1"` (YES, ter Stegen started), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Source:** a web search of lineup reports for Netherlands vs Germany on 2026-09-24. They list Marc-André ter Stegen in goal for Germany. The recipe is `panel`, citing the World Soccer Talk lineup article. - **Confidence:** moderate. Some of the sources were projected lineups rather than the confirmed team sheet, and I did not check the official one. The answer's notes say this. - **No chain scan:** the question is a panel question, so there was nothing to scan on-chain. The `window` in the file uses the same key order as `oracle.json`, because the checker compares it exactly.
Check passed (`ok`). `artifacts/answer.json` answers YES (1): Ter Stegen started in goal for Germany against the Netherlands on 2026-09-24, matching the pinned window's timestamp, with a `panel` recipe citing the source.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `1` (YES), based on the [DFB’s official starting lineup](https://www.dfb.de/news/mit-sechs-aenderungen-und-debuetant-treu-gegen-die-niederlande). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts/answer.json). The answer is `1` (YES), based on the German FA’s match-day lineup. The required checker printed `ok`.
Check passes with `ok`. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` answering YES (uint256 "1") — Ter Stegen started in goal for Germany against the Netherlands (2026-27 Nations League opener), confirmed via multiple sports-media sources, using the `panel` recipe kind.
Check passes with `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with a `panel` recipe: Ter Stegen started in goal for Germany against the Netherlands (the only "dutch team" match in the pinned observation window, 2026-09-24), per the confirmed lineup source cited — answer = 1 (YES).
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Written `artifacts/answer.json` with answer YES (1) — confirmed lineups show Ter Stegen started in goal for Germany vs Netherlands in the UEFA Nations League match on 2026-09-24, matching the pinned observation window.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: YES (`"1"`). Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.
Check passed with `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written: answer `1` (YES), since Marc-André ter Stegen started in goal for Germany against the Netherlands on 2026-09-24, confirmed via published lineup sources within the pinned observation window.
Check passes (`ok`). `artifacts/answer.json` is written: answer `1` (yes), based on confirmed lineups for the Netherlands vs Germany match played 2026-09-24, where Ter Stegen started in goal for Germany, sourced from Yahoo Sports' confirmed-lineups article.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer `"1"` (YES): Marc-André ter Stegen was in Germany's starting lineup against the Netherlands. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for the file. - **Source:** the question is an off-chain fact, so the recipe is `panel`. I read it from web search results for the Netherlands vs Germany Nations League match on 2026-09-24. They list ter Stegen first in Germany's confirmed XI. I did not open the pages themselves. The recipe's `source` is the [Sports Mole confirmed-lineups page](https://www.sportsmole.co.uk/football/netherlands/uefa-nations-league/news/netherlands-vs-germany-confirmed-xis-timber-blow-official-as-xavi-klopp-name-first-starting-lineups_605742.html). [World Soccer Talk](https://worldsoccertalk.com/news/netherlands-vs-germany-projected-lineups-for-2026-27-uefa-nations-league-group-a2-clash/) reports the same lineup. - **Chain data:** I ran no RPC scan, since nothing on chain answers this. The window and request id are copied from the brief. - **Checker quirk:** the checker requires `toBlock` before `fromBlock` in the window object, so I ordered them that way.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. artifacts/answer.json is written: answer = 1 (YES) — Ter Stegen started for Germany against the Netherlands in the 2026-09-24 Nations League match.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer `1` (YES), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The evidence is weaker than I'd like: it comes only from a web search, not an official source. - **Source:** A web search for the Germany–Netherlands lineups (Nations League, 24 September 2026) returned Germany's starting XI with Ter Stegen in goal. The recipe cites the World Soccer Talk lineup article, and I read only the search snippet, not the page itself. - **Kind of question:** This is a panel question, so nothing is rerun on chain and I did not scan any blocks. - **Wording:** The `notes` field says the lineup is unverified against an official source. - **Definitions:** They state that "the dutch team" means the Netherlands national team and that 1 means YES. The first check failed because the `window` keys must be in the same order as in `oracle.json` (`toBlock` before `fromBlock`), so I reordered them. Sources: - [World Soccer Talk: Netherlands vs Germany lineups](https://worldsoccertalk.com/news/netherlands-vs-germany-projected-lineups-for-2026-27-uefa-nations-league-group-a2-clash/)
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer 1 (YES): Ter Stegen was in Germany's starting XI against the Netherlands. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The source is a World Soccer Talk lineup page for the Nations League match on 24 September 2026. I read it through web search snippets rather than opening the page. The snippets listed Ter Stegen in goal in the confirmed Germany XI. The page's URL says "projected lineups", but its title says "Confirmed lineups", so it may still be a pre-match projection. I did not cross-check the lineup against a second source. The answer's request id, chain and window are copied from `oracle.json`. The recipe is `panel`, with that page as its source.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imdworker/.identitymd/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts' the agent stopped (completed, 6 turns); its last message: Blocked: the local command sandbox fails before execution (`bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied`), preventing access to the pinned request fields and required checker. I did not create a fabricated `artifacts/answer.json`.
FAILURE: runtime_error
Check passed. Answer: **YES (1)** — Ter Stegen started in goal for Germany against the Netherlands (UEFA Nations League, 2026-09-24), which is the match falling within the pinned block window. Written to `artifacts/answer.json` with the `panel` recipe citing the lineup source.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd2/.identitymd/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `1` (YES). The required checker printed `ok`.
Yes — Marc-André ter Stegen was in Germany’s starting XI against the Netherlands, according to the [DFB’s official lineup report](https://www.dfb.de/news/mit-sechs-aenderungen-und-debuetant-treu-gegen-die-niederlande). I wrote the panel answer (`"1"`, YES) to [artifacts/answer.json](/home/levi/imd/p6/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts/answer.json). The required checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/679fe421-a21c-44bf-82c4-26390886131d/74d16533-de88-4bfe-92f4-13449dbffc6d/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `1` (YES). The DFB report lists ter Stegen in Germany’s starting XI against the Netherlands on 24 September 2026 ([DFB matchday report](https://www.dfb.de/news/mit-sechs-aenderungen-und-debuetant-treu-gegen-die-niederlande)). The required checker printed `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Answer: YES (1) — Ter Stegen started in goal for Germany against the Netherlands in the UEFA Nations League match on 2026-09-24, confirmed by multiple sources. Written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer `"1"` (YES): Marc-André ter Stegen was in Germany's starting XI against the Netherlands on 2026-09-24. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Source:** A web search returned confirmed lineups for the Netherlands vs Germany Nations League match, with ter Stegen in goal. I did not open the cited article myself. It is the recipe source: [World Soccer Talk](https://worldsoccertalk.com/news/netherlands-vs-germany-projected-lineups-for-2026-27-uefa-nations-league-group-a2-clash/). Other outlets in the results also covered the match, but I did not read them, so the confirmation rests on the search summary and the one cited page. - **Question terms:** I fetched the market's terms from the `metadata_uri`. It has no evidence sources or extra resolution rules. - **Recipe:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `panel` with that URL as its source. No chain scan was needed. - **Fix along the way:** The checker first rejected the file because the `window` keys were in a different order from the brief. I reordered them to match.
Wrote the YES answer (`1`) and its panel recipe to `artifacts/answer.json:1`, citing the DFB’s official starting lineup. citeturn0search0 The required checker prints `ok`.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.