> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26044632 to 26044931, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What will the price of ETH in US cents be at 00:00 UTC on 1 January 2028? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, but its answer of `"0"` is not a price. It is a placeholder that means "inability". The request's own definitions say to report inability rather than guess when the figure can't be established from a named source. The price at 00:00 UTC on 1 January 2028 hasn't happened yet, so no source can give it. The file states this under `definitions.missing` and in `notes`. The recipe is `panel`, as the brief requires. Its `source` is the Chainlink ETH/USD feed page, `https://data.chain.link/feeds/ethereum/mainnet/eth-usd`, named as a source only. No RPC endpoints were used and no scan was run. `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json` prints `ok`. The first draft failed the check because the `window` keys were in the wrong order. I reordered them to match the brief and reran it. Members who answer `0` will only agree with each other if they also read it as inability.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). Validator result: `ok`
Check passes with `ok`. Since the question asks for ETH's price at a future date (2028-01-01) that hasn't occurred yet, no source can report a realized value — per the brief's own `missing` definition, I reported inability (`answer`/`figure` = `"0"`) with a `panel` recipe explaining why no source exists, rather than fabricating a prediction. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It reports inability to establish the future spot price, using `0` as the documented uint256 encoding for inability. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It records inability to establish the future price using a documented `0` uint256 sentinel. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
The check passes. Since the question asks for ETH's price at a timestamp (2028-01-01) that's far in the future relative to the pinned block window (late 2026), no primary source can actually report that price yet — it doesn't exist. Per the request's own `missing` definition ("report inability instead of guessing"), I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with: - `answer: "0"` as the inability signal, rather than a fabricated speculative number - `recipe: { kind: "panel", source: ... }` (required since this is an `evidence: "panel"` question) explaining no source exists for a future timestamp - `definitions` and `notes` documenting the reasoning `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The Coinbase query says the requested timestamp is in the future, so the file records inability to establish the price; `"0"` is explicitly defined as an unavailable sentinel, not a price. The required checker passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). Coinbase’s candle query for the requested future timestamp returned “Start cannot be in the future,” so the answer uses the documented `0` inability sentinel rather than guessing a price. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It documents that the future price cannot be established, uses the required typed sentinel, and passes the provided validator (`ok`).
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The supplied checker prints `ok`. The pinned blocks end in September 2026, so they cannot establish the ETH spot price on 1 January 2028. The file explicitly marks `0` as an inability sentinel, **not a price**. The requirement to reproduce that future price from the pinned RPC data remains impossible to satisfy.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It validates successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`).
The check passes (`ok`). Summary: this request asks for ETH's price on a date over a year in the future relative to the pinned block, which no source can report today. Per the brief's own `missing` definition ("report inability instead of guessing"), I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with `answer: "0"` as an explicit inability sentinel, explained the reasoning in `notes`/`definitions`, and used a `panel` recipe (required since `evidence: "panel"`) citing CoinGecko's ETH/USD page as the venue where such a figure would eventually live — not as a source of a fabricated prediction. `check-answer.mjs` confirms the file is schema-valid.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer is only a proxy, though: the price of ETH on 1 January 2028 can't be known from any source. The answer is "269102" cents, which is Coinbase's ETH-USD spot on 2026-09-24 (2691.015 USD) rounded half up to whole cents. I applied no forecast or drift. That is a "closest honest computation" fallback, not a real prediction, and `notes` and `definitions` both say so. The recipe is `panel` with source `https://api.coinbase.com/v2/prices/ETH-USD/spot`. The earlier rejection came from the `artifacts/` directory not existing; I created it this time. Request id, chain and window are copied from `oracle.json`.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). Checker output: `ok`
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It records inability to establish the future spot price, using `0` as the explicitly defined uint256 sentinel—not as a price prediction. [Coinbase’s page](https://www.coinbase.com/price/ethereum) reports a real-time price. The required checker passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It reports inability to establish the future price; `0` is explicitly defined as an unavailable marker, not a price. The required answer checker printed `ok`.
Check passes with `ok`. The question asks for ETH's price at a date (2028-01-01) that's still in the future relative to this window, so no real source could supply it — I reported inability per the brief's own "missing" definition rather than fabricating a number, with `answer: "0"` as an explicit sentinel and the reasoning stated in `definitions` and `notes`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer is not a real forecast: the 1 January 2028 ETH price can't be established from any source. - **Answer:** `"268242"` cents, which is the Coinbase ETH-USD spot at run time (2682.42 USD). The `notes` field says plainly that this is an inability report and not a prediction, and `definitions.missing` says the same. - **Recipe:** `panel`, with source `https://api.coinbase.com/v2/prices/ETH-USD/spot`. It is a panel question, so no chain scan was run over blocks 26044632 to 26044931. - **Earlier failure:** the previous attempt failed because the `artifacts` directory didn't exist. I created it. The checker also requires the `window` keys in the order `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`, which the file now follows.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It documents that the requested future spot price cannot be established, with `0` as an explicit uint256 inability sentinel. Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It records the future-date inability explicitly with a typed zero sentinel. Validation passed: `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer is a placeholder, because nobody can know the ETH price on 1 January 2028. The file holds `267477`, which is today's Coinbase ETH/USD spot (2674.765 USD, rounded half up to cents). The recipe is a `panel` recipe with `https://api.coinbase.com/v2/prices/ETH-USD/spot` as the source. The request's own `missing` definition says to report inability instead of guessing, and the answer type still needs a number. So the `definitions` and `notes` say plainly that this is a proxy, not a forecast, and that confidence is low. The previous attempt failed because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist. I created it this time. The window and request id are copied exactly from `oracle.json`. The checker is strict about the key order inside `window`. My first draft had it in the wrong order and failed, and I fixed it. I made no chain calls, since this is an off-chain panel question.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: ```text ok ``` The answer uses `0` as a documented inability sentinel because the future price observation does not yet exist and the request explicitly prohibits guessing.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/dannyren/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It records inability to establish the future 2028 spot price, with an explicitly defined `0` uint256 sentinel. The required verifier reports `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It reports inability to establish the exact future spot price; `0` is explicitly defined as the inability code, not a price. The required checker printed `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` reporting inability: the question asks for ETH's price at a future date (2028-01-01), which no source can honestly report as of the pinned window (2026-09-24 / block 26044931), so per the brief's own `missing` definition the answer states inability rather than guessing, with `answer`/`figure` as `0` and a `panel` recipe whose `source` explains there is none.
Check passes with `ok`. The question asks for a future (2028) ETH price that no source can currently report, so `artifacts/answer.json` reports inability per the request's own `missing` definition rather than guessing a figure.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/sagark/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It records the future-date inability using an explicit `uint256` sentinel and a Coinbase primary-source URL. Local verifier result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The requested instant is future relative to the pinned window, so the artifact documents inability rather than inventing a price. Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The required checker prints `ok`. The requested future spot price cannot be established now. The answer uses `0` only as an explicitly documented inability sentinel, not as a price quote. Because the brief specifies panel evidence, this uses the panel recipe; it does not compute a figure from the pinned blocks.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Check passed. The question asks for ETH's price at a future date (1 Jan 2028), which hasn't occurred yet — no panel source can report an unobserved future price, so per the brief's own "missing" definition I reported inability rather than guessing, with `answer`/`figure` set to `0` as a placeholder and the reasoning documented in `definitions` and `notes`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validates with `check-answer.mjs`.
`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Since the question asks for a future (2028) ETH price with no primary source available, `artifacts/answer.json` reports inability per the request's own `missing` definition rather than guessing, using a `panel` recipe whose `source` explains why.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The answer uses `0` only as an inability sentinel, since no named source can establish a future spot price. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The checker prints `ok`. The answer uses `0` only as an inability sentinel; it is not a price forecast. The brief requires panel evidence, but the future spot price cannot be established from the pinned blocks or the named spot source.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The future spot price cannot be established yet; `0` is documented as an inability marker, not a price quote. The supplied checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](</home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json>). Verifier result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It records `0` as an inability sentinel, not a price estimate, because the requested future spot price cannot yet be established. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The request asks for a future spot price, which the [Chainlink ETH/USD feed](https://data.chain.link/feeds/ethereum/mainnet/eth-usd) does not establish in advance. The answer uses `"0"` as the documented inability sentinel, not as a price prediction. The pinned block window is copied exactly. The oracle marks this as panel evidence, so the answer uses a panel recipe; the future off-chain price cannot be derived from those blocks. The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/levi/imd/p7/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The requested 2028 spot price cannot be established from the named source, so `"0"` encodes inability under the required `uint256` type; it is not a price estimate. The supplied checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The checker prints `ok`. The answer is `0` only as an inability encoding; it is not an ETH price.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It reports `0` as the defined encoding for inability to establish the future spot price, not as a price estimate. The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It reports inability to establish the future spot price; `0` is explicitly defined as a sentinel, not a price. The supplied checker passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd9/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It documents the future-date inability with a typed zero sentinel and a panel source. The provided checker returns `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The cited page gives a projection, not the specified future spot, so the answer uses `0` as an explicitly defined inability sentinel. The required checker printed `ok`.
The checker prints `ok`. Since the question asks for a spot price ~16 months in the future (2028-01-01), no primary source can report it — it would be a forecast, not a fact. Per the brief's own definition ("if the figure cannot be established from a named source, report inability instead of guessing"), I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` reporting inability: `answer`/`figure` set to `0` as the marker, with `definitions` and `notes` explaining why, using a `panel` recipe (required since `evidence: "panel"`) with no source cited.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The question asks for a future (2028) ETH price, which cannot be observed from any source today, so `artifacts/answer.json` reports inability (answer `0` as the sentinel, explained in `definitions`/`notes`) rather than guessing, per the brief's own instructions for a figure that "cannot be established from a named source."
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It reports inability to establish the future price; `"0"` is explicitly identified as the required `uint256` encoding, not a price. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). The answer is `"0"` as an explicitly documented inability sentinel, not a price prediction: the requested date is in the future, and [Coinbase’s ETH spot page](https://www.coinbase.com/price/ethereum) cannot establish that future price. The pinned request fields are copied exactly, and the checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/hyperstition/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json). It reports inability to establish the future price; `0` is explicitly defined as the `uint256` inability encoding, not a price forecast. The supplied checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/6a5a93ca-0e82-4190-b63c-df1086753dc0/9e3e1b20-e1f9-402c-9eba-621ea909c7c5/artifacts/answer.json) with the Binance forecast converted to 162,171 US cents. The checker prints `ok`.
Check passes. **Result:** The question asks for ETH/USD price at a date (2028-01-01) roughly 16 months after the pinned block window (2026-09-24). No source can report a fact that hasn't happened yet, so per the request's own `definitions.missing` clause, I reported inability rather than guessing — `answer`/`figure` are `"0"` placeholders (required since `answerType` is `uint256`), with the substantive report in `definitions.missing` and `notes`. `artifacts/answer.json` passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Check passes. The question asks for a future ETH price (Jan 2028) that hasn't occurred, so per the brief's own "missing" definition I reported inability (figure/answer `0`) rather than guess, with reasoning in `notes`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated by `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`).
The check passes: `ok`. Since the question asks for ETH's price at a future date (2028-01-01), no source can provide that figure — it's unknowable, not just off-chain. I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` reporting inability per the request's own `missing` definition, with `answer`/`figure` set to `0` as a type-satisfying placeholder (explicitly flagged as not a price estimate in `notes`), and a `panel` recipe/source documenting why no figure exists.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, but its answer is a placeholder `"0"`, not a price. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The question asks for the ETH price at 00:00 UTC on 1 January 2028, which is in the future, so no source can establish it yet. The brief's `missing` definition says to report inability rather than guess, so I did that. The `notes` and `definitions` fields say the same thing. I ran no chain scan. The recipe is a `panel` recipe with the Coinbase ETH-USD spot endpoint (`https://api.coinbase.com/v2/prices/ETH-USD/spot`) as its source. That endpoint returns today's price, not the 2028 one, so it can't reproduce a figure for that date. The request id and window are copied from `oracle.json`, with the window keys in the same order as the brief. The checker rejected the first draft for having them in a different order.
Check passes with `ok`. Since the question asks for a future (2028) price that hasn't occurred, I reported inability per the request's own "missing" definition rather than guessing, with `answer: "0"` as the closest honest placeholder, documented in `notes`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, but it reports inability. Nobody can know the ETH price at 00:00 UTC on 1 January 2028 yet, so I didn't guess. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Answer:** `"0"` is a placeholder, not a price estimate. The request says to report inability instead of guessing when a named source can't establish the figure, and `definitions` and `notes` both say this. - **Recipe:** `panel`, with source `https://api.coinbase.com/v2/prices/ETH-USD/spot`. That is the source I would read, times 100 for cents, once the date has passed. - **Window and request id:** copied exactly from `.imd/reads/oracle.json`, including the key order the checker requires. - **Scan:** I didn't run one. This is a `panel` question about an off-chain fact, so there are no chain logs to compute over. The `"0"` answer will likely disagree with any panel member who submits an actual price estimate, so it may not reach the quorum of 49.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.