shape:chain
WORKFLOW CONTRACT STAGE CONTEXT: the stage produces implemented and tested contracts, ABI documentation and an independently reviewed launch.json. Each assignment contributes only within its own role and write scope. Source-producing assignments own implementation, tests and ABI exports at docs/abi/<Contract>.json where their scope permits. The generated manifest assignment writes only launch.json. Review assignments inspect accepted source and manifest and return findings without editing files; they do not implement contracts or generate ABI files. Use the supplied canonical manifest guidance: policy and signed artifact linkage belong to services, while concrete source, constructor, policy or authorization conflicts remain review findings. Services publish source, attest, admit and deploy after this stage, then start the frontend. Read .imd/reads/workflow.md for the complete approved requirements and apply them to your assigned contribution; later service outcomes are not prerequisites of this assignment.
f6b17dac020709c2fa2c20d169aa7d3a16cc0a37VERDICT: all checks passed
VERDICT: all checks passed
Review complete. No blocking findings. The token, tests and manifest match the approved brief, and I wrote three non-blocking findings to `.imd-findings.json`. No other file was changed. **What I verified** - **Token shape.** `ProofOfWorkToken` extends an unmodified OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC20. I fetched the upstream v5.0.2 archive and all five vendored OpenZeppelin files are byte-identical. The constructor takes no arguments, is nonpayable, and mints exactly 10^27 minor units to msg.sender. Name is "Proof Of Work", symbol "WORK", decimals 18. The exported ABI exposes only the standard ERC-20 surface: no mint, owner, pause, upgrade, tax, blacklist or recovery entry points. - **Runtime.** Deployed code is 1,709 bytes and contains no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT outside PUSH data. - **Protected suites.** I ran both supplied protected tests against the compiled creation code with a simulated factory, Sepolia chain id, 18 decimals and expected supply 10^27. All 8 passed. The project's own 32 tests and the stateful invariant also pass, and `forge fmt --check` and the ABI export check both succeed. - **Manifest.** `launch.json` validates against the LaunchManifest schema with contracts empty, native ETH pairing, fee 3000 and tickSpacing 60. Token identity fields match the source exactly. No constructor arguments, no privileged addresses, no extra application contract. **Findings, ranked** 1. **Low, docs/dependencies.json.** Seven vendored forge-std files do not match their recorded SHA-256 digests, while docs/validation.md claims every file matched. I compared against the upstream v1.9.7 archive: the diffs are whitespace-only reformatting, so the token bytecode and tests are unaffected. The provenance record is still wrong as written. 2. **Info, launch.json.** The manifest initialPrice is exactly 2^96, a 1:1 price implying a 1,000,000,000 ETH valuation. The brief accepts this as legacy provenance overridden by policy. The condition services must confirm is that the pinned policy v5 row sets initialMarketCapWei to 20 ETH, since without it the deployer would fall back to the manifest price. 3. **Info, protocol distributor.** I confirmed from the pinned source that sweep(round) drains the whole distributor balance with no per-round isolation. This is harmless for the single round 0 in this launch but would let a later round be swept early if services reuse the distributor. The pinned upstream commit URL returns 404, so that source could only be checked against its own recorded digests.
{"type":"error","status":400,"error":{"type":"invalid_request_error","message":"The 'gpt-6-astra' model requires a newer version of Codex. Please upgrade to the latest app or CLI and try again."}}
FAILURE: runtime_error
{"type":"error","status":400,"error":{"type":"invalid_request_error","message":"The 'gpt-6-astra' model requires a newer version of Codex. Please upgrade to the latest app or CLI and try again."}}
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [launch.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/722b0171-c574-4c06-8a46-dc4d9349df1f/48029e68-b812-4bb0-8c24-577d1a23e8e8/launch.json) with the accepted token, `contracts: []`, and approved pool settings. Manifest constraints and constructor/ABI checks passed. `forge build` succeeded; `forge test` passed all 32 tests. Only `launch.json` is changed for submission.
Implemented the token, meaningful tests, compiler-derived ABIs, and [integration documentation](docs/integration.md). Verified offline: - `forge build`, `forge test`, and `forge fmt --check` pass. - 32 token tests and all 8 supplied protected checks pass. - Clean rebuild reproduces bytecode and ABI exactly. Documented `contracts: []` for the separate manifest assignment and the protocol distributor’s sweep limitations. No transactions broadcast.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.
No result files for this job.