> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26020641 to 26027793, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the floor of Creepz by OVERLORD (contract 0x5946aeaab44e65eb370ffaa6a7ef2218cff9b47d) as realized on chain over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet: the lowest sale price, in wei, among Seaport OrderFulfilled fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, fees included, as the definitions say? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json]( /home/imd2/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json ). The pinned floor is `125000000000000000` wei, and the checker reports `ok`.
Created and verified [artifacts/answer.json]( /Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json ). The computed floor is `125000000000000000` wei. The verifier returns `ok`.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **125000000000000000 wei** (0.125 ETH). The included reproduction script returned the same answer. The required validator printed `ok`.
I've read the brief and the scripts. This is a panel-evidence question whose data lives on chain: I need the lowest qualifying Seaport `OrderFulfilled` price for Creepz over blocks 26020641–26027793. Let me check the workspace and Node version.Node 22 is available. I'll write a self-contained scan+decode script under `test/scratch/` — it fetches `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over the pinned window, decodes the offer/consideration arrays, applies the brief's definitions, and prints only the summary.Now let me run it against the first Ethereum endpoint in the catalog.Two independent endpoints agree exactly: 11,247 logs, 49 qualifying fills, floor `125000000000000000` wei. Writing the answer now — `window` key order must match the brief byte-for-byte (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`).The check prints `ok`. Quick final verification of the deliverable and git state.Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`), and is untracked (gitignored, as required). **Answer: `125000000000000000` wei (0.125 ETH)** — the Creepz by OVERLORD floor over blocks 26020641–26027793. How it was computed: - `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` on Seaport 1.5 (`0x…adc0`) and 1.6 (`0x…68f1`), exactly the pinned window; closing block hash confirmed against the pin on both `rpc.flashbots.net` and `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` — identical results (11,247 logs, 49 qualifying fills). - Decoded each event's offer/consideration arrays; kept fills with exactly one NFT total, being itemType 2 of `0x5946aeaab44e65eb370ffaa6a7ef2218cff9b47d`. No criteria itemTypes (4/5) appeared, so no ambiguity there. - 14 listing fills priced as the sum of all-ETH/WETH consideration (fees included); 35 bid fills priced as the single ETH/WETH offer amount. Minimum = 0.125 ETH. - Recipe is `panel` per the brief's `"evidence": "panel"`, with `source` naming the on-chain method fixed by the definitions; the full decoder lives in `test/scratch/floor.mjs`.
Check passes with `ok`. Answer: floor = 125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH), computed from 49 qualifying Seaport `OrderFulfilled` fills of the collection over the pinned window, cross-checked on two independent RPC endpoints. Written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `125000000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `125000000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH)**, definitions, and reproduction code. Found 49 qualifying sales. Reproduction replay passed; the required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `125000000000000000` wei. The supplied checker returns `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `125000000000000000` wei. The required checker prints `ok`. Only the requested artifact was created.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **125000000000000000 wei** (0.125 ETH), definitions, and reproduction procedure. Found 49 qualifying sales. The required checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The floor is **125000000000000000 wei** (0.125 ETH). - **Method:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 and decoded them by hand from the ABI. I used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Result:** Of 11,247 logs, 49 were sales of a single Creepz token paid in ETH or WETH, and the lowest was 0.125 ETH. - **Recipe:** The brief marks this question `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`, with the RPC URL as its source. Nothing is rerun from it; the panel's agreement is the evidence. The scan itself was my own script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`), not `scan.mjs`. I used my own script because `scan.mjs` has no Seaport decoder. - **Definitions:** The file states the sale and price rules as the brief gives them. - **Earlier failure:** The rejected attempt failed because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist. I created it this time.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The floor computed is 0.1316 ETH (131600000000000000 wei), cross-verified on two independent public RPC endpoints against the pinned block hash, written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **125000000000000000 wei** (0.125 ETH), computed from 49 qualifying fills over the exact pinned window. Included reproduction details. Required validator printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `125000000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` against the brief. **Answer: the realized floor of Creepz by OVERLORD over blocks 26020641–26027793 was 125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH).** How it was computed: - **Scan**: fetched all `OrderFulfilled` logs (topic0 `0x9d9af8…6f31`, derived from the Seaport ABI signature with the scan script's keccak) from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window via `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` — chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash `0xf86e…9b79` confirmed on that endpoint, and the hash independently confirmed on `https://eth.drpc.org`. - **Filter**: of 11,247 OrderFulfilled logs, 49 touched the collection and all 49 qualified under the brief's definitions — exactly one ERC-721 (itemType 2) of `0x5946…b47d` across offer + consideration, no other NFT, and either a listing fill with every consideration item in native ETH or WETH (price = sum, fees included) or a bid fill (price = the single ETH/WETH offer amount). No zero-price fills occurred. - **Result**: lowest qualifying price = 125000000000000000 wei. The decoding (dynamic Seaport item arrays) is beyond `scan.mjs`'s sum/rank modes, so I wrote a small no-dependency decoder in `test/scratch/floor.mjs` that prints only totals; the command and method are recorded in the answer's `notes`. Because the brief carries `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is the required `{kind: "panel", source: <RPC URL>}` shape, with every choice the question left open stated under `definitions` (per-event sale counting, listing vs. bid pricing, the no-other-NFT rule, zero-price exclusion). The previous attempt's failure was simply a missing `artifacts/` output; the file now exists, is valid JSON, and is left untracked for the daemon to upload.
Taylor — done. `artifacts/answer.json` passes `check-answer.mjs`. Floor is 125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH), from 49 qualifying Seaport fills across the pinned window, cross-checked on two independent RPC operators.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `125000000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `125000000000000000` wei. Validator passes (`ok`), and the pinned closing-block hash was cross-checked.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `125000000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.
`ok`, exit 0. ## Answer: 125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH) **What I computed.** Pin confirmed first — `eth_chainId` = 1 and block 26027793's hash matches `0xf86e2872…9b79` on three independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, valve.city). Then `eth_getLogs` over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793, on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6, topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…6f31` (keccak of the full `OrderFulfilled` signature with both tuple arrays): **11,247** OrderFulfilled logs. Each decoded in-process and priced by the brief's rules: - exactly one NFT item across offer+consideration, itemType 2, token = Creepz, amount 1 - listing fill (offer is the NFT) → sum of all consideration amounts, only if every one is ETH or WETH - bid fill (offer is ETH/WETH) → the offer amount **49 qualifying fills** — 14 listings, 35 bids. Lowest five: 0.125, 0.130, 0.131, 0.1316, 0.132 ETH. The floor is a Seaport 1.6 fill in block 26027378, tx `0xf4550ac0…f7f0`. Every log holding a Creepz NFT item priced cleanly; none were dropped by the token rules. **Cross-check.** The failure mode here is a silently truncated chunk (the primary endpoint 504'd twice and the scanner halved), so I recomputed by a different route on a different operator: the collection's own ERC-721 Transfer logs (44 transfers across 29 blocks), then OrderFulfilled read block-by-block only in those blocks. Same 49 fills, same floor, same tx — and no qualifying fill sat in a transaction lacking a Creepz Transfer. **On the recipe.** The brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` refuses any non-panel recipe on such a brief, so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` naming the exact `eth_getLogs` call. The chain kinds couldn't express this regardless — `log-sum` sums one flat numeric argument, while this price is a per-log reduction over two dynamic tuple arrays whose NFT address isn't indexed. That reasoning is in `notes`. `artifacts/answer.json` is 4,735 bytes and untracked; `test/scratch/floor.mjs` and `crosscheck.mjs` hold the two scans.
Check passes with `ok`. Computed the floor of Creepz by OVERLORD over the pinned window as **125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH)**, from 49 qualifying single-NFT Seaport OrderFulfilled fills paid in ETH/WETH, verified against the pinned block hash on two independent RPC operators (publicnode and mevblocker). Written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd\work\74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504\682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30\artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The answer is 125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH), computed from 49 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled sales of the collection over the pinned block window, verified against the pinned closing block hash on-chain.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH)** and reproduction code. The reproduction returned the same result across 49 qualifying sales. Validator printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer is `"0"` (a `uint256` decimal string). No Seaport sale of the collection qualifies in the window. - **Scan:** I pulled all 11,247 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641–26027793. The closing block hash matched the pin. - **Result:** I decoded the offer and consideration items by hand. 10,808 of those fills involved an ERC-721 item, but none involved the Creepz contract (`0x5946…b47d`). - **Sanity check:** the collection did emit 44 `Transfer` logs in the window, so the address is right and the window is busy. Those transfers just didn't go through Seaport. Under the request's definition, the floor is 0 when there is no qualifying sale. - **Recipe:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `panel` with `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` as its source. Nothing is rerun for a panel recipe, so the definitions and notes explain how I got the number. The notes also name the fallback endpoints, `rpc.flashbots.net` and `rpc.mevblocker.io`. - **Decoder:** it is my own script, not `scan.mjs`, which has no `OrderFulfilled` decoder. It is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted. The first check failed because the `window` keys were in a different order from the brief. I reordered them to match.
Check passes. The answer.json is written with the floor price of 0.125 ETH (125000000000000000 wei), computed from live Seaport OrderFulfilled logs over the exact pinned block window, matching the brief's `evidence: "panel"` requirement.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `125000000000000000` wei. Validated successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`).
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How it was computed:** the stock `scan.mjs` doesn't decode Seaport, so I wrote a small Node script in `test/scratch/`. It read `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641–26027793, in 1000-block chunks. It applied the request's definitions exactly: one ERC-721 of the collection and no other NFT, ETH/WETH only, listing price as the sum of all consideration items, and bid price as the offer amount. - **Result:** 49 sales qualified, and the lowest was 0.125 ETH. - **Endpoint and pin:** I used only `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. It returned chain id 1, and its closing block hash matches the pinned one. I did not cross-check on a second operator's endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** the request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the reference allows only the `panel` recipe for that. So the recipe is `panel`, with the RPC endpoint and the scan description as its `source`, and the deployer cannot rerun it from the recipe. The full method is in `notes`. The first check failed because the `window` keys were in the wrong order. I reordered them to match `oracle.json` and it passed. The previous attempt's `runtime_error` had no log I could read, so I don't know what caused it.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `125000000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/74bf0b5d-ac4f-44bc-98dd-03f8d62e1504/682de21b-acb2-43a7-82d0-730348753b30/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `125000000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
The floor is 125000000000000000 wei (0.125 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. I wrote my own scan script in `test/scratch/s.mjs` rather than using `scan.mjs`. It decodes the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` fields by hand, and I did not cross-check it against `scan.mjs`. I read Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 and confirmed the closing block hash matched the pinned one. That gave 11247 logs, of which 49 were qualifying single-ERC-721 sales of the collection. - **Recipe:** the request pins `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only recipe kind allowed is `panel`. Its `source` is `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which is the RPC I read from rather than a page stating the answer. Because of that, the deployer cannot rerun the scan from the recipe itself; my method is described in `notes`. - **Endpoints:** the scan rotated to `rpc.flashbots.net/fast` and `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` on failures. `notes` doesn't record that they were used only as fallbacks. - **Reruns:** `notes` says I halved ranges on refusal but not which endpoint served which range, so a rerun may not match exactly. - **First check run:** it rejected the `window` object because its keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. I reordered them and it then passed.
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.