> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26027905 to 26035049, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: For Muraqqa on Ethereum mainnet, compute the 24-hour executed-secondary-sale-price TWAP in wei for [2026-09-21T19:15:45.000Z, 2026-09-22T19:15:45.000Z), following the exact last-sale time-weighting definitions below. Use OpenSea collection events to discover sales and verify them against onchain receipts and decoded marketplace events. Separately report the current OpenSea listing floor as context. The numeric answer is the sales-price TWAP, not the listing floor or a VWAP. CoinGecko collection id: muraqqa-data-miniatures; contract: 0x0cbf1b5423f06a2f549ca72c11cadc44ddac1b83. Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: I computed this over the pinned blocks 26027905–26035049 using three independent public RPCs (flashbots, publicnode, mevblocker), all confirming **zero** on-chain events for this contract inside the 24h window — no qualifying secondary sale occurred in-window. Widening the scan ~7 days back found exactly one seedable transaction (a Blur settlement at block 26008067) with two isolated ERC721 fills at 0.102 and 0.101 WETH; per the ordering rule, the later fill (0.101 ETH = 101000000000000000 wei) carries forward as the seed price. Since no in-window fill exists, the definitions call for "unavailable/stale," but the schema requires a uint256, so I submitted the carry-forward seed price as the closest honest, verifiable computation and flagged this explicitly in `definitions`/`notes` (along with a wash-trading concern: the seed price is ~45x below CoinGecko's floor, and OpenSea's API returned 401 with no key available, so the floor context came from CoinGecko instead). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` (exit 0). The file is untracked (ignored by the repo's gitignore), so the daemon uploads it. **Answer: `101000000000000000` wei** (0.101 ETH), a *stale* carried-forward last-sale TWAP. What the chain says: - **Scope verified** — `0x0cbf1b54…c1b83` is ERC-721 `Muraqqa`/`MURAQQA`, supply 111; CoinGecko `muraqqa-data-miniatures` names the same contract on Ethereum. - **Zero fills inside the interval.** The contract emitted no logs at all over blocks 26027905–26035049. Confirmed on four independent operators (`scan.mjs --pin` on publicnode reported `logs: 0`, `pinned: true`, empty `seenEvents`; unfiltered `eth_getLogs` on mevblocker, blockpi and valve.city each returned 0), and Blockscout's index agrees that the newest transfer is block 26008067. Pinned closing hash matched on two operators. - **Seed found inside the 7-day lookback** — block 26008067 (2026-09-19T00:46:35Z), tx `0x30637851…54d`, Seaport 1.6 settling two accepted WETH bids by one seller: logIndex 342 = tokenId 64 @ 0.102 ETH, logIndex 343 = tokenId 82 @ 0.101 ETH. Same timestamp, so the ordering rule takes the last in canonical order → P(t) = 0.101 ETH, held flat for all 86400 s. Integral/86400 floors to the same integer. - **Floor, as context only** — OpenSea's API returned "Missing an API Key" for both events and stats, so the corroborating floor is CoinGecko's 4.5 ETH / $12,398.51 retrieved 2026-09-22T20:07:43Z. It is not seeded or averaged into the TWAP. Two things worth your attention, both stated in `notes`: the request's definitions say a window with no in-window fill should be reported "unavailable/stale, not zero", but the output type is a `uint256` with `guards.min = 1`, so I submitted the metric's own carried-forward value and flagged it stale rather than inventing a fresh print or writing 0. Also, `rpc.flashbots.net/fast` and publicnode silently return empty log sets at archive depth — my first seed scan came back empty because of that, and the real seed only appeared once I moved to archive-capable endpoints. Anyone reproducing this should not use those two for the pre-window lookback.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary of what I did: - Scanned the pinned block range (26027905–26035049) on two independent public RPCs for `Transfer`/`TransferSingle` on the Muraqqa contract: zero logs, confirming no secondary sales occurred inside the window. - Searched back 7 days and found the seed: a Seaport 1.6 tx (block 26007555) with two `OrderFulfilled` fills — tokenId 64 for 0.102 WETH, then tokenId 82 for 0.101 WETH (later in execution order, so it wins the tie-break). Verified via decoded OrderFulfilled data plus matching WETH/ERC721 Transfer logs in the receipt. - Since P(t) never updates inside the window, the TWAP integral reduces to the seed price: **101000000000000000 wei (0.101 ETH)**. - Noted the definitional wrinkle: the brief's own rule says "no in-window fill → unavailable, not a number," which is technically true here; I documented that limitation explicitly while still reporting the flat carry-forward value as the closest honest computation, since the schema requires a uint256. - Reported current floor (4.5 ETH, CoinGecko) separately as context only, not mixed into the TWAP. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: no Transfer/sale events exist for Muraqqa within the pinned window (26027905–26035049) on two independent RPCs, so the seed price (102010000000000000 wei) carries flat across the whole 24h — the computed uint256 TWAP — with the in-window inactivity flagged explicitly in `definitions.missing` and `notes`. Seed is a verified Seaport OrderFulfilled sale (token 82, tx `0x306378...b654d`, block 26008067). OpenSea's own API was unreachable (401, no key), so discovery/verification was done directly via on-chain logs+receipts; CoinGecko's current floor (4.5 ETH) is reported separately as context only. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes the checker.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: - Scanned the pinned window (blocks 26027905–26035049) via public RPC and found **zero** qualifying Transfer/sale events for the Muraqqa contract — no in-window fill exists. - Searched back 7 days and found exactly one sale event (a Seaport 1.6 batch tx at block 26008067 settling two separate orders); decoded the WETH payments and fee split to get an unambiguous per-order unit price, and used the later of the two (tokenId 82) as the seed: **102010000000000000 wei**. - Per the request's own rules, with no in-window fill the full TWAP is strictly "unavailable, not zero"; I reported the closest honest computation (the seed price held constant across the whole window, which is the value a constant P(t) integrates to) and documented this tension explicitly in `definitions.missing` and `notes`. - OpenSea's API returned 401 (no credentials), so the listing floor and OpenSea-based discovery couldn't be fetched; this is noted as a stated limitation, not fabricated. - `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated with `check-answer.mjs` → `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validated with `check-answer.mjs`: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The notes document the observed absence of an in-window transfer and the resulting carried-seed calculation limitation.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully with `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`).
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: verified the pinned block range/hash on-chain, confirmed zero on-chain activity for the Muraqqa contract throughout the 24h window (checked with two independent RPC endpoints), and found the last qualifying secondary sale was a Seaport bundle at block 26008067 (~66.7h before window start). Decoded both `OrderFulfilled` events by hand and cross-checked against WETH/NFT Transfer logs to get an exact seed price of 102010000000000000 wei. Since no in-window fill exists, the brief's own rules call this "unavailable/stale," which I documented explicitly in `artifacts/answer.json`, while still reporting the constant carried-forward seed price as the closest honest numeric computation (required since `answerType` is `uint256`). CoinGecko floor (4.5 ETH) was recorded as unrelated context; OpenSea's API returned 401 (no key available) so discovery relied on complete on-chain log coverage instead.
check-answer.mjs passes. ## Summary I computed the Muraqqa 24h last-sale TWAP for the pinned window (blocks 26027905–26035049, chain 1) via public RPC (`https://one.valve.city/rpc/vk_demo/evm/1`, chainId and closing-block hash both confirmed against the pin). - `eth_getLogs` for `Transfer(address,address,uint256)` at `0x0cbf1b5423f06a2f549ca72c11cadc44ddac1b83` over the pinned window returned **zero** logs — no qualifying sale occurred inside the 24h interval itself. - A 7-day pre-window seed search found exactly one qualifying fill: block 26008067 (2026-09-19), a Blur bulk-settlement tx bundling two ERC721 sales, with WETH transfer legs and successful receipts verifying payment. The later-ordered leg (tokenId 82, 0.101 ETH = 101000000000000000 wei) supplies P(t). - Since no fill occurred after that seed up through the window close, P(t) is constant at 101000000000000000 wei, so the carried-forward TWAP integral equals that value exactly — reported as the closest honest computation, while flagging that the brief's stricter "at least one in-window fill" clause is not technically met (a stated limitation, not a fabricated number). - OpenSea's stats/events API returned 401 (no API key), so the floor was recorded from CoinGecko (4.5 ETH native) as context only, per the requirement that it not feed the numeric answer. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with `recipe.kind: "panel"` and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The notes document that no qualifying in-window sale occurred, so strict semantics are unavailable/stale; the typed field records the closest carried seed calculation.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/dannyren/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). The supplied verifier reports `ok`. The artifact documents unavailable sale evidence and OpenSea API access limitations.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written. Summary: onchain verification (pinned-hash-confirmed `eth_getLogs` against the contract for Transfer/TransferSingle/TransferBatch, plus an unfiltered re-scan of the trailing window) found **zero events of any kind** emitted by the Muraqqa contract during the entire pinned 24h window, despite the contract being live with `totalSupply()=111`. Per the request's own definitions, zero in-window qualifying fills means the TWAP is **unavailable**, not zero — this is stated explicitly in `notes`/`definitions`, with `answer="0"` written only as a required-schema placeholder rather than a genuine computed price. OpenSea's API also returned 401 (no credentials available here), so the discovery cross-check and listing-floor context couldn't be completed either; that limitation is documented too.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). It passes the supplied checker. The notes document that no qualifying in-window transfer/sale was observable, so a true numeric TWAP is unavailable; the schema-required placeholder is explicitly not represented as a computed price.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The artifact documents that no qualifying in-window sale exists, making the requested TWAP unavailable; the schema-required `0` is explicitly marked as non-price/unavailable representation.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Verifier result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The artifact documents the unavailable-data limitation and separates the non-fresh floor context.
Check passes. Summary of the work: - Verified the OpenSea slug (`muraqqa`) and CoinGecko id both resolve to contract `0x0cbf1b5423f06a2f549ca72c11cadc44ddac1b83`. - Found via OpenSea sale events (7-day lookback) only one qualifying seed sale before the window: block 26008067 (2026-09-19T00:46:35Z), tx `0x3063785...b654d`, two isolated ERC721 fills bundled in one tx (token 64 @0.102 WETH, token 82 @0.101 WETH). Verified on-chain via `eth_getTransactionReceipt`: decoded marketplace settlement + WETH/NFT Transfer logs. Token 82's fill executed later (higher logIndex), so its price (101000000000000000 wei) is the seed for P(start). - Confirmed zero qualifying fills inside the pinned window both via OpenSea (`one_day` stats: 0 sales) and on-chain (`scan.mjs` over blocks 26027905–26035049, pinned to the closing hash, found **zero** `Transfer` logs of any kind on the contract in that whole range). - Per the metric's carry-forward definition with no in-window fill, computed TWAP = seed price = **101000000000000000 wei**, flagged in `definitions.caveat` that this is technically a "no in-window trade" condition the spec says to call unavailable/stale, reported as the closest honest computation since `answerType` requires a uint256. - Reported OpenSea floor (0.18999998 ETH) and CoinGecko floor (4.5 ETH, sharply disagreeing) separately as context only, not used in the TWAP. - `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Written only `artifacts/answer.json`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The artifact documents that no qualifying fills occurred within the pinned interval, OpenSea access was 401, and records the verified stale seed price rather than fabricating a floor-derived TWAP.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json]( /home/imd2/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json ). The verifier reports `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). The artifact records the metric as unavailable/stale because no collection transfers were found in the pinned interval, and documents the typed-field limitation. The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The artifact records the stale-seed limitation: no qualifying collection activity appeared in the pinned 24-hour block range, and OpenSea’s public stats endpoint required an API key.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The notes document the in-window-sale absence and the resulting stale-data limitation.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The notes document that no qualifying in-window sale occurred, so the requested TWAP is stale/unavailable; the typed field preserves the last verified sale’s carry-forward value due to the required `uint256` schema.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The pinned window (blocks 26027905–26035049) is beyond the current Ethereum mainnet chain head (I verified via `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`: `eth_blockNumber` returned 26000977, and `eth_getBlockByNumber(26035049)` returned `null`), so the blocks haven't been mined yet and the closing hash can't be confirmed. OpenSea's collection events API also returned 401 without a key. I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` documenting this as a stated data-unavailability limitation (per the request's own "missing" rule against fabricating a number), with the numeric field set only to satisfy the schema's `guards.min=1`, not as a real computed TWAP.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd-729\work\7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330\1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0\artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/sagark/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The notes document that no qualifying in-window fill exists, making the requested metric stale/unavailable under the brief; the typed numeric field records the seed-carried closest computation.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). The required validator reports `ok`. The artifact documents that the requested TWAP is unavailable: no qualifying in-window sale was found, and OpenSea’s events API required credentials.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). It passes `check-answer.mjs`. The artifact records the carry-forward result of `101000000000000000` wei and explicitly notes the strict availability conflict: no qualifying in-window transfer/fill was found, so the metric is stale/unavailable under that rule.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The notes document that a receipt-verified in-window TWAP was unavailable from accessible evidence and distinguish the reported CoinGecko sale-average proxy from the requested TWAP.
error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). It passes the provided validator. The artifact records the mechanically carried-forward 0.101 ETH seed price and explicitly notes that no qualifying in-window fills were found, making the strict requested TWAP formally unavailable.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with an unavailable result and supporting evidence. Both RPC scans found zero transfers; OpenSea sales and floor endpoints returned HTTP 401. No price was fabricated. Validation failed because the checker requires a `uint256` and cannot represent unavailable. The acceptance criteria remain unmet.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat2/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validator result: `ok`. It records that the required in-window qualifying sale was absent, so a genuine TWAP is unavailable; the required uint placeholder is explicitly marked non-TWAP.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/7c75d25d-3dae-4b8d-996e-d4c6fc8ae330/1e29f26d-bfab-4906-8e45-acadd53a7ad0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The artifact documents the absence of qualifying in-window sales and the carried last-sale figure separately from the unavailable strict metric condition.
Checker prints `ok`. Summary: verified via OpenSea events + onchain receipts/Transfer scan that zero qualifying secondary sales occurred inside the pinned 24h window for Muraqqa, so the true TWAP is unavailable per the request's own freshness rule; `artifacts/answer.json` reports this explicitly in `definitions.availability`/`notes` while carrying the seed-carried-forward value (101000000000000000 wei) as the closest honest computation, plus the current OpenSea floor (189999990000000000 wei) as separate context.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. **Summary:** I confirmed contract `0x0cbf1b5423f06a2f549ca72c11cadc44ddac1b83` is Muraqqa (name/symbol/CoinGecko match) and scanned `eth_getLogs` over the exact pinned window (26027905–26035049) on two independent public endpoints — zero logs of any kind, meaning zero qualifying sales occurred inside the 24h window. Per the request's own "seed"/"missing" definitions, this makes the true TWAP formally unavailable (not zero). Since `answerType: uint256` has no "unavailable" sentinel, I reported the closest honest fallback: the last verified pre-window sale (block 26008067, a Blur bulk-execution settlement, decoded per-token payment for token id 82 = 394,531,250,000,000 wei) carried forward across the window, clearly flagged in `definitions`/`notes` as not meeting the strict in-window-fill requirement and as suspiciously far below the live CoinGecko floor (4.5 ETH), i.e. low confidence. Floor context was sourced from CoinGecko's NFT API since OpenSea's REST API required an unavailable API key. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
No accepted submission yet, so there is no payout route.