7cdfacfa-cf28-43f4-bf80-ba537ce8b9beIMD JOB

The artifact is in place and excluded from Git by the repo's own `.git/info/exclude`, as the daemon expects. ## What I produced `artifacts/answer.json` — the only file written. Answer: **`177000000000000000` wei** (0.177 ETH), recipe `{"kind":"panel","source":"https://opensea.io/collection/vv-checks-originals"}`. The brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue in `.imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/REFERENCE.md` says a panel brief takes only the `panel` recipe — a floor price is off-chain listing state, not derivable from logs or calls over the pinned blocks. So the acceptance line about "reproduces the answer from public RPC data alone" cannot literally hold for this question; I used the chain recipes' RPC only to pin the window and the collection's identity, and said so in `notes`. ## How I verified - **Window**: `eth_chainId` = `0x1` and block `0x18d0e62` hash = `0x57ff11be…4397` — matching the pinned `toBlockHash` — on two operators (`rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`). Timestamps: `fromBlock` 2026-09-20T20:40:11Z → `toBlock` 21:40:11Z. - **Collection**: on `one.valve.city`, `name()` = "Checks", `symbol()` = "CHECKS", `totalSupply()` at block 26021474 = 5346, matching the 5346 items OpenSea shows for the pinned contract. - **Floor**, three agreeing readings at 0.177 ETH: OpenSea's collection page (`floorPrice` field *and* the cheapest `bestListing` in its price-ascending grid, fetched twice, 22:50Z and 22:52Z); Alchemy `getFloorPrice` (`openSea` 0.177, `retrievedAt` 22:50:00Z); CoinGecko's NFT contract endpoint (0.177). OpenSea emits full float precision elsewhere on the page (0.188999999, 0.15493302657711608), so 0.177 is exact, not rounded. - A 15-assertion schema/consistency check in `test/scratch/check.js` passes. ## What I could not do, stated plainly - **Blur was unreadable** from this container — both `core-api.prod.blur.io` and `blur.io` return a bot-protection interstitial. Reservoir, Rarible, NFT Price Floor and OpenSea's REST API all require an API key this run has no way to receive. The figure is the minimum over *reachable* venues; a strictly lower Blur-only listing would not have been seen. - **The reading is ~70 minutes after the closing block** (22:50Z vs 21:40:11Z). No keyless source serves a historical floor, so this is the earliest reading available, not a snapshot at the block. - Two of the three sources (Alchemy, CoinGecko) ultimately derive from OpenSea order data, so they corroborate rather than being fully independent venues. All three limitations are recorded in the artifact's `definitions` and `notes`, not just here.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor price of **177000000000000000 wei** (0.177 ETH). The reading was taken about 70 minutes after the pinned closing block, not at it. The file is valid JSON, and I didn't `git add` it. - **Source:** OpenSea's page for this contract reports a floor of 0.177 ETH. Its cheapest item, when sorted low to high, is also listed at 0.177 ETH. That list includes Blur listings, and the next cheapest are 0.18 (on Blur), 0.189, 0.189 (on Blur) and 0.196 ETH. - **Cross-check:** Alchemy's NFT floor-price API (public demo key) returned the same 0.177 ETH for the OpenSea floor, and it was independent of my page read. I ignored its LooksRare value of 0.85 because it dates from 2024. - **Timing:** I read at 2026-09-20 22:50 UTC. Block 26021474 has timestamp 21:40:11 UTC, and no historical listing snapshot is available, so this is the closest reading I could get. If the floor moved in between, the figure would differ. - **Collection identity:** The contract `0x036721e5…8b1` reports `name()` "Checks" and `totalSupply()` 5346. OpenSea shows it as "Checks - VV Originals" (slug `vv-checks-originals`) with 5,346 items. The slug `checks-vv-edition` is delisted and empty, so I didn't use it. - **Recipe:** The recipe is `panel`, with the OpenSea collection page as its source URL. The other choices are recorded in `definitions` and `notes`. - **Chain check:** Both public endpoints I queried (`ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`) returned the pinned closing hash for block 26021474. - **Not reached:** Blur's own API and Reservoir were unreachable or needed a key, so Blur listings were only seen through OpenSea's aggregation.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor price of **177000000000000000 wei** (0.177 ETH). It is valid JSON, and it is untracked and not committed. - **Source:** CoinGecko's NFT endpoint for `0x036721e5a769cc48b3189efbb9cce4471e8a48b1` reported `floor_price.native_currency` = 0.177. I used the `panel` recipe with that URL as the source. - **Timing gap:** I read it at 22:49 UTC on 2026-09-20, about 350 blocks (~70 minutes) after the closing block, so the floor at block 26021474 may have differed slightly. CoinGecko showed a +5.99% 24h floor change. - **Not read directly:** OpenSea's API needs a key, the OpenSea and Blur pages are rendered by JavaScript, and Reservoir was unreachable. The figure is an aggregator reading, not a per-marketplace one. The `definitions` and `notes` in the file say this. - **Window check:** `publicnode` and `flashbots` both returned the pinned closing hash for block 26021474. The window in the file is copied exactly from `oracle.json`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **177000000000000000 wei (0.177 ETH)**. That is CoinGecko's aggregated floor, read about 70 minutes after the closing block, and I couldn't cross-check it against a second marketplace. - **Window:** I confirmed block 26021474 has the pinned hash `0x57ff11be…8e4397` on two operators, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. Its timestamp is 2026-09-20 21:40:11 UTC. - **Source:** the CoinGecko NFT API for contract `0x036721e5…8a48b1` reports a floor of 0.177 ETH ($467.19). I read it at about 22:50 UTC. The USD figure implies an ETH price of about $2,639, which matches the price OpenSea's page showed at the time. - **Recipe:** `panel`, with that CoinGecko URL as the source. - **Rounding:** CoinGecko publishes the floor to 3 decimals of ETH, so the answer is 0.177 ETH as published, not an exact-to-the-wei listing price. If other panel members read a more precise listing price, the values may differ slightly. - **No historical floor:** CoinGecko had no floor for the closing block itself. The reading is the closest available, and `definitions` and `notes` say so. - **Other marketplaces:** OpenSea and Blur couldn't be read. OpenSea's API needs a key, and its collection pages returned a generic "collection no longer available" page for every slug I tried, even unrelated ones, so I treated that as unusable rather than as a delisting. Blur is behind a bot challenge. Reservoir is defunct. Magic Eden, X2Y2 and NFTPort needed keys or were unavailable, and SimpleHash needed a key. - **Collection name:** CoinGecko lists the pinned contract as "Checks" (`checks-vv-originals`) rather than "Checks (VV Edition)". The request pins the contract, so I followed the contract and noted the mismatch in `definitions`. The file is untracked and nothing else was touched.

Created and validated `artifacts/answer.json` with the observed value `177000000000000000` wei. The file explicitly documents unmet requirements: exact-window RPC reproduction is unavailable, and the pinned contract identifies Checks Originals rather than VV Edition.

Created and validated `artifacts/answer.json` with an observed floor of **177000000000000000 wei** for the pinned contract. The file explicitly records that this is a later off-chain observation and cannot satisfy exact-window, RPC-only reproduction. It also documents the conflicting collection name and contract address.

Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/7cdfacfa-cf28-43f4-bf80-ba537ce8b9be/e71771a6-9938-4a78-be59-d6464cbe8b92/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `149900000000000000` wei.

Created and validated `artifacts/answer.json` with fallback observation `177000000000000000` wei. The file documents conflicting collection identifiers and requirements. The exact historical floor and RPC-only reproducibility remain unverified.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the observed **177000000000000000 wei** price and validated its JSON and arithmetic. The artifact documents unresolved requirements: the pinned address identifies VV Originals, and the marketplace observation cannot establish an exact-window, RPC-only floor.