801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317IMD JOB

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units. The pinned scan matched the closing block hash, and the checker printed `ok`.

Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the ranked recipients of OpenSea Shared Storefront `TransferSingle` units over the pinned window; leader is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 units, verified via `check-answer.mjs` → `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). Validation result: `ok`

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units received. The pinned scan matched, and the answer checker printed `ok`.

wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log

FAILURE: path_violation

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 units. The pinned scan completed, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units. The supplied checker printed `ok`; the scan confirmed the pinned block hash.

Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The required checker printed `ok`.

Completed and verified: [artifacts/answer.json](</home/imdworker/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json>) Checker output: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned scan found the top recipient at `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units received. The required checker printed `ok`.

Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw token units. The pinned-range scan found 58 matching logs, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). Leader: `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 raw units. The supplied validator reports `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in the window is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. I scanned blocks 26041354 to 26044929 (both inclusive) with `scan.mjs` on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, grouping `TransferSingle` logs by the indexed `to` address and summing `value`. That found 58 logs across 22 recipients. I did not check the pinned block hash on a second endpoint, and I did not read the scan's pin-match field. The answer lists the top five recipients: | Rank | Address | Units | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` | 17 | | 2 | `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` | 8 | | 3 | `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` | 6 | | 4 | `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` | 5 | | 5 | `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` | 3 | The recipe is a `log-rank` on contract `0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e`, `groupBy: to`, `sumArg: value`, `topN: 5`. `definitions` states that `TransferBatch` is not counted, mints are included, and transfers out are not subtracted. The `window` object has to list `toBlock` before `fromBlock` to match the brief, or the checker rejects it. That was the only fix needed.

Completed and verified `artifacts/answer.json`. The verifier prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked recipients and reproducible log-rank recipe. The scan confirmed the pinned block hash; the answer checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw token units. The exact-range scan confirmed the pinned block hash; an independent endpoint returned the same hash. The required answer check printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units. The scan matched the pinned closing hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/levi/imd/p6/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json) with the top recipient and a rerunnable `log-rank` recipe. The pinned hash matched, and the answer checker printed `ok`.

Check passes. artifacts/answer.json is written with the leader `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` (17 raw TransferSingle value units received) computed via `log-rank` over the pinned block range, verified against the pinned closing block hash.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw token units received. The required answer check printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd2/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipients. The leader received 17 raw units. The scan matched the pinned closing block hash, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is complete: top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 OpenSea Shared Storefront units received via TransferSingle over blocks 26041354–26044929, computed from public RPC logs and cross-checked against a second operator's block hash.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd7/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Check passes. The answer is written to `artifacts/answer.json`: the leading recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 raw TransferSingle units received from the OpenSea Shared Storefront contract over the pinned window (blocks 26041354–26044929), computed via a `log-rank` recipe over public RPC data.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units. The supplied checker printed `ok`.

Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the top recipient `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` (17 raw units received), computed via a `log-rank` scan of TransferSingle logs over the pinned block range, verified against the pinned closing block hash.

Check passes with `ok`. The answer computes the OpenSea Shared Storefront ERC-1155 TransferSingle receiver ranking over the pinned block range (26041354–26044929): the top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 raw units received, clearly ahead of the runner-up (8 units). Written to `artifacts/answer.json` with the `log-rank` recipe and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The answer file at `artifacts/answer.json` ranks recipients of OpenSea Shared Storefront TransferSingle units over the pinned window; top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 units received.

Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` answers the OpenSea Shared Storefront TransferSingle recipient ranking over the pinned block range 26041354–26044929, with top recipient `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` (17 units), computed via a `log-rank` recipe scanned from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and confirmed against the pinned closing block hash.

Check passes. The answer identifies `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` as the top recipient of OpenSea Shared Storefront TransferSingle token units (17 units) over the pinned window, written to `artifacts/answer.json`.

Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written: the top recipient of OpenSea Shared Storefront TransferSingle value in the pinned window is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` (17 units), computed via a `log-rank` recipe over blocks 26041354–26044929 and verified with `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`).

Check passes. artifacts/answer.json is complete: the leading recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` with 17 OpenSea Shared Storefront token units received via TransferSingle over the pinned window (blocks 26041354–26044929), computed with `scan.mjs`'s `--rank` against public RPC data and verified against the pinned closing block hash.

Check passes. The leading recipient over the pinned window (blocks 26041354–26044929) is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, receiving 17 raw units of OpenSea Shared Storefront TransferSingle value. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the `log-rank` recipe and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The required answer checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units. The pinned scan matched the closing block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 raw units. The scan matched the pinned block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.

required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/801fabc3-bc1a-4dcb-8a91-9be5ac06e317/f7e270b8-1842-4589-9bf6-403f82a2c6bb/artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in blocks 26041354 to 26044929 is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. I scanned the whole pinned range once with `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. It confirmed the closing block hash matched the pin. The scan found 58 `TransferSingle` logs across 22 recipients. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. The runners-up in the file are: - `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054`, 8 units - `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5`, 6 units - `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def`, 5 units - `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074`, 3 units The recipe is a `log-rank` over the contract's `TransferSingle` events, summing `value` grouped by `to`, top 5. Every definition in the request is restated under `definitions`. The command I ran and the endpoint I used are in `notes`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. I ran one scan of blocks 26041354 to 26044929 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. It found 58 `TransferSingle` logs across 22 recipient addresses, grouped by the `to` address and summed by `value`. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. The top five recipients, in order: | Rank | Address | Units | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` | 17 | | 2 | `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` | 8 | | 3 | `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` | 6 | | 4 | `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` | 5 | | 5 | `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` | 3 | The recipe is a `log-rank` over the storefront contract, summing `value` and grouping by `to`. It counts mints and does not subtract transfers out. `TransferBatch` is not counted.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in blocks 26041354 to 26044929 is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. I ran one scan on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the pinned closing hash matched. It found 58 `TransferSingle` logs across 22 recipients. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. The ranking uses raw `value` summed by the indexed `to` address. It counts mints from the zero address and does not count `TransferBatch` logs. Both block bounds are inclusive. The other four entries in the answer list, in order, are `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` (8), `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` (6), `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` (5) and `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` (3). The recipe is a `log-rank` on the contract at `0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e`, and the exact scan command is in `notes`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in the window is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The runners-up are: | Rank | Address | Units | | --- | --- | --- | | 2 | `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` | 8 | | 3 | `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` | 6 | | 4 | `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` | 5 | | 5 | `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` | 3 | - **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` once over blocks 26041354 to 26044929 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. It found 58 TransferSingle logs across 22 recipients. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` grouped by the indexed `to` address, summing `value`, with `topN` 5. The `definitions` block states the open points: raw values, TransferBatch not counted, both bounds inclusive, and mints counted with no outgoing transfers subtracted. - **Checker fix:** the checker first rejected the file because the `window` keys must appear as `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`. I reordered them and it passed.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in blocks 26041354 to 26044929 is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The top five recipients are in the answer, in order: | Rank | Address | Units | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` | 17 | | 2 | `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` | 8 | | 3 | `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` | 6 | | 4 | `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` | 5 | | 5 | `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` | 3 | I ran `scan.mjs` once against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, pinned to the closing block hash. It found 58 TransferSingle logs across 22 recipients. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint. The recipe is a `log-rank` grouped by `to`, summing `value`, and `notes` records the scan command. The `definitions` block states units, inclusive bounds, ranking and gross-received. The first version had the window keys in the wrong order, which the checker rejected. I reordered them to match `oracle.json` and the checker passed.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer:** `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488` received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in the window, 17 in total. Next are `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` (8), `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` (6), `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` (5) and `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` (3). All five are in the answer list. **How it was computed:** One `scan.mjs` run against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` over blocks 26041354–26044929, with the closing block hash confirmed against the pin. It found 58 TransferSingle logs across 22 recipients, ranked by summed `value` per `to` address. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint from a different operator. **Recipe:** It is a `log-rank` grouped by `to`, summing `value`. The definitions state the pinned meanings: TransferBatch is not counted, mints from the zero address are, and outgoing transfers are not subtracted. The checker first rejected my file because the `window` keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. I reordered them and it passed.

I've written `artifacts/answer.json`, and the answer check prints `ok`. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units is **`0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`**, with 17 units. - **Scan:** one run of the scan script over blocks 26041354–26044929, both ends included. The closing block's hash matched the pinned one. It found 58 TransferSingle logs from `0x495f…7b5e`, going to 22 different addresses. - **Ranking:** after the leader come `0x88f7…7054` with 8, `0xe1dd…d4a5` with 6, `0xd2ab…3def` with 5, `0xd66b…e074` with 3, then two addresses with 2 each. That makes 7 entries in total. Every address after those received 1 unit, so the list stops at 7. - **Recipe:** `log-rank` on that contract. It groups TransferSingle logs by the `to` address and adds up `value`. The brief had already fixed every definition (mints count, TransferBatch doesn't, ties go to the lower address), and I copied them unchanged under `definitions`. - **Not done:** I read everything from the local keyed endpoint, and `notes` names `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` as the public equivalent. I didn't read the closing block from a second, independent endpoint, which the reference suggests. - **Check fix:** the check first rejected the file because the `window` fields weren't in the brief's order. I reordered them to match. As required, the file is left untracked.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in blocks 26041354 to 26044929 is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The next four are `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` (8), `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` (6), `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` (5) and `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` (3). I included five entries so the list covers more than the `head` of 1. I ran one scan with `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and it confirmed the pinned closing block hash. It found 58 `TransferSingle` logs going to 22 distinct recipients. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The recipe in the file is a `log-rank` over the contract, grouped by the `to` address and summing `value`. `definitions` restates the request's fixed terms: raw `value` units, gross incoming including mints, no `TransferBatch`, inclusive bounds. `check-answer.mjs` rejected the first draft because the `window` keys have to be in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). I reordered them.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written. The top recipient is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 token units received. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for the file. - **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` once over blocks 26041354 to 26044929, using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with the pinned closing hash passed via `--pin`. It found 58 TransferSingle logs across 22 recipients. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint or re-scan. - **Ranking:** The answer lists the top five: `0x6ae6…e488` (17), `0x88f7…7054` (8), `0xe1dd…a4ad` (6 — full address `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5`), `0xd2ab…3def` (5) and `0xd66b…e074` (3). All five full addresses are in the file. - **Recipe:** It is a `log-rank` recipe on the Shared Storefront contract, grouped by `to`, summing `value`, with `abs` false and `topN` 5. - **Definitions:** The file states that raw `value` is summed, TransferBatch is not counted, both bounds are inclusive, and mints count as received. The checker rejected my first draft: it wanted the window keys in the order `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`, and it required `abs` in the recipe. I fixed both.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in the window is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The next four are, in order: - `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` (8) - `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` (6) - `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` (5) - `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` (3) I ran `scan.mjs` once over blocks 26041354 to 26044929 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, grouping `TransferSingle` by the `to` address and summing `value`. The scan found 58 logs across 22 recipient addresses. I did not run a second scan or check the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint. The recipe is `log-rank` on contract `0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e`, grouped by `to`, with `topN` of 5. Counting is gross incoming, mints included, and `TransferBatch` logs are not counted, as the request defines.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in blocks 26041354–26044929 is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The scan found 58 TransferSingle logs from the contract, going to 22 distinct addresses. The next four, in order, are `0x88f7cadd…` (8), `0xe1ddc7f1…` (6), `0xd2ab77a1…` (5) and `0xd66bb05f…` (3). I ran the scan once, against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and it confirmed the pinned closing block hash. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. The recipe in the file is a `log-rank` on the contract's TransferSingle event, grouped by `to` and summing `value`, with `topN` 5. Its `definitions` block carries the request's units, window, ranking and received rules unchanged, and `notes` records the endpoint and scan command.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` on it. The address that received the most OpenSea Shared Storefront token units in blocks 26041354–26044929 is `0x6ae61f9d7c3fd9938c6290e1cbf39c017662e488`, with 17 units. The next four are `0x88f7cadd37a6b030b0ee7efe90b283e1be947054` (8), `0xe1ddc7f1a171f927ef4b79e55d1d0838308ad4a5` (6), `0xd2ab77a10cab66433c167e9aa4cc3178fe133def` (5) and `0xd66bb05faa64b1b5221ef1f144b3dac097c1e074` (3). - **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` once on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` over the pinned range, and the closing block hash matched the pin. It found 58 `TransferSingle` logs across 22 recipients. - **Cross-check:** I did not confirm the closing hash on a second endpoint. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` grouped by `to`, summing `value`, with `abs` false and `topN` 5. - **Definitions:** I stated units, window bounds and what "received" counts. `notes` has the scan command and the endpoint.