skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26022889 to 26023188, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What is the floor price of Autoglyphs (Autoglyphs, contract 0xd4e4078ca3495de5b1d4db434bebc5a986197782) on Ethereum mainnet, in wei, as of the pinned window? Read the lowest active listing on a major marketplace and name the source. Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`), and is left untracked (excluded via `.git/info/exclude`) for the daemon to upload. ## Answer **59690000000000000000 wei** (59.69 ETH) — the lowest active listing on OpenSea, Autoglyph #132. ## How it was established - **Window pin**: closing block 26023188 confirmed on two operators (`rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`) — chain id 0x1, hash matches `0x6823bad2…fca579`, timestamp 2026-09-21T03:24:59Z. The read was made ~30–40 minutes after that block; both OpenSea (1d floor change 0%) and NFTPriceFloor (24h native change 0) indicate the same listing was the floor at the closing block. - **OpenSea** (primary, named in `recipe.source`): the collection page title reads "Autoglyphs 59.69 ETH", Listed 2. NFTPriceFloor's OpenSea feed independently identifies the same listing: token 132, 59.69 ETH, origin `opensea`, timestamp 03:52:22Z. - **Blur**: lowest listing 1024 ETH (#216), top bid 35 ETH — does not lower the floor. - **Magic Eden**: unreadable from here (v4 API returned 503 "no healthy upstream" on every attempt; the frontend sits behind a Cloudflare challenge). Since Magic Eden aggregates Seaport/OpenSea listings, it wouldn't show a lower ask than OpenSea itself. This is stated in `notes`. - **Disregarded**: CoinGecko's 87 ETH figure, which matches no live marketplace listing. Caveats worth knowing: OpenSea's API needs a key, so the marketplace pages were read rendered through a text proxy (`r.jina.ai`) — noted in `notes`. The listing price is displayed to two decimals; two independent sources agree on 59.69, so the wei figure is exact to that precision.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the uint256 answer: `59690000000000000000` wei Validation passed: `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` → `ok`
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/864ce30d-a5e6-4306-9f51-0e8c615b3ba5/4ef97af2-da19-45fc-bae0-3f4c908c14b0/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH), sourced from OpenSea. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/864ce30d-a5e6-4306-9f51-0e8c615b3ba5/4ef97af2-da19-45fc-bae0-3f4c908c14b0/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json); checker prints `ok`. Records OpenSea’s observed floor: **59690000000000000000 wei**. Notes explicitly disclose that the historical pinned-time floor and RPC-only reproduction remain unverified.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with OpenSea’s observed listing: **59690000000000000000 wei (59.69 ETH)**. Checker prints `ok`. The file explicitly records the limitation: historical floor verification and RPC-only reproduction remain unmet because the required panel recipe uses off-chain marketplace evidence.
I've written `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. My answer is a floor of **59690000000000000000** wei (59.69 ETH), taken from OpenSea's lowest active listing. It is not pinned exactly to the closing block's time, so it could be wrong if a listing changed in between. - **Window:** two public nodes run by different operators (publicnode and mevblocker) both return the pinned hash `0x6823bad2…fca579` for closing block 26023188. That block's time is 2026-09-21 03:24:59 UTC. - **Source:** the recipe is a `panel` recipe pointing at `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats`, whose `floor_price` field was 59.69 ETH. - **Timing gap:** I read that endpoint about 31 minutes after the closing block. The collection had no sales in the last 1, 7 or 30 days, so the floor most likely didn't move in those 31 minutes. OpenSea's listings endpoint, which would show the exact listing, needs an API key, so I couldn't confirm it. - **Other marketplaces:** I couldn't check Blur (it served a Cloudflare challenge page) or Magic Eden (its API returned "Not Found" or "no healthy upstream"), so the floor covers OpenSea only. The `notes` field records all of this, and `definitions` repeats the brief's floor and denomination definitions and adds the source and the as-of time. The file is left untracked, as the brief asks.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **59690000000000000000 wei** (59.69 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Source:** OpenSea's public collection stats endpoint for Autoglyphs, `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats`, field `total.floor_price`. The recipe is `panel` with that URL as the source. - **Timing:** I read it about 30 minutes (roughly 117 blocks) after the closing block's timestamp. The endpoint has no historical option, so this is a near-window reading, not a snapshot at the block. - **Not checked:** I did not cross-check against Blur or Magic Eden. OpenSea's per-listing endpoint needs an API key, so I could not see the individual lowest listing. - **Pinned block:** Two independent RPC endpoints, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, both returned block 26023188 with the pinned hash `0x6823bad2…fca579` on chain 1. - **No log scan:** I ran none, since this is a panel question. All of this is also recorded in the answer's `notes` field.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `59690000000000000000` wei (59.69 ETH)** How it was established: - **Pin confirmed on two operators.** `eth_getBlockByNumber(26023188)` returns `0x6823bad2…fca579` on both `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, matching the brief. The window is one hour: 2026-09-21T02:24:59Z → 03:24:59Z. - **Source.** Autoglyphs listings are off-chain (`"evidence": "panel"`), so the figure comes from a marketplace orderbook. OpenSea's own public GraphQL endpoint `https://gql.opensea.io/graphql` answers without an API key; Blur's `core-api.prod.blur.io` returns a Cloudflare challenge and Magic Eden's EVM/RTP API now 400s without a key, so OpenSea is the readable marketplace of the three the brief names. - **The listing.** `collectionBySlug("autoglyphs").floorPrice` = 59.69 ETH, native ETH, order `3eee914dc2d73a7c9c9054a95c8ef63f`, created 2026-09-18T14:36:55Z. Cross-checked with `collectionItems(sort:{by:PRICE,direction:ASC})`: only 4 of 512 glyphs are listed — #132 at 59.69, #156 at 69.0, #361 at 75.0, #453 at 87.0 ETH. The 33 WETH collection offer is a bid and is excluded by the request's own definition. - **Active at the closing block.** The ask predates the window by three days. To close the ~29-minute gap between the closing block and my read, I scanned Autoglyphs `Transfer` logs: 0 in 26022889→26023188 (pinned) and 0 in 26023188→26023333, so no cheaper ask was filled in between. - **Rejected 87 ETH.** CoinGecko's free NFT endpoint reports 87.0 ETH, but that is glyph #453's ask from 2026-08-27; its own 24h volume and native floor change are both 0. It is stale relative to OpenSea's live orderbook. One caveat recorded in `notes` and `definitions`: Blur and Magic Eden were not readable from this environment, so a lower ask on either would not have been seen.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with OpenSea’s observed floor: **59690000000000000000 wei**. Checker prints `ok`. The file documents the unresolved limitation: historical floor verification and RPC-only reproduction are not established; the required `panel` recipe uses off-chain evidence.
Created `artifacts/answer.json`; checker prints `ok`. Observed [OpenSea floor](https://opensea.io/collection/autoglyphs): **59690000000000000000 wei**. The file documents the limitation: historical listing status remains unverified, and the required panel recipe cannot satisfy RPC-only reproduction.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and untracked (excluded by `.git/info/exclude`), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 59690000000000000000 wei (59.69 ETH)** How I got there: - **Window pinned.** `eth_chainId` on `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast` returned `0x1`; block `26023188` returned hash `0x6823bad2…fca579`, matching the brief exactly, timestamp `2026-09-21T03:24:59Z`. The opening block is one hour earlier. - **No log scan.** Marketplace asks are off-chain signed orders (Seaport/Blur) — they touch the chain only when filled — so there is no event in the pinned hour that carries a listing price. `scan.mjs` had no figure to produce here; the RPC work was the pin verification. - **Floor read.** `GET https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats` is open without a key and returned `floor_price: 59.69 ETH`, with `num_owners: 171` / `sales: 399` confirming it is the Larva Labs contract `0xd4e4…7782`. ×10^18 gives the wei answer. - **Recipe** is `{ kind: "panel", source: "https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats" }` — the only kind a `"evidence": "panel"` brief accepts. Two limits I recorded in `notes` rather than papering over: - Of the three marketplaces the brief names, only OpenSea was readable. Blur's `core-api` serves a Cloudflare challenge page, and Magic Eden's Ethereum RTP API returns `400 Not Found.` for this contract. If a lower Blur or Magic Eden ask exists, it is not visible from here. - OpenSea's keyed paths (`/collections/autoglyphs`, `/listings/collection/autoglyphs/best`) return `401`, so the exact per-token ask and order hash weren't retrievable; the collection-level floor is the finest figure the open endpoints expose. I also checked CoinGecko, which reports 87.0 ETH for the same contract, and deliberately did **not** use it: it is an aggregator rather than one of the named marketplaces, it is higher (the brief asks for the *lowest* listing), and its native-currency floor change is 0.0% across 24h/7d/14d/30d — the signature of a stale carried-forward number.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 59.69 ETH, which is `59690000000000000000` wei. The answer check prints `ok`. - **Source:** OpenSea's public collection stats endpoint for Autoglyphs, `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/autoglyphs/stats`, field `total.floor_price`. The recipe is `panel` with that URL as its source. - **Timing:** I read it about 20 minutes after the closing block (block 26023188, timestamp 1789961099). Autoglyphs had no sales in the 1, 7 or 30-day intervals, so the lowest listing is unlikely to have moved in that gap. - **Not cross-checked:** OpenSea's per-listing endpoint needs an API key, so I couldn't confirm the number against the individual lowest listing. I didn't consult Blur or Magic Eden, and the stats figure is a two-decimal rounded ETH value. - **Block hash:** I confirmed on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` that block 26023188 has the pinned hash. The check initially rejected the answer because the `window` keys were in a different order from the brief's. I reordered them to match.
The Autoglyphs floor price is **59690000000000000000 wei (59.69 ETH)**, from the lowest active listing on OpenSea (`https://opensea.io/collection/autoglyphs`). I only checked OpenSea, because Blur and Magic Eden couldn't be read from here, so a cheaper listing on those two can't be ruled out. The answer is in `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. On its first run it flagged two things, which I fixed: the window fields weren't in the brief's order, and `figure` wasn't a wei integer. The file is left untracked, as required. **How I got it** - **Closing block:** I confirmed on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` that block 26023188 has the pinned hash `0x6823bad2…fca579`. Its time is 1789961099, which is 2026-09-21 03:24:59 UTC. - **Reading the listing:** This is a panel question, so the recipe is `{"kind":"panel","source":"https://opensea.io/collection/autoglyphs"}` and nothing is rerun on chain. About 17 minutes after the closing block I fetched the OpenSea collection page. Its floor was 59.69 ETH, and the cheapest listing on the page was the same price: - sold on OpenSea itself, order `3eee914dc2d73a7c9c9054a95c8ef63f` - seller `0x7eb29af9bab59b56c6ed152c3d583a8e742b8d0d`, quantity 1 - listed from 2026-09-18T14:36:38Z to 2027-03-17T14:36:38Z It went up before the closing block and hadn't expired, so it was active at that time. - **Excluded:** A 59 ETH value on the page is a past sale, not a listing, so I left it out. Offers were ignored, as the brief's definition requires. **Limits** - **Other marketplaces:** Blur returned a 403 bot wall, and Magic Eden's API returned 404 and 503. - **Timing:** I read the listing 17 minutes after the closing block, not at it. The listing's start and end dates show it was active then. But I can't rule out a cheaper OpenSea listing that existed at the closing block and was gone by the time I looked. - **OpenSea API:** It needs a key, so I didn't use it. All of this is written in the answer's `notes`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/864ce30d-a5e6-4306-9f51-0e8c615b3ba5/4ef97af2-da19-45fc-bae0-3f4c908c14b0/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `59690000000000000000` wei, sourced from OpenSea. Validation passed: `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **59.69 ETH, or 59690000000000000000 wei**, from OpenSea alone. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Source:** OpenSea's collection page for Autoglyphs (`https://opensea.io/collection/autoglyphs`). Its page data lists a floor of 59.69 ETH as the best listing (USD 159,195). That listing is in native ETH and ran from 2026-09-18 to 2027-03-17, so it was active at the closing block. - **Bids left out:** the 33 WETH figures on the page are offers, not listings, and are excluded as the request's definition says. - **Recipe:** `panel` with that URL as the source, since the brief calls for panel evidence. The window, request id and chain are copied from `oracle.json`, and the definitions and notes are filled in. Three things could make this differ from other panel members' answers: - **Fetch time:** I read the page on 2026-09-21, about 15 minutes after the closing block (03:24:59Z), so it shows the floor at fetch time, not at that block. I confirmed the block hash on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. - **Single marketplace:** the OpenSea API needs a key, and the Reservoir, Blur and Magic Eden endpoints I tried didn't answer. OpenSea is the only marketplace I read. - **Rounding:** the page shows the price to two decimals, so the wei figure assumes the listing is exactly 59.69 ETH. Only `artifacts/answer.json` is delivered; my scratch download is in `test/scratch/` and isn't submitted.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with OpenSea’s observed floor: **59690000000000000000 wei**. Checker printed `ok`. The file documents the unresolved limitation: the historical floor and RPC-only reproduction could not be verified; the required `panel` recipe provides off-chain evidence.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Checker prints `ok`. Recorded OpenSea’s observed floor: **59690000000000000000 wei**. The file explicitly notes that historical accuracy at the pinned block and RPC-only reproduction remain unverified.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json); checker prints `ok`. Recorded OpenSea’s observed floor: **59690000000000000000 wei**. The artifact explicitly states that pinned-time accuracy and RPC-only reproduction remain unverified, so those acceptance criteria are not satisfied.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.