91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867IMD JOB

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`). The selected floor is `3399000000000000000` wei.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, passes the checker (`ok`), is 4,634 bytes, and is left untracked for the daemon to upload. **Answer: 3399000000000000000 wei (3.399 ETH)** — the current Pudgy Penguins listing floor per OpenSea v2 collection stats, selected by the brief's pinned `floorRule`. How each requirement was met: - **Collection verification**: CoinGecko id `pudgy-penguins` → ethereum contract `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8`; OpenSea's contract-lookup endpoint confirmed it as a standalone ERC-721 with verified slug `pudgypenguins` (not equal to the CoinGecko id, as the brief warned). - **Both API attempts succeeded** (no keys needed, no 401/403/429): CoinGecko returned floor 3.4 ETH at 20:57:17Z; OpenSea stats returned 3.399 ETH (symbol ETH) at 20:57:55Z, re-confirmed at 21:01:11Z. Difference is 0.03%, below the 1% investigation threshold. Per `floorRule`, OpenSea stats wins, so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats"}` — a guard-allowed URL. - **Onchain cross-check over exactly the pinned window** (26021221–26028367): chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash confirmed on two independent operators (flashbots, publicnode). Of 47 transfers, the latest 3 receipt-verified sales were all Blur v2 `Execution721Packed` trades — tokens 3824 (3.32 ETH, block 26028010), 5412 (3.4264 ETH, block 26027958), and 7052 (3.45 ETH, block 26027948) — with earlier Seaport 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` sales in the window agreeing (3.21–6.23 ETH/WETH). Sales corroborate the ~3.4 ETH floor but were not used as the answer. - **Discrepancy explained**: OpenSea's Seaport-only best-listings feed showed a cheapest listing of 3.475 ETH (2.2% above the stats floor); noted in the answer as an indexing-scope difference, with the stats floor kept per the pinned rule. The one prior substantive failure was a missing `artifacts/` output; that directory and file now exist at the required path with the request id, chain, and window copied byte-exactly from the brief.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: `3399000000000000000` wei (3.399 ETH). Required validator result: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). It reports the verified OpenSea floor: `3399000000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). It reports the OpenSea ETH listing floor as `3399000000000000000` wei and passes the supplied validator (`ok`).

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). Selected OpenSea’s fresh ETH floor: `3399000000000000000` wei. The artifact includes provider attempts, contract/scope verification, sales receipt evidence, timestamps, and discrepancy explanation. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3.399 ETH, which is `3399000000000000000` wei, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not do the onchain sales cross-check the task asked for. - **OpenSea:** `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats` returned HTTP 200 without a key, with `total.floor_price` 3.399 ETH. The collection page `https://opensea.io/collection/pudgypenguins` shows the same figure. I picked this one because the brief prefers OpenSea when the symbol is ETH and the collection matches. - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` returned HTTP 200 with floor 3.4 ETH. It is about 0.03% higher than OpenSea, well under the 1% threshold. The contract is `0xBd3531dA5CF5857e7CfAA92426877b022e612cf8` on Ethereum, a dedicated ERC721, so no token-id filter applies. - **Timestamps:** both fetches ran around 20:58–21:00 UTC on 2026-09-21. Neither response gave a usable last-updated time. - **Missing sales evidence:** I did not decode any Seaport sale receipts in blocks 26021221 to 26028367, so the answer has no onchain sales support. `notes` says so, and the floor is not inferred from sales. - **Earlier failure:** the earlier rejection was a missing `artifacts/` directory, which I created. The first draft of the file also failed the window check on key order, so I copied the window straight from `oracle.json`. The recipe is `panel` with the OpenSea stats URL as its source.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **3399000000000000000 wei** (3.399 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The sales cross-check the request asked for was not done. - **Floor source:** OpenSea `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats` returned HTTP 200 without a key, at 2026-09-21T20:58Z. It gave `total.floor_price` = 3.399 ETH (symbol ETH). It supplies no `last_updated` field. I used it because the floor rule prefers OpenSea when the symbol is ETH and the collection scope matches. - **Contract:** `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8` on Ethereum. OpenSea's collection endpoint lists it, and CoinGecko's `contract_address` matches it. It is a dedicated contract, so no token-id filter applies. - **CoinGecko cross-check:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` returned HTTP 200 with a floor of 3.4 ETH. That is 0.029% from the OpenSea figure, well under the 1% investigation threshold. - **Sales not decoded:** OpenSea's sale-events endpoint returned HTTP 401 (missing API key, and I have none). I found no sales to decode from receipts and made none up. `notes` records this along with the 19-sale, 64.5 ETH one-day figure OpenSea's stats report, as coverage context only. - **Recipe:** `panel`, with `recipe.source` set to the OpenSea stats URL above. I did not use any RPC endpoint, so the pinned block hash was not checked against a node. The answer is a live offchain listing, not something the block window reconstructs. The `window` object had to follow the brief's key order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`) for the checker to accept it. The earlier attempt's failure was a missing `artifacts` directory, which this run created.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3.399 ETH, which is `3399000000000000000` wei. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not do the sales cross-check the question asks for. - **Source:** OpenSea v2 `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats` returned HTTP 200 with `total.floor_price` 3.399 ETH. The recipe is `panel` and cites that URL. The response has no `last_updated` field, so the only timestamp in the notes is my retrieval time (about 20:58 UTC on 2026-09-21). - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` returned 200 with a floor of 3.4 ETH and contract `0xBd3531dA5CF5857e7CfAA92426877b022e612cf8` on Ethereum. That is 0.03% off OpenSea, so no discrepancy to investigate. I followed the request's floor rule and used OpenSea, without averaging. - **Not done:** I did not decode any Seaport sale events or fetch transaction receipts in blocks 26021221–26028367. The notes say the sales cross-check was not performed. I also did not separately verify the OpenSea slug from contract links. The slug returned stats for the right collection, and that is the only check on it. The earlier rejection was a missing `artifacts/` directory; I created it this time.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **3399000000000000000 wei** (3.399 ETH), and the checker prints `ok`. The onchain sales cross-check the request asked for is not done. - **OpenSea:** `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats` returned HTTP 200 without a key. `total.floor_price` is 3.399 ETH, and I used this figure. The response has no source timestamp, so I recorded my own retrieval time (2026-09-21T20:58Z). - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` returned HTTP 200 with a floor of 3.4 ETH. It gives the same contract, `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8` on Ethereum, and has no source timestamp either. The two floors differ by 0.029%, well under the 1% threshold. I did not average them. - **Sales:** I did not fetch or decode any sales in blocks 26021221–26028367. The notes say so and assert no sales figures. - **Recipe:** `panel`, with source `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats`. The first `check-answer.mjs` run failed because it wants the `window` keys in the request's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). I reordered them and it now passes.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

[artifacts/answer.json](</Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json) created and verified with the assessor (`ok`).

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3399000000000000000 wei (3.399 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I did not do the onchain cross-check of the latest 3 sales, so the answer has no sales evidence behind it. - **Floor source:** OpenSea v2 stats at `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats`. It returned HTTP 200 with `total.floor_price` 3.399 in ETH, retrieved at 2026-09-21T20:56Z. I selected it under the brief's floor rule, since the symbol is ETH and the collection scope matches. That endpoint supplies no last-updated time. - **CoinGecko check:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` also returned HTTP 200, with a floor of 3.4 ETH. That is a 0.03% difference, under the 1% investigation threshold. It also supplies no last-updated time. - **Collection:** CoinGecko lists the mainnet contract as `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8`. It is a dedicated contract, so no token-id filter is needed. - **Recipe:** a `panel` recipe with the OpenSea URL as its source. The floor is an offchain fact, so I used no RPC for the answer. `notes` says plainly that the sales cross-check was not performed. - **Fix for the earlier rejections:** this run created the `artifacts/` directory before writing. I also had to put the `window` keys in the same order as `oracle.json`. The checker rejects the other order. The file is untracked, as required.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3399000000000000000 wei (3.399 ETH). The check script prints `ok` on it. I did not do the on-chain sales cross-check the question asks for. - **Floor source:** OpenSea's collection stats endpoint, `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats`. It returned HTTP 200 without a key at 2026-09-21T20:56Z, with `total.floor_price` 3.399 in ETH. I picked it because the floor rule prefers OpenSea when the symbol is ETH. - **Second source:** CoinGecko's `/nfts/pudgy-penguins` also returned HTTP 200 and lists `floor_price.native_currency` as 3.4 ETH. That is 0.03% higher, well under the 1% threshold. The CoinGecko response had no `last_updated` field, so I could not check its age. - **Collection scope:** CoinGecko gives the Ethereum contract as `0xBd3531dA5CF5857e7CfAA92426877b022e612cf8`. I did not verify the contract on chain or check for any token-id restrictions. I assumed it is a dedicated contract with no shared-contract filter. - **Not done:** I did not fetch any OpenSea sale events or decode any transaction receipts. I also did not confirm the pinned closing block hash against an RPC. The notes in the answer say so. - **Recipe:** it is a `panel` recipe citing the OpenSea URL above as its source. - **Earlier failure:** the previous attempt failed because the `artifacts` directory did not exist. I created it before writing the file.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). Selected floor: `3399000000000000000` wei (3.399 ETH), from OpenSea stats. The artifact includes both API attempts, timestamps, collection verification, and three decoded Blur sale events in the pinned window. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` → `ok`.

Checker prints `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` reports the Pudgy Penguins live-listing floor as `3475000000000000000` wei (3.475 ETH), sourced from OpenSea's `listings/collection/pudgypenguins/best` endpoint, with both provider checks, the contract/slug verification, and onchain Transfer-log corroboration (pinned to the exact block range) recorded in `notes`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). Verified with the supplied checker: `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3399000000000000000 wei (3.399 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I skipped the onchain cross-check of the latest sales, which the task asked for. That check would have decoded Seaport `OrderFulfilled` receipts in blocks 26021221–26028367. The notes in the file say so, and no sales data is claimed. - **Answer:** the OpenSea stats value, converted to wei exactly. I used OpenSea because its floor is in ETH and the collection scope matches. The recipe is `panel` with `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats` as its source. - **OpenSea:** the stats endpoint returned HTTP 200 with `total.floor_price` 3.399 ETH, retrieved at 2026-09-21T20:55:53Z. It supplied no `last_updated` time. - **CoinGecko:** `/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` returned HTTP 200 with a floor of 3.4 ETH, retrieved at 20:55:56Z. That is 0.03% above OpenSea, inside the 1% tolerance, so I put the difference down to CoinGecko rounding. - **Contract:** CoinGecko lists Pudgy Penguins on Ethereum at `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8`. It is a dedicated contract, so no token-id filter applies. - **Reproducibility:** the file states that an offchain listing floor can't be reproduced from RPC data, so this rests on panel agreement. The first check failed because the window keys were in the wrong order, `fromBlock` first. I reordered them to match `oracle.json`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is 3399000000000000000 wei, which is 3.399 ETH. - **OpenSea:** the v2 collection stats endpoint (slug `pudgypenguins`) returned HTTP 200 at 2026-09-21T20:55:51Z with `total.floor_price` 3.399 ETH. It supplies no source timestamp. I used this figure, per the request's floor rule, and cited that URL as the recipe source. - **CoinGecko:** `/nfts/pudgy-penguins` returned HTTP 200 at 20:55:55Z with a native floor of 3.4 ETH and contract `0xBd3531dA5CF5857e7CfAA92426877b022e612cf8` on Ethereum. It also supplies no `last_updated_at`. The two floors differ by 0.029%, which is under the 1% threshold that would need investigating. - **Sales cross-check not done:** I did not decode Seaport sales from receipts in blocks 26021221 to 26028367. The notes in the answer file say so and give no sales figures. OpenSea's one-day stats show 19 sales, so there were sales in the window. - **Recipe kind:** it is `panel`, since the request pins evidence as `panel`. The earlier failures were all a missing `artifacts/` directory, which I created this time.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, untracked (excluded by `.git/info/exclude`), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 3399000000000000000 wei (3.399 ETH)** — Pudgy Penguins collection-wide listing floor. How it was established: - **Collection scope verified.** CoinGecko `pudgy-penguins` → contract `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8`, platform ethereum. Confirmed on chain at the pinned closing block via `eth_call`: `name()` = PudgyPenguins, `symbol()` = PPG, `totalSupply()` = 8888. Dedicated contract, so no project/token-id filter is needed. - **Both providers attempted, both fresh.** OpenSea v2 stats (`/collections/pudgypenguins/stats`) returned `total.floor_price` 3.399 with `floor_price_symbol` ETH; CoinGecko returned `floor_price.native_currency` 3.4 ETH. Read at 20:53:42Z and again at 20:55:11Z with identical values; the window closes 20:48:59Z. Per the brief's `floorRule`, OpenSea is selected (symbol ETH, scope matches); the 0.0294% gap to CoinGecko is under the 1% threshold and is reported, not averaged. - **API failure reported.** `/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins` answered HTTP 200 with `{"errors":["Missing an API Key…"]}` — no key available, so scope came from listing payloads plus onchain calls instead. The keyless `/listings/collection/pudgypenguins/best` did work; its cheapest Seaport order is 3.475 ETH, 2.24% above the stats floor, which I explain in notes as OpenSea's own order book being a subset of the aggregated floor (Blur carries most current PPG flow). - **Onchain cross-check.** flashbots RPC, chain id 0x1, closing hash matches the pin. 47 ERC-721 Transfers in the 24h window; decoded the latest sales from receipts — Blur id 3824 at 3.32 ETH (BETH), Blur id 5412 at 3.4264 ETH (native), and the latest Seaport 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` sale, id 5685 at 3.289026570 ETH total consideration including fees. One Blur Blend flow was excluded as having no attributable unit price. Sales bracket the floor but were not used to derive it. The recipe is `{ kind: "panel", source: "https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats" }`, an allowed guard host.

Check passes with `ok`. Summary: - Resolved CoinGecko id `pudgy-penguins` → contract `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8` on Ethereum, verified matching OpenSea `pudgypenguins` collection contract. - OpenSea v2 stats (200 OK): floor 3.399 ETH; CoinGecko NFT API (200 OK): floor 3.4 ETH — 0.03% apart, so no discrepancy to investigate; per `floorRule`, OpenSea's floor is selected. - Confirmed the pinned block window's closing hash exactly via RPC, then scanned Transfer logs on the contract and decoded one corroborating sale (tokenId 7052, 3.45 ETH via native-currency settlement logs) — consistent with a floor near 3.4 ETH; two other transfers lacked decodable payment legs and were excluded per the "Transfer alone isn't a sale" rule. - Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with answer `3399000000000000000` wei (3.399 ETH) and a `panel` recipe citing the OpenSea stats URL; `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Taylor — done. `artifacts/answer.json` passes `check-answer.mjs`. Floor: **3.399 ETH = 3,399,000,000,000,000,000 wei**, from OpenSea's `total.floor_price` (200 OK, slug `pudgypenguins`), corroborated by CoinGecko's `floor_price.native_currency` (3.4 ETH, 0.03% diff). Pinned-window scan confirmed the block-range hash and found 47 Transfer logs on the contract, but I didn't finish decoding Seaport `OrderFulfilled` for exact sale prices within budget — noted as a limitation, not substituted for the floor.

Check passes. Answer computed: Pudgy Penguins floor = 3.399 ETH = **3399000000000000000 wei**, sourced from OpenSea v2 collection stats (preferred over CoinGecko's 3.4 ETH per the floorRule, 0.03% discrepancy noted), cross-checked with on-chain contract verification and a 47-Transfer scan over the pinned block window. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `3399000000000000000` wei (3.399 ETH). Validation passed: `ok`.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd\work\91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867\d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

Failed to authenticate: OAuth session expired and could not be refreshed

FAILURE: runtime_error

required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/seat3/.identitymd/work/91214ffc-e216-4f1a-be9a-af08a1a9f867/d4ef095c-32ee-4d13-80a6-ae50fa8a053f/artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3399000000000000000 wei (3.399 ETH). It passes `check-answer.mjs` (prints `ok`). I did not do the on-chain sales cross-check the question asked for. - **Floor source:** OpenSea v2 `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats` returned HTTP 200 with `total.floor_price` 3.399 ETH, fetched at about 2026-09-21T20:53Z. The response carried no last-updated timestamp. - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` also returned HTTP 200, with a floor of 3.4 ETH. That is 0.029% above OpenSea's, well under the 1% threshold that needs investigating. - **Why OpenSea:** the floor rule prefers OpenSea stats when the symbol is ETH and the collection matches. - **Collection:** CoinGecko lists the Ethereum contract as `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8`. It is a dedicated Pudgy Penguins contract with no token-id filter. - **Recipe:** `panel`, with the OpenSea stats URL as its source. - **Sales:** I did not fetch receipts or decode Seaport sale events for the latest 3 sales. The notes state that limitation. OpenSea's one-day figure showed 19 sales, so sales exist. No last-sale price was used for the floor.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3.399 ETH, which is `3399000000000000000` wei. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I did not do the onchain sales cross-check the question asks for. - **OpenSea:** `GET https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats` returned HTTP 200 without a key, with `total.floor_price` 3.399 ETH. I used this as the floor, since the symbol is ETH and the collection scope matches. That is the source cited in the recipe, which is kind `panel`. - **CoinGecko:** `GET https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` returned HTTP 200 with a native floor of 3.4 ETH. The two floors differ by about 0.03%, under the 1% threshold. CoinGecko lists the mainnet contract as `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8`, so there is no token-id restriction. - **Timestamps:** I retrieved both at 2026-09-21T20:53Z. Neither response supplied a `last_updated` time. - **Sales:** I did not decode any Seaport `OrderFulfilled` events or transaction receipts in blocks 26021221–26028367. `notes` says so plainly rather than claiming coverage. OpenSea does report 19 sales in the last day. The first version of the file failed the check because `window` keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. I reordered them to match.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3,399,000,000,000,000,000 wei (3.399 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I did not do the onchain sales cross-check the question asked for. It is stated in `notes`. - **Selected floor:** OpenSea returned `total.floor_price` 3.399 ETH from `https://api.opensea.io/api/v2/collections/pudgypenguins/stats`. I picked it because the floor rule prefers OpenSea when the symbol is ETH and the collection matches. - **Collection:** contract `0xbd3531da5cf5857e7cfaa92426877b022e612cf8` on Ethereum, taken from CoinGecko's response. The contract is dedicated to Pudgy Penguins, so no token-id filter is needed. I did not verify the OpenSea slug against the contract independently. - **CoinGecko:** `https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/nfts/pudgy-penguins` also returned HTTP 200, with a floor of 3.4 ETH. That is 0.03% from OpenSea, well under the 1% threshold. - **Source timestamps:** neither API supplied a last-updated time. I fetched both around 20:53 UTC on 2026-09-21, so the data is fresh, but the source times are not known. - **Sales cross-check:** I did not decode any Seaport `OrderFulfilled` receipts in blocks 26021221 to 26028367, and I used no RPC at all. OpenSea's one-day stats show 19 sales and 64.51 ETH volume, which nothing onchain corroborates. The answer rests on the two API floors alone. - **Recipe:** a `panel` recipe citing the OpenSea stats URL as its source, since this is an offchain fact.

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error