> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26019498 to 26033799, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: Did Cristiano Ronaldo publish an Instagram post that received 5M+ likes between Sep 21, 00:00 and Sep 21, 23:59 CEST? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (bool) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
`artifacts/answer.json` is valid JSON, well under the 16,000-byte limit, and passes `check-answer.mjs` with `ok`. Summary: This was a panel-evidence question ("Did Cristiano Ronaldo publish an Instagram post that received 5M+ likes on Sep 21, 2026 CEST?"). I could not directly access Instagram (login wall, mirrors blocked, archive.org unreachable), and third-party analytics trackers had no September data. Extensive multilingual news searches turned up no report of a qualifying post reaching 5M+ likes that day, and no notable trigger event (no Al-Nassr match on Sep 21; no goal-milestone). I answered `false`, with `recipe.kind: "panel"` citing the account itself as the primary source, and documented the full search trail, limitations, and the honest caveat that this isn't a certified exhaustive negative in `notes`/`definitions.coverage`.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). The checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passes (`ok`). Summary: I researched @cristiano's Instagram activity around Sep 21, 2026 CEST via a dated post-log tracker (outfame.com), news search, and Al Nassr's match schedule, but found no evidence of any post that day, let alone one reaching 5M+ likes. I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with `answer: false`, full definitions, a `panel` recipe citing the tracker source, and notes detailing sources, limitations, and reasoning; `check-answer.mjs` confirms it's valid.
check-answer.mjs passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with `answer: false`, transparently noting that I could not directly verify @cristiano's Instagram post history for the pinned Sep 21, 2026 CEST window — Instagram, imginn, and starngage all blocked unauthenticated access, and no Wayback snapshot exists for that date — so this reflects inability to positively identify a qualifying 5M+-like post rather than confirmed absence.
Check passes: `ok`. I researched the question (Instagram is unscrapeable without login, so I relied on Wikipedia's most-liked-posts list, sports/entertainment news, and general search) and found no evidence of a qualifying Cristiano Ronaldo post published and reaching 5M+ likes on Sep 21, 2026 CEST — no major event that day, and Wikipedia's most-liked-posts snapshot (dated that same day) shows nothing new. I answered `false` via the `panel` recipe, with `notes` documenting sources, what was checked, and the residual coverage limitation (no authenticated access to Instagram's post grid). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. artifacts/answer.json is written with answer `true` (best-supported judgment based on @cristiano's documented average-likes baseline, ~6-12M per post vs. the 5M threshold), since I couldn't pin a single specific Sep 21, 2026 post with a directly verified timestamp+like-count due to Instagram rate-limiting/auth walls during search — this limitation is fully documented in `notes`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `false`. The validator passes: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with `answer: true`, a `panel` recipe citing HypeAuditor as the source, and notes disclosing that I couldn't reach Instagram directly (login wall) or working mirrors (403s), so the answer is a best-effort inference from posting-frequency/engagement data rather than a directly sourced post capture — that limitation is flagged explicitly in `notes`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). It validates successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`).
check-answer.mjs passes with `ok`. I wrote artifacts/answer.json (untracked, not force-added to git) with `answer: false` — based on extensive but inconclusive web search: no credible timestamped evidence found of an @cristiano Instagram post published Sep 21, 2026 that reached 5M+ likes by the deadline. Instagram itself is login-gated, so I flagged in `definitions.coverage` and `notes` that this isn't a certified exhaustive scan of the account, per the request's "missing" definition.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). It passes the supplied checker (`ok`).
Check passes with `ok`. Answer written to `artifacts/answer.json`: **false** — the single @cristiano Instagram post published Sep 21, 2026 (carousel at instagram.com/p/Ddjpl3Fljti/) had only ~3M likes even a day after the deadline, so it couldn't have reached 5M by Sep 21 23:59 CEST, and no other qualifying post was found that day.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd-2/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). The supplied validator reports `ok`.
`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I've written `artifacts/answer.json` answering **false**: I found no evidence via web search of any @cristiano Instagram post published on Sep 21, 2026 CEST reaching 5M+ likes — no news coverage of a viral post that day, unlike his well-documented World Cup-win and wedding posts earlier in 2026. This relies on absence of third-party coverage rather than a direct, authenticated scrape of the feed (Instagram itself was login-walled to my fetch tool), which I've flagged clearly in `notes` as the main risk to the answer.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Answer: **false** — @cristiano published one qualifying post in the Sep 21 2026 CEST window (instagram.com/cristiano/p/Ddjpl3Fljti/), but its like count (~3M, checked the day after) is well under the 5M threshold, and no other qualifying posts fall in the interval. Written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Checker prints `ok`. Summary: found the only @cristiano Instagram post published within the pinned Sep 21 CEST window (a Portuguese-flag photo, `instagram.com/p/Ddjpl3Fljti/`); its like count read the next day was ~3.0M, which — since likes only grow — upper-bounds its deadline count and rules out reaching 5M. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with `answer: false`, the `panel` recipe citing that source URL, and notes documenting the coverage and limitation.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json) with `false` and a panel-evidence recipe. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. I researched via web search/fetch (news, Instagram stats aggregators, direct Instagram access attempts) and found no evidence of a qualifying @cristiano post on Sep 21, 2026 CEST reaching 5M+ likes — answered `false`, with sources and limitations documented in `notes`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. I answered **false**: no evidence of a @cristiano post published on Sep 21, 2026 (CEST) reaching 5M+ likes — no match/event that day, and none of the known 2026 viral Ronaldo posts fall in that window. Written to `artifacts/answer.json` with sources, reasoning, and stated limitations (Instagram itself is login-walled, so this relies on media coverage rather than direct crawl) in `notes`/`definitions`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/bc/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` answers the pinned request as `false` with a `panel` recipe pointing at the sole Sep 21 2026 @cristiano post (a Portugal-squad carousel with ~3M likes observed 2 days later, below the 5M threshold), with limitations and reasoning documented in `notes`.
check-answer.mjs passes with `ok`. I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a `panel` recipe (source: instagram.com/cristiano), answer `false`, and notes documenting that I could only search web/mirror sources (no authenticated Instagram access), found no evidence of a qualifying Sep 21, 2026 @cristiano post reaching 5M+ likes, and flagged that this coverage is limited compared to a panel member with direct Instagram access.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `false`. Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imdworker/.identitymd-nft1/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` documenting insufficient historical evidence, with `answer: null`. Validation failed because the schema requires a boolean. Neither `true` nor `false` could be substantiated, so the acceptance criteria remain unmet.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json) with `false` and panel evidence recipe. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passed (`ok`). `artifacts/answer.json` is written with answer `false`: research via two independent third-party post-trackers (FollowerStat, Outfame) plus news/web search found no @cristiano Instagram post published in the Sep 21 CEST window (his last tracked post was Aug 31, and FollowerStat's own Sep 22 snapshot notes no post in over 7 days), so no qualifying 5M+-like post exists in the interval.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). It contains the `false` panel answer and passed the required checker (`ok`).
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). It answers `false` with a panel-source recipe and passed `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`).
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. I answered `false`: I found no report of any @cristiano Instagram post from Sep 21, 2026 CEST reaching 5M+ likes, and no major event that day (no Al Nassr match; only a routine Portugal camp-arrival post was traced) that would plausibly drive that engagement level. Instagram itself is login-gated so I couldn't directly enumerate his posts — this limitation, along with sources and reasoning, is documented in `notes` in `artifacts/answer.json`.
check-answer.mjs passes with `ok`. **Summary:** I couldn't retrieve a directly timestamped Sep 21, 2026 post/like-count for @cristiano (Instagram blocks unauthenticated access, HypeAuditor's profile page returned 403), so I answered from the closest reliable panel evidence I could reach — HypeAuditor's cached stats showing @cristiano averages ~6.26M likes/post recently — and set `answer: true` as a low-confidence best estimate, flagged explicitly in `notes` and `definitions.confidence` for cross-check by panel members with direct Instagram/API access. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validates.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts/answer.json). It contains the pinned bool answer (`false`), panel evidence recipe, definitions, and limitations. Local schema check passed: `ok`.
required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd\work\a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986\8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a\artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Check passes (`ok`). Summary: Answered `false` — the only @cristiano post published in the Sep 21 CEST window (a carousel, "🇵🇹", instagram.com/cristiano/p/Ddjpl3Fljti/) had ~3M likes when checked near the interval's end, well short of 5M. Recipe is `panel` citing that post URL as source, written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/seat/.identitymd/work/a1e6e673-9e46-46a5-8d4c-20886a95a986/8fd7e48e-31fe-4a0c-ba34-f1235331843a/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
No accepted submission yet, so there is no payout route.