> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26020641 to 26027793, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the floor of ApuApustajas (contract 0xe2fcfbd86e386857a97e0833c888f35405c3cdd7) as realized on chain over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet: the lowest sale price, in wei, among Seaport OrderFulfilled fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, fees included, as the definitions say? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `30253970000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.
I'll start by reading the provided files to understand the task requirements.Now let me read the RPC endpoints file and the scripts.Now let me read the scan script to understand its capabilities.Let me see the rest of the scan script to check how it runs main.The scan script can't decode dynamic-array event data or compute a minimum — I'll write a purpose-built scanner in `test/scratch/` reusing its keccak256 and chunked-fetch approach. First, let me verify the OrderFulfilled topic hash and check network access.Topic hash confirmed (`0x9d9af8e3...6f31`) and network is reachable. Now I'll write the floor scanner in `test/scratch/`.Clean result: pin matched, 11247 OrderFulfilled logs, 28 qualifying sales, floor = 22260120000000000 wei. Before writing the answer, let me add two sanity diagnostics — whether any qualifying fill had an ERC721 `amount != 1`, and counts of near-misses — then re-run on a different operator to guard against a truncated scan.Now let me re-run on a different operator's endpoint to cross-check (guards against silent truncation).Both endpoints agree exactly: 11247 OrderFulfilled logs, 28 collection-NFT fills, all qualifying (25 listings, 3 bids), floor = 22260120000000000 wei. Note the brief has `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe must be `panel` kind per the checker. Writing the answer now — the `window` key order must match the brief exactly since the checker compares `JSON.stringify`.Done. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` and the deliverable is in place. **Answer: `22260120000000000` wei** (~0.02226 ETH) — the floor of ApuApustajas over blocks 26020641–26027793. How it was computed: - Scanned `OrderFulfilled` (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…6f31`) on both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window, decoding offer/consideration item arrays per the Seaport ABI. - Two independent endpoints — `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` — both confirmed `eth_chainId=1` and the pinned closing hash, and returned identical results: **11247** OrderFulfilled logs, **28** fills with exactly one NFT item (the collection's ERC-721, amount 1). - All 28 qualified: 25 listing fills priced as total ETH/WETH consideration (fees included), 3 bid fills priced as the offer amount. Zero exclusions for bundles, multi-item offers, non-ETH/WETH payment, or bad amounts. - Since the brief pins `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` naming the RPC read; the full reproduction method is in `notes`, and my open interpretation choices (NFT itemTypes, single-offer requirement, amount==1) are stated under `definitions`. The prior attempt failed because no `artifacts/answer.json` existed; that is now written and validated.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the floor of **22260120000000000 wei** and a reproducible RPC procedure. The required validator printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `22260120000000000` wei. Validation: checker returned `ok`.
Check passes. Answer computed: floor = **22,260,120,000,000,000 wei** (28 qualifying Seaport fills over the pinned window, verified on two independent RPC operators, closing-block hash pinned). Written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `22260120000000000` wei. Validator output: `ok`.
The floor over blocks 26020641–26027793 is **22260120000000000 wei** (about 0.0223 ETH). I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **How I got it:** I pulled all 11,247 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks. I read them from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` after confirming chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash there. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. I decoded the logs by hand with the Seaport ABI in a scratch script, since `scan.mjs` has no mode for this. - **Qualifying sales:** 25 fills met the definitions, and the lowest priced at the figure above. - **Recipe:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. Its `source` names the endpoint and the log query. The deployer can't rerun a panel recipe, so the answer stands on the panel agreeing. - **Earlier failure:** the previous attempt died because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist. I created it this time.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the floor: **22260120000000000 wei**, computed from 28 qualifying sales. Includes definitions and runnable RPC reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `22260120000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `22260120000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` returned `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `22260120000000000` wei. Validated successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`).
Taylor — `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs` (ok). Floor of ApuApustajas over blocks 26020641–26027793: **22260120000000000 wei** (0.02226012 ETH), from 28 qualifying Seaport 1.6 OrderFulfilled fills, cross-verified on two independent RPC endpoints against the pinned block hash. Recipe is `panel` (required since the brief's `evidence` is `"panel"`) with the on-chain source cited; full reproduction steps are in `notes`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`). The floor is `30253970000000000` wei.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `22260120000000000` wei. The supplied validator reports `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **22260120000000000 wei**, computed from 28 qualifying fills over the exact pinned range. Includes definitions and RPC reproduction instructions. The required checker printed `ok`.
Check passes. Computed the ApuApustajas floor over the pinned block window (26020641–26027793) by scanning both Seaport contracts for `OrderFulfilled`, decoding the tuple arrays by hand, filtering to single-ERC721 ETH/WETH fills per the definitions, and taking the minimum: **22260120000000000 wei** (28 qualifying fills; floor tx `0x60b5d0e9...`, block 26021236). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated with `check-answer.mjs`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The floor for ApuApustajas over the pinned window is **22260120000000000 wei** (0.02226012 ETH), computed from 28 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled fills, written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes the plane's checker (`ok`, exit 0), left untracked as required. **Answer: `22260120000000000` wei** (0.02226012 ETH). How it was computed: - **Pin confirmed** — `eth_chainId` `0x1` and closing hash `0xf86e…9b79` at block 26027793 verified on three independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, mevblocker). - **Narrow, then decode whole** — Seaport's offer/consideration arrays live in log *data*, so the collection can't be topic-filtered. I first pulled the collection's ERC-721 `Transfer` logs over exactly 26020641–26027793 (28 transfers, 8 blocks, 8 txs), then pulled `OrderFulfilled` from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 in those blocks (39 events) and decoded them with the Seaport ABI. This is a strict superset filter — a fill carrying a collection ERC-721 must emit that Transfer in the same tx and block — and the counts corroborate it: 28 transfers, 28 `OrderFulfilled` events holding a collection ERC-721. - **Result** — all 28 qualified (exactly one NFT item, single-item offer, ETH/WETH only): 25 listing fills, 3 bid fills, zero excluded on currency. Lowest 0.02226012 ETH (token 7561, block 26021236), next 0.0244, highest 0.244. One judgment call worth flagging: the minimum is the **net-proceeds leg of an accepted WETH bid**. That transaction emits two `OrderFulfilled` events — the bid (0.0244 WETH gross, with fee + royalty as consideration items) and the seller's counter order (offer = NFT, consideration = 0.02226012 WETH). The brief's `sale` definition fixes the unit as *the event*, and both events satisfy it verbatim, so both are qualifying sales and the lower one is the floor. Had the unit been the economic trade instead, the window held 25 trades and the floor would be `24400000000000000`. I recorded that reading under `definitions.dedupedVariant` rather than substituting it — it's the most likely axis of panel disagreement. The recipe is `panel` (the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker enforces it); the catalogue's chain recipes reduce one scalar per log and cannot express a minimum over decoded Seaport item arrays. The `source` names the endpoint, topic0, both Seaport contracts and the exact blocks.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Verified with the provided checker: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json) with floor: `22260120000000000` wei The required checker prints `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat2/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `22260120000000000` wei. Validator passes (`ok`), and the closing-block pin was confirmed on two public RPCs.
The floor is **22260120000000000 wei** (0.02226012 ETH), the lowest price among 28 qualifying sales in blocks 26020641 to 26027793. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Computation:** The scan.mjs script has no OrderFulfilled decoder, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. I pulled OrderFulfilled logs for both Seaport contracts over exactly the pinned range from publicnode and confirmed the closing block hash matches. That gave 11247 logs; 28 met the request's sale and price definitions. - **Recipe:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. Its `source` is the publicnode endpoint, and the recipe is not something the deployer can rerun. - **Notes and definitions:** They state the endpoint used, the topic and the decoding. - **Not cross-checked:** I did not run a second scan or check the closing hash on a second endpoint. - **Ordering quirk:** The checker requires the window keys in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`), so the file uses that order.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `22260120000000000` wei. The supplied checker passes: `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **22260120000000000 wei** (about 0.0222 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26020641 to 26027793. I read them from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, in 6000-block chunks. The endpoint reported chain 1 and returned the pinned closing hash. - **Filtering:** I decoded 11,247 fills and kept only those matching the request's own definitions of sale and price. 28 fills qualified, and the lowest paid 22260120000000000 wei. - **Recipe:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is the `panel` kind with that RPC URL as its source. It is not a rerunnable chain recipe, so the deployer can't reproduce the number from it. The method is described in `notes` instead. - **Scan method:** `scan.mjs` doesn't decode Seaport's nested item arrays, so I decoded them with my own throwaway script in `test/scratch/f.mjs`, which is not submitted. I did not cross-check on a second endpoint or rerun the scan. The file is untracked and not force-added to Git.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **22260120000000000 wei** (about 0.02226 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I pulled the collection's Transfer logs over blocks 26020641–26027793, which gave 28 logs in 8 transactions. I decoded each transaction's Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 OrderFulfilled events by hand and applied the request's definitions. That left 28 qualifying single-ERC-721 fills paid in ETH or WETH, and the lowest is the answer. - **Recipe:** the request has `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `kind: panel`. Its `source` is the RPC endpoint and the method, and the deployer cannot rerun it mechanically. - **Not done:** I did not use `scan.mjs`; I decoded the logs myself with a throwaway script. I read only from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, so I did not check the closing block hash or confirm the chain id. I did not run a second scan or a second endpoint. - **Odd values:** the fills include amounts like 24400000000000000 and 22260120000000000, which look like distinct sales rather than a decoding error, but I did not cross-check them. One fill in transaction `0xdbf9b4a3…` sums to 33272079999999996 wei. It is not the minimum, so it does not affect the answer.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `22260120000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/a46a5856-2832-4561-a158-81fac2c7b79b/ec3e3d8c-e0fa-492a-aaf6-e4e1f6e6451a/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Check passes. Computed the floor by fetching all Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs at both Seaport 1.5/1.6 over the pinned block range, ABI-decoding the dynamic offer/consideration arrays, filtering to single-ERC-721 ApuApustajas fills paid fully in ETH/WETH, and taking the minimum: **22260120000000000 wei** (28 qualifying sales found), written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
The floor is 22260120000000000 wei (about 0.02226 ETH). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, in 500-block chunks. The closing block hash matched the pin. I did not cross-check against a second endpoint. - **Counts:** the scan returned 11,247 logs, of which 28 met the definitions. The minimum of those 28 is the answer. - **Recipe:** the request's evidence type is `panel`, so the recipe kind is `panel`. That kind only takes a `source` URL, and nothing is rerun. The decoding logic lives in my scratch script, not in the recipe. `notes` records the endpoint, the window and the log counts, but not the decoding steps. - **Decoding:** the standard catalogue scan can't read Seaport's nested offer and consideration arrays. I wrote a small script in `test/scratch/s.mjs` to do it. It counts listing fills paid only in ETH or WETH by summing the consideration amounts, fees included. It counts bid fills at the single ETH or WETH offer amount. - **Earlier failure:** my first run returned 0 because I read the wrong field as the amount. After fixing that, the check failed once on key order in `window`, which I corrected.
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.