> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26020642 to 26027794, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the floor of Drop Ded Gorgez (contract 0x9c51a3cb5094b26aa1dcb380f3dc7e1a7c681c2d) as realized on chain over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet: the lowest sale price, in wei, among Seaport OrderFulfilled fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, fees included, as the definitions say? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `13600000000000000` wei. Validated with the provided checker: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **13600000000000000 wei** and a reproducible RPC procedure. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with: - **answer**: `13724000000000000` wei (0.013724 ETH) — the floor price for Drop Ded Gorgez over blocks 26020642–26027794 - Computed by scanning `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 on two independent public RPC endpoints (publicnode and mevblocker), decoding offer/consideration arrays per the pinned definitions (single ERC-721 of the collection, no other NFT, ETH/WETH-only consideration), and taking the minimum over 13 qualifying sales - Both endpoints agreed on the closing-block hash pin, log counts, and the floor - Recipe kind is `panel` (the brief is marked `evidence: "panel"`, which the checker enforces regardless of the fact being on-chain) — `notes` documents the full on-chain method for reproducibility since none of the five catalogue kinds compute a minimum
I'll look at the workspace and check the environment, then compute the floor by scanning Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned window.Node 22 is available. Now I'll write a scratch script that fetches `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over the pinned window, decodes them, and computes the floor per the brief's definitions.Now I'll run it against the first listed endpoint.The pin matched. The scan is still running — I'll wait for it to finish.The scan completed: 11,249 `OrderFulfilled` logs, 17 qualifying fills, floor = 0.0136 ETH. To guard against silent truncation, I'll rerun once on a different operator's endpoint.Both endpoints agree exactly: floor = `13600000000000000` wei over 17 qualifying fills. Writing the answer file now.Done. `artifacts/answer.json` passes the checker (`ok`). **Answer: `13600000000000000` wei** (0.0136 ETH) — the floor of Drop Ded Gorgez over blocks 26020642–26027794. How it was computed: - `eth_getLogs` for the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` topic on both Seaport 1.5 (`0x0000...14dc`) and 1.6 (`0x0000...b395`), over exactly the pinned window; the closing block hash matched the pin on both endpoints. - Decoded all 11,249 `OrderFulfilled` events; 17 fills qualified under the brief's definitions — exactly one ERC-721 item of `0x9c51a3cb…1c2d` and no other NFT. 13 were listing fills (priced as the sum of all ETH/WETH consideration, fees included) and 4 were bid fills (priced as the WETH offer amount). - Identical result on two independent endpoints (`rpc.flashbots.net` and `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`). One note on the recipe: the brief declares `"evidence": "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` refuses any non-`panel` recipe for such briefs, so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com"}` with the full reproduction procedure documented in `notes`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Validated with the provided checker: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **13600000000000000 wei** and a self-contained RPC reproduction script. Found 17 qualifying fills. Required validator printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.
The floor is 13600000000000000 wei (0.0136 ETH). I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. I scanned exactly blocks 26020642 to 26027794 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned chain id 1. That gave 11,249 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs. I decoded each one and kept the fills of exactly one ERC-721 from the collection, priced as the definitions say. Seventeen fills qualified. The five lowest prices are 0.0136, 0.013724, 0.013818, 0.0144 and 0.0146 ETH. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `panel`, with the RPC endpoint as its source URL. The catalogue's chain recipes can't express this computation. - **Scan tooling:** the provided `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested offer and consideration arrays, so I used my own script in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. That folder is not submitted. - **Closing hash:** I did not check the pinned closing block hash against a second endpoint, and the notes in the answer say so.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Validation passed (`ok`).
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `13600000000000000` wei. The supplied verifier reports `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **13600000000000000 wei** and a reproducible RPC procedure. Found 17 qualifying sales. Independent decoding matched; the required checker printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **13600000000000000 wei** (0.0136 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I scanned every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26020642 to 26027794 in 500-block chunks. That was 11,249 logs. I decoded them with my own Node script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`), not the shipped `scan.mjs`. The script keeps only fills with exactly one ERC-721 of the collection and no other NFT. It prices listing fills as the sum of the consideration, and only if every item is ETH or WETH. It prices bid fills as the offer amount. - **Result:** 17 sales qualified, and the lowest cost 0.0136 ETH. - **Endpoint and checks:** I used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` only. It returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash `0x814f8623…`. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint or run a second scan. - **Recipe kind:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for that. So the recipe is `panel`, with the RPC and log query as its `source`, even though the figure comes straight from the chain. The deployer can rerun it from public RPC data, but it is not one of the on-chain recipe kinds. - **Definitions:** They are stated in the file and match the request. I did not need to fill in anything the request left open.
The floor is 13,600,000,000,000,000 wei (0.0136 ETH), and `artifacts/answer.json` is written. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Scan:** I read Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over exactly blocks 26020642 to 26027794 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. It returned the pinned closing block hash. I did not scan a second time or check a second endpoint. - **Decoding:** I decoded the logs with my own script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`), not `scan.mjs`. `scan.mjs` can only sum or rank a data word, so it couldn't apply the sale and price definitions. - **Result:** Of 11,249 fills in the window, 17 met the definitions: exactly one ERC-721 of the collection, and every price item paid in ETH or WETH. The lowest of those is the answer. - **Recipe:** The brief's evidence type is `panel`, so the recipe kind is `panel` with the endpoint, event topic and block range as its source. That means the deployer cannot rerun it from the recipe, so the answer rests on panel agreement. The `source` field is a description rather than a bare URL, which the reference asks for, but the checker accepted it. - **File format:** The checker rejected the first draft because the `window` keys were in a different order from the brief, so I reordered them to match `oracle.json`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The floor is **13600000000000000 wei** (0.0136 ETH). - **Scan:** I pulled 11,249 `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over blocks 26020642–26027794 in 500-block chunks. I decoded the offer and consideration items myself and applied the brief's definitions. - **Result:** 17 sales qualified: exactly one ERC-721 of the collection, paid in ETH or WETH. The lowest of them is the answer. The next four lowest prices are 13724000000000000, 13818000000000000, 14400000000000000 and 14600000000000000. - **Endpoint:** I used only `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and this is not fully cross-checked. I did not check the closing block hash on a second endpoint, and I did not run `scan.mjs` because it can't filter by NFT contract. The note in the file says the hash check was skipped. - **Recipe:** the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`. Its `source` is the publicnode endpoint plus the event topic and block range. The deployer can't rerun it as a chain recipe. - **Scratch script:** the decoding script is `test/scratch/s.mjs`. It isn't submitted.
The floor of Drop Ded Gorgez over the pinned window is **13600000000000000 wei** (0.0136 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Scan:** I fetched 11,249 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020642 to 26027794 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. It returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. I did not check the hash on a second operator's endpoint. - **Filter:** I decoded each log with a script of my own in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, not the provided `scan.mjs`. I kept fills of exactly one ERC-721 of the collection and no other NFT, priced per the definitions. That left 17 qualifying sales. - **Recipe:** The brief's evidence is `panel`, so the recipe kind is `panel`. Its `source` is the endpoint and the event topic. The deployer cannot rerun a panel recipe, so the answer relies on the panel agreeing on the value.
The floor for Drop Ded Gorgez over blocks 26020642 to 26027794 is **13600000000000000 wei** (0.0136 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Sales:** 17 Seaport fills qualified. All were listing fills paid in ETH or WETH. - **Floor sale:** the lowest one is in block 26025131. - **Method:** I fetched the collection's Transfer logs in the window (19 logs across 17 blocks). I then read the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 OrderFulfilled logs in only those blocks and decoded them by hand. This assumes every qualifying sale moves the token and so emits a Transfer. - **Endpoint:** I used one endpoint, `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and confirmed chain 1 and the pinned closing block hash on it. I did not scan a second endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `panel`. Its source is the publicnode `eth_getLogs` query rather than a rerunnable chain recipe, because no chain recipe kind decodes Seaport logs. The deployer cannot mechanically rerun it. - **Files:** the only file I delivered is `artifacts/answer.json`. My scratch script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs` and is not submitted.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **13600000000000000 wei** (0.0136 ETH), and the check script prints `ok`. - **How I computed it:** I pulled 11,249 Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs from both contracts (1.5 and 1.6) over exactly blocks 26020642–26027794. The endpoint was `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and its closing block hash matched the pinned one. I decoded each log myself, keeping single-ERC-721 fills of the collection paid in ETH or WETH. Both listing fills and bid fills count, priced as the brief defines. That left 17 qualifying sales, and the lowest was 0.0136 ETH. - **Why the recipe is `panel`:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the reference allows only the `panel` recipe kind. Its `source` field is a URL, so I put the endpoint and the event topic there. It is not a rerunnable log recipe. - **Scan method:** I did not use the provided `scan.mjs`, since it only sums or ranks. My decoding script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted. - **Cross-check:** I did not do the optional second-endpoint hash check.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Task complete. Computed the floor for Drop Ded Gorgez over the pinned window (blocks 26020642–26027794) by scanning `OrderFulfilled` on both Seaport contracts, decoding offer/consideration by hand, and filtering to single-ERC-721/ETH-or-WETH fills: **13,600,000,000,000,000 wei (0.0136 ETH)** across 17 qualifying sales. Pin confirmed on two independent public RPCs. `artifacts/answer.json` written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **13600000000000000 wei** and reproduction code. Found 17 qualifying sales over the exact pinned window. The required checker printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Verified with the supplied checker: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json) with the computed floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` returned `ok`.
`ok`. The answer file is written: floor price of Drop Ded Gorgez over the pinned window is **13600000000000000 wei** (0.0136 ETH), computed from 17 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled fills, cross-checked on two independent RPC endpoints with matching pin hash.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `13600000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `13600000000000000` wei Qualifying sales: 17 Validation: `check-answer.mjs` → `ok`
`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Summary: Computed the floor of Drop Ded Gorgez over blocks 26020642–26027794 by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs on two independent public RPCs (both confirmed the pinned block hash). Of 17 qualifying single-ERC721 ETH/WETH fills, the lowest fee-inclusive price was **13,600,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.0136 ETH). Wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, which passes the check script.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `13600000000000000` wei. Validation result: `ok`.
`check-answer.mjs` prints **ok** (exit 0). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and left untracked. **Answer: 13600000000000000 wei (0.0136 ETH)** How I got it: - Confirmed `eth_chainId` = 1 and the pinned closing hash `0x814f86…cb9e` on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and re-confirmed the hash on a second operator (`rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`). - `OrderFulfilled` doesn't index the NFT contract, so I took the equivalent cheap route: all ERC-721 `Transfer` logs of `0x9c51…1c2d` over blocks 26020642–26027794 (19 logs, 17 txs), then each receipt, then every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5/1.6 in them, decoded with the Seaport ABI. topic0 derived from the signature matches `0x9d9af8e3…6f31`. This set is complete because any Seaport fill of one of these tokens must emit that Transfer. - 17 fills, all 17 qualifying (exactly one ERC-721 of the collection, no other NFT, every payment leg ETH or WETH). Prices ranged 0.0136–0.05 ETH; next-lowest were 0.013724, 0.013818, 0.0144, 0.0146 ETH, so the minimum isn't an isolated artifact. - The minimum is a Seaport 1.6 bid fill at block 26025131 (tx `0xdf89e1ad…0d0f`, log 668): offer = 0.0136 WETH, consideration = token #4422 plus two WETH fee items. Per the brief's bid rule the price is the gross offer amount. Judgment calls, all stated under `definitions`: only fills with exactly one offer item are priced (the brief's listing/bid rules presuppose it — this excluded nothing here), WETH counted 1:1 with ETH in one pooled series, and each `OrderFulfilled` log counted as its own sale. One thing to flag: the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker enforces a `panel` recipe for it — which is also the only honest option, since a minimum over decoded dynamic ABI structs isn't expressible as `log-sum`/`log-rank`/`call-compare`/`v4-volume-rank`. The recipe's `source` therefore names the endpoint and the exact query sequence that reproduces the figure from public RPC data alone.
The floor is 13600000000000000 wei (0.0136 ETH). I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I pulled `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over blocks 26020642 to 26027794, using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and confirmed the closing block hash matches the pin. There were 11249 logs. I decoded each one with a throwaway script in `test/scratch/` and kept only fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of Drop Ded Gorgez paid in ETH or WETH, priced as the definitions say. - **Result:** 17 sales qualified, and the lowest was the answer above. - **Recipe:** The brief marks this question as `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue allows only a `panel` recipe for such briefs. That recipe takes only a `source` URL, so I named the RPC endpoint. The deployer can't rerun the computation from the recipe itself. `notes` in the answer describes the method instead. - **Cross-check:** I did not run the second-endpoint block-hash check the reference suggests, and I did not use `scan.mjs`. I used my own decoder because it can't filter on the offer and consideration items.
Check passes with `ok`. Summary: scanned Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned block range (26020642–26027794), decoded manually, filtered to single-ERC721-of-collection ETH/WETH fills, found 17 qualifying sales, floor = 13600000000000000 wei (0.0136 ETH), confirmed via two independent public RPC endpoints matching the pinned closing block hash. Written to `artifacts/answer.json`, which passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Created [answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/ac166bf3-a005-49b8-9de9-a91968727113/ff4e3e94-a4ad-4509-8807-7fb09769a449/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `13600000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.