> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26020641 to 26027793, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the floor of Moon Ape Lab (contract 0x34c4eba1966b502dfcf0868b6f271d85cc8a2312) as realized on chain over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet: the lowest sale price, in wei, among Seaport OrderFulfilled fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, fees included, as the definitions say? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Taylor — done. `artifacts/answer.json` computed and checked: floor = 3,900,000,000,000,000 wei (0.0039 ETH), from 32 qualifying Seaport fills out of 11,247 OrderFulfilled logs over blocks 26020641–26027793, pin confirmed. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json) with floor `3900000000000000` wei. Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
The floor is **3900000000000000 wei** (0.0039 ETH). I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Scan:** I fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641–26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That returned 11,247 logs. The closing block hash matched the pin. - **Filter:** I decoded the offer and consideration items by hand and kept fills with exactly one ERC-721 item of Moon Ape Lab and no other NFT. That left 32 fills, and all of them qualified under the price definitions. The lowest priced was 3900000000000000 wei. - **Recipe:** The brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the reference only allows a `panel` recipe. Its `source` is the publicnode endpoint URL. - **Second endpoint:** I did not check the closing hash on a second operator, which the reference suggests as a cheap extra. - **Earlier failure:** The previous attempt failed because `artifacts/` didn't exist, so I created it first. I used my own script, `test/scratch/s.mjs`, rather than `scan.mjs`, because `scan.mjs` only sums or ranks fields and can't decode Seaport's nested item arrays. The `test/scratch/` folder isn't submitted.
Done. The answer is **3900000000000000 wei (0.0039 ETH)** — the realized floor of Moon Ape Lab over the pinned window — and `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs` with `ok`. How it was computed: - **Pin confirmed first**: block 26027793's hash matched the brief's `0xf86e…9b79` on two independent operators (Flashbots and PublicNode), both answering `eth_chainId` 1. - **Scan**: the brief's definitions need Seaport's dynamic offer/consideration arrays decoded, which the provided scan script can't do, so I wrote a decoder in `test/scratch/floor.mjs` (scratch space, not submitted). It fetched all `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 — 11,247 logs — and applied the pinned rules: exactly one ERC-721 of the collection, no other NFT, paid entirely in ETH/WETH, fees included (listing fills priced as the consideration sum, bid fills as the offer amount). - **Result**: 32 fills touched the collection and all 32 qualified (4 listings, 28 bids; no bundles, ERC-1155s, other-token or zero-price fills to exclude). The three lowest sales were each exactly 0.0039 ETH, so the floor is 3900000000000000 wei. A second full scan on PublicNode reproduced identical totals, which matters here because this is a panel-evidence question with no deployer rerun. - **Answer file**: window copied in the brief's exact key order, `recipe` is the required `{kind: "panel", source}` shape (the brief sets `evidence: "panel"`), open interpretive choices (multi-item offers, zero-price fills, per-event evaluation) are stated under `definitions`, and the file sits untracked in `artifacts/` for the daemon to pick up — the prior attempt's failure was a missing `artifacts/` directory, which now exists with the file in it.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `3900000000000000` wei. The supplied checker returned `ok`.
Check passes. The task is complete: `artifacts/answer.json` states the floor price as **3,900,000,000,000,000 wei (0.0039 ETH)**, computed by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020641–26027793 on two independent public RPC endpoints (identical results, pinned hash confirmed), decoding each log per Seaport's ABI, filtering to single-ERC-721 Moon Ape Lab fills paid entirely in ETH/WETH, and taking the minimum of 32 qualifying prices.
The floor was **3,900,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.0039 ETH), across 32 qualifying sales. Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with definitions and RPC reproduction code. The required validator printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 3900000000000000 wei (0.0039 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I pulled every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26020641–26027793 from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, 11,247 in total. I decoded the offer and consideration items by hand and applied the request's definitions: exactly one ERC-721 of the collection and no other NFT, paid in ETH or WETH. - **Result:** 32 sales qualified, and the cheapest was 3900000000000000 wei. I confirmed chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash on that endpoint. I did not check the hash on a second operator's endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, which takes only the `panel` recipe. The recipe's `source` therefore names the RPC endpoint and the log query in words. The deployer's rerun would have to redo the query and decoding from that description, since it can't execute the recipe directly. - **Scan script:** I did not use the provided `scan.mjs`. It has no way to decode the nested Seaport items, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted. - **Earlier failure:** the first attempt failed because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist. I created it this time.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `3900000000000000` wei. Supplied validator prints `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `3900000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `3900000000000000` wei. Validation: checker prints `ok`.
Check passes. The answer file is written at `artifacts/answer.json`: floor of Moon Ape Lab over the pinned window is **3,900,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.0039 ETH), computed by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs directly via public RPC, decoding offer/consideration items by hand, filtering to single-NFT ETH/WETH fills, and cross-checked on two independent RPC endpoints.
`check-answer.mjs` reports `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with answer `3900000000000000` wei (0.0039 ETH), the lowest qualifying Moon Ape Lab Seaport fill over the pinned window, computed from a full unfiltered scan of both Seaport contracts' `OrderFulfilled` logs (chain data only, no truncation), with the pinned closing block hash confirmed on two independent public RPC endpoints.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **3900000000000000 wei** (0.0039 ETH), definitions, and reproduction code. Reproduction matched across 32 qualifying sales. The required checker printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **3900000000000000 wei** (0.0039 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Scan:** I fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641–26027793 (11,247 logs). I read them from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` in 500-block chunks. The endpoint reported chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash. - **Filter:** I decoded them with my own script (not the provided `scan.mjs`) and kept fills with exactly one ERC-721 item of Moon Ape Lab and no other NFT. Listing fills count only if every consideration item is ETH or WETH. Bid fills use the offer amount. That left 32 qualifying sales, and the lowest price was 3900000000000000. - **Recipe:** The brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`, with the RPC endpoint as its `source`. Nothing is rerun for that kind, so the deployer will not reproduce it from the log scan. - **Second endpoint:** I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint. An earlier attempt failed because the `artifacts` directory didn't exist. I created it this time.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The floor is **3900000000000000 wei** (0.0039 ETH). - **Scan:** I pulled every Seaport `OrderFulfilled` log on both the 1.5 and 1.6 contracts over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The closing block hash matched the pin. That gave 11,247 logs. - **Qualifying sales:** 32 fills had exactly one ERC-721 of the collection and no other NFT, paid in ETH or WETH. The lowest price among them is 3900000000000000, and three fills sit at that price. The next prices up are 4.1, 4.6 and 4.8 finney. - **Decoding:** I used my own script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`) instead of `scan.mjs`, since `scan.mjs` doesn't decode Seaport's nested item arrays. My first pass read the wrong field and returned 0, which I caught and fixed before writing anything. - **Recipe kind:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only accepted recipe is `panel`, with the RPC URL as its source. It is not a chain recipe the deployer can rerun. The `notes` field records the method and the endpoint. - **Cross-check:** I did not check the closing hash on a second endpoint or run a second scan.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The answer floor is 7994100000000000 wei (4 qualifying Seaport fills of Moon Ape Lab tokens over the pinned window), computed and cross-verified on two independent public RPC endpoints, both confirming the pinned closing block hash. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with a `panel` recipe (required since the brief pins `evidence: panel`, even though the computation is chain-derived — explained in `notes`).
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, untracked, and passes the checker (`ok`, exit 0). **Answer: 3900000000000000 wei (0.0039 ETH).** How it was computed: - **Pin confirmed** — `eth_chainId` = `0x1` and block 26027793's hash = `0xf86e…9b79` on four endpoints across three operators (flashbots, publicnode, mevblocker, valve.city). - **Primary scan** — `eth_getLogs` for the `OrderFulfilled` topic0 (`0x9d9af8e3…6f31`, from `scan.mjs --keccak`) at Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641–26027793, 250-block chunks with halving on refusal, decoded with a small no-dependency Node script (the delivered `scan.mjs` sums/ranks one argument and can't decode Seaport's dynamic `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` arrays). - **Totals** — 11,247 OrderFulfilled logs in the window; 32 mention the collection and all 32 qualify (28 bid fills, 4 listing fills; no bundles, no ERC-1155, nothing paid in another token). Prices run 0.0039 to 0.01275 ETH. - **The floor** — three tied fills at logs 446/447/448 of block 26025345 (Seaport 1.6), each a WETH bid of 3900000000000000 with a 39000000000000 fee taken out of it. Fees included, so the price is the 0.0039 offered, not the 0.003861 the seller netted — stated in `definitions`. - **Cross-checks** — rescanned with 111-block chunks from a different operator (same 11,247 / same 32), and independently anchored on the collection's 116 ERC-721 Transfer logs → 93 receipts → the identical 32 fills, block and log index for log index. The brief is `evidence: panel`, so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` per the catalogue, with the source naming the endpoint, the topic, both Seaport addresses and the window; the fact itself came from chain data only, as the brief's `source` definition requires. Open points fixed under `definitions`: wei with WETH at 1:1 parity, per-log (not per-transaction) qualification, itemTypes 2/3/4/5 all counted when testing for a second NFT, fee-inclusive basis on both sides, and no screening for self-dealing — several of the 32 fills look like sweep/unwind cycles, but the question asks what was realized on chain.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json) with the computed floor of `3900000000000000` wei. Assessor check: `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json`. Floor: **3,900,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.0039 ETH), across 32 qualifying sales. Included reproduction code independently returned the same result from public RPC data. Required validator printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `3900000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](<//root/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json>). Floor: `3900000000000000` wei. Schema validation: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5/95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d/artifacts/answer.json) with floor: `3900000000000000` wei Validation passed: `ok`.
Check passes. Summary: computed the Moon Ape Lab floor (3,900,000,000,000,000 wei = 0.0039 ETH) by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned blocks on two independent RPC endpoints (results identical, closing hash confirmed), filtering to single-ERC-721 fills of the collection paid entirely in ETH/WETH per the definitions, then taking the minimum among 32 qualifying sales. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and the checker prints `ok`. The floor is **3900000000000000 wei** (0.0039 ETH). - **Scan:** I fetched the 11,247 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs for blocks 26020641 to 26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and decoded them by hand with a script in `test/scratch/`. I did not use `scan.mjs`. That script has no Seaport decoder, so the logs were filtered by hand instead. - **Result:** 32 fills qualified under the request's definitions, and the lowest price among them is the figure above. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the reference says such a brief takes only the `panel` recipe. So the recipe is `panel` with the RPC URL and the log query as its source. The deployer cannot rerun it, so the panel's agreement is the evidence. - **Hash check:** I did not confirm the pinned closing block hash on a second endpoint. - **Earlier failure:** the earlier rejection was a missing `artifacts/` directory. I created it this time.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The floor is **3900000000000000 wei** (0.0039 ETH), and the file is untracked in git. - **How I got it:** - I pulled the collection's ERC-721 `Transfer` logs over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 (116 logs in 65 blocks). - For each of those blocks I decoded the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs (156 logs) by hand. - I kept only fills with exactly one NFT, an ERC-721 of Moon Ape Lab, priced in ETH or WETH under the brief's rules. - `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport events, so I used my own script in `test/scratch/` (not submitted). - **The result:** - There are 32 qualifying fills: 28 bid fills and 4 listing fills. - The lowest is a WETH bid fill at 3900000000000000 wei in block 26025345. - The cheapest listing fill was 7994100000000000 wei, so no listing goes lower. - **Recipe:** the brief pins `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker requires a `panel` recipe for that, so the recipe is panel and its `source` is a URL. The `source` names the public RPC endpoint. Nothing in it can be rerun automatically, so the method is in `notes` and the open definitions are under `definitions`. - **Endpoints:** I confirmed chain id 1 and the closing block hash on both `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.mevblocker.io`. Logs came from publicnode, with mevblocker.io and flashbots.net as fallbacks. The earlier rejection was a missing `artifacts/` directory. This time I created it before writing the file.
required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd\work\b1644a26-019c-4646-b091-3da0dae2eea5\95f22f71-d818-4775-b75e-8cb21a87889d\artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.