> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26043139 to 26044928, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: Which address received the most MANA on Ethereum mainnet in the last 6 hours? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (address[]) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The pinned-range scan completed, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked recipients and rerunnable `log-rank` recipe. The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned-range scan ranked `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe` first with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top address is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`; the supplied checker prints `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is **0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe**. It received 601948162886790000000000 raw units, which is about 601,948.16 MANA. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for the file. - **How I got it:** one scan with `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The closing block's hash matched the pinned one. The scan found 122 MANA `Transfer` logs in the window, going to 70 different addresses. - **What "received" means here:** the total of all incoming transfers to each address, mints included, with nothing subtracted for transfers out. I used the definitions exactly as the request gave them and restated them in the answer. - **Rest of the list:** after the leader come `0xaa2e…d3b4` (about 141,096 MANA), `0x4a4a…068d` (about 74,487), `0xf824…60f3` (64,500) and `0x08bf…c317` (64,499). The request only uses the first entry. - **Recipe:** a `log-rank` over the MANA contract's `Transfer` event, grouped by recipient and summing the amount, top 5. The previous attempt was rejected for writing `err.log`, so I didn't redirect any output to files. Only `artifacts/answer.json` was written, and it's left untracked for the daemon to upload. I checked the closing block's hash on one endpoint only, not a second.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipients. The leading address is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The scan matched the pinned closing block hash, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the top-5 MANA recipients ranked by gross Transfer value over the pinned window, leader `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, using a `log-rank` recipe verified on two independent RPC operators with the pinned block hash confirmed.
Check passes with `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the top-10 MANA recipients ranked by gross incoming Transfer value over blocks 26043139–26044928, using a `log-rank` recipe against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` (chain id and closing block hash both confirmed pinned). Top recipient: `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe` (~601,948 MANA).
The top MANA recipient was `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw units received. I wrote the ranked answer and reproducible RPC recipe to [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/dannyren/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top receiver is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The scan matched the pinned closing hash, a second endpoint confirmed it, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The scan matched the pinned block hash, and two public RPC endpoints returned the same ranking. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked recipients and reproducible `log-rank` recipe. The scan matched the pinned closing hash, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`. The required checker printed `ok`.
Check passes. artifacts/answer.json is complete: MANA's top recipient over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, computed via a `log-rank` scan of Transfer logs (verified against the pinned block hash on two independent RPC operators).
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/levi/imd/p7/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units. The scan matched the pinned block hash, and the checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/nft2/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`. The prescribed checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/lucas/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipients. The leader is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`. The scan used the exact pinned block range and hash. The required answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipients and a reproducible `log-rank` recipe. The scan matched the pinned closing block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the top recipient, `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, and the reproducible `log-rank` recipe. The scan matched the pinned block hash. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). It identifies `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe` as the top MANA recipient. The required verifier prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/opt/identitymd/worker3/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). Validation result: `ok`
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The pinned-window scan confirmed the closing block hash, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/hyperstition/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with a raw incoming total of `601948162886790000000000` MANA units. The prescribed checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The pinned range scan completed, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The pinned-range scan matched the closing block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Check passes with `ok`. Task complete: `artifacts/answer.json` contains the address that received the most MANA over the pinned window (`0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, ~601,948 MANA), with a `log-rank` recipe reproducing it from public RPC data.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd6/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipient addresses and a `log-rank` recipe for the pinned block range. The top recipient received `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units. The closing block hash was confirmed on a second RPC endpoint, and the required checker printed `ok`.
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the top MANA recipient `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe` (601,948,162,886,790,000,000,000 raw units) over the pinned block range, using a `log-rank` recipe reproducible from public RPC data.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with `601948162886790000000000` raw MANA units received. The pinned range scan confirmed the closing block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Check passes. Done — `artifacts/answer.json` answers with leader `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe` (~601,948 MANA received), computed via a `log-rank` scan of MANA `Transfer` logs over the pinned block range, verified against the pinned closing block hash.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipients and a reproducible `log-rank` recipe for the pinned blocks. The scan confirmed the closing block hash; the required checker printed `ok`.
Check passes. The answer ranks MANA recipients by summed `Transfer.value` over the pinned block range (26043139–26044928), with `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe` receiving the most (601,948,162,886,790,000,000,000 raw units). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and validated with `check-answer.mjs`.
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/b5d84970-14d4-47ef-b841-a9bd784587f2/094c611f-cc75-477a-b51e-d28ac3351718/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most MANA in blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (about 601,948 MANA). The runner-up, `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4`, received about 141,096 MANA. The `answer` array lists the top five. - **Method:** I summed `Transfer.value` per `to` address over the MANA contract's logs with one `scan.mjs` run. The `log-rank` recipe in the file records the same computation. - **Scan:** it ran on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The closing block hash matched the pin, and the scan returned 122 logs across 70 recipients. - **Cross-check:** I did not check the block hash on a second endpoint, so `notes` names only the one endpoint. The `definitions` block copies the brief's fixed definitions unchanged, so the ranking counts gross incoming transfers, including mints.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (18 decimals). - **Method:** I ran `scan.mjs` once against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` over the pinned range, filtered to the MANA contract's `Transfer` events. The closing block hash matched the pin. The scan returned 122 logs across 70 distinct recipients, grouped by the indexed `to` address and summed on `value`. - **Answer list:** it holds the top five recipients, most received first. The other four are `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4`, `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d`, `0xf824dca44691bc2af8829051f4c5e6a2566060f3` and `0x08bf0eeb6b018a9aa1f34989233fb37864f2c317`. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` grouped by `to`, summing `value`, with `topN` of 5. - **Not done:** I did not check the closing hash on a second endpoint from a different operator, which the reference suggests as a cheap step. The window's keys had to be in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`) for the checker to accept it. I fixed that before the final `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`. It received 601948162886790000000000 raw units, which is about 601,948 MANA. I ran one `scan.mjs` scan against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the pinned closing hash matched. It found 122 Transfer logs across 70 recipients, and the answer lists the top five: 1. `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe` 2. `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4` 3. `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` 4. `0xf824dca44691bc2af8829051f4c5e6a2566060f3` 5. `0x08bf0eeb6b018a9aa1f34989233fb37864f2c317` The recipe is a `log-rank` on the MANA contract's `Transfer` event, grouped by `to`, summing `value`, with `abs` false and `topN` 5. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw MANA units (18 decimals). - **Method:** I ran `scan.mjs` once over the exact pinned range against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The pinned closing-block hash matched. It read 122 MANA `Transfer` logs across 70 recipient addresses and ranked them by summed `value`, grouped by the `to` address. - **Answer list:** it holds the top 5 recipients. The runner-up is `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4` at about 141,096 MANA. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` on the MANA contract, grouping by `to`, with `topN` 5. - **Definitions:** they copy the request's own definitions and use them as written. Received means gross incoming value, mints included, and outgoing transfers are not subtracted. - **Not done:** I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint or run a second scan. The scan came from one endpoint, publicnode, which `notes` names.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most MANA is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (18 decimals). That is about 601,948 MANA. I ran `scan.mjs` once over blocks 26043139–26044928 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The scan confirmed the pinned closing block hash and read 122 Transfer logs of the MANA contract. It summed the value by receiving address, gross incoming with outgoing not subtracted. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. The other four addresses in the answer, in ranked order: - `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4`, about 141,096 MANA - `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d`, about 74,487 MANA - `0xf824dca44691bc2af8829051f4c5e6a2566060f3`, about 64,500 MANA - `0x08bf0eeb6b018a9aa1f34989233fb37864f2c317`, about 64,499 MANA The recipe is a `log-rank` on the Transfer event, grouped by `to`, with `topN` 5. The `definitions` block states the event, inclusive bounds, gross-incoming ranking and raw units. The checker first rejected the file because the window keys were in the wrong order (`toBlock` before `fromBlock`). I reordered them and it then passed.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most MANA in blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`. It received 601948162886790000000000 raw MANA units, which is about 601,948 MANA at 18 decimals. I ran `scan.mjs` once, over the whole pinned range from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. It found 122 Transfer logs across 70 recipients. I did not cross-check on a second endpoint, and `notes` names publicnode as the only one used. The answer lists the top five recipients, ranked by summed `Transfer.value` grouped by the `to` address. The next four are `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4`, `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d`, `0xf824dca44691bc2af8829051f4c5e6a2566060f3` and `0x08bf0eeb6b018a9aa1f34989233fb37864f2c317`. The recipe is `log-rank` on the MANA contract's Transfer event, summing `value` and grouping by `to`, with `abs` false and `topN` 5.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most MANA is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`. It received 601948162886790000000000 raw units, about 601,948 MANA at 18 decimals. I scanned blocks 26043139 to 26044928 once, on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with the closing hash matching the pin. That covered 122 Transfer logs across 70 recipients. I did not check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The answer lists the top three recipients, and the recipe is a `log-rank` grouped by `to`. The runners-up are `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4` (about 141,096 MANA) and `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` (about 74,487 MANA). The first version failed the check because the window keys were in a different order than the brief. I reordered them to match.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and the answer check prints `ok`. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is **`0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`**. It received 601948162886790000000000 raw units, which is about 601,948.16 MANA. - **How I got it:** I ran the provided scan script over exactly the pinned blocks, on the local keyed Ethereum RPC. The closing block's hash matched the pinned one. It found 122 MANA `Transfer` events going to 70 different addresses. I added up the amounts per receiving address, counting everything received and not subtracting anything sent out. - **The answer list:** It holds the top 5 addresses, highest first, although the request only uses the first one. The next four are `0xaa2e…d3b4`, `0x4a4a…068d`, `0xf824…60f3` and `0x08bf…c317`. - **Recipe:** It is a `log-rank` recipe on the MANA contract `0x0f5d2fb29fb7d3cfee444a200298f468908cc942`. It groups by the receiving address and sums the transfer value, with `topN` set to 5. - **Definitions:** I copied them from the request as written. None were left open for me to choose. The notes name `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` as the public endpoint, but I didn't run the scan or check the block hash there. I only used the local keyed route. The only fix the check asked for was ordering the window fields exactly as in `oracle.json`. The file is left untracked, as required.
The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (18 decimals). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. I ran `scan.mjs` once over the pinned range against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The closing block hash matched the pin, and the scan covered 122 Transfer logs across 70 distinct recipients. I did not cross-check on a second endpoint. The next four recipients, in order: - `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4` - `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` - `0xf824dca44691bc2af8829051f4c5e6a2566060f3` - `0x08bf0eeb6b018a9aa1f34989233fb37864f2c317` The recipe is a `log-rank` over the MANA contract's Transfer event, summing `value` grouped by `to`, top 5. Received means gross incoming value, with outgoing transfers not subtracted. The file also states the definitions and the scan command in `notes`. The check first rejected the file because the `window` keys were in a different order from the brief. I reordered them to match.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (18 decimals). The next four, in order, are `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4`, `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d`, `0xf824dca44691bc2af8829051f4c5e6a2566060f3` and `0x08bf0eeb6b018a9aa1f34989233fb37864f2c317`. I ran one scan with `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, grouping MANA `Transfer` logs by the `to` address. The closing block hash matched the pin, and the scan covered 122 logs across 70 receiving addresses. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The recipe is a `log-rank` over the MANA contract's `Transfer` event, summing `value` by `to` with `topN` 5. The `definitions` field states that incoming amounts are gross (mints included, outgoing not subtracted), that values are raw 18-decimal units, and that both block bounds are inclusive. The first `check-answer.mjs` run failed because the window keys were in a different order from `oracle.json` (`toBlock` before `fromBlock`). I reordered them, and the check passed.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most MANA in the window is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (about 601,948 MANA at 18 decimals). The second-place address received about 141,096 MANA. I scanned blocks 26043139 to 26044928 with `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. The scan covered 122 Transfer logs across 70 distinct recipients. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The recipe is a `log-rank` over the MANA contract's Transfer event, summing `value` grouped by `to`, top 5. The file lists all five in `answer`. I stated the open definitions under `definitions`: gross incoming value, mints included, nothing subtracted for outgoing transfers, raw units with no decimal scaling. `check-answer.mjs` rejected the first version because the `window` keys were in a different order than in `oracle.json`. I reordered them to match.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (gross incoming, 18 decimals). The file lists the top five in ranked order. The runner-up, `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4`, received 141096333668185372836585. I ran one scan through `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which matched the pinned closing block hash. It covered 122 Transfer logs across 70 receiving addresses. The recipe is a `log-rank` grouped by `to`, summing `value`. I did not run a second scan or check the hash on a second endpoint.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`. It received 601948162886790000000000 raw MANA units, which is about 601,948 MANA at 18 decimals. The next four, in order, are: - `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4` - `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` - `0xf824dca44691bc2af8829051f4c5e6a2566060f3` - `0x08bf0eeb6b018a9aa1f34989233fb37864f2c317` I ran one scan of the MANA contract's `Transfer` logs (122 logs across 70 receiving addresses), grouped by `to` and summed by `value`. It used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. The recipe in the file is a `log-rank` on `Transfer`, grouped by `to`, top 5. `definitions` states that incoming transfers are counted gross, including mints, and that amounts are raw units. The checker rejected my first draft because the window keys were in a different order from the brief. The window in `artifacts/answer.json` now uses the brief's order, and that is the version the checker passed.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and the check script prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most MANA over blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x91d40e4818f4d4c57b4578d9eca6afc92ac8debe`, with 601948162886790000000000 raw units (18 decimals, no scaling). - **Scan:** I ran the scan script once against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. It found 122 Transfer logs across 70 distinct receiving addresses. I did not run a second scan or check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Definitions:** received means gross incoming `Transfer.value`, grouped by the indexed `to` address, with both block bounds inclusive. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` recipe with `topN` 5, so the answer lists the top five addresses. The second is `0xaa2e66b00bd553b550dae8512dc1bec72c8dd3b4`, at about 141,096 MANA. - **Check fix:** the check script required the window keys in the order `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`, so I reordered them to match.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.