> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26043139 to 26044928, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: Which address received the most APE on Ethereum mainnet in the last 6 hours? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (address[]) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units received. The pinned block hash was confirmed on a second endpoint, and the required answer checker printed `ok`.
Check passes with `ok`. The answer.json is written at `artifacts/answer.json`: - Top address: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` received ~9,872,163,412.05 APE (raw `9872163412050000000000000`) via ERC20 Transfer logs on APE (0x4d22...94381) over blocks 26043139–26044928, verified against the pinned block hash on two independent public RPC operators (thirdweb for the full scan, mevblocker for hash cross-check). - Recipe kind `log-rank` with the required `abs`, `sumArg`, `groupBy` fields per the reference's schema.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units received. The scan matched the pinned closing hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Check passes. The answer is written to `artifacts/answer.json`: top APE recipient in the pinned window (blocks 26043139–26044928) is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, computed via a `log-rank` scan of APE's `Transfer` events on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, confirmed against the pinned closing block hash.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The task is complete: `artifacts/answer.json` holds the top APE (ApeCoin) Transfer recipients on Ethereum mainnet over the pinned block window 26043139–26044928, led by `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` (9,872,163.41205 APE received), computed via `scan.mjs` with a `log-rank` recipe and cross-checked against a second public RPC.
unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3ff430abaab309e-ICN, request id: req_1c0ca700f8f14dc1b96dbf688ac62a47
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units received. The scan confirmed the pinned block hash, and the required answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3ff3e5d4fbbea07-ICN, request id: req_f4f1220618284d17b6026756c368c057
FAILURE: runtime_error
unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3ff3e4c7fe08abe-EWR, request id: req_9b8f8ab7b87a427fb4148b54785f9000
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Leading recipient: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` Validation: `ok`
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully with the provided checker (`ok`).
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Top recipient: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Completed `artifacts/answer.json`. The checker prints `ok`. Top address: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
The top APE recipient was `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with **9,872,163.41205 APE** received across the pinned blocks. I wrote the ranked answer and reproducible RPC recipe to [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipients. The leading address is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. The scan matched the pinned closing hash, and the answer check printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned scan ranked `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` first, and the supplied answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top address is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with gross incoming volume `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units. The full scan matched the pinned block hash. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked recipients and rerunnable recipe. The provided checker prints `ok`.
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the top APE recipient over the pinned block range (26043139–26044928), computed via `log-rank` on APE's Transfer events using publicnode's public RPC, verified against the pinned closing block hash.
Check passes with `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the `log-rank` recipe over the pinned block window (26043139–26044928), computed via `scan.mjs` against publicnode's Ethereum RPC, ranking APE Transfer recipients by summed value. Top recipient: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units received. The scan matched the pinned closing hash. The required answer checker printed `ok`.
Check passed: `ok`. The task is complete — `artifacts/answer.json` ranks the top 5 APE recipients over blocks 26043139–26044928 by summed Transfer.value, with the leader `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` receiving 9,872,163.41 APE, computed via a `log-rank` recipe reproducible from public RPC data.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The scan confirmed the pinned block hash and ranked `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` first. The required answer check printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The leading recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units received. The scan matched the pinned block hash, and the supplied checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json) with the top five recipients and the reproducible `log-rank` recipe. The leading recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. The required answer check printed `ok`.
Check passes with `ok`. The answer is written to `artifacts/answer.json`: the top APE recipient over the pinned window is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, receiving 9,872,163.412050 APE gross via Transfer logs, computed with a `log-rank` recipe over the APE contract's Transfer events, verified against the pinned block hash on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units received. The scan matched the pinned closing block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd2/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with a gross incoming total of `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units. The scan matched the pinned closing block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/dannyren/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned-range scan identifies `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` as the top APE recipient. The required checker returns `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). The top recipient is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with `9872163412050000000000000` raw APE units received. The required checker prints `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json). Top recipient: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` Validated with the supplied checker (`ok`).
Check passes. Answer written to `artifacts/answer.json`: the address receiving the most APE over the pinned window (26043139–26044928) is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, receiving ~9,872,163 APE, computed via a `log-rank` scan of APE's Transfer logs on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` with the pin confirmed.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd10/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked APE recipients and reproducible `log-rank` recipe. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked recipients and rerunnable `log-rank` recipe. The scan confirmed the pinned block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with 9872163412050000000000000 raw units (18 decimals). The file lists the top five receivers, in this order: 1. `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` 2. `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` 3. `0xa67f381eedb82ab46f2aa79f09b7bb38135c8615` 4. `0xeb9ca8fdfac0652a97c0e1a48c1178d32d3a6b8f` 5. `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` I scanned with `scan.mjs` against `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`. The scan matched the pinned closing hash and covered 444 Transfer logs across 149 receiving addresses. `https://one.valve.city/rpc/vk_demo/evm/1` returned the same ranking. The recipe is a `log-rank` on APE `Transfer`, grouped by `to`, summing `value`, top 5. The first two endpoints I tried did not work. `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` returned 429, and `rpc.flashbots.net/fast` lagged behind the pinned range. `virginia.rpc.blxrbdn.com` refused `eth_getLogs` ("method not available"), so it was not used for the scan. I did not run the closing-hash check on a second operator by hand. The valve.city scan was a full scan, and `scan.mjs` confirmed the pinned hash only on the mevblocker endpoint.
Check passes: `ok`. The answer is written to `artifacts/answer.json` — top APE recipient over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` (9,872,163.41205 APE received gross), computed via a `log-rank` scan of Transfer logs on the APE contract, verified against the pinned block hash.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked recipients and reproducible `log-rank` recipe. The scan matched the pinned closing block hash, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/cbf7f91b-e947-479f-8ddc-91ca0e0b6b45/f394dc7d-d4e8-4929-ba3f-62a570b20208/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`. Top APE recipient over blocks 26043139–26044928: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, computed via a `log-rank` scan of Transfer logs on the APE contract using the public Ethereum RPC.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with 9872163412050000000000000 raw units (18 decimals). The next four are: - `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` - `0xa67f381eedb82ab46f2aa79f09b7bb38135c8615` - `0xeb9ca8fdfac0652a97c0e1a48c1178d32d3a6b8f` - `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` I ran one scan with `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The closing block hash matched the pin. The scan found 444 APE Transfer logs across 149 recipients. The endpoint refused large log ranges, so the script split the range and still covered the whole window. The recipe is `log-rank` on the APE contract, grouped by `to` and summing `value`, with no absolute values. It uses the pinned event signature and `topN` 5. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The first checker run failed because the `window` keys were in the wrong order. I reordered them to match the brief.
The address that received the most APE over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with 9872163412050000000000000 raw units (18 decimals). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. I ran one scan from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which confirmed the pinned closing hash. It found 444 APE `Transfer` logs across 149 recipient addresses, summed by receiver. The top five, in order, are in `answer`: 1. `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` 2. `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` 3. `0xa67f381eedb82ab46f2aa79f09b7bb38135c8615` 4. `0xeb9ca8fdfac0652a97c0e1a48c1178d32d3a6b8f` 5. `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` The recipe is a `log-rank` over the APE contract's `Transfer` event, grouped by `to`, summing `value`, with `topN` 5. The definitions state that "received" means gross incoming transfers, mints included and outgoing not subtracted. I did not run a second scan or check the closing hash on a second endpoint.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. It received 9872163412050000000000000 raw APE units (18 decimals, no scaling). The answer lists the top five recipients, ranked by gross incoming Transfer value (nothing subtracted for outgoing). The runners-up are `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` (about 9.55M APE) and `0xa67f381eedb82ab46f2aa79f09b7bb38135c8615` (about 4.54M APE). I ran one scan through `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. The scan found 444 APE Transfer logs across 149 recipient addresses. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint, and my notes name only publicnode. The recipe is a `log-rank` over the APE contract's Transfer event, grouped by `to`, summing `value`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. It received 9872163412050000000000000 raw units, which is about 9.87 million APE at 18 decimals. The scan used one endpoint, `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and its closing block hash matched the pinned one. It found 444 Transfer logs across 149 recipients. The ranking is gross incoming transfers, as the brief defines it. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint, and the notes name only the one endpoint used. The answer lists the top five recipients, and the recipe is a `log-rank` grouped by the indexed `to` address. The runner-up is `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` with about 9.55 million APE, so the lead is not large.
The address that received the most APE in the pinned window is **`0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`**. It received 9,872,163,412,050,000,000,000,000 raw units, which is about 9.87 million APE. That is the answer I wrote to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How it was computed:** I ran `scan.mjs` over blocks 26043139–26044928, both ends included, and it confirmed the pinned closing-block hash. It found 444 APE `Transfer` logs going to 149 addresses. I added up the incoming value for each address and kept the top one. - **Runner-up:** `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` received about 9.55 million APE, so the top spot is not a tie. - **Recipe:** a `log-rank` on the ApeCoin contract's `Transfer` event. It sums `value` for each `to` address with `abs: false` and `topN: 1`. - **Definitions:** copied exactly from the brief. They count gross incoming transfers, including mints, and use raw 18-decimal units. I ran the scan through the local keyed endpoint. In the notes I named `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` as the public equivalent, but I didn't rerun the scan against it.
I've written `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **Answer: `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`** received the most APE over blocks 26043139–26044928, with 9872163412050000000000000 raw units (about 9.87M APE). - **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` once, on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. It confirmed chain 1 and the pinned closing block hash. It found 444 APE Transfer logs spread across 149 recipients. - **Runner-up:** `0xa9d1e08c…3e43` received about 9.55M APE, so first place is not close enough to be a tie. - **Answer list:** it holds the top 5 recipients, since the brief only uses the first entry. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` over Transfer logs from the APE contract (`0x4d224452801aced8b2f0aebe155379bb5d594381`). It sums `value` by recipient (`to`), counting the full incoming amount including mints, and lists the top 5. - **Definitions:** I copied these from the brief rather than choosing my own: raw units with no decimal scaling, both block bounds inclusive, and ties broken by lowercase address. The first check failed only because my window fields were in a different order from the brief's. I reordered them and the check passed. I skipped the optional check of the closing block hash on a second endpoint, so only publicnode was used.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. It received 9872163412050000000000000 raw units of APE, which is about 9.87 million APE at 18 decimals. I ran `scan.mjs` once over the whole pinned range. It used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and the closing-block hash matched `--pin`. It found 444 Transfer logs across 149 receiving addresses. The answer lists the top five in order. The second is `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` at about 9.55 million APE. The recipe is `log-rank` on the APE contract's Transfer event, grouped by `to` and summing `value`, with no absolute values and `topN` 5. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most APE over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. It received 9,872,163,412,050,000,000,000,000 raw units (about 9.87M APE). The next two, in order, are `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` with about 9.55M APE and `0xa67f381eedb82ab46f2aa79f09b7bb38135c8615` with about 4.54M APE. I ran one scan on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the pinned closing block hash matched. It found 444 APE Transfer logs across 149 recipients, and the ranking sums the `to` address's incoming `value`, as the request defines it. The recipe is a `log-rank` on the APE contract, grouped by `to`, with `topN` 5, and the scan command is in `notes`. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. Its gross incoming total is 9872163412050000000000000 raw units (18 decimals). I scanned once with `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. The scan covered 444 Transfer logs across 149 receiving addresses. I did not check the pinned hash on a second endpoint from another operator. The recipe is a `log-rank` over APE at `0x4d224452801aced8b2f0aebe155379bb5d594381`, grouped by the `to` address and summing `value`. The answer lists the top five addresses, and the runner-up is `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` with about 9.55 million APE. Under `definitions` I stated inclusive bounds, gross incoming value with nothing subtracted, and raw 18-decimal units. The checker rejected my first draft because it wants the `window` keys in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). I reordered them and it then passed.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139 to 26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. - **Figure:** it received 9,872,163,412,050,000,000,000,000 raw units, which is about 9.87 million APE at 18 decimals. Second place is `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` at about 9.55 million APE. - **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` once, with `--pin` on the closing block hash, against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. It read 444 Transfer logs of the APE contract, summed by receiving address (gross incoming, no netting). I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` on the APE contract's `Transfer` event, summing `value`, grouped by `to`, with `abs` false and `topN` 5. The answer lists the top five addresses.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **Answer:** `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` received the most APE. Its gross incoming total is 9872163412050000000000000 raw units (18 decimals), about 9.87M APE. The file lists the top five recipients, and the runner-up is `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` with about 9.55M APE. **How I computed it:** I ran `scan.mjs` once, over exactly blocks 26043139 to 26044928, ranking `Transfer` logs of the APE contract by the `to` address. It used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and confirmed chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. It found 444 logs across 149 recipients. The recipe is a `log-rank` with `groupBy: to`, `sumArg: value`, `abs: false` and `topN: 5`, and the definitions copy the request's. **What I did not do:** I did not run a second full scan or check the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint, so publicnode is the only endpoint used.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most APE in blocks 26043139–26044928 (both inclusive) is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. It received 9872163412050000000000000 raw units of APE, which is about 9.87 million APE at 18 decimals. The runner-up is `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` at about 9.55 million. The answer is the top 5 addresses. The recipe is a `log-rank` over the APE `Transfer` event, grouped by the `to` address and summing `value`. I ran one scan, from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with `scan.mjs`. It found 444 logs across 149 receiving addresses, and the closing block hash matched the pin. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint, so the notes name only that one. The first draft failed the check because the `window` keys were in the wrong order. The checker wants `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`, and I reordered them.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The address that received the most APE over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`, with 9872163412050000000000000 raw units (18 decimals). The scan ran once on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. It covered 444 Transfer logs across 149 recipients. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The recipe is a `log-rank` grouped by `to`, summing `value`, with `topN` 5. The next four recipients, in order, are: - `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` - `0xa67f381eedb82ab46f2aa79f09b7bb38135c8615` - `0xeb9ca8fdfac0652a97c0e1a48c1178d32d3a6b8f` - `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` The checker rejected my first draft because the `window` keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. It only accepts `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash` in that order, so I reordered them.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most APE in the pinned window is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. It received 9872163412050000000000000 raw units of APE (18 decimals, no scaling) across blocks 26043139 to 26044928. The answer lists the top five receivers, in this order: 1. `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7` 2. `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43` 3. `0xa67f381eedb82ab46f2aa79f09b7bb38135c8615` 4. `0xeb9ca8fdfac0652a97c0e1a48c1178d32d3a6b8f` 5. `0x4a4aaa0155237881fbd5c34bfae16e985a7b068d` I scanned once with `scan.mjs` on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which matched the pinned closing block hash. The scan found 444 Transfer logs of the APE contract. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint, and the scan itself ran on that single endpoint. The recipe is `log-rank`, grouping by `to` and summing `value`, with `abs` false and `topN` 5. The checker first rejected my window because the keys were in the wrong order (`toBlock` must come before `fromBlock`), so I swapped them.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that received the most APE over blocks 26043139–26044928 is `0x15da7556d5ed888306839bed06f868aeaedcb0d7`. It received 9872163412050000000000000 raw units, which is about 9.87 million APE. The second-place address, `0xa9d1e08c7793af67e9d92fe308d5697fb81d3e43`, is close behind at about 9.55 million. I ran `scan.mjs` once, from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and it matched the pinned closing-block hash on chain 1. It found 444 Transfer logs to 149 distinct recipients. I did not cross-check the closing hash against a second endpoint. The recipe is a `log-rank` of the APE `Transfer` event, grouped by `to` and summing `value`, with `topN` of 5. The answer lists the top five addresses in ranked order.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.