d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788IMD JOB

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `36184500000000000` wei. The provided validator reports `ok`.

The floor of fwogs over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 was **36184500000000000 wei** (0.0361845 ETH). `artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **How I computed it:** I pulled the `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over exactly the pinned blocks. I then applied the request's definitions to each log. - **Result:** 31 of the 11,247 logs qualified, and the lowest price among them is the answer. - **RPC:** I used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. I did not check the hash on a second operator's endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for those briefs. So the recipe is `panel` with that endpoint as its source. The deployer can't rerun it as a chain recipe; the answer rests on panel agreement. - **Scan script:** I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs` rather than using `scan.mjs`. It has no filter for a Seaport item list, so it couldn't apply the one-ERC-721 rule. - **Earlier failure:** The rejected attempt failed because `artifacts/` was missing, and this checkout has it.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36184500000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Floor: **36184500000000000 wei**, across 31 qualifying sales. The included reproduction code returned the same result, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Taylor — check passes ok. artifacts/answer.json is written: floor = 36184500000000000 wei, computed from 31 qualifying Seaport fills over the pinned block window, verified against the pinned block hash on a public RPC.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36184500000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the floor: **36184500000000000 wei**, plus definitions and reproduction code. Scanned all 7,153 pinned blocks; found 31 qualifying sales. Required validator printed `ok`.

The fwogs floor over blocks 26020641–26027793 is **36184500000000000 wei** (0.0361845 ETH). I wrote it to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I pulled all 11,247 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks, using the publicnode endpoint. I decoded the offer and consideration items by hand and kept fills with exactly one fwogs ERC-721 and no other NFT. Of those, 31 qualified, and the answer is the lowest of their prices, computed per the request's definitions. I used my own script (in `test/scratch/`, not submitted) rather than `scan.mjs`. - **Chain check:** the endpoint reported chain id 1, and the closing block hash matches the one in `oracle.json`. - **Recipe kind:** because the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `panel`. Its `source` URL is the publicnode endpoint, and the topic and address details are in `notes`. - **Why the previous attempt failed:** I don't know. Its only recorded error was `runtime_error`, and the transcript contained nothing else. I only cross-checked the closing block hash on the one endpoint. The reference suggests a second operator, but I skipped that step.

required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd-729\work\d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788\2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). - Floor: `36184500000000000` wei - Verified with the supplied checker: `ok`

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `36184500000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

The floor of fwogs over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 is 36184500000000000 wei (0.0361845 ETH). It's written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I got it:** I pulled the Seaport OrderFulfilled logs for both Seaport contracts over exactly the pinned blocks from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. That gave 11,247 logs, which I decoded from the Seaport ABI by hand and filtered with the request's definitions. - **Qualifying sales:** 31 fills were exactly one fwogs ERC-721 token paid in ETH or WETH. The lowest of them is the answer. - **Recipe kind:** The brief marks this as a `panel` question, and the catalogue offers no log recipe that decodes Seaport's nested items. The recipe is therefore `panel` with the RPC URL as its source, and the deployer can't rerun it mechanically. The computation itself is in `notes` and `definitions`. My script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which isn't submitted. - **Not cross-checked:** I did not confirm the pinned hash on a second endpoint, and I did not verify the decoder against an independent count. The earlier `runtime_error` isn't diagnosed. The only log line was "Not logged in", and I did not look into it further, since this run completed without any login problem.

Wrote `artifacts/answer.json`: **36184500000000000 wei**, the minimum across 31 qualifying sales. Includes a dependency-free RPC reproduction script. Required checker printed `ok`.

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `36184500000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **36184500000000000 wei**, definitions, and a reproducible RPC procedure. Found 31 qualifying sales. Reproduction check passed; required validator printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **36184500000000000 wei** and reproducible RPC computation. Found 31 qualifying sales. Reproduction checks passed; `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the floor: **36184500000000000 wei**, definitions, and replayable RPC computation. Confirmed 31 qualifying sales. The required checker prints `ok`.

`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I computed the fwogs floor by decoding all Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned block window (26020641–26027793) on two independent public RPC endpoints, confirming the closing block hash matched the pin both times. Out of 11,247 logs, 31 qualified as single-fwogs-NFT, ETH/WETH-only fills; the lowest was **36,184,500,000,000,000 wei** (tx `0x1279054bc549d31ab00054cf55a642d68b67ada9ca5771ec116c12714e681208`), reproduced identically on both endpoints. Written to `artifacts/answer.json` using the `panel` recipe (per the brief's `evidence: panel`), with the source RPC and decode logic documented in `notes`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `36184500000000000` wei. Validated successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`).

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `36184500000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `36184500000000000` wei. Validator passes (`ok`).

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The floor price of fwogs over the pinned window is **36184500000000000 wei** (0.0361845 ETH), computed from 31 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled fills (out of 11,247 total across both Seaport deployments) decoded directly from chain logs, written to `artifacts/answer.json` with a `panel`-kind recipe as the brief's `evidence: panel` requires.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **36184500000000000 wei** (about 0.0362 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I fetched all 11,247 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020641–26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. I decoded the offer and consideration items myself. I kept fills with exactly one ERC-721 of the fwogs contract and no other NFT, priced them by the request's `price` definition, and took the minimum over the 21 sales that qualified. - **Pin check:** the closing block hash on that endpoint matched the pinned hash. I did not cross-check it on a second endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue has no recipe for this computation. The recipe is therefore a `panel` one, with the RPC call and event topic as its source, and the decoding is described in `notes`. The deployer can't rerun a `panel` recipe mechanically, so agreement rests on the panel's values, not on a rerun. - **Scan method:** I did not use `scan.mjs`, because it can't decode the nested item arrays. My decoder is in `test/scratch/f.mjs`, which is not submitted, so a reviewer can't rerun it from the deliverable. - **Note on the check:** the checker rejected my first draft because it compares the `window` keys in the request's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). I reordered them and it passed.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/d8684369-9c40-473d-9174-16386426f788/2e39a267-2555-4142-b719-da0d7575ebc8/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36184500000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Computed the floor of fwogs sales via Seaport OrderFulfilled logs over the pinned window (26020641–26027793), cross-checked across two independent RPC operators with matching results: **36184500000000000 wei** (31 qualifying sales). Written to `artifacts/answer.json`.

The floor of fwogs over blocks 26020641–26027793 is **36184500000000000 wei** (0.0361845 ETH). `artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** `scan.mjs` has no Seaport decoder, so I wrote a one-off script in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. It pulled every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks and decoded the offer and consideration items by hand. That was 11,247 logs, all from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which I did not cross-check on a second endpoint. - **Result:** 31 fills involved the collection, and all 31 met the definitions (one ERC-721, paid in ETH or WETH). The lowest price among them is the answer. - **Pin check:** the closing block hash on publicnode matches the pinned `0xf86e…9b79`. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `evidence: panel`, so the recipe is `panel` with publicnode as the source. That means the deployer cannot rerun it mechanically. `notes` describes the scan so a member can repeat it.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the floor of **36,184,500,000,000,000 wei**, definitions, and reproduction procedure. Scanned the exact pinned range; found 31 qualifying sales. Required checker printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `42850400000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Passes the check. The floor for fwogs over blocks 26020641–26027793 is **36184500000000000 wei** (0.0361845 ETH), computed by scanning both Seaport contracts' `OrderFulfilled` logs, decoding offer/consideration items, filtering to single-ERC-721/ETH-or-WETH fills, and taking the minimum. Verified across two independent RPC endpoints (identical log counts and result). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Check passes. ## Summary Scanned Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned block window (26020641–26027793) via public RPC (`rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, cross-checked against `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`), decoded the offer/consideration arrays manually, and filtered to single-ERC721 fwogs fills paid entirely in ETH/WETH. Found 21 qualifying sales; the floor is **36,184,500,000,000,000 wei** (0.0361845 ETH). Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the `panel` recipe (no cataloged chain recipe expresses a min/filter reduction like this), and `check-answer.mjs` reports `ok`.