d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81aIMD JOB

**45759144918032786** wei (≈0.04576 ETH) — 61 qualifying Beanz fills, sum 2791307840000000000 wei, over blocks 26019451–26026607. `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json` prints `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average Beanz sale price over blocks 26019451–26026607 is **45759144918032786 wei**. - **Sales:** 61 sales qualified under the definitions in the brief. Their prices sum to 2791307840000000000 wei, and dividing by 61 and rounding down gives the answer. - **Scan:** I fetched every OrderFulfilled log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over the pinned range. That was 12,231 logs from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with no duplicates. I decoded the offer and consideration arrays myself, since `scan.mjs` can't do that. - **Pin:** The closing block hash on that endpoint matched the pinned one. I did not check it on a second operator's endpoint, and the notes say so. - **Recipe:** The brief says `evidence: "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` requires a `panel` recipe for that. The recipe names the RPC endpoint and topic as its source, and `notes` gives the full method. - **Window key order:** The checker compares the `window` object as a string, so its keys follow the brief's order: `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`. The scan script is in `test/scratch/scan.mjs`. The answer file is untracked and nothing else in the repo was touched.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. It gives an average sale price of **45759144918032786 wei** (about 0.0458 ETH) for Beanz over blocks 26019451 to 26026607. - **Sales counted:** 61 qualifying Seaport sales, 22 listing fills and 39 bid fills. Their prices sum to 2791307840000000000 wei, which is the `figure` in the file. Dividing by 61 and rounding down gives the answer. - **How I computed it:** I pulled the `OrderFulfilled` logs for both Seaport contracts over the pinned window from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which was 12,231 logs. I decoded them with the Seaport ABI and applied your definitions of a sale and its price. The closing block hash matched the pin. - **Decoder:** `scan.mjs` can't decode the array fields in this event, so I wrote a custom decoder. It is in `test/scratch/sales.mjs`, which is not submitted. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` requires the `panel` kind for that. The recipe therefore only names the RPC endpoint and event as its source, and the deployer can't automatically rerun it. The full method is in `notes`. - **Single scan:** I ran one full scan from one operator and did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The file is untracked and nothing else outside `artifacts/` was changed.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei**, from 61 qualifying sales over the exact pinned range. Included reproduction details; the required validator printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average Beanz sale price over blocks 26019451–26026607 is **45759144918032786 wei**. - **Sales counted:** 61 qualifying sales totalling 2791307840000000000 wei; the answer is that total divided by 61, rounded down. - **Logs scanned:** 12231 OrderFulfilled logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6, decoded with the Seaport ABI and applying the request's definitions. No duplicates turned up, and no otherwise-qualifying fill was dropped for non-ETH/WETH payment or an unusual shape. - **Pin:** `eth_chainId` was 1 and the closing block hash matched the pinned hash on publicnode. I also confirmed the hash on Flashbots. - **Recipe kind:** the brief is marked `evidence: "panel"`, so the recipe has to be `kind: "panel"` with a source string. It is the publicnode `eth_getLogs` scan, and the rerunnable method is in `notes`. - **Scan tooling:** `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's tuple arrays, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/sale.mjs` and imported its keccak helper. That scratch file isn't submitted, and only `artifacts/answer.json` is new and left untracked. The earlier `git ENOENT` and missing-`artifacts/` failures didn't recur; I created the directory before writing.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **45759144918032786 wei**, averaged over 61 qualifying sales, and RPC reproduction code. Required validator printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` (exit 0). **Answer: 45759144918032786 wei** (≈ 0.04576 ETH), from 61 qualifying sales summing to 2791307840000000000 wei. How it was computed over exactly blocks 26019451–26026607: 1. **Pin confirmed** — `eth_getBlockByNumber(26026607)` returned the pinned hash on four independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, merkle, drpc); `eth_chainId` = 1 on each. 2. **Candidate blocks** — Beanz ERC-721 `Transfer` logs over the window: 121 logs in 42 blocks. Any Seaport fill moving a Beanz token emits a Transfer in the same tx, so this bounds the search exactly while keeping the scan to 35 RPC calls instead of ~50k Seaport logs. 3. **Fills** — `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 + 1.6 in those blocks: 297 events, deduped by `blockNumber:logIndex`, decoded with the full `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` ABI and filtered per the brief's definitions. 61 qualified (39 bid fills, 22 listing fills, all Seaport 1.6). 4. **Verified** — decoder spot-checked against a real receipt; the whole scan re-run end-to-end on a second operator returned identical counts and sum, so nothing was truncated. Two judgement calls worth flagging, both stated under `definitions`: - The brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe must be `{kind: "panel", source}` — and no chain recipe in the catalogue could express this reduction anyway (it needs per-log decoding of dynamic item arrays; `log-sum` can only add one fixed data word). The `source` names the endpoints, topic, contracts and block range so it reproduces from public RPC data alone. - Two of the 61 events are the two sides of a single matched trade (same tx, same token id). The brief's `sale` definition qualifies each `OrderFulfilled` event individually, so both are counted; deduplicating by trade instead would give 59 sales and 45979675254237288 wei — a 0.5% difference, recorded in `definitions` so a reader sees the alternative.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Average: `45759144918032786` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Done. The deliverable is written and validated. **Answer: 45759144918032786 wei (~0.0458 ETH)** — the average Beanz sale price on OpenSea over the pinned window, blocks 26019451–26026607. How I got there: - Fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log (topic `0x9d9af8e3…`) from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned range via `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, using a scratch script in `test/scratch/beanz-avg.mjs` built on the scan script's chunk/halve/dedup pattern — the provided scan script can't decode Seaport's dynamic item arrays, so the decoding had to be custom. It printed only totals, never logs. - The endpoint answered `eth_chainId` = 1 and block 26026607 hashed to the pinned `0x8a84f5aa…cdec2`; I cross-checked that hash with one `eth_getBlockByNumber` on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` (a different operator) and it matched. - Of 12231 `OrderFulfilled` events in the window, 61 qualified under the brief's definitions: exactly one NFT item across offer + consideration, that item being ERC-721 Beanz, and priced either as a listing fill (22 sales — single offer item is the NFT, every consideration item ETH or WETH, price = sum of consideration amounts including fees) or a bid fill (39 sales — single offer item is ETH/WETH, price = the offer amount). All 61 were on Seaport 1.6, none on 1.5. Sum = 2791307840000000000 wei; floor(sum / 61) = 45759144918032786. - Since the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}`; the full method, endpoints, and totals are in `notes`, and the choices the request left open (fill shapes, one-sale-per-event, what counts as "another NFT", no zone filter) are stated under `definitions`. - `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json` prints `ok`, and `artifacts/answer.json` is untracked (the repo's exclude rules already keep it out of git), ready for the daemon to upload.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and the checker prints `ok`. The answer is **45759144918032786 wei** (about 0.04576 ETH), the average Beanz sale price on OpenSea over blocks 26019451–26026607. - **Result:** 61 qualifying sales summing to 2791307840000000000 wei. The mean is 45759144918032786.885 wei, rounded down as the question asks. The cheapest sale was 0.0364 ETH and the dearest 0.149 ETH. - **Scan:** I read all 12231 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over exactly the pinned blocks from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and decoded them with my own scanner. The provided `scan.mjs` can't decode nested arrays. No fills were excluded for non-ETH/WETH payment, and none were duplicates. - **Pins:** publicnode reported chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. `eth.drpc.org` and `rpc.mevblocker.io` returned the same hash. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `evidence: panel`, so the checker only accepts `{kind: "panel", source}`. The `source` is the RPC URL plus the `eth_getLogs` topic and block range, and the `notes` describe the full computation. - **Definitions:** they state the price rules for listing fills and bid fills, the requirement that every consideration item be ETH or WETH, and how the average and de-duplication were done. - **File placement:** the file is untracked and nothing else in the repo changed. The scanner is in `test/scratch/`, which is discarded before submission. The first check failed because the checker compares the `window` keys in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). I reordered them and it now passes.

The average Beanz sale price over the pinned window was **45759144918032786 wei** (about 0.0458 ETH). It's written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **How I got it** - I fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019451–26026607 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That endpoint returned chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. I also checked the hash on `https://rpc.mevblocker.io`, a different operator, and it matched. - That gave 12,231 logs. After decoding them and applying the request's definitions as written, 61 were qualifying Beanz sales: 22 listing fills and 39 bid fills. - There were no bundles, ERC-1155 fills, fills paid in another token, or zero-price fills to exclude. - Prices summed to 2791307840000000000 wei (recorded as `figure`), and 2791307840000000000 ÷ 61, rounded down, gives the answer. **Choices and limits** - **Recipe kind:** the request marks this as a panel-evidence question, so the only recipe the checker allows is `{kind: "panel", source}`. The `source` names the endpoint, both Seaport addresses, the event topic and the block range. - **No deduplication:** I counted each qualifying event once and did not merge events from the same transaction, following the literal wording of the definition. I did not check whether any transaction produced two qualifying events for the same token. - **Decoder:** the provided `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's offer and consideration lists, so I used my own Node decoder in `test/scratch/`, which is not submitted. - **Single scan:** I ran the full scan once, on one endpoint. Only `artifacts/answer.json` was written, and it is left untracked.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: - Schema checker: `ok` - Qualifying sales: `61` - Total: `2791307840000000000` wei - Average: `45759144918032786` wei

The check prints `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and left untracked (git status is clean apart from it being ignored/untracked — nothing staged). ## Result **Answer: `45759144918032786` wei** (≈0.04576 ETH) — the floored mean Beanz sale price on Seaport 1.5/1.6 over blocks 26019451–26026607. **How it was computed** (`test/scratch/beanz.mjs`, scratch only): - Confirmed `eth_chainId` = 1 and the closing block hash matched the pinned `0x8a84f5aa…cdec2`. - `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` topic0 on both Seaport contracts across exactly the pinned range, decoded the `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` arrays by ABI. - 12231 OrderFulfilled logs → 61 contained a Beanz ERC-721 → all 61 had exactly one NFT (no bundles/1155) → 22 listing fills (all-ETH/WETH consideration, summed incl. fees) + 39 bid fills (single WETH/ETH offer amount). Zero fills excluded by shape or currency, so none of the open definition choices moved the number. - Sum 2791307840000000000 / 61 = 45759144918032786.885… → rounded down. **Cross-check:** re-scanned on a second operator (`ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`) with 400-block chunks — identical log count, sale count, sum, and average, ruling out silent truncation on the 2000-block primary scan. **Recipe:** `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}`, as the brief's `"evidence": "panel"` requires (the check refuses chain recipes for it, and `log-sum` can't express per-log dynamic-array decoding anyway). The full reproduction procedure and every definition I fixed (NFT = any `itemType >= 2`, offer array must be exactly one item, per-event counting with no zone filter) are in `definitions` and `notes`.

failed to start git: spawn git ENOENT

FAILURE: internal_error

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average Beanz sale price on OpenSea over blocks 26019451 to 26026607 is **45759144918032786 wei** (about 0.04576 ETH). - **Result:** 61 qualifying sales summed to 2791307840000000000 wei, and dividing by 61 and rounding down gives the figure above. - **Scan:** I read Beanz `Transfer` logs over the whole pinned range (121 logs in 42 blocks). Every Seaport fill moves the token, so I then read Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs only in those blocks. I decoded the items from the log data and applied the request's definitions. - **What I saw:** 247 Seaport fills in those blocks contained Beanz, 61 qualified, and none were excluded. - **Pin check:** the closing block hash `0x8a84f5aa…cdec2` matched on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, two different operators. The scan itself used only publicnode. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker requires a `panel` recipe for that. So the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: <publicnode URL and the scan description>}`, and the on-chain method is written out in `notes`. The deployer cannot rerun a panel recipe. - **Deviation from the reference:** I did not use `scan.mjs`. It cannot decode Seaport's nested item arrays, so I wrote my own script, which is in `test/scratch/` and is not submitted. The earlier failure was a missing `artifacts/` directory. I created it, and the file is untracked in git.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` and the checker prints `ok`. The answer is **45759144918032786 wei** (about 0.0458 ETH). - **How it was computed:** I pulled every `OrderFulfilled` event from both Seaport contracts (1.5 and 1.6) over exactly blocks 26019451–26026607. That came to 12,231 events, with no duplicates and none outside the window. I then read each event's offer and consideration items. The provided scan script can't read those item lists, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/`. - **Qualifying sales:** 61 (22 listing fills, 39 bid fills). None were excluded for being paid in another token or for being bundles, and none had a zero price. - **Result:** the prices add up to 2,791,307,840,000,000,000 wei. Divided by 61 and rounded down, that gives the answer. Sale prices ranged from 0.0364 ETH to 0.149 ETH. - **Checks:** both `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.mevblocker.io` confirmed chain 1 and the pinned closing block hash. I ran the scan twice on different endpoints and got the same event count and figures both times. `eth.drpc.org` rejected the requests, so none of the counted data came from it. - **Definitions:** I kept the request's definitions and added three: which items count as an NFT, how a listing fill is priced, and how a bid fill is priced. Each event counts as its own sale, as the definitions say. - **Recipe:** the request is marked `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. Its source names the exact endpoint, contracts, event topic and block range, so anyone can rerun it from public RPC data. The answer file is untracked, as required: `artifacts/` is excluded in `.git/info/exclude`, so git doesn't list it.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **45759144918032786 wei**, averaged across 61 qualifying sales. The included reproduction code returned the same result. The required validator printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Computed average: `45759144918032786` wei across 61 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction recipe. Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei** across **61 sales**. Required checker: `ok`. Embedded reproduction code and independent decoding both match.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproducible calculation. Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei** across **61 sales**. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction procedure. Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei** across **61 sales**. Independent decoding agreed; the required validator printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes the check. **Answer: 45759144918032786 wei** (≈0.04576 ETH) average Beanz sale price; figure (sum) 2791307840000000000 wei over 61 sales. How it was produced: - Confirmed `eth_chainId` = 0x1 and block 26026607's hash = the pinned `0x8a84f5aa…cdec2` on two independent operators (flashbots, publicnode) before reading anything. - Swept `eth_getLogs` for the `OrderFulfilled` topic on Seaport 1.5 + 1.6 over blocks 26019451–26026607 inclusive, chunked with halve-on-refusal: 12231 events. Decoded each event's `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` arrays (data tail length matched decoded array lengths on every log) and applied the brief's sale/price rules. - 61 qualifying Beanz sales — 22 listing fills (sum of all consideration, all items ETH/WETH) and 39 bid fills (the WETH offer amount), 54 distinct token ids, 0.0364–0.149 ETH. Nothing that mentioned the Beanz contract was excluded: no bundles, no ERC-1155, no other payment token in this window. - Repeated the whole sweep on a second endpoint with a different chunk size to rule out silent truncation: identical 12231 / 61 / same sum. Two judgement calls, both stated under `definitions` and `notes`: the brief's `evidence: "panel"` forces the `panel` recipe kind (no chain recipe in the catalogue can express a price buried in dynamic struct arrays), and two counter-order pairs (bid event + listing event for the same token in one tx) are counted as two events each, since the brief defines a sale as an `OrderFulfilled` event — deduping them would give 45979675254237288 instead, and that alternative is named in the notes.

Completed `artifacts/answer.json`. Computed result: `45759144918032786` wei Verification: `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` prints `ok`. The calculation used the pinned Ethereum block range exactly, with 61 qualifying Beanz sales totaling `2791307840000000000` wei.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Computed average: `45759144918032786` wei across 61 qualifying sales. Validator result: `ok`.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd-729\work\d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a\0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `45759144918032786` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei** across **61 sales**. The included reproduction procedure returned the same answer, and the checker printed `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an average Beanz sale price of **45759144918032786 wei** (about 0.0458 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26019451–26026607 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The chain id and the closing block hash matched the pin. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Result:** 12,231 logs decoded, of which 61 qualified as single-ERC-721 Beanz sales paid in ETH or WETH. Their total is 2,791,307,840,000,000,000 wei, and the average is rounded down. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe with a source URL. I used that, with the RPC endpoint as the source. This means the recipe names an endpoint rather than a rerunnable event scan. - **Decoder:** `scan.mjs` can't decode the offer and consideration arrays, so I used my own decoder at `test/scratch/s.mjs`. It isn't submitted, and `notes` in the answer says so.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `45759144918032786` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **45759144918032786 wei**, which is 61 qualifying sales totalling 2791307840000000000 wei, rounded down. - **Scan:** I pulled all 12231 Seaport OrderFulfilled logs from both contracts (1.5 and 1.6) over exactly blocks 26019451 to 26026607. The source was `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned chain id 1 and a closing block hash that matches the pin. I decoded the events by hand and applied the request's own sale and price definitions. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker rejects any other recipe kind for panel briefs. So the recipe is `panel`, with the RPC endpoint and contracts as its `source`. The question is still answered from on-chain data, so nothing off-chain was consulted. - **Scan script:** I did not use `scan.mjs`. It can't decode Seaport's nested offer and consideration arrays, so the scan is a script of my own at `test/scratch/s.mjs`. - **Cross-check:** I read from one endpoint only and did not check the pinned hash on a second operator's endpoint.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei** across **61 sales**. The embedded calculation reproduced the result from public RPC data. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`. Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei** across **61 sales**. Reproduction matched, and the required checker printed `ok`.

Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/d8a03997-1378-4626-bb6d-46f813d2c81a/0060d95d-99b1-46e4-b3e8-075b10e35bfc/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `45759144918032786` wei Validator result: `ok`

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei**, averaged across 61 qualifying sales, plus reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **45,759,144,918,032,786 wei** across **61 sales**. The included reproduction code returned the same result, and the required validator printed `ok`.