deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8IMD JOB

Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](</Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). The oracle checker reports `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `301950000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `301950000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **301950000000000000 wei**. The included reproduction returned the same result across 24 qualifying sales. Required validator: **ok**.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `301950000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` returned `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the floor of **301950000000000000 wei** and a reproducible RPC computation. Found 24 qualifying sales over the exact pinned window. Required validator printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer **301950000000000000 wei**, definitions, and reproduction code. Computed across the exact pinned window: 24 qualifying fills. The required validator printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `301950000000000000` wei. The supplied validator reports `ok`.

Check passed (`ok`). `artifacts/answer.json` is written with floor = 301950000000000000 wei, computed from 24 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled fills over the pinned block window, verified on two independent RPC endpoints matching the pinned block hash.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `301950000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `301950000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **301950000000000000 wei**, definitions, and reproduction code. The required validator printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`. Floor: **301950000000000000 wei**, across 24 qualifying sales. Embedded reproduction code returned the same result; the required checker printed `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The floor of LilPudgys over blocks 26020642 to 26027794 is **301950000000000000 wei** (0.30195 ETH). - **How I got it:** I pulled every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over exactly the pinned blocks. That was 11,249 logs, from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. I confirmed the closing hash matched the pin on that endpoint, but did not check a second operator's endpoint. I decoded the offer and consideration arrays and kept the fills that matched the request's definitions. That left 24 qualifying sales, and the lowest price among them is the answer. - **Scan tool:** I used my own decoding script, not `scan.mjs`, because the catalogue has no recipe for a minimum over decoded arrays. The script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted. - **Recipe kind:** The file carries a `panel` recipe, because the checker requires that for this request. It points at the same endpoint and events as its source. The notes state that the figure comes from the on-chain scan, not from a rerunnable catalogue recipe. - **Window and file:** The window is copied exactly from the brief. The required `artifacts/` folder now exists, which was the fault in the earlier attempt.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat2/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `301950000000000000` wei. Validated successfully with the supplied checker (`ok`).

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `301950000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `301950000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `301950000000000000` wei The supplied checker prints `ok`. Only the required artifact was created.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `301950000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

The floor for LilPudgys over blocks 26020642–26027794 was **301950000000000000 wei**, about 0.302 ETH. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` on `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 OrderFulfilled log in the window, 11,249 in total, from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The closing block hash matched the pin. The catalogue's `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's offer and consideration arrays, so I decoded them with my own script in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. - **Filter:** 24 fills of exactly one LilPudgys ERC-721 were priced under the request's definitions. The lowest was 301950000000000000 wei. The next lowest were 304920000000000000 and 305000000000000000. - **Recipe:** because the request says `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is kind `panel`. Its `source` names the endpoint, both Seaport contracts, the event topic and the block range. The deployer can't rerun it as code, so agreement across the panel is the evidence. The earlier failure was a missing `artifacts/` directory. It now exists and the file is written there.

Taylor, done. `artifacts/answer.json` written and passes `check-answer.mjs` ("ok"). - Scanned Seaport 1.5 + 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over exactly blocks 26020642–26027794 (pin confirmed on publicnode.com and mevblocker.io/fast). - Decoded offer/consideration to find single-ERC721-LilPudgys fills paid entirely in ETH/WETH: 24 qualifying sales. - Floor: **301950000000000000 wei** (0.30195 ETH), tx `0x4e8761d0c9595f2e3f37c6b198fbe34da77dfa04448cc65ef9eea2c55b0b3968`. - Recipe kind is `panel` (required since the brief sets `evidence: panel`), with source pointing to that transaction; full reproduction method is in `notes`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **301950000000000000 wei** (0.30195 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. So the recipe is `panel` with a public RPC URL as its source, even though I computed the figure from chain data. - **Method:** I did not use `scan.mjs`. I fetched the collection's ERC-721 Transfer logs over exactly blocks 26020642–26027794, which gave 113 transfers in 93 blocks. Any Seaport sale has to move a token, so I then pulled the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs for just those 93 blocks (119 logs) and decoded them by hand. - **Qualifying sales:** 24 fills contained exactly one LilPudgys token and no other NFT. All 24 were paid in ETH or WETH, so none were excluded on price. - **Floor:** the lowest is a listing fill in tx `0x4e8761d0c9595f2e3f37c6b198fbe34da77dfa04448cc65ef9eea2c55b0b3968`, block 26022909. The next lowest is 304920000000000000. - **Endpoints:** the scan ran on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The script rotates to `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` and `one.valve.city` on failure, and I can't say whether any call fell back. Chain id 1 and the closing block hash were confirmed on publicnode. The hash was confirmed again on `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. The `definitions` and `notes` fields in the file state the sale, price and floor definitions and the method. The helper script is in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `301950000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and the answer check printed `ok`. The floor is **301950000000000000 wei** (about 0.302 ETH), the lowest of 24 qualifying sales. - **Method:** The scan script can't decode Seaport events, so I wrote a small script under `test/scratch/`. - It pulled the collection's `Transfer` logs over blocks 26020642 to 26027794, which touched 98 transactions. - It decoded the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` events from those receipts. - It applied the brief's definitions: exactly one ERC-721 item of the collection, priced in ETH or WETH, with listing and bid fills priced as the brief says. - **Endpoint:** The only endpoint I used was `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. I did not cross-check the closing block hash against a second operator's endpoint. The hash line got cut off in my output, so I never confirmed the match on the endpoint I used either. - **Recipe:** The brief marks this question as panel evidence, so the recipe kind is `panel`. Its `source` field describes the RPC method rather than a page, because the check requires a `source` and the data comes from the chain itself.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of **301950000000000000 wei** (0.30195 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I used a custom Node script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`, not delivered) rather than `scan.mjs`, because the scan script has no way to filter Seaport fills by collection. It pulled every OrderFulfilled log from both Seaport contracts over blocks 26020642–26027794, 11,249 in total. It decoded the offer and consideration items and kept the sales that meet the request's definitions. Twenty-four sales qualified, and the lowest was the answer above. - **Endpoint and pin:** I read from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` only. It reported chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Recipe is `panel`:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue only allows the `panel` recipe for that. The recipe's `source` is the endpoint and log query above, so the deployer cannot rerun it mechanically. It has to agree on the value. - **Earlier failure:** I never saw why the previous attempt was rejected. Only "runtime_error" and a login message were shown. I did not run any other check on the answer beyond `check-answer.mjs`.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Computed the LilPudgys floor over the pinned window (blocks 26020642–26027794) by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs from two independent public RPC endpoints, decoding offer/consideration items, and applying the exact bundle/payment-token/fee rules from the brief's definitions. Found 24 qualifying single-NFT ETH/WETH fills; the lowest was **301950000000000000 wei** (0.30195 ETH), written to `artifacts/answer.json`.

No action needed — that monitor was for the earlier scan attempt, which has since been superseded. The task is already complete: `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **301950000000000000 wei**, definitions, and a self-contained RPC replay procedure. Verified all 7,153 pinned blocks and 24 qualifying sales. The required checker prints `ok`.

Check passes. The floor of LilPudgys over the pinned window is **301,950,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.30195 ETH), confirmed identically from two independently-operated public RPC endpoints, and written to `artifacts/answer.json`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/deb70f91-052a-4d0f-b500-8f2a505eeba8/4b039d73-4f02-4ce4-8cd0-71b013d3ebd2/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `301950000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.