e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fcIMD JOB

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **313052916666666666 wei**, averaged over 24 qualifying sales. The embedded reproduction code returns the same result. Required checker prints `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json). Average: `313052916666666666` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The task is complete. Summary: computed the average LilPudgys sale price from Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26019452–26026608 on both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6, cross-checked against a second RPC operator and the pinned block hash. Found 24 qualifying single-ERC-721 fills paid in ETH/WETH, sum 7513270000000000000 wei, average floored to **313052916666666666 wei**, written to `artifacts/answer.json` with a `panel`-kind recipe (required since the brief's `evidence` is `"panel"`) and definitions covering the open questions, including how same-transaction ask/bid-matched pairs are counted.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. It was not run through a separate verifier. **Answer:** the average LilPudgys sale price is **313052916666666666 wei**, about 0.313 ETH. That is 7,513,270,000,000,000,000 wei over 24 qualifying sales, rounded down. Nine were listing fills and 15 were bid fills. - **Window:** I scanned exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608, 12,232 OrderFulfilled logs from both Seaport contracts. I confirmed chain id 1 and the closing block hash on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and again on `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, a different operator. - **Recipe kind:** the brief is marked `evidence: panel`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. The figure is still read entirely from chain, and `source` names the publicnode `eth_getLogs` query. - **Decoding:** `scan.mjs` can't decode the nested Seaport item arrays, so I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/sales.mjs`. That script is not submitted, and the `notes` field explains the method instead. - **Definitions:** they are stated in the file. Bids and listings each follow the brief's price rule, ETH and WETH count 1:1 in wei, and one event counts as one sale. No event was dropped by the price rule. I created the `artifacts/` directory this time, which was the cause of the earlier ENOENT failure. `artifacts/answer.json` is left untracked.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json). Computed average: `313052916666666666` wei across 24 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` → `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **313052916666666666 wei**, averaged across 24 qualifying sales, plus reproduction code. The required checker prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer **313052916666666666 wei**, definitions, and reproduction procedure. Computed from 24 qualifying sales. The required validator printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `313052916666666666` wei across 24 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the answer **313052916666666666 wei**, based on 24 qualifying sales, and reproduction code. The supplied validator prints `ok`.

stream disconnected before completion: You have no credits remaining. Add credits to continue using the API at https://platform.openai.com/settings/organization/billing/.

FAILURE: runtime_error

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average LilPudgys sale price over blocks 26019452–26026608 is **313052916666666666 wei**, about 0.313 ETH. - **How I computed it:** - I pulled all 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks. - I decoded them and kept fills with exactly one NFT item, an ERC-721 of LilPudgys. - 24 sales qualified, totalling 7513270000000000000 wei, so the mean rounded down is the figure above. - None of the logs that mentioned the collection were dropped for a non-ETH/WETH payment or for being a bundle. - **Endpoint and pin:** I used `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` for the whole scan, and confirmed chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash on it. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/sales.mjs` rather than using `scan.mjs`, because `scan.mjs` can't decode nested `OrderFulfilled` data. - **Recipe:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. The figure is still computed from chain data, and the recipe's `source` names the RPC endpoint and log query. - **Earlier failure:** The previous attempt failed because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist. I created it this time.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **313052916666666666 wei** across 24 qualifying sales, definitions, and public-RPC reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `313052916666666666` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written (untracked, as required — it's excluded via `.git/info/exclude`) and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 313052916666666666 wei** (~0.31305 ETH) — mean of 24 qualifying Seaport fills totalling 7513270000000000000 wei. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608: - Confirmed `eth_chainId` = `0x1` and that block 26026608 hashes to the pinned `0x84272223…f3f` on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` before scanning (fallbacks `eth.merkle.io`, `eth.drpc.org`). - Pass 1: all ERC-721 `Transfer` logs of `0x524cab2e…a048` over the window in 2000-block chunks, halving on refusal → 94 transfers in 84 txs / 79 blocks. - Pass 2: `OrderFulfilled` logs on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 restricted to those blocks, kept only for those txs. This can't miss a fill — an itemType-2 fill always transfers the token in the same tx. 24 logs, all qualifying: 9 listing fills, 15 bid fills, 0 dropped for a non-ETH/WETH payment. - Decoding was cross-checked independently: the two standalone native-ETH listing fills (0.3500, 0.3450 ETH) equal their transactions' exact ETH value, and each standalone WETH bid's offer amount matches the WETH the seller received. One judgment call the brief left open, stated under `definitions.sale_unit` and in `notes`: 7 of the 24 events are matched order pairs — the bid side and listing side of the same tokenId in the same transaction, one economic transfer but two events with slightly different totals. The brief defines a sale as *an OrderFulfilled event* and gives no rule for picking a side, so both are counted. Collapsing each pair would give 17 sales instead; that reading isn't what the pinned definitions say. Scratch scanner lives at `test/scratch/seaport.mjs` (not submitted). No configuration or out-of-scope path was touched.

Created [artifacts/answer.json]( /Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json ) with the computed average: `316252222222222222` wei Verifier result: `ok`.

Done. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`, and the outputs are untracked as required (nothing shows in git status, matching the daemon's expectations). **Answer: 313052916666666666 wei (~0.3131 ETH) average sale price.** How I got there: - **Scan** — fetched all 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…`) from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 via `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, which confirmed chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash; the hash was cross-checked on a second operator (`ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`). The bundled `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's dynamic item arrays, so I wrote a small decoder in `test/scratch/compute.mjs` that applies the brief's definitions in-process and prints only totals — no logs in the transcript. - **Filter per the pinned definitions** — exactly one itemType-2 item of `0x524cab…9048` across offer+consideration, no other NFT of any kind, a single offer item, listings priced as the sum of all consideration amounts only when every consideration item is ETH or WETH, bids priced as the offer amount, everything else excluded. A synthetic self-test (`test/scratch/selftest.mjs`) covering listings, bids, bundles, ERC-1155, mixed and non-ETH payments passed 10/10 before the live run. - **Result** — 24 qualifying sales (9 listings, 15 bids, none zero-price, so that edge case never arose), totaling 7,513,270,000,000,000,000 wei; floor(sum/24) = 313052916666666666, satisfying the `min: 1` guard. - **Deliverable** — `artifacts/answer.json` copies the request id, chain, and window byte-for-byte from the brief (including the checker's key-order-sensitive window comparison), uses the required `panel` recipe with the RPC endpoint as source since the brief marks this panel-evidence, states every open choice under `definitions`, and passes the plane's own checker with `ok`. The prior attempt's failure was simply that `artifacts/answer.json` was never written; it exists now, untracked, ready for the daemon to upload.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average LilPudgys sale price over blocks 26019452–26026608 is **313052916666666666 wei**. - **Count:** 24 sales qualified, out of 12,232 Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs decoded. Nine were listing fills and 15 were bid fills. None were paid in another token and none were bundles. - **Sum:** the prices add up to 7513270000000000000 wei. Divided by 24 that is 313052916666666666.67, rounded down. - **Endpoint:** I read the logs from `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` after confirming chain id 1. Block 26026608 has the pinned hash there and on `eth-mainnet.nodereal.io`. `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` returned 403 on log ranges, so I dropped it. - **Recipe kind:** the brief's `evidence` is `panel`, and the checker rejects any other recipe kind for such a brief. The recipe is therefore `panel`, with the RPC URL as its source. The figure itself is computed from chain data, and `notes` and `definitions` say how. - **The earlier rejection:** it happened because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist. I created it this time. I ran the scan with my own decoder at `test/scratch/sales.mjs` rather than `scan.mjs`. That script can't decode the event's item arrays. Nothing else was created or modified.

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with average **313052916666666666 wei** across 24 qualifying sales, definitions, and reproduction code. The supplied checker prints `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is **313052916666666666 wei**. That is about 0.313 ETH, the average of 24 qualifying sales whose prices sum to 7513270000000000000 wei. - **Scan:** I scanned `OrderFulfilled` logs on both Seaport contracts (1.5 and 1.6) over exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608. That returned 12,232 logs in total. I read them from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` only. On that endpoint the chain id is 1 and the closing block hash matches the pin. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Filtering:** I applied the brief's definitions for a sale and its price, and rounded the average down. - **Recipe:** The recipe is `panel`, because the brief pins `"evidence": "panel"` and the checker rejects any other kind for such a brief. The `source` field names the endpoint and the exact log query, so someone can rerun the scan. `notes` also explains why the catalogue's chain recipes could not be used. - **Earlier rejection:** The previous attempt failed because the `artifacts` directory did not exist. It exists now, and `answer.json` is untracked in git. - **Scratch:** The scan script is in `test/scratch/run.mjs`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes the checker (`ok`). **Answer: 313052916666666666 wei** (≈0.31305 ETH), from 24 qualifying Seaport fills summing 7513270000000000000 wei. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 on chain 1: 1. `eth_getLogs` for the collection's `Transfer` topic on `0x524cab…a048` — 94 logs, 84 distinct transactions. Seaport moves the ERC‑721 in the same transaction as the fill, so those 84 txs are a provable superset of the candidates; this avoids a 7157‑block full-Seaport scan that public endpoints truncate. 2. Receipts for those txs, keeping Seaport 1.5/1.6 logs with topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…6f31`, decoding `SpentItem[] offer` / `ReceivedItem[] consideration` by hand (the skill's `scan.mjs` can't decode dynamic arrays; it was used for the transfer count and the pin check). 3. Applying the brief's definitions: exactly one NFT item, itemType 2, of the collection; listing fills priced as the sum of all consideration when every item is ETH or WETH; bid fills priced as the single ETH/WETH offer amount. 9 listing fills, 15 bid fills, nothing excluded. Verification: `eth_chainId` = 0x1 and the pinned closing hash matched on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and independently on `0xrpc.io/eth` and `mainnet.gateway.tenderly.co`. A full recompute on a second endpoint did not complete — drpc returned 400, merkle 429, 1rpc a plan limit, blastapi/llamarpc/cloudflare timed out or errored through this seat's proxy — so the figures come from the publicnode read alone; the reference notes a second full scan isn't what the panel needs. One judgement call, stated in `definitions` and `notes`: 7 of the 17 trades were matched orders emitting two `OrderFulfilled` events (bid side and listing side). The brief defines a sale as the event, so both count — 24 sales. Deduplicating to one sale per (tx, tokenId), priced buy-side, would instead give 17 sales and 315411764705882352; that alternative is recorded in the answer.

The average LilPudgys sale price over the pinned window was **313052916666666666 wei (about 0.3131 ETH)**. It's written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Sales counted:** 24 in total, all single ERC-721 fills paid entirely in ETH or WETH. 9 were listing fills and 15 were bid fills. No event touching the collection had to be excluded. - **How it was computed:** the prices sum to 7513270000000000000 wei, and dividing by 24 and rounding down gives the answer. - **Scan:** I fetched all 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport contracts over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608. I confirmed chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash first. The scan ran on `one.valve.city`, then a full rescan on `nodereal` gave the same log count, sale count and sum, so the data wasn't truncated. - **Recipe:** the request is marked `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe has to be `kind: "panel"`. Its `source` names the endpoint, the event topic, the two Seaport addresses and the block range. The definitions and notes explain how sales and prices were counted. The script that did the scan is only in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted. The answer file is left untracked for the daemon to upload.

Answer: **313052916666666666 wei** (24 qualifying Seaport fills, sum 7513270000000000000 wei; 9 listing fills, 15 bid fills; confirmed two ways — full OrderFulfilled window scan and collection Transfer receipts). Checker: `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproduction procedure. Average: **313052916666666666 wei** across **24 sales**. Reproduction matched the fetched RPC data. Required checker printed `ok`.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd-729\work\e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc\955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with **313052916666666666 wei**, averaged across 24 qualifying sales, and reproduction code. The required validator printed `ok`.

Done. Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json) with: `313052916666666666` Verified with: `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` Result: `ok`

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **313052916666666666 wei**, from 24 qualifying sales. Independent decoding confirmed the result; the required validator printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **313052916666666666 wei**, about 0.313 ETH. - **How it was computed:** I used a custom Node script. It fetched Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs from both contracts over blocks 26019452 to 26026608 in 1000-block chunks and decoded the offer and consideration arrays. It then applied your definitions for what counts as a sale and its price. It scanned 12232 logs and found 24 qualifying sales totalling 7513270000000000000 wei, which is the `figure` field. The mean rounds down to the answer above. - **Endpoint:** All logs came from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which reported chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash `0x84272223…bf3f`. I did not check the hash on a second operator's endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** The brief is panel-evidence, so the checker required a `panel` recipe. Its `source` field names the endpoint, both Seaport addresses, the event topic and the block range. The full on-chain method is in `notes`. - **Not rerun by the deployer:** A `panel` recipe cannot be rerun, so the deployer will have to rely on panel agreement rather than reproducing the scan. - **Scan script:** I did not use `scan.mjs` for the sale extraction. It cannot decode the nested arrays in `OrderFulfilled`, so my script lives in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **313052916666666666 wei**, averaged over 24 qualifying sales. Included reproduction script returns the same result. Required checker prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **313052916666666666 wei**, averaged across 24 qualifying sales, and a public-RPC reproduction procedure. The required checker printed `ok`; an independent ABI decoding check matched the result.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `313052916666666666` wei across 24 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction details. Average: **313052916666666666 wei** across 24 qualifying sales. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `313052916666666666` wei across 24 qualifying sales. Validator result: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **313052916666666666 wei**, averaged over 24 qualifying sales. Public RPC replay reproduced the result. The required validator printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/e05eef99-52a6-481f-ba3b-f9a82747c6fc/955b20b0-8162-4334-be5d-a338a85f56c8/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `313052916666666666` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of **313052916666666666 wei** (about 0.313 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **How I got it:** I wrote a small scan script, `test/scratch/lp.mjs`, because the provided `scan.mjs` can't read inside the Seaport event's arrays. It fetched every `OrderFulfilled` event from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608, using `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. That was 12,232 events; no requests were refused, none were duplicated and all were inside the window. I then decoded each event and applied the request's rules for what counts as a sale and what its price is. - **Chain and closing block:** the chain id is 1, and the pinned closing hash matched on flashbots and again on a second provider, `rpc.mevblocker.io`. - **Result:** 24 events qualify (15 accepted bids and 9 listing-style fills). They total 7513270000000000000 wei, which is the `figure` field. The average, rounded down, is 313052916666666666 wei. - **Recipe:** the request marks this as a panel question, so the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}`. The exact method is in `notes`. **One judgement call, which could split the panel:** when a buyer's offer is accepted, one transaction emits two qualifying events: the bid and the seller's matching counter-order. 7 of the 9 listing-style events are these counter-orders, so 7 sales appear twice. The request defines a sale as one event, so I counted both and submitted that. If each transaction counted once, there would be 17 sales and the average would be 315411764705882352 wei. Both figures and this reasoning are in `definitions` and `notes`. I only wrote `artifacts/answer.json` and left it untracked. The script is in `test/scratch/`, and I did not run a second full scan.

`ok`, exit 0. File is 6562 bytes, notes 3364 chars, all definitions under the 512 limit, and `artifacts/answer.json` is untracked. ## Result **Average LilPudgys sale price over blocks 26019452–26026608: `313052916666666666` wei** (≈0.3131 ETH) = floor(7513270000000000000 / 24). **How it was computed** - Pinned closing hash `0x84272223…` confirmed on four independent operators (publicnode, drpc, mevblocker, tenderly). Flashbots and nodereal were dropped after repeated 429s. - `scan.mjs` over the exact window gave 94 LilPudgys ERC-721 `Transfer` logs in 79 blocks (`pinned: true`). - A local script read every `OrderFulfilled` from both Seaport deployments in exactly those 79 blocks — one `eth_getLogs` per block, so no range could truncate — and ABI-decoded the `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` arrays. Seaport emits the NFT `Transfer` in the same tx as the event, so those blocks are the whole population. - 116 events seen, 92 touched no LilPudgys item, **24 qualified**: 9 listing fills, 15 WETH bid fills, all on Seaport 1.6. Zero rejections for extra NFTs, odd offer shapes, or non-ETH consideration. **The one judgement call**, stated in `definitions.unitOfSale` and the notes: those 24 events cover only 17 distinct (tx, tokenId) trades. Seven are `matchOrders` bid acceptances that emit two events for one trade — the gross bid leg (e.g. 0.317 WETH) and its mirror listing leg (0.31383 WETH net of the 1% fee). Both match the brief's definition of a sale verbatim, so both are counted; deduplicating would require a rule the brief doesn't give, and the legs differ in all seven pairs. The dedup alternative (17 trades, mean `315411764705882352`) is recorded in the notes but not submitted. **On the recipe kind**: the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts `{kind: "panel", source}`. That happens to be the right fit anyway — `log-sum`/`log-rank` sum one fixed data word, and `OrderFulfilled` carries the price in dynamic arrays whose word offsets vary per event, so no `sumArg` could reach it. The `source` field names the endpoint, topic0, both Seaport contracts and the window so the deployer can rerun it from public RPC data alone.