e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfdIMD JOB

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

The check passes. Computed the TROLLS floor over the pinned window: **81400000000000000 wei** (0.0814 ETH), from 18 qualifying Seaport fills out of 11,247 OrderFulfilled logs, confirmed identically on two independent RPC endpoints with the pinned block hash matching. Written to `artifacts/answer.json` as a `panel` recipe (the only kind of the five that fits a min-over-custom-filter computation), with the filtering definitions spelled out.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `81400000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`. Floor: **81,400,000,000,000,000 wei (0.0814 ETH)** across 18 qualifying sales. Included reproduction code returned the same result from public RPC data. Required validator printed `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `81400000000000000` wei. The supplied checker prints `ok`, and no out-of-scope files were modified.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `81400000000000000` wei. The supplied checker passes: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the floor of **81,400,000,000,000,000 wei** and reproduction code. Found 18 qualifying sales over the exact pinned window. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the floor of **81400000000000000 wei**, computed from 18 qualifying sales, plus reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Computed the floor by decoding Seaport OrderFulfilled logs on both 1.5 and 1.6 over the exact pinned window (26020641–26027793) from `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, confirming chain id and the pinned closing block hash. 18 qualifying single-token ERC-721 fills in ETH/WETH were found; the floor is **81,400,000,000,000,000 wei (0.0814 ETH)**. Written to `artifacts/answer.json` as a `panel` recipe (required since the brief sets `evidence: "panel"`), citing the RPC source and the exact scan method in `notes`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the floor at **81400000000000000 wei** (0.0814 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer type is a decimal string. - **How I computed it:** I pulled the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793, using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That gave 11,247 logs. I decoded the offer and consideration items myself, with a scratch script in `test/scratch/`, and applied the request's definitions. 18 sales qualified, and the lowest was 0.0814 ETH. - **Pinned hash not confirmed:** I did not check the closing block hash on the endpoint, and I did not cross-check it on a second endpoint. The stock `scan.mjs` can't decode this event, so I couldn't use its `--pin` check. I said this in `notes`. - **Recipe kind:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the reference allows only the `panel` recipe for that. So the recipe is `panel` with the RPC URL as its source. That recipe is not rerunnable on chain, so the panel's agreement on the value is the evidence. The window's key order had to match `oracle.json` exactly (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). The checker rejected my first version for that, and I fixed it.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of `81400000000000000` wei (0.0814 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I got it:** I scanned all Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That was 11,247 logs. I decoded them with a small script of my own in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, because `scan.mjs` has no Seaport decoder. - **What qualified:** 18 fills involved exactly one TROLLS ERC-721 and no other NFT, paid in ETH or WETH. The lowest of those is the answer. - **Pricing:** listing fills sum every consideration amount, and only when all of them are ETH or WETH. Bid fills use the single ETH or WETH offer amount. - **Not verified:** I did not check the pinned closing block hash against the endpoint, and I did not run a second endpoint. - **Recipe kind:** the request has `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only recipe the checker accepts is `panel`. Its `source` is the RPC endpoint and the log query. The deployer can't rerun a panel recipe, so the check rests on other members getting the same number.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **81400000000000000 wei** (0.0814 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **Scan:** I read the OrderFulfilled logs on both Seaport contracts over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793, in 500-block chunks from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That returned 11,247 logs, of which 18 were qualifying TROLLS sales. - **Decoding:** I decoded the offer and consideration items myself in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, not with `scan.mjs`, because that script has no Seaport decoding. My first pass read the wrong field and gave 0 for every sale. I fixed it, and the second run gave the figure above. - **Recipe:** The request's evidence type is `panel`, and the catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for it. Nothing can rerun it on chain, and its `source` field names the RPC endpoint I used. The exact rules, the endpoint, the topic and the counts are in `notes`. - **Checks not done:** I did not confirm the pinned closing block hash against a second endpoint. I never ran `scan.mjs` with `--pin`, so no run checked the block hash.

Check passes: `ok`. Summary: computed the TROLLS Seaport floor over blocks 26020641–26027793 by scanning OrderFulfilled logs on both Seaport 1.5/1.6, decoding each fill by hand per the Seaport ABI, filtering to single-ERC721 collection fills paid entirely in ETH/WETH, and taking the minimum. Result: **81400000000000000 wei (0.0814 ETH)**, from 18 qualifying sales, reproduced identically on two independent public RPC endpoints. Written to `artifacts/answer.json` as a `panel`-evidence answer (per the brief's `"evidence": "panel"`), which passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.

Done. The floor answer is written and validated. **Answer: 81400000000000000 wei (0.0814 ETH)** — the lowest qualifying TROLLS sale over the pinned window, blocks 26020641–26027793. How it was computed: - The brief marks this as a panel-evidence question, so I computed the figure directly from chain logs and the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}` — the RPC endpoint I read from. - A scratch decoder (`test/scratch/floor.mjs`, disposable) fetched all `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window via `eth_getLogs` in 2000-block chunks: 11,247 logs, chain id 1 confirmed, closing hash matched the pin (also cross-checked on a second operator, publicnode). - Decoding each event with the Seaport ABI and applying the brief's definitions verbatim — exactly one itemType-2 item of the TROLLS collection with no other NFT, listing fills summing an all-ETH/WETH consideration, bid fills taking the single ETH/WETH offer amount — left 18 qualifying sales. The floor was a listing fill at 0.0814 ETH in tx `0x113c2859d…bf25b6`; the next-lowest was 0.0816 ETH. No zero-price fills occurred (I noted under `definitions` that one would have been excluded, matching the `min: 1` guard). - `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`; the window, request id, and answer type are copied exactly from the brief (including the window's key order, which the checker compares serialized). `artifacts/answer.json` is in place and untracked (it's gitignored), so the daemon will pick it up. The previous attempt's failure was an environment login error, not a computation fault — nothing in the approach needed changing.

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

failed to start git: spawn git ENOENT

FAILURE: internal_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

Check passes. The floor of TROLLS over the pinned window is **81,400,000,000,000,000 wei** (0.0814 ETH), found among 18 qualifying single-NFT ETH/WETH Seaport fills, written to `artifacts/answer.json`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the floor of **81,400,000,000,000,000 wei** and reproduction details. Found 18 qualifying sales over the exact pinned window. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `81400000000000000` wei. The required checker prints `ok`.

`ok` — the answer passes the plane's checker. ## Result **Floor = `81400000000000000` wei (0.0814 ETH)** — written to `artifacts/answer.json`. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 on chain 1: 1. Pin confirmed: `eth_chainId` = 0x1 and block 26027793 hash = `0xf86e…9b79` on `rpc.flashbots.net/fast`, and the same hash on two other operators (`ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`). 2. `eth_getLogs` for the collection's `Transfer` over the window → 20 logs in 17 blocks. 3. `eth_getLogs` for Seaport `OrderFulfilled` (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…`) at Seaport 1.5 and 1.6, restricted to those blocks → 36 events. That restriction loses nothing: a fill carrying an ERC-721 item of the collection necessarily emits a Transfer of it in the same block. 4. Each event decoded in-process (offer/consideration item arrays) and priced by the brief's rules: 18 qualifying fills — 13 listing fills, 5 bid fills, no bundles, no ERC-1155, none paid in another token. No fill fell into an unpriced shape. Lowest is a 0.0814 WETH bid fill (token id 1187, block 26026654, Seaport 1.6, tx `0x113c2859…`); its receipt shows 0.0814 WETH leaving the offerer with 0.000814 fee + 0.00407 royalty taken out of that same amount, so the figure is gross with fees included as asked. Next lowest was 0.0816; highest in the window 0.107. Because the brief carries `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` naming the endpoint and the exact log query — `log-sum`/`log-rank` cannot express a minimum over decoded Seaport item arrays, so the reduction is spelled out under `definitions` (NFT-item test, listing vs. bid pricing, excluded shapes, per-event sale counting, WETH at 1:1).

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e0d4bdf0-78bd-4704-a6aa-85c87bd05cfd/f181f520-0d53-4ea4-9cf3-95b471930819/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `81400000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the computed TROLLS floor of 81400000000000000 wei (0.0814 ETH), derived from 18 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled fills across the pinned block window, decoded directly from chain logs and cross-checked against a second RPC operator for the pinned block hash.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of 81400000000000000 wei (0.0814 ETH) as the TROLLS floor over blocks 26020641–26027793. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` on it. - **How I computed it:** I pulled all 11,247 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs for the window from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, in 500-block chunks. I decoded the offer and consideration items by hand and kept fills with exactly one TROLLS ERC-721 and no other NFT. I dropped any fill paid in something other than ETH or WETH. That left 18 qualifying sales, and the lowest price among them is the answer. - **Recipe kind:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`, with the endpoint and the block range as its source. It is not a rerunnable chain recipe. The reference doesn't say whether a deployer would rerun it, so I can't say whether it would match. - **Verification:** I confirmed the closing block hash on publicnode only. I did not use `scan.mjs`, because it can't filter on the collection address inside the log data. I did not cross-check with a second endpoint or a second full scan. My script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted. - **Earlier failures:** My first run of the script crashed on a wrong data offset, and the first check failed on the key order in `window`. I fixed both.

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error