e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10IMD JOB

Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker2/.identitymd/work/e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10/554c131a-d704-4bc6-8846-28296ee49912/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction procedure. Average: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei**, rounded down across **22 qualifying sales**. The required checker printed `ok`.

`check-answer.mjs` prints **ok**. Deliverable written to `artifacts/answer.json` (untracked, 4,864 bytes). **Answer: 1998499909090909 wei** (≈0.0019985 ETH) — the floor of 43966998000000000 wei over 22 qualifying sales. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608: 1. Confirmed `eth_chainId` = `0x1` and the closing block hash matched the pinned `0x84272223…f3f` on both endpoints used. 2. `eth_getLogs` for the ERC-721 `Transfer` topic on `0xc39012e9…94c1` over the window → 39 logs in 32 distinct blocks. Every Seaport ERC-721 fill moves the token, so those blocks bound where a qualifying sale can be. 3. `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` (`0x9d9af8e3…6f31`) on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 for those blocks → 41 logs, decoded with the Seaport ABI. 4. Applied the brief's definitions: 22 qualifying sales (11 listing fills summing all ETH/WETH consideration incl. fees, 11 bid fills taking the offer amount), all on Seaport 1.6. Nothing was rejected for a bundle, a second NFT, a non-ETH/WETH leg or an amount ≠ 1. Range 0.001335–0.01 ETH. Verification: scanned whole on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and reproduced figure-for-figure on `eth.api.pocket.network` (different operator); `rpc.swiftnodes.io` returned the same 39 collection Transfer logs. `eth.drpc.org` refused the range and nothing is read from it. One thing worth flagging: the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and the check script enforces that a panel-evidence brief takes only `{ kind: "panel", source }` — so the recipe is a panel recipe naming the two `eth_getLogs` calls, even though the figure is pure chain data. The catalogue's `log-sum` could not express it anyway (the prices live inside two dynamic arrays, and the collection is not an indexed topic). That reasoning is stated in `notes`; `definitions` records each open choice — venue, unit of count, qualifying fill, listing vs bid pricing, denomination and rounding.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei**, averaged over 22 sales. The included reproduction procedure returned the same result. Required checker printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **1998499909090909 wei**. That is 43966998000000000 wei over 22 qualifying sales, rounded down. - **Scan scope:** I confirmed on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` that the chain is 1 and that block 26026608 has the pinned hash. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Method:** I listed the collection's Transfer logs over exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608, which gave 39 logs in 32 transactions. Then I decoded the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` events from each transaction's receipt. This covers every Seaport fill of the collection without pulling all Seaport events, because any sale has to move the token. - **Exclusions:** No fills were excluded. There were no bundles, ERC-1155 fills or payments in other tokens. - **Multi-fill transactions:** Each event counts as one sale, so a transaction with several fills contributes several sales (one transaction had five). - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. Its `source` is the RPC endpoint and the event query. The deployer can't rerun it as a chain recipe, and the answer stands on panel agreement. - **Earlier failure:** The previous attempt failed because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist. It exists now, and `answer.json` is untracked, as required. - **Scratch script:** The scan script I used is in `test/scratch/run.mjs`. It is not submitted.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **1998499909090909 wei**, computed from 22 qualifying sales, plus reproducible RPC instructions. Required validator printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproduction procedure. Average: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei** across **22 qualifying sales**. Required validator printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written, passes the plane's checker (`ok`), and sits untracked for the daemon to upload — the prior attempts failed on a missing artifacts directory and a login error, neither of which applies here. **The answer: 1,998,499,909,090,909 wei (~0.0020 ETH) average sale price.** How it was computed, exactly per the pinned definitions in `.imd/reads/oracle.json`: - Scanned `eth_getLogs` for the Seaport `OrderFulfilled` topic on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608, confirming chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash first. The window held 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs; the scan script can't decode Seaport's dynamic item arrays, so I wrote a dependency-free decoder in `test/scratch/compute.mjs` that keeps logs in-process and prints only totals. - 22 fills qualified — exactly one ERC-721 of `0xc390…94c1` and no other NFT: 11 listing fills (price = consideration sum including fees, all items ETH/WETH) and 11 bid fills (price = the single WETH offer amount). 9 logs were bundles/multi-NFT fills and were excluded; none were paid in another token. - Sum 43,966,998,000,000,000 wei ÷ 22, rounded down → **1,998,499,909,090,909**, which clears the `min: 1` guard. - To rule out silent `eth_getLogs` truncation (the classic panel-disagreement cause), I reran the identical scan on a second operator (publicnode) with 5× smaller chunks: same log count, same 22 sales, same sum and average. The pinned hash was confirmed on both operators. Since the brief marks `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}` (the checker rejects any chain recipe for a panel brief), with every decoding choice the question left open — NFT counting, listing/bid fill shapes, exclusion rules, dedup, floor division — stated under `definitions` so other panel members and the deployer land on the same value.

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10/554c131a-d704-4bc6-8846-28296ee49912/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1998499909090909` wei across 22 qualifying sales. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd-729\work\e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10\554c131a-d704-4bc6-8846-28296ee49912\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of **1998499909090909** wei, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I scanned every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log across blocks 26019452 to 26026608 (12,232 logs). I decoded each one and applied the definitions in `oracle.json`. That left 22 qualifying sales totalling 43966998000000000 wei, and the average rounded down is 1998499909090909. - **Endpoint:** all logs came from `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with the range halved on refusals. I confirmed the closing block hash matches the pinned one. I did not cross-check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Scan script:** I did not use `scan.mjs`, because it can't decode the nested offer and consideration items in these events. I wrote a small decoder instead, which lives in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, so it isn't part of the submission. - **Recipe kind:** the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and the reference says such a brief takes only the `panel` recipe. So the recipe is `panel`, with the RPC method, both Seaport contracts, the event topic and the block range as its `source`. That source string starts with a URL but is not a bare URL, so the deployer may not be able to rerun it as written. The check accepted the file only after I reordered the `window` keys to `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`, matching `oracle.json`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei** across 22 qualifying sales and reproduction code. The required checker printed `ok`; reproduction matched the cached RPC data.

Answer: **1998499909090909 wei** (22 qualifying Seaport 1.6 fills, sum 43966998000000000 wei, floored mean) — written to `artifacts/answer.json`, untracked. `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` (exit 0).

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **1998499909090909 wei**. - **Sales:** there were 22 qualifying sales of A Goat Cult - Etherwars, totalling 43966998000000000 wei; that sum is `figure`. Nothing was excluded by the definitions. - **How I computed it:** - I pulled every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26019452 to 26026608, 12232 logs in all. - I decoded each one and kept fills with exactly one ERC-721 of the collection, priced as the request's definitions say. - I confirmed chain id 1 and that the closing block hash matches the pin. - **Cross-check:** the collection emitted 39 Transfer logs in the window, which fits 22 sales plus mints and other transfers. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. The recipe is therefore `{kind: "panel", source: <public RPC URL and the OrderFulfilled query>}`. - **Reproducibility:** the exact decoding rules are in `definitions` and `notes`. The scan script itself is in `test/scratch/goat.mjs`, which is not submitted. - **Prior failure:** the earlier `runtime_error` looks like the "Not logged in" message and had nothing to do with the task. It did not affect this run. `artifacts/answer.json` is the only deliverable and is untracked.

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the computed answer: `1998499909090909` wei Validation passed: ```text node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json ok ``` I cross-checked the scan on two public RPC endpoints; both returned 22 qualifying sales, total price `43966998000000000` wei, and the same pinned closing block hash.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproducible procedure. Average: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei** across **22 sales**. The required checker printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10/554c131a-d704-4bc6-8846-28296ee49912/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1998499909090909` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10/554c131a-d704-4bc6-8846-28296ee49912/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1998499909090909` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `1998499909090909` wei** (≈0.0019985 ETH) — the floored mean of 22 qualifying sales. How it was computed: - Scanned `OrderFulfilled` logs from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` (chain id 1, pinned closing hash confirmed there and cross-checked on `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`; the window is exactly 24h, 2026-09-20T14:53:59Z → 2026-09-21T14:53:59Z). - 15 chunks of 500 blocks, no refusals, 12,232 OrderFulfilled logs total. The catalogue's `scan.mjs` can't decode the nested `SpentItem[]`/`ReceivedItem[]` arrays, so I wrote a decoder in `test/scratch/avg.mjs` (reusing its `keccak256`) and applied the brief's definitions in-process. - Result: 22 sales (11 listing fills, 11 bid fills, all on Seaport 1.6, none excluded for foreign tokens or extra items), sum 43,966,998,000,000,000 wei, min 0.001335 ETH, max 0.01 ETH → 43966998000000000 / 22 floored = 1998499909090909. Since the brief is `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{ kind: "panel", source }` with the RPC/filter as the source; every open choice (NFT-item test, listing vs bid classification, per-log counting, criteria items) is stated under `definitions`, and the endpoints and procedure are in `notes`. The answer file is left untracked as required.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei**, averaged across 22 qualifying sales. Included RPC reproduction steps. The required checker printed `ok`.

I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and the answer checker prints `ok`. The average sale price is **1998499909090909 wei** (about 0.0019985 ETH): 22 qualifying sales totalling 43966998000000000 wei, divided and rounded down. **How I got it:** I read every Seaport OrderFulfilled event from both Seaport contracts over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608. The endpoint was `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and it reported chain `0x1` and the pinned closing-block hash. The window had 12,232 of these events. I used a script I wrote rather than the supplied scan script, because the scan script only adds up plain numbers and can't read the offer and payment item lists inside these events. Of the 22 qualifying sales, 13 were listing fills and 9 were fills of a buyer's offer. None had to be dropped for being a bundle or for being paid in another token. I only checked the closing hash against that one endpoint, not a second provider. **One judgement call:** two transactions (tokens 7039 and 4660) are matched trades. Each sold one NFT but produced two qualifying events: one at 1.5e15 wei (the buyer's side) and one at 1.335e15 wei (the seller's side). The request defines a sale as each such event, so I counted both. If each of those trades counted once, at the buyer's price, the average would be 2031599900000000 wei (20 sales). The notes in the file explain this. **Recipe:** the request marks this as a panel question, so the checker only accepts the `panel` recipe kind. Its `source` field describes the exact chain query instead of a web page. `git status` shows nothing, so the answer file looks git-ignored. That fits the instruction to leave it uncommitted.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei**, averaged across 22 qualifying sales. The included reproduction procedure returned the same result. The required validator printed `ok`.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **1998499909090909 wei**, over 22 qualifying sales summing to 43966998000000000 wei. - **Recipe:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only recipe the check accepts is `{kind: "panel", source}`. I put `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, the endpoint I read from, as the source. - **How I computed it:** `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested arrays, so I wrote a decoder in `test/scratch/sales.mjs`, which is not submitted. It pulled every `OrderFulfilled` log from both Seaport contracts over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608, 12,232 in all. I confirmed chain id 1 and the closing hash on that endpoint, and the hash again on flashbots. - **Filtering:** I kept fills with exactly one ERC-721 item of the collection and no other NFT, priced as the definitions say. No fill of the collection was excluded. - **Cross-check:** the collection emitted 39 `Transfer` events in 32 transactions over the window, with no mints. Those transactions contain exactly 22 Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs, which matches my 22 sales. The other 10 transactions were direct transfers with no Seaport fill. - **Not verified:** I did not break the 22 sales down into listing fills versus bid fills. The answer file makes no claim about that split. - **Only one full scan:** I did not run a second scan from another operator. The window's key order matters to the check: `toBlock` comes before `fromBlock`, copied as in the brief.

`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average sale price is **1998499909090909 wei**, which is 43,966,998,000,000,000 wei across 22 qualifying sales, rounded down. - **Scan:** I pulled every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned 12,232 logs. The closing block hash matched the pin. - **Decoding:** `scan.mjs` can't decode the nested offer and consideration arrays, so I decoded the events with my own script in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. That script isn't submitted. - **Definitions:** I applied them as the request states them. The sale price is the fee-inclusive consideration total for listing fills and the offer amount for bid fills. - **Recipe:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the recipe catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for such a brief. So the recipe is `panel` with the RPC URL as its source, and `notes` explains the actual computation. The deployer can't rerun a `panel` recipe on-chain, so the figure will be judged on agreement with other panel members. - **Cross-check:** I did not check the closing hash on a second endpoint from a different operator, which the reference suggests doing cheaply.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproduction procedure. Average: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei** across **22 qualifying sales**. Required validator: `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **1998499909090909 wei**, computed from 22 qualifying sales, and the reproduction procedure. Required validator printed `ok`.

Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei**, averaged over 22 qualifying sales. Included reproduction code; replay matched the result. The required checker printed `ok`.

Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes the plane's check (`ok`), left untracked as required. **Answer: 1998499909090909 wei** (≈0.0019985 ETH), the floored mean of 22 qualifying sales totalling 43966998000000000 wei. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608: 1. Confirmed `eth_chainId = 0x1` and the pinned closing hash `0x84272223…` on three independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, mevblocker). 2. `eth_getLogs` for ERC-721 `Transfer` on `0xc39012e9…` over the window (range-halving on refusal): 39 transfers in 32 transactions. Every Seaport ERC-721 fill moves the token in the same transaction, so this is an exact prefilter for the collection and avoids a truncation-prone full-day Seaport log scan. 3. Receipts for those 32 transactions yielded 22 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5/1.6, decoded with the Seaport ABI. 4. All 22 qualified: single ERC-721 of the collection, no other NFT, all payments ETH/WETH. Listing fills priced as the fee-inclusive consideration sum, bid fills as the offer amount. Zero bundles, zero ERC-1155, zero other-token fills. Since the brief carries `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is `{ kind: "panel", source }` — the check script rejects any chain recipe here, and none of the four chain kinds can express "decode item arrays, match one collection, take a mean" anyway. The `source` names the exact RPC reads that reproduce the figure. Every choice the request left open (offer arity, per-log vs per-transaction counting, receipt status, WETH parity, truncation) is stated under `definitions`; scratch work is in `test/scratch/seaport-avg.mjs` and is not submitted.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10/554c131a-d704-4bc6-8846-28296ee49912/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `1998499909090909` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.

The check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` computes the average sale price as **1,998,499,909,090,909 wei** (~0.001998 ETH), from 22 qualifying Seaport fills (sum 43,966,998,000,000,000 wei) over the pinned block window, decoded directly from `OrderFulfilled` events on Seaport 1.5/1.6, cross-checked against a second independent RPC for the pinned block hash.

The average sale price over the pinned window was **1998499909090909 wei** (about 0.0019985 ETH). That is 22 qualifying sales totalling 43966998000000000 wei, divided and rounded down. The answer is written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **How I got it:** - I wrote a small Node decoder in `test/scratch/avg.mjs`. The provided `scan.mjs` can only count, sum or rank log fields; it can't decode Seaport's offer and consideration lists. - The script fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608, in 500-block chunks, halving a range on any error. I checked the topic hash with `cast keccak`. - I ran the full scan on two endpoints from different operators: `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`. Both returned chain id 1, the pinned closing block hash, 12232 Seaport logs and the same result. - 22 events involve the collection and all 22 qualify: 11 listing fills and 11 bid fills. None were bundles, ERC-1155 fills, paid in another token, or zero-priced. **Choices you should know about:** - **Two trades appear twice.** Transactions `0x69099a2277…` and `0x70514bc4f4…` each emit two events for one trade: the buyer's offer (1.5e15 wei) and the seller's matching order (1.335e15 wei, what the seller received). The request's definition counts every qualifying event, so I included both. If each of those trades counted once, it would be 20 sales and an average of 2064849900000000 wei. Panel members who count them that way will not agree with this answer. The notes explain this. - **Recipe is `panel`.** The request marks this as a panel question, and the checker only accepts a panel recipe, so the recipe cites the public RPC query as its `source`. None of the five recipe kinds can express this decoding anyway, so the deployer cannot rerun it. It rests on the panel agreeing. I changed only `artifacts/answer.json`, apart from the scratch script, and committed nothing. The file doesn't appear in `git status`, most likely because `artifacts/` is ignored, which fits leaving it for the daemon to upload.

Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](.../artifacts/answer.json). - Average sale price: `1998499909090909` wei - Qualifying sales: 22 - Verifier result: `ok`

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with replay instructions. Average: **1998499909090909 wei** across **22 sales**. Independent calculation and replay checks passed. The required validator printed `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/e454fed3-801c-4bab-8165-0c6423af1f10/554c131a-d704-4bc6-8846-28296ee49912/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `1998499909090909` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.