> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26039429 to 26039429, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: Did any Kardashian or Jenner publicly post about, appear with, or mention a new romantic partner between Sep 18 00:00 and Sep 22 23:59 CEST? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (bool) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
I'll start by reading the pinned request and the skill files that define the answer format.This is a panel-evidence question: the fact lives off-chain, and the recipe must be `{kind: "panel", source: <URL>}`. The pinned window is a single block (26039429). Let me first check that block's timestamp to anchor the dates, and search for the relevant news.The block hex I used was wrong. Let me compute it properly and verify the pinned hash, and search for more specific news in that window.Now let me verify the pinned block's hash and timestamp, and check whether any Kardashian/Jenner debuted a genuinely new relationship in the window.The block hash matches the pin exactly (`0x4855...cc9e`), timestamped 2026-09-23T09:56:59Z — so the calendar window Sep 18–22 CEST 2026 is the evaluation period. Research findings for that window: - **Kendall Jenner & Jacob Elordi** — photographed on an LA lunch date Sept 19 (E! Online, pub. Sept 21) and a movie date Sept 20 (geo.tv, which calls it "their new romance"). Relationship began spring 2026 — her current, new partner. - **Kim Kardashian & Lewis Hamilton** — appeared together at the Lucas Museum opening gala Sept 19, sharing their first public kiss (Metro, TOI); Kim posted date-night photos of him on Instagram Sept 22 (Daily Mail). He's her 2026 partner. - Non-qualifying: Kris/Corey Gamble (11-year partner), Kourtney/Travis Barker (married), Kylie/Timothée (since 2023), Khloé (single). Under the natural reading — "new romantic partner" = a recently formed relationship rather than a long-established one — the answer is **true**: at least two members publicly appeared with (and one posted about) their new partner in the window. Writing the answer file now.The checker prints `ok`. Let me confirm nothing else was touched and the file is left untracked as required.Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes the plane's own checker (`ok`), and the working tree is otherwise untouched (the file is untracked, as required). **Answer: `true`** — within Sep 18 00:00–22 23:59 CEST 2026: - Kendall Jenner appeared publicly with Jacob Elordi (LA lunch date Sep 19, movie date Sep 20) — her new partner since spring 2026. - Kim Kardashian appeared with Lewis Hamilton at the Lucas Museum gala Sep 19 (first public kiss) and posted him on Instagram Sep 22 — her new 2026 partner. Key decisions stated under `definitions`: "new romantic partner" means a relationship formed in 2026 (Elordi, Hamilton), excluding long-term partners (Corey Gamble, Travis Barker, Timothée Chalamet) — so Kris's Sep 19 outing with Gamble doesn't count, while Kendall's and Kim's do. The recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: <E! News URL>}` — the only recipe kind allowed for `"evidence": "panel"` — and the pinned window, request id, and chain were copied verbatim from the brief (block hash independently confirmed via `eth_getBlockByNumber` on rpc.flashbots.net).
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json). The checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/var/lib/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json). It answers `true`, states the definitions used, cites the panel source, and passes the required checker (`ok`).
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `true`, panel source, and explicit definitions. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/seat10/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e74c6347-e028-4b68-af6c-250a6407c7b6/2d720ced-0040-466a-abf1-958a66cf4bd7/artifacts/answer.json). It answers `true` with explicit definitions and a panel source. The supplied validator prints `ok`.
Failed to authenticate: OAuth session expired and could not be refreshed
FAILURE: runtime_error
No accepted submission yet, so there is no payout route.