> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26019452 to 26026608, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the average sale price of Ten Thousand Tokens (contract 0x26d7ad0e930b54b84c00daad077ee31ba9e2fb2e) on OpenSea over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet, in wei? Compute it from Seaport OrderFulfilled events on chain as the definitions say: every fill of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, price including fees, averaged over those sales and rounded down. Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
I'll start by reading the task inputs.Now let me read the scan and check scripts.I have the full picture. This is a chain-data task: average sale price of a specific ERC-721 collection via Seaport `OrderFulfilled` events over blocks 26019452–26026608. The brief's `evidence: "panel"` means the checker requires a `panel` recipe; I'll compute on-chain data and cite the RPC URL as the source. Let me check the environment first.Network and Node are good. Let me verify the OrderFulfilled topic hash, then write the scan script.Topic matches the known Seaport `OrderFulfilled` hash. Now the scanner script:Scan succeeded: pin confirmed, 12232 `OrderFulfilled` logs, 21 qualifying sales, avg = 4873280952380952 wei. Let me verify with a second endpoint to rule out silent truncation.Both endpoints agree exactly: 12232 logs, 21 qualifying sales, total 102338900000000000 wei, average 4873280952380952 wei. The pin hash matched on both. Writing the answer file now — note the window key order must match the brief's stringified form, and `evidence: "panel"` requires a `panel` recipe.Checker prints `ok`. Let me remove the two stray log files I created in the repo root, since only `artifacts/answer.json` and `test/scratch/` are in scope.Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `4873280952380952` wei** (~0.00487 ETH) — the floored mean over **21 qualifying sales** totaling `102338900000000000` wei. How it was computed: - `eth_getLogs` for `OrderFulfilled` (topic `0x9d9af8e3…f31`) on both Seaport 1.5 (`…adc0…14dc`) and 1.6 (`…68f1…b395`) over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608 — 12232 logs, closing-block hash confirmed against the pin on both `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `rpc.flashbots.net/fast` (identical results). - Each log's `offer`/`consideration` arrays were ABI-decoded and filtered per the brief: exactly one itemType-2 item of `0x26d7ad0e930b54b84c00daad077ee31ba9e2fb2e` (amount 1, no other NFTs); listing fills priced as the sum of all-ETH/WETH consideration; bid fills priced as the single ETH/WETH offer item. One thing worth flagging: the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe — the answer file uses `{ "kind": "panel", "source": "https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com" }` with the full on-chain methodology in `notes`, which is the only recipe shape the plane's own check will read here.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the reproduction procedure. Average: **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei** across **21 qualifying sales**. Decoder tests and recipe replay passed. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **4873280952380952 wei** across **21 qualifying sales**, definitions, and a public-RPC reproducer. The required validator printed `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The answer is complete: computed average sale price = **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei** from 21 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled sales of the collection over the pinned block window, verified against two independent RPC endpoints. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the `panel` recipe (matching the brief's `"evidence": "panel"` field) naming the exact on-chain source, and full computation details in `notes`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei**, averaged across 21 qualifying sales, and reproduction instructions. Required validator printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with average **4873280952380952 wei** across **21 sales**, including reproduction code. The embedded computation matched the captured RPC data, and `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
stream disconnected before completion: You have no credits remaining. Add credits to continue using the API at https://platform.openai.com/settings/organization/billing/.
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei**, averaged over 21 qualifying sales, and a reproducible RPC procedure. Required checker printed `ok`.
Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.
FAILURE: runtime_error
Done. **The answer is 4873280952380952 wei** (~0.00487 ETH average per sale), and `artifacts/answer.json` is written, validated (`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`), and left untracked for the daemon to pick up. How I got there: - **Scan**: A Node 22 script in `test/scratch/` (modelled on the delivered `scan.mjs`) fetched every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608, confirmed `eth_chainId` = 1 and the pinned closing hash before scanning, and decoded each log's offer/consideration arrays in-process — only totals were printed. - **Result**: 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs in the window, of which 21 qualified under the pinned definitions — 14 listing fills and 7 bid fills, all paid in ETH/WETH, no bundles, no zero-price fills, no other-token exclusions. Sum 102,338,900,000,000,000 wei; floor(sum ÷ 21) = **4,873,280,952,380,952**. - **Confirmation**: Because this is a panel-evidence question (nothing is rerun downstream), I repeated the full scan on an independent operator (`ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`) and got byte-identical totals; the closing hash was also cross-checked on a third operator. - **Answer file**: recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: "https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast"}` as required for panel evidence; the window is copied with the brief's exact key order; the one genuinely open choices (multi-item offers excluded, per-event counting, the itemType ≥ 2 NFT test, strict WETH address match) are stated under `definitions`, and the full method plus counts are in `notes`.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes the checker (`ok`, exit 0). **Answer: 4873280952380952 wei** (21 qualifying sales, sum 102338900000000000 wei). How it was computed: - **Pin confirmed** on three independent operators (flashbots, publicnode, mevblocker): chain id `0x1`, block 26026608 hash matches `0x84272223…f3f`. - **Scan A** (flashbots): `eth_getLogs` for the `OrderFulfilled` topic on Seaport 1.5 + 1.6 across 26019452–26026608 in 200-block chunks — 36 chunks, no refusals, 12232 events, decoded in-process (nothing printed but totals). 21 qualified: 14 listing fills, 7 bid fills. - **Cross-check** (publicnode, different path *and* operator): pulled the collection's 175 ERC-721 `Transfer` logs → 100 candidate blocks → re-read Seaport logs one block per call. Identical 21 sales, identical sum and mean, so scan A was not truncated. - `name()` on `0x26d7ad0e…` returns "Ten Thousand Tokens" at the closing block, so the scanned contract is the collection in the question. Two things worth your attention: 1. The brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, and `check-answer.mjs` refuses any non-`panel` recipe for such a brief — so despite being a chain computation, the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` with the RPC URL and the exact log query as `source`. A `log-sum` recipe could not express this anyway (Seaport prices need per-event decoding of two dynamic tuple arrays). 2. The one genuinely open judgement is a matched-order trade: tx `0xf05266…f76b` (block 26020470) emits two qualifying events for token 7989 — the bid side (0.0045 WETH) and the listing side (0.004455 WETH) — i.e. one economic trade reported twice. The brief defines a sale *per OrderFulfilled event* and defines a price for each side, so I counted both. Counting it once instead gives 20 sales and 4894195000000000 wei; that alternative is stated explicitly in `notes` so a disagreeing panel member's figure is legible.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is **4873280952380952** wei, the average sale price over blocks 26019452 to 26026608. - **How I got it:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log for the pinned range from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The chain id and the hash of block 26026608 matched the pin. I decoded each log with the Seaport ABI. - **Sales:** 12,232 `OrderFulfilled` logs in total, of which 21 involved the collection. All 21 were single ERC-721 fills paid in ETH or WETH: 14 listing fills and 7 bid fills. None were excluded as bundles, ERC-1155 fills or other-token payments. - **Totals:** the prices sum to 102338900000000000 wei, and dividing by 21 and rounding down gives the answer. - **Recipe kind:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `panel`. The catalogue's `log-sum` cannot express a per-event decode and mean anyway. The recipe's `source` names the endpoint and the block range, and `notes` gives the decoding. - **Verification:** this was one scan from one operator with no second full scan. I didn't confirm the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint. I did the scan with my own script in `test/scratch/sales.mjs` rather than the delivered `scan.mjs`, because `scan.mjs` only prints a sum or ranking and can't apply the per-sale rules. Nothing outside `artifacts/answer.json` is meant to be submitted, and `git status` shows no tracked changes.
required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/root/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Computed average: `4873280952380952` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price of Ten Thousand Tokens over blocks 26019452 to 26026608 is **4873280952380952 wei**. - **Sales counted:** 21 qualifying sales, 14 listing fills and 7 bid fills, summing to 102338900000000000 wei (rounded down after dividing by 21). - **Scan:** I scanned Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over exactly the pinned blocks from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, which returned 12232 logs. That endpoint reported chain 1 and its hash for block 26026608 matched the pin. I did not run a second full scan or check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Decoding:** I wrote my own script, `test/scratch/sales.mjs`, to decode the nested offer and consideration arrays, because `scan.mjs` can't do that. It isn't submitted, so the deployer can't run it; the method is spelled out in `notes`. - **Recipe:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for such briefs. The recipe is therefore `panel` with the RPC and topic as its source, and nothing can rerun it automatically. Only `artifacts/answer.json` was written to a submitted path, and it is untracked.
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
failed to start git: spawn git ENOENT
FAILURE: internal_error
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei**, averaged across 21 qualifying sales, plus runnable reproduction code. The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4873280952380952` wei across 21 qualifying sales. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The average sale price is **4873280952380952 wei**, about 0.004873 ETH. **How I got it** - I pulled every Seaport `OrderFulfilled` log from both contracts over exactly blocks 26019452 to 26026608, using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That came to 12,232 logs, fetched 500 blocks at a time, with a range split in half whenever the endpoint refused it. - The chain id is 1, and the closing block's hash matches the pinned one on that endpoint and on `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`. - 21 events involved the collection, and all 21 met the request's definition of a sale: 14 were listings bought and 7 were accepted bids. None were bundles, ERC-1155 fills, paid in another token, or in an unexpected shape, so no judgement call changed the result. - The prices add up to 102338900000000000 wei, and dividing by 21 and rounding down gives the answer. **Things to know** - The request is marked as panel evidence, so the recipe is kind `panel`, with the RPC URL as its source. The chain recipe kinds don't apply to this request. - I didn't use the provided `scan.mjs`, because it can only add up raw data words and can't unpack Seaport's nested item lists. I decoded the logs with my own Node script, which was in `test/scratch/` and isn't submitted. The notes in the answer describe the method. - The first draft failed the check because the window's keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. I reordered them and it now passes. - `git status` doesn't list the file, so it isn't tracked; I haven't checked whether an ignore rule is hiding it. The file is at `artifacts/answer.json`, which is what the daemon uploads. That path was missing in the previous attempt.
required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd\work\e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447\0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86\artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4873280952380952` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the average **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei**, based on 21 qualifying sales, and reproduction instructions. The required checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Answer:** the average sale price is **4873280952380952 wei**. That is a sum of 102338900000000000 wei over 21 qualifying sales, rounded down from 4873280952380952.38. - **Scan:** I fetched `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26019452 to 26026608 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. That gave 12232 logs with no duplicates. The endpoint reported chain 1, and its closing block hash matched the pinned one. - **Decoding:** `scan.mjs` can't decode the offer and consideration arrays, so I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/sales.mjs`. It applies the sale and price definitions from the brief. No collection event was excluded, so all 21 were priced as listing or bid fills. - **Recipe:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe. The recipe's `source` is the RPC URL plus the query parameters. The exact method is in `notes`. - **Not done:** I did not run a second scan or cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint; the reference says one complete scan is enough. I had to reorder the `window` keys to match the brief (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`), because the checker compares them as a string. I only wrote `artifacts/answer.json` and the scratch script, and left the answer file untracked.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Average: **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei** across **21 qualifying sales**. Included reproducible RPC code and definitions. Reproduction matched the scan; the required checker printed `ok`.
Implemented `artifacts/answer.json`. Computed result: `4873280952380952` wei Check passed: `node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs artifacts/answer.json .imd/reads/oracle.json` printed `ok`. The scan found 21 qualifying sales totaling `102338900000000000` wei over the pinned Ethereum block window.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4873280952380952` wei (21 qualifying fills; total `102338900000000000` wei). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei**, averaged over 21 qualifying sales, and reproduction steps. The required validator printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4873280952380952` wei. Validation passed: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with reproduction code. Average: **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei** across **21 qualifying sales**. Required checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer is **4873280952380952** wei. - **Result:** 21 qualifying sales in blocks 26019452 to 26026608, summing to 102338900000000000 wei. The mean is 4873280952380952.38, rounded down. - **Method:** I did not use `scan.mjs`, because `OrderFulfilled` has no indexed collection field and scanning every Seaport log in the window would be very large. Instead I listed the collection's ERC-721 Transfer logs (175 transfers in 100 blocks), then fetched Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs for only those blocks (235 logs). I decoded them by hand and applied the definitions for one ERC-721 item, ETH/WETH payment, fees included for listings and the offer amount for bids. Any sale must move the token, so this filter should not miss a sale. - **Endpoint:** I read everything from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The chain id and the closing block hash matched the pin there. I did not cross-check the hash on a second operator. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe for that. None of the catalogue's chain recipes could express this sale filter anyway. The recipe's `source` therefore names the RPC and the log query, and `notes` explains the actual computation, so the deployer may not be able to rerun it mechanically. The scratch script is at `test/scratch/run.mjs`; it is not part of the submission.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is **4873280952380952** wei. - **Sales:** 21 qualifying sales in blocks 26019452 to 26026608, totalling 102338900000000000 wei, so the mean rounds down to that figure. - **Scan:** I fetched Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs (12,232 in the window) from ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com and decoded the offer and consideration arrays. Sales were filtered to exactly one ERC-721 item of the collection and priced per the request's definitions. The script is in `test/scratch/`, which is not submitted. - **Pin:** The closing block hash matched the pinned one. - **Recipe:** The checker rejected my first `log-sum` recipe because this is a panel-evidence question. It now uses `{kind: "panel", source}` with the RPC URL as the source. The deployer cannot rerun that kind, so it will rely on panel agreement. `notes` describes the computation. - **Second endpoint:** I did not separately confirm the hash on a second operator's endpoint. The scan could rotate to flashbots or mevblocker on failure, but I didn't check whether it did.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The average sale price is **4873280952380952 wei**. - **Result:** 21 qualifying sales totalling 102338900000000000 wei, averaged and rounded down. - **Method:** I scanned with my own script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`), not `scan.mjs`. It pulled the collection's Transfer logs over the pinned window (100 blocks). It then read Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs in those blocks and decoded the offer and consideration items by hand. Of 235 fills seen, 21 met the definitions. - **Endpoint:** `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with the closing block hash confirmed as the pinned one. I did not check it against a second operator. - **Recipe:** The request is marked `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only recipe kind allowed is `panel`. Its `source` is the RPC URL, and the notes carry the method. Nothing in the catalogue can rerun an averaged decode of Seaport events, so the deployer cannot reproduce this from the recipe alone.
Created `artifacts/answer.json`: **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei**, averaged over 21 qualifying sales. The included reproduction code returned the same result. The required validator printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4873280952380952 wei**, averaged over 21 qualifying sales. The included reproduction script matched the result. Required checker printed `ok`.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 4873280952380952 wei** (≈0.004873 ETH), from 21 qualifying sales totalling 102338900000000000 wei. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608: - **Pin confirmed on two operators.** `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and `https://mainnet.gateway.tenderly.co` both returned `eth_chainId` `0x1` and block 26026608 hash `0x84272223…fbf3f`, matching the brief. `eth.drpc.org` answered `eth_chainId` but refused `eth_getLogs`, so it was not used. - **Discovery.** `eth_getLogs` for the ERC-721 `Transfer` topic on `0x26d7ad…fb2e` over the window → 175 transfers in 102 transactions; receipts of those transactions yielded 56 Seaport `OrderFulfilled` events, decoded as `(bytes32, address, SpentItem[], ReceivedItem[])`. - **Selection per the brief's definitions.** Exactly one item with `itemType ≥ 2` across offer+consideration and it is `itemType 2` of the collection; listing fills priced as the sum of all consideration (all items ETH or WETH), bid fills as the single offer amount. Result: 14 listing fills, 7 bid fills, all on Seaport 1.6, prices 4455000000000000–5269900000000000 wei over 19 token ids. No bundle, ERC-1155, second NFT, other-ERC-20 consideration or failed transaction appeared, so none of the excluded-shape rules changed the figure. - **Cross-checks.** The transfer scan re-run on Tenderly with 500-block chunks gave identical 175 logs / 102 transactions (no silent truncation); a direct Seaport-wide scan of blocks 26020400–26020800 (1483 `OrderFulfilled` events) reproduced exactly the same 10 qualifying sales with identical prices that the receipt path found there. One judgement call, stated under `definitions`: block 26020470 matched a bid order against a listing order for token 7989, emitting two qualifying events. The brief defines a sale as an `OrderFulfilled` event, so both are counted; the definition records that deduplicating them would yield 20 sales and 4891945000000000 or 4894195000000000 wei instead. Since the brief carries `"evidence": "panel"`, the recipe is the `panel` kind (the check rejects a chain recipe here), with the chain read — endpoint, Seaport addresses, topic, filter — named as the source. `artifacts/answer.json` is untracked; scratch scripts live in `test/scratch/`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4873280952380952` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4873280952380952` wei. Validation result: `ok`.
**4873280952380952 wei** — 21 qualifying Seaport fills of 0x26d7…fb2e in blocks 26019452–26026608, sum 102338900000000000 wei, floored mean; totals identical from the keyed dRPC route and from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, pinned hash confirmed on two public endpoints. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4873280952380952 wei**, averaged over 21 qualifying sales, plus reproduction code. Required validator: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/e7ef066a-5d17-44a5-8518-698b26596447/0d10096f-34a3-42bd-876d-e54efe68ca86/artifacts/answer.json). Average sale price: `4873280952380952` wei. The supplied validator prints `ok`.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: 4873280952380952 wei** (sum 102338900000000000 over 21 qualifying fills, floored). How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608: 1. `eth_getLogs` for the ERC‑721 `Transfer` topic on `0x26d7ad0e930b54b84c00daad077ee31ba9e2fb2e` in 2000-block chunks (halving on refusal) → 175 transfers in 102 transactions. 2. `eth_getTransactionReceipt` per transaction → 56 Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs, each ABI-decoded into `SpentItem[] offer` / `ReceivedItem[] consideration`. A fill of the collection always transfers the token in the same transaction, so this sees what a full `OrderFulfilled` scan would; the 35 non-qualifying fills held no item of the collection at all (aggregator transactions touching other collections). 3. 21 events had exactly one ERC‑721 of the collection and no other NFT. 14 listing fills (price = sum of all consideration, all ETH/WETH), 7 bid fills (price = the single ETH/WETH offer amount). Nothing was dropped for bundles, ERC‑1155, criteria items or non‑ETH/WETH payment. Two things worth your attention, both stated in `definitions`: - **The one judgement call.** Tx `0xf05266…f76b` is a `matchOrders` that fills a bid and a listing for token 7989 and emits two qualifying events (4500000000000000 and 4455000000000000) for one economic trade. The brief defines a sale *as* an `OrderFulfilled` event and gives no de-duplication rule, so both are counted. Counting that trade once would yield 4894195000000000 or 4891945000000000 depending on which half you keep — I recorded both in the answer. - **Recipe kind.** The brief is `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe is `{ kind: "panel", source }`; none of the chain recipes can express this (no indexed collection topic on `OrderFulfilled`, price inside dynamic struct arrays, and the reduction is a mean). Verification: pin and chain id confirmed on `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`, and the whole scan reproduced identically on a second operator (`eth-mainnet.nodereal.io`) — same 175 transfers, 56 events, 21 qualifying, same sum. Flashbots confirmed the pin but 429'd on `eth_getLogs`; publicnode and valve.city were unusable. Only `artifacts/answer.json` was created (untracked, per repo exclude); scratch work is in `test/scratch/`.
The average sale price of Ten Thousand Tokens over the pinned window was **4873280952380952 wei** (about 0.004873 ETH). The answer is in `artifacts/answer.json`, and the checker script prints `ok` for it. - **How it was computed:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over exactly blocks 26019452–26026608, which came to 12,232 logs. I did this from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` after confirming chain id 1 and the pinned closing block hash there. I then decoded each event's offer and consideration items. - **Sales found:** 21 events involve the collection, and all 21 qualify: - 13 listings paid in ETH - 1 listing paid in WETH - 7 WETH bids that were accepted Together they total 102338900000000000 wei, which is the `figure`. That total divided by 21 and rounded down gives the answer. - **Recipe:** the request marks this as panel evidence, so the checker only accepts a `panel` recipe with a source. The source names the RPC endpoint, the event topic, both Seaport addresses and the block range. - **Open point, now stated in `definitions`:** several transactions contain more than one qualifying event. These look like buys of several separate orders in one transaction, and I counted each event as one sale, as the request's definitions say. My first pass found no sales because of a decoding bug: it read token addresses from the wrong field. I fixed that before the final run.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei**, averaged across 21 qualifying sales, plus reproduction details. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the reproduction procedure. Average: **4,873,280,952,380,952 wei** across **21 sales**. The required checker printed `ok`.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.