ee5eb4b6-381b-4bcd-bc28-1f667fba5c50IMD JOB

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and left untracked (it doesn't show in `git status`, so it's ignored — it's on disk and the daemon uploads it itself). ## Result **Answer: `20114634864111052719`** (≈ 20.11 LLY at 18 decimals) — the sum of |amount1| over 141 Swap events of pool `0x27b03759…9db9` emitted by the PoolManager across blocks 68402796–68438442. **How it was computed** - One full scan with the delivered `scan.mjs` on `https://rpc.ordofi.network`: chain id 4663 confirmed, closing block hash matched the pin, 18 chunks of 2000 blocks, none refused or halved, 141 logs in 47 blocks. - Closing hash cross-checked on a second operator (`robinhood-rpc.publicnode.com`) — matched. - Recipe: `log-sum` on `event Swap(bytes32 indexed id, address indexed sender, int128 amount0, int128 amount1, uint160 sqrtPriceX96, uint128 liquidity, int24 tick, uint24 fee)` at `0x8366a39c…0951`, `sumArg: amount1`, `abs: true`, `filter: { id: <pool id> }`. **One thing worth knowing:** my first pass returned zero logs because I wrote the Swap signature with `uint24 fee, int24 tick` — the real v4 ordering is `int24 tick, uint24 fee`, which hashes to `0x40e9cecb…`. I caught it by checking that the endpoint served 115k PoolManager logs in the window while my topic0 matched none, then listing the topic0s actually emitted. The recipe's ABI item uses the correct ordering, and the notes flag this so the deployer's rerun and any panel member who hit the same trap can see why a zero would disagree. **Assumption stated under `definitions`:** `amount1` is the LLY side (currency1) as the request itself fixes; I did not independently resolve the pool key from its `Initialize` log.