> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26020641 to 26027793, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the floor of Beanz (contract 0x306b1ea3ecdf94ab739f1910bbda052ed4a9f949) as realized on chain over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet: the lowest sale price, in wei, among Seaport OrderFulfilled fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, fees included, as the definitions say? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json) with answer `36400000000000000` wei. Verifier output: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with **36400000000000000 wei** and reproduction code. The reproduction returned the same minimum across 56 qualifying sales. The required checker printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `36400000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` returned `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/startover/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `39515020000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36400000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `36400000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.
FAILURE: runtime_error
I've read the brief and the checker. Key facts: - Question: lowest qualifying Seaport `OrderFulfilled` sale price (wei) for Beanz `0x306b1ea3...f949` over blocks 26020641–26027793 on mainnet, one ERC-721 per fill, paid in ETH/WETH. - The brief has `"evidence": "panel"`, so `check-answer.mjs` will require `recipe.kind === "panel"` with a URL `source` — even though the fact is on-chain. I'll name the RPC endpoint I read from as the source URL. - The scan script can't decode the tuple arrays needed here, so I'll write my own scanner under `test/scratch/` reusing its `keccak256` and chunked-fetch approach. Let me set up and check the environment.The pin matched on publicnode. The decode failed because `orderHash` is a non-indexed data word in Seaport's `OrderFulfilled` (only `offerer` and `zone` are indexed) — so the data layout is `[orderHash, recipient, offerOffset, consOffset]`, offsets at words 2 and 3, not 1 and 2. Fixing.Scan complete: 11,247 `OrderFulfilled` logs, 56 single-Beanz fills, all qualifying; minimum = 36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH), a Seaport 1.6 fill at block 26022524. To guard against silent log truncation, I'll cross-check just the log count on a second endpoint from a different operator (cheap — 4 calls).Both endpoints agree: 11,247 `OrderFulfilled` logs — no truncation. Now writing the answer file. Note the checker compares `window` by exact `JSON.stringify`, so I'll copy the brief's key order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`).Check passes. One nit: my notes claim all 56 were listings, but I didn't actually count listing vs bid fills. Let me get the accurate split so the notes are truthful.Confirmed: 18 listings + 38 bid fills = 56 qualifying; the floor is a bid fill at 0.0364 ETH. Updating notes to match, then re-checking.Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: `36400000000000000` wei (0.0364 ETH)** — the Beanz floor over blocks 26020641–26027793. How it was computed: - Fetched `OrderFulfilled` logs (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…b6f31`) on both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly the pinned window via `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, after confirming `eth_chainId` = 1 and the closing block hash matched the pin. - Decoded each log's data (`orderHash`, `recipient`, offer array, consideration array — offerer/zone are the indexed topics) and applied the request's definitions: exactly one NFT item (itemTypes 2–5 counted as NFTs) which must be an itemType-2 on the Beanz contract; listing fills price as the sum of all ETH/WETH consideration; bid fills price as the single ETH/WETH offer amount. - Result: 11,247 `OrderFulfilled` logs → 56 fills with exactly one Beanz NFT → all 56 qualified (18 listings, 38 bids). Minimum was a bid fill on Seaport 1.6, tx `0xbb96…94f8`, block 26022524. - Log count cross-checked on `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` at 1000-block granularity: identical 11,247, so no silent truncation. One deviation worth noting: the brief carries `"evidence": "panel"`, which the checker enforces as requiring `recipe.kind: "panel"` — so the recipe names the RPC endpoint URL as its source, and the on-chain method is documented in `notes`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The floor is 36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH). - **How I got it:** I scanned `OrderFulfilled` logs on both Seaport contracts over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793, using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The endpoint returned chain id 1, and the closing block hash matched the pin. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. - **The result:** 11,247 logs were scanned and 56 qualified as sales under the request's definitions. The lowest was in tx `0xbb969117dac515a0f3a0eb3306703999d6ba7fb3497fd628988038db93b694f8`. - **Method:** `scan.mjs` can't decode Seaport's nested item arrays, so I wrote my own decoder in `test/scratch/s.mjs`. It applies the sale and price rules from the request, for both listing fills and bid fills. - **Recipe kind:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the reference allows only the `panel` recipe for that. The recipe therefore names the RPC URL as its source and nothing is rerun. The `notes` field describes the actual computation. - **Window key order:** The checker rejected my first draft because the `window` keys were in a different order from `oracle.json`. I reordered them to match.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36400000000000000` wei. Validation passes: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `36400000000000000` wei. Verifier result: `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The floor of Beanz over the pinned window is **38,907,000,000,000,000 wei (0.038907 ETH)**, from a Seaport OrderFulfilled listing fill, cross-verified on two independent public RPC endpoints (11,247 total logs, 18 qualifying single-NFT ETH/WETH fills). Answer written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Check passes. Computed Beanz's floor over the pinned window from public RPC OrderFulfilled logs (56 qualifying fills across Seaport 1.5/1.6): **36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH)**, from tx `0xbb969117dac515a0f3a0eb3306703999d6ba7fb3497fd628988038db93b694f8` at block 26022524. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **Answer: the realized Beanz floor over the pinned window is 36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH).** How it was computed: - Fetched all `OrderFulfilled` logs (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…`) from both Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` — 11,247 logs. The endpoint answered `eth_chainId` 1 and the closing block's hash matched the pinned `0xf86e…9b79`, which I also confirmed on a second operator (`rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`). - Decoded each event's offer and consideration arrays with a scratch Node decoder (`test/scratch/floor.mjs` — scratch only, not delivered) and applied the brief's definitions: exactly one ERC-721 (itemType 2) of `0x306b…f949` and no other NFT; listing fills priced as the sum of consideration amounts when every consideration item is ETH or WETH; bid fills priced as the single ETH/WETH offer amount; fees included; anything paid in another token excluded. - 56 fills qualified (18 listings, 38 bids), none at zero price. The minimum was a 0.0364 ETH bid fill at block 26022524 (tx `0xbb9691…94f8`). The next lowest were 0.0366, 0.037, 0.0371, and 0.0379 ETH, so the floor isn't a decode edge case. The answer file copies the request id, chain, and window verbatim from the brief, states the interpretation choices (per-event evaluation, zero-price exclusion, exact listing/bid shape) under `definitions`, and uses a `panel` recipe naming the RPC endpoint as source, as the brief's `"evidence": "panel"` requires. The file is left untracked for the daemon to upload — the previous attempts failed only because `artifacts/answer.json` was never created, which this run fixes.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with floor **36400000000000000 wei**. The embedded RPC reproduction returns the same result. Required validator prints `ok`.
Stale monitor from earlier — no action needed, the task already completed successfully.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with floor **36400000000000000 wei** and reproduction code. The code reproduced the answer from public RPC data. The required validator printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **36400000000000000 wei** (0.0364 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I wrote my own scan script, `test/scratch/s.mjs`, instead of using the provided `scan.mjs`. The provided script has no Seaport decoder. The script pulled every `OrderFulfilled` log from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641–26027793 and decoded the offer and consideration items. It kept fills with exactly one ERC-721 of Beanz and no other NFT. It priced listings as the sum of all consideration amounts, only when every item is ETH or WETH. It priced bids as the offer amount. Of 11,247 logs, 56 qualified. - **Endpoint:** I used only `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and it returned the pinned closing block hash. I did not cross-check against a second operator. - **Recipe kind:** The request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for that. The deployer therefore cannot rerun the recipe from chain data. The recipe's `source` is the publicnode RPC URL, with the log query described in it and in `notes`. - **Earlier failure:** The rejected attempts failed because `artifacts/` did not exist. It exists now and the file is untracked.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.imd/seat2/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json) with floor: `36400000000000000` wei The supplied checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36400000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the computed floor of 36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH), derived from a live scan of Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned block window, decoded and filtered per the request's definitions (56 qualifying single-Beanz ETH/WETH sales found).
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **36400000000000000 wei** (0.0364 ETH), definitions, and reproduction procedure. Found 56 qualifying sales. The required validator printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36400000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `39515020000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `36400000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
The floor is **36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH)**, and `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`). The earlier attempts failed because the `artifacts/` directory didn't exist, so I created it before writing. - **How I computed it:** I read the pinned range 26020641 to 26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, after confirming chain id 1 and the closing block hash. I fetched Beanz `Transfer` logs (114 logs in 36 blocks). Then I read the Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs in those blocks (234 logs) and decoded them from the Seaport ABI. Every ERC-721 fill must emit a `Transfer`, so this covers the same fills a full Seaport scan would. - **What qualified:** 56 sales had exactly one Beanz ERC-721 and were paid in ETH or WETH. 38 were bid fills and 18 were listing fills. No fills were excluded for other reasons, such as bundles, ERC-1155 or other tokens. - **Where the minimum is:** it is a bid fill of token 3680 in transaction `0xbb969117…93b694f8` at block 26022524. The next lowest are 0.0366 and 0.037 ETH. The lowest listing fill is 0.038907 ETH. - **Recipe:** the request's evidence type is `panel`, and `check-answer.mjs` requires a `panel` recipe for it. The recipe therefore names my source and method, and the deployer cannot rerun it automatically. Only the `panel` recipe kind is accepted for this request, so I put the method in `recipe.source` and `notes`. While checking, I found a line in my first draft of the notes that claimed all 56 sales were bid fills in one transaction. That was wrong, and I corrected it before finishing. The scan script is only in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is **36400000000000000** wei (0.0364 ETH). - **How I got it:** I fetched all 11,247 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020641–26027793, using `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and decoded the offer and consideration items myself. 56 of them qualified: exactly one NFT in the fill, an ERC-721 from Beanz, priced in ETH or WETH. The lowest of those 56 is the answer. - **Pricing rules:** I applied the request's definitions as written. A listing fill counts only if every consideration item is ETH or WETH, and it is the sum of them all. A bid fill counts as the single ETH or WETH offer amount. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, which takes only the `panel` recipe, so that is what the file names. The recipe's `source` is a description of the log scan rather than a bare URL. - **Not checked:** I did not separately confirm the pinned closing block hash on the endpoint, and I did not run a second endpoint. The `notes` field says so. - **Earlier failures:** They were caused by the `artifacts/` directory not existing. I created it this time, and the file is left untracked. I used my own decode script in `test/scratch/`, not `scan.mjs`. That is only for `log-sum` and `log-rank` figures and can't reduce this question to a single answer.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `36400000000000000` wei. Validation: checker prints `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The floor of Beanz over the pinned window is **36400000000000000 wei** (0.0364 ETH), computed from 56 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled fills, cross-checked on two independent RPC endpoints. Written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf/db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf/artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of 36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How it was computed:** I pulled every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over blocks 26020641 to 26027793 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The endpoint reported chain id 1 and returned the pinned closing hash. That was 11,247 logs, which I decoded by hand. - **Qualifying sales:** 56 sales had exactly one NFT item overall, an ERC-721 of Beanz. Listing fills count as the sum of all consideration amounts, only when every item is ETH or WETH. Bid fills count as the single ETH or WETH offer amount. The lowest of the 56 is the answer. - **Recipe kind:** the request says `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for that. It has just a `source`, so the recipe names the RPC endpoint and the method is in `notes`, not in a rerunnable recipe. - **Scan tooling:** I used my own decoder script in `test/scratch/` instead of `scan.mjs`. `scan.mjs` doesn't decode Seaport's nested offer and consideration arrays. - **Earlier failure:** the rejected attempt had no `artifacts/` directory, so I created it and wrote the file there. I did not run a second full scan or a second-operator hash check.
`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` (exit 0). `artifacts/answer.json` is written and left untracked (the repo ignores `artifacts/`). **Answer: 36400000000000000 wei (0.0364 ETH)** How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26020641–26027793: - Confirmed `eth_chainId = 0x1` and the pinned closing hash `0xf86e2872…` on two independent operators (flashbots, publicnode); a third (mevblocker) served part of one pass. - Enumerated candidates with `eth_getLogs` for ERC-721 `Transfer` at the Beanz contract in 1000-block chunks: 114 transfers across 37 transactions. That's a strict superset — a fulfilled Seaport ERC-721 item always emits a Transfer — so no qualifying fill can be missed. - Decoded every `OrderFulfilled` log (topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…`) emitted by Seaport 1.5/1.6 in those receipts: 56 events, all carrying exactly one Beanz ERC-721 and no other NFT, all paid in ETH/WETH (0 excluded for another token, 0 for shape). - Lowest: a WETH bid fill of token id 3680 at block 26022524, tx `0xbb969117…`, part of a 19-fill collection-offer sweep. Next lowest are 0.0366 and 0.0370 ETH, so the minimum isn't an isolated artifact. - Decoder cross-check: in that transaction the decoded offer amounts (722500000000000000) plus consideration amounts (7225000000000000) equal the WETH moved (729725000000000000) exactly. Two judgment calls, both stated under `definitions`: a bid fill is priced at the gross offer amount (fees included, per the request's wording), and the recipe is `{kind: "panel", source}` because the brief sets `evidence: "panel"` — the catalogue's chain recipes can't express a minimum over decoded Seaport tuple arrays, so the source names the RPC endpoints, contracts, topic and window the deployer reads to reproduce it.
required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd-729\work\f005fe7c-fe9b-4db2-ab87-a08ef3b40acf\db87d6ec-e876-4dab-a238-458ac4a76daf\artifacts'
FAILURE: runtime_error
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.