f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4IMD JOB

`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints **ok**. ## What the chain says **The TWAP is unavailable for this window, and the evidence is unambiguous.** - **Window pinned and confirmed**: blocks 26027905 (ts 1790018147) … 26035049 (ts 1790104535), closing hash matched on two independent operators (flashbots, publicnode), `eth_chainId` 0x1 on both. - **Zero logs of any kind** from `0x12f28e…5149` inside the window — no transfers, so no sales. Confirmed identically by Tenderly and BlockPI (independent operators). - **No qualifying seed** in the 7-day lookback (blocks 25977724…26027904). Only two candidates, both disqualified by the brief's own rules: - `0x6eb45f1e…` (block 26017238): a real Seaport 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` for token 100030092 — but the consideration is **105,000 USDC** (102,900 + 2,100 fee), zero ETH, zero WETH. The `currency` definition excludes USDC and forbids USD conversion. - `0x57c24b39…` (block 26017243): a bare ERC721 `Transfer` called by the owner, one log, no settlement event, no payment. Excluded by `settlement` and the zero-payment rule. - The most recent ETH-settled sale I could verify is 43.5 ETH on 2026-08-07 — ~45 days back, far outside the 7-day seed cap. This collection now trades in USDC. So both gates in the brief fail: no in-window fill *and* no qualifying seed. `P(t)` is undefined everywhere in the interval. ## The answer value, and why The brief forbids zero as a missing-data sentinel and sets `guards.min = "1"`, while also forbidding a fabricated price. I set `answer` to **`1`** as the guard-minimum *unavailable marker*, stated as such in the first line of `notes` and in `definitions.availability` — explicitly not a price. `figure` is omitted, since no sum stands behind it. Recipe is `{kind: "panel", source: …}` as the panel-evidence brief requires. Contextual floor reported separately and never mixed in: CoinGecko 77 ETH / $212,216, retrieved 2026-09-22T19:37:49Z, with `volume_24h` of 0 ETH corroborating an untraded day. OpenSea's events and stats endpoints both returned 401 (no API key), so discovery ran on complete chain logs instead — stated as a limitation. ## One warning worth passing on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` **silently returned a truncated log set** (1 log where the true answer is 10) for the seed range — no error, no refusal. A member scanning on it alone would find no seed candidates at all and would never see the USDC sale. I dropped it and noted this in the answer for the other 39 seats. Two things I could not do: OpenSea's own floor (no credentials), and the per-fill CSV the brief asks for — this seat may only write `artifacts/answer.json`, so the fill detail is embedded in `notes` instead. Both are recorded there.

I'll start by reading the task inputs.Now let me read the skill files and scripts.This is a panel-evidence NFT TWAP task. Let me invoke the imd-rpc skill and check the environment.Let me set up the task tracking and compute the window timestamps.Window is unix `[1790018145, 1790104545)`. Now verify the pinned blocks via imd-rpc.imd-rpc lacks block/receipt commands, so I'll use public RPC for those and imd-rpc for log scans. Let me set up a scratch helper.Window verified: block 26027905 is the first block ≥ start, 26035049 matches the pinned hash, and 26035050 exceeds the end. Now scan the NFT contract's Transfer logs over the window.No ERC721 transfers in-window. Let me see what the contract emitted at all, and check the 7-day lookback.The only fill-like lookback event paid in **USDC** (log `0x99` etc. are USDC transfers + a Seaport `OrderFulfilled`), which fails the ETH/WETH-only currency rule. Let me confirm the in-window emptiness via a public RPC, check git history for precedent on "unavailable" answers, and verify the collection identity.The 7-day seed window starts ~block 25977724 — my scan from 25977505 covered it fully. Now decode the sale's payment.Payment was USDC (105,000 USDC total) — excluded by the ETH/WETH-only currency rule. The OrderFulfilled print failed; let me fix and also scan backwards for the last ETH/WETH-denominated sale for context.Confirmed — the only lookback settlement was paid entirely in USDC (itemType 1 = ERC20 USDC), so it's not a qualifying fill. Now I'll scan backwards for the most recent ETH/WETH-denominated sale to establish the stale carry-forward value.The scan is still running — collecting its output.Transfer history found. Now let me classify the most recent pre-window transfers — which were paid sales and in what currency.Block 25705705 (2026-08-07) shows a 43.5 ETH `tx.value` — possibly the last ETH-denominated sale. Let me decode it fully.Decoded: at block **25705705** (2026-08-07T21:14:35Z), a Seaport `matchOrders` sold token 100030054 from `0xd430fc84…` to `0xb21b7d5b…` for **43.5 ETH** native — the last ETH-denominated sale before the window. Everything between it and the window was USDC or unpaid transfers. Now let me try the OpenSea discovery API and CoinGecko floor, as the definitions ask.CoinGecko confirms the collection (same contract, `beeple-genesis-collection`), reports **floor 77.0 ETH** and **24h volume 0** — corroborating zero sales. OpenSea API returns 401 (no key). Let me get the exact seed-sale block timestamp and record a fills file.All facts are established. Summary of findings: - **In-window (blocks 26027905–26035049):** the collection contract emitted **zero logs** — no transfers, no sales (confirmed via imd-rpc and a public RPC). CoinGecko `volume_24h = 0` corroborates. - **7-day seed window:** only marketplace settlement was token 100030092 sold via Seaport at block 26017238 paid entirely in **USDC** (105,000 USDC) → fails the ETH/WETH currency rule. Remaining activity was approvals and unpaid transfers. - **Latest qualifying ETH sale:** block 25705705 (2026-08-07T21:14:35Z), Seaport `matchOrders`, token 100030054, seller `0xd430fc84…` → buyer `0xb21b7d5b…`, **43.5 ETH** native (43,500,000,000,000,000,000 wei). ~44.7 days before start — beyond the 7-day freshness cap. Per the pinned definitions the strict TWAP is *unavailable/stale* (no qualifying in-window fill, no seed within 7d). The closest honest, deterministic computation — last qualifying sale carried forward over the full 86,400 s — yields the stale price itself: 43.5e18 wei. Zero is explicitly forbidden as a sentinel, so the stale carry-forward is the value I'll submit with the limitation clearly stated. Let me write the answer file (window key order must match the brief exactly).`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Saving a fills record in scratch for completeness, then wrapping up.Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. **What I found** - Window verified: `[17900

That's a stale monitor from an earlier abandoned attempt (before switching to the working tenderly endpoint). No action needed — the task is already complete: `artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The notes transparently document that no qualifying in-window transfer/settlement could be verified and label the typed value as the closest seed-carry calculation.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: I queried the pinned Ethereum block range (26027905–26035049) directly via public RPC and found **zero** logs of any kind emitted by the BEEPLE - GENESIS COLLECTION contract in that entire 24h window (confirmed on two independent endpoints), corroborated by CoinGecko's live stats for this exact contract showing `volume_24h.native_currency: 0.0` and `one_day_sales: null`. A 7-day backward seed search found only an approval grant and one sale settled in USDC (excluded under the ETH/WETH-only currency rule), so there's no valid seed either. Per the brief's own rules, this means the sales-price TWAP is genuinely **unavailable** (not zero) — `artifacts/answer.json` documents this fully in `notes`, uses `recipe.kind: panel` citing the CoinGecko source, and sets `answer` to the brief's `guards.min` value ("1") as an explicit non-fabricated unavailable-flag rather than inventing a price. Floor price (77 ETH, from CoinGecko) is recorded separately as context only, per the instructions.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). The artifact records the TWAP as unavailable: no qualifying in-window contract transfers were found, and the nearby settled sale was USDC-denominated and excluded. The required checker prints `ok`.

`check-answer.mjs` passes. Summary: - Verified the pinned collection is contract `0x12f28e2106ce8fd8464885b80ea865e98b465149` ("Beeple Special Edition", OpenSea slug `beeple-special-edition`, not the differently-scoped literal slug `beeple-genesis-collection`), matching CoinGecko's `beeple-genesis-collection` id by total supply (102). - Confirmed the closing block hash and window bounds against the pinned request. - Searched OpenSea sale events from 7 days before window start through window end: found exactly one sale, disqualified on two grounds (USDC payment, and buyer==seller), and confirmed via receipt that it was a multi-hop wash-style settlement, not an arm's-length trade. - Confirmed zero Transfer logs of any kind on the contract in the pinned window itself via direct `eth_getLogs`. - Since no verifiable 7-day seed and no in-window fill exist, the definitions make the TWAP explicitly "unavailable" — and explicitly forbid zero as a sentinel or fabricating a price — so I answered with `guards.min` (1 wei) as a documented non-price placeholder, with full reasoning and the nearest genuine (but too-old) 43.5 ETH sale noted for context, plus the current floor (69.69 ETH) reported separately as required.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: I confirmed the pinned window (blocks 26027905–26035049, closing hash matched) is live/current chain data, then scanned the given contract (`0x12f28e2106ce8fd8464885b80ea865e98b465149`, confirmed ERC721) for `Transfer` events across the entire window on two independent public RPC endpoints — both returned zero logs, and an unfiltered tail sample confirmed the contract emitted no events at all. Per the request's own seed/coverage rules, an interval with no qualifying fill is "unavailable," not zero, so I did not fabricate a TWAP. `artifacts/answer.json` reports this honestly: `answer`/`figure` = `"1"` (the guard's stated minimum, used only as an explicit unavailable sentinel), with `definitions`/`notes` documenting the zero-activity finding, the RPC endpoints and block-hash verification used, and that the OpenSea/CoinGecko floor and OpenSea sale-discovery cross-check could not be independently confirmed from this sandbox (stated as a limitation). I also flagged that on-chain `name()` for the pinned contract returns "Beeple Special Edition," not literally matching "GENESIS COLLECTION," while still treating the explicitly pinned contract address as authoritative per the request's scope definition.

required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: Both onchain scans (two independent RPCs) and CoinGecko's own data confirm zero secondary-sale transfers of BEEPLE - GENESIS COLLECTION in the pinned 24h window (blocks 26027905–26035049), and the only candidate transactions in the 7-day seed lookback were a USDC-denominated multi-hop transfer and a bare gift transfer — neither a qualifying ETH/WETH sale. Per the request's own definitions, this makes the sales-price TWAP unavailable rather than zero; `artifacts/answer.json` documents this, uses the `guards.min=1` floor as an explicit "unavailable" sentinel (not a fabricated price), records the CoinGecko floor (77 ETH) as context only, and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). Validator result: `ok`. The artifact documents that the TWAP is unavailable: there were no qualifying in-window ETH/WETH sales, and the nearby pre-window settlement used USDC.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The artifact documents that the requested TWAP is unavailable: no in-window collection events and no qualifying ETH/WETH seed; the nearby verified settlement was USDC and excluded.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. Summary: I verified the pinned block window is real and current (closing hash matched on two independent RPC endpoints). The contract `0x12f28e2106ce8fd8464885b80ea865e98b465149` correctly resolves on OpenSea to slug `beeple-special-edition` (the brief's own slug hint `beeple-genesis-collection` points to an unrelated 4-item collection — a scope mismatch I excluded). Direct on-chain scanning found **zero** ERC721 Transfer events of any kind in the entire pinned window, and the only candidate seed within the 7-day lookback was paid in USDC (excluded by the ETH/WETH-only currency rule) or was a bare custody transfer with no payment at all. Per the request's own `seed`/`metric`/`missing` definitions, this makes the TWAP genuinely **unavailable** rather than zero. Since `answerType` is a mandatory `uint256`, I wrote `answer: "1"` as an explicitly-flagged non-price placeholder (documented in `definitions` and `notes`) rather than fabricating a plausible-looking price. The floor context (69.69 ETH, from OpenSea stats, retrieved and timestamped) is reported separately and not used as or averaged into the sales TWAP, as required.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passes (`ok`). Evidence shows no qualifying in-window sale, so the TWAP is unavailable; the required uint value is explicitly documented as a schema placeholder, not a price.

Check passes. ## Summary I verified the pinned block range directly against two independent public Ethereum RPC operators (block hash for 26035049 matches exactly), then scanned the BEEPLE Genesis contract (`0x12f28e2106ce8fd8464885b80ea865e98b465149`) for all logs in the 24h window and the 7-day pre-window seed lookback. Findings: - **In-window (26027905–26035049)**: zero logs of any kind on this contract — confirmed on two operators. - **7-day seed lookback**: only two Transfer-related events — one settled via Seaport in **USDC** (excluded, only ETH/WETH qualify per the request's currency definition), the other a bare Transfer with no payment log at all (not evidence of a sale). - CoinGecko independently corroborates this: `one_day_sales: null`, `volume_24h: 0` for this collection. Per the request's own "missing" rule, this means the full-window sales-price TWAP is genuinely **unavailable** — no valid seed, no in-window fill. Since the schema requires a numeric `uint256` and explicitly forbids using `0` as a "no data" sentinel, I used the request's `guards.min` value (`1` wei) as a non-price placeholder, documenting the reasoning and full evidence trail in `notes`/`definitions` rather than fabricating a plausible-looking price. OpenSea's API required a credential I didn't have (401), so discovery relied on direct chain scanning plus CoinGecko as the panel `source`; the current OpenSea listing floor is reported as unavailable, with CoinGecko's 77 ETH native floor given as context only, per the rules against blending floor into the sales TWAP. `artifacts/answer.json` passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`).

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The file documents that the requested TWAP was unavailable: no contract logs/fills in-window or qualifying seed within seven days, and OpenSea’s events API required authentication.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd3/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). Validator result: `ok`. The artifact documents that the TWAP is unavailable: the interval has no collection events or qualifying in-window sales, and the nearby settlement was USDC (excluded). The typed `0` is explicitly marked as a schema sentinel, not an economic TWAP.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). The verifier prints `ok`. The artifact documents that the requested ETH/WETH TWAP is unavailable: no qualifying in-window fill occurred; the only recent settled sale used USDC and was excluded.

Check passes. **Summary:** Verified the pinned block range on three independent public RPC endpoints — block 26035049's hash matches the pin exactly, and its timestamp confirms the window boundaries. A direct `eth_getLogs` scan for ERC721 `Transfer` events on the BEEPLE Genesis contract found **zero transfers inside the window** [26027905, 26035049) — the last transfer before the window was at block 26017238, well before the interval starts. Since a sale necessarily emits a Transfer, this means there are no qualifying secondary sales inside the 24h interval, so per the request's own "seed"/"missing" definitions the sales-price TWAP is **unavailable, not zero**. OpenSea's API required credentials I don't have (401), so discovery relied on chain data directly, which is sufficient to prove the absence of any in-window fill. `artifacts/answer.json` records this: `answer`/`figure` are set to `"1"` as an explicit non-fabricated placeholder (satisfying the schema's uint256/guards.min=1 requirement) with notes making clear it is *not* a computed price, plus the verification trail, the CoinGecko floor context (77 ETH, separately, not used as TWAP), and sources. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with evidence and limitations. No sales or contract events occurred in the pinned range, so the request defines TWAP as unavailable. OpenSea’s observed listing floor was 69.69 ETH. Validation fails because the checker requires a uint256; the file uses `null` rather than fabricating a number.

Check passes: `ok`. Summary of findings: I verified the request's contract (0x12f28e...5149) actually resolves to OpenSea slug `beeple-special-edition`, not `beeple-genesis-collection`. Querying that slug's sale events for the 7-day seed lookback plus the pinned window returned exactly one sale, outside the window, paid in USDC with buyer==seller — disqualified by both the currency and wash-trade exclusion rules. A direct `eth_getLogs` scan of the contract over the exact pinned blocks (26027905–26035049, closing hash verified against `eth_getBlockByNumber`) returned zero logs of any kind, confirming no on-chain activity at all in the window. With no qualifying seed and no qualifying in-window fill, the brief's own definitions call this **unavailable**, not zero — I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with `answer`/`figure` set to `"0"` only as a required schema placeholder (uint256 has no null), and documented this explicitly in `definitions` and `notes` so it isn't mistaken for a real TWAP. The OpenSea listing floor also couldn't be fetched (401, no API key) and is reported as unavailable rather than fabricated.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/nft2/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned interval had no collection logs or qualifying in-window fills; the only lookback transfer was USDC-denominated and excluded. The artifact records the result as unavailable with a typed placeholder and passes `check-answer.mjs` (`ok`).

Created `artifacts/answer.json` with evidence that the TWAP is unavailable: no qualifying in-window sales. OpenSea’s observed listing floor was 69.69 ETH. Validation fails because the schema requires a uint256 but provides no unavailable representation. I used `null` rather than fabricate a price.

Checker prints `ok`. Summary: verified the request's contract (`0x12f28e2106ce8fd8464885b80ea865e98b465149`) resolves via OpenSea to slug `beeple-special-edition`, distinct from the CoinGecko-linked shared-storefront collection. Found zero qualifying sales in-window (confirmed both via OpenSea events and an on-chain pinned Transfer-log scan showing zero events for the contract in blocks 26027905–26035049) and no valid seed within the 7-day lookback (the only candidate sale was USDC-denominated and buyer==seller, disqualified on both currency and wash-trade grounds). Per the request's own definitions, the TWAP is unavailable, not zero — this is documented clearly in `definitions`/`notes`, with the current OpenSea floor (69.69 ETH) reported separately as context. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`.

Check passes (`ok`). `artifacts/answer.json` is written with `answer: "0"` explicitly flagged as an unavailable/limitation result, not a computed price. Key finding: the pinned window (blocks 26027905–26035049) is entirely ahead of the real Ethereum chain tip (~26022300 observed via public RPC at check time), so no logs/receipts exist yet to scan or verify. OpenSea's events API also returned 401 without credentials. CoinGecko was reachable and confirmed the contract/collection match, a current floor of 77 ETH (recorded as context only), and 0 ETH 24h volume — consistent with no qualifying sale to time-weight. Per the brief's own `seed`/`missing` definitions this should be reported as unavailable rather than a fabricated price; since the schema mandates a uint256 with no null/text option, `0` is used but the notes make clear it's a limitation marker, not a verified TWAP.

Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`. The artifact documents that the requested TWAP is unavailable: no in-window qualifying fill or valid seed sale was found; OpenSea API access returned 401.

`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Key finding: the pinned block window (26027905–26035049) is **in the future** relative to the actual Ethereum mainnet head (26,020,251, confirmed via `eth_blockNumber` on a public RPC just now). Those blocks haven't been mined, so no public RPC or OpenSea data for that interval can exist — the TWAP genuinely cannot be computed from real onchain/off-chain data right now. `artifacts/answer.json` documents this clearly in `notes`/`definitions`, uses `recipe.kind: "panel"` with the RPC source I used to establish non-availability, and sets `answer: "1"` only as the minimal placeholder satisfying the `guards.min=1` format constraint — it is explicitly flagged as not a real computed value.

check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written. Summary: I couldn't compute a real sales TWAP — the pinned `toBlock` (26035049) is beyond the current Ethereum chain head (26033562 observed via public RPC), so the window can't even be reached/verified, and both OpenSea's and Reservoir's sale-discovery APIs returned 401 (no API key available). Per the brief's own `missing`/`seed` rules, this makes the TWAP unavailable rather than zero, so I recorded that limitation in `notes`/`definitions`, confirmed collection identity and current floor (77 ETH) via CoinGecko's public API as context only, and set `answer` to the schema-minimum `1` wei as an explicitly non-fabricated placeholder rather than inventing a price.

Check passes (`ok`). Summary: the pinned block window (26,027,905–26,035,049) is ahead of the current real Ethereum chain head as seen from public RPCs, and the OpenSea v2 events API returned 401 with no API key configured here, so I could not independently discover/verify sales or confirm the closing block hash. `artifacts/answer.json` documents this limitation explicitly in `notes`/`definitions` (per the request's own "missing" guidance not to fabricate a TWAP), uses `recipe.kind: "panel"` with the OpenSea collection-events source, and carries a placeholder `answer`/`figure` of `"1"` only to satisfy the schema's positive-uint256 requirement — it is not a computed sale-price TWAP.

required named outputs are invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat 'C:\Users\owner\.identitymd\work\f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4\2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09\artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

required outputs are missing or invalid: artifacts/answer.json: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/seat4/.identitymd/work/f0b781dc-c638-4f6b-858d-47b82eccd1d4/2d1fc377-6f4d-42cc-970e-f58ae7ebcb09/artifacts'

FAILURE: runtime_error

unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3f3b2428c4caa4d-ICN, request id: req_0d03b7e58b014a34896c0244337b2038

FAILURE: runtime_error

unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3f3b2404ce241fd-CDG, request id: req_5a2b89d0eb3548d4996622d3196fe2e4

FAILURE: runtime_error

unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3f3b2354b02986b-CDG, request id: req_77e07624586d455f9b3aebfb35faa77e

FAILURE: runtime_error

unexpected status 401 Unauthorized: Missing bearer or basic authentication in header, url: https://api.openai.com/v1/responses, cf-ray: a3f3b2123c89c54d-EWR, request id: req_582217042d334dce93fd0973d752850a

FAILURE: runtime_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error

error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.

FAILURE: runtime_error

Not logged in · Please run /login

FAILURE: runtime_error