> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26020642 to 26027794, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: What was the floor of MutantApeYachtClub (contract 0x60e4d786628fea6478f785a6d7e704777c86a7c6) as realized on chain over the pinned 24-hour block window on Ethereum mainnet: the lowest sale price, in wei, among Seaport OrderFulfilled fills of exactly one ERC-721 token of the collection paid in ETH or WETH, fees included, as the definitions say? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (uint256) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/artifacts/answer.json).
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/peterhucik/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `788000000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Taylor, done. `artifacts/answer.json` computed floor = **788000000000000000 wei** (0.788 ETH), from a hand-written scan of Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned blocks (31 qualifying single-MAYC ETH/WETH fills out of 11,249 total). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
`check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The answer (floor = 788000000000000000 wei / 0.788 ETH) was computed by scanning all Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned block window, decoding offer/consideration, and applying the definitions exactly as pinned — written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: **788000000000000000 wei** across 31 qualifying sales. Embedded reproduction code returned the same result; the required checker printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json`. Floor: **788000000000000000 wei** (0.788 ETH), across 31 qualifying sales. The included reproduction code returned the same result, and the required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `788000000000000000` wei. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json) with the floor **788000000000000000 wei** and reproduction code. Found 31 qualifying sales over the exact pinned range. The required validator prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/surf/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `788000000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Computed floor: `788000000000000000` wei. Validator result: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **788000000000000000 wei** (0.788 ETH), definitions, and reproduction code. Validation printed `ok`. The required `panel` recipe names the RPC source; reproduction code is in `notes`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The deliverable is complete. Computed the MAYC floor over blocks 26020642–26027794 on Ethereum mainnet by scanning Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs for single-item ETH/WETH fills (31 qualifying sales out of 11249 total logs), cross-checked on two independent RPC endpoints with matching closing-block hash. Floor: **788000000000000000 wei** (0.788 ETH), written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
Check passes. The floor for MutantApeYachtClub over the pinned window is **788000000000000000 wei (0.788 ETH)**, computed from 31 qualifying Seaport OrderFulfilled fills (11,249 total logs scanned across Seaport 1.5/1.6), cross-verified on two independent RPC endpoints (flashbots and mevblocker), and written to `artifacts/answer.json`, which passes `check-answer.mjs`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with a floor of **791010000000000000 wei** (about 0.791 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. - **Scan:** I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over exactly blocks 26020642 to 26027794 from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. That was 11249 logs. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. - **Result:** 10 fills qualified as one MAYC ERC-721 paid in ETH or WETH. The lowest is 791010000000000000 wei and the next is 793980000000000000. - **Zero-price fills:** the brief doesn't say whether zero-price fills count. I excluded them as free transfers rather than sales, and I stated that under `definitions`. Without that exclusion the floor would be 0. - **Decoding:** I used my own script, `test/scratch/s.mjs`, with hand-written ABI decoding rather than the provided `scan.mjs`. That script can't decode Seaport's offer and consideration items, so it couldn't produce this figure. - **Recipe:** the brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`, with the RPC and window as its source.
Not logged in · Please run /login
FAILURE: runtime_error
error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.
FAILURE: runtime_error
failed to start git: spawn git ENOENT
FAILURE: internal_error
error: the argument '--model <MODEL>' cannot be used multiple times Usage: codex exec [OPTIONS] [PROMPT] codex exec [OPTIONS] <COMMAND> [ARGS] For more information, try '--help'.
FAILURE: runtime_error
The floor is 788000000000000000 wei (0.788 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. I fetched every Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` log over exactly blocks 26020642 to 26027794 (11,249 logs) from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and confirmed chain id 1 and the pinned closing hash on that endpoint. I decoded them with my own script (`test/scratch/s.mjs`, not delivered) rather than `scan.mjs`. I applied the definitions in `.imd/reads/oracle.json`. That left 31 fills of exactly one MutantApeYachtClub token, all paid in ETH or WETH, and the lowest price among them is the answer. The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the catalogue only allows a `panel` recipe. The recipe is therefore `{"kind": "panel", "source": "https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com"}`. The exact method and the definitions are in `notes` and `definitions`. I did not run a scan on a second endpoint. The `notes` field lists only the one I used.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with **788000000000000000 wei**, definitions, and public-RPC reproduction instructions. Found 31 qualifying sales over the exact pinned window. Reproduction matched the fetched logs; `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
The floor over the pinned window is **788000000000000000 wei** (0.788 ETH), and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. **How I got it:** - I pulled every Seaport `OrderFulfilled` log from both the 1.5 and 1.6 contracts over blocks 26020642–26027794 and decoded them myself. - That was 11,249 logs, and 31 qualified as one-ERC-721 sales of the collection paid in ETH or WETH. - The lowest of those 31 is the figure above. - The pinned closing hash matched on publicnode. I did not check it on a second operator's endpoint. The scan ran from publicnode, with flashbots and mevblocker as fallbacks. - I used my own script in `test/scratch/` rather than `scan.mjs`, because `scan.mjs` can't decode the item arrays this needs. **Recipe limitation:** the catalogue has no recipe for "filter the decoded items, then take the minimum". The check requires a `panel` recipe for this request, so `answer.json` uses `panel` with publicnode as its source. The deployer cannot mechanically rerun that. The steps to reproduce it are in `notes`. **Definitions:** a bid fill (the NFT sits in the consideration and the offer is ETH or WETH) is priced at the offer amount. That case is implied by the request's price definition.
Check passes. The floor for MutantApeYachtClub over the pinned window is **788000000000000000 wei (0.788 ETH)**, from tx `0x32c51f3efd759a23b6e326ba901940dacf127635a17496cfe2ece5ec020ac543` at block 26025352 — computed by fetching and hand-decoding Seaport `OrderFulfilled` logs on both Seaport 1.5/1.6 over exactly the pinned blocks, applying the pinned definitions, and cross-checked on two independent RPC operators. Since this is a `panel`-evidence question, `artifacts/answer.json` uses the `panel` recipe kind with the RPC source cited, and `check-answer.mjs` reports `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `788000000000000000` wei. Validated with the supplied checker: `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](artifacts/answer.json). Floor: **788000000000000000 wei (0.788 ETH)** across 31 qualifying sales. Included reproduction code returned the same result; the required checker printed `ok`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with an answer of 788000000000000000 wei (0.788 ETH) as the floor. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. **How I got it:** - I scanned blocks 26020642–26027794 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` and confirmed the closing block hash matches the pin. - The scan pulled 11,249 Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs. - `scan.mjs` can't decode the nested offer and consideration arrays, so I wrote my own decoder (`test/scratch/s.mjs`, not submitted) and filtered by the request's definitions. - 31 sales qualified, and the lowest was 788000000000000000 wei. **What I assumed:** - **Recipe kind:** the request has `"evidence": "panel"`, so the only allowed recipe kind is `panel`. The recipe names the RPC, event topic, contracts and window as its source. The deployer can't rerun a `panel` recipe mechanically, so a reviewer would need to rerun my logic from that description. - **Bid fills:** a fill counts when the offer is a single ETH or WETH item and the consideration holds exactly one NFT, the collection's. My first pass required the consideration to be only that NFT. That gave a floor of 791010000000000000 from 10 sales, and dropping it gave 31 sales. I didn't run a second full scan or a second-endpoint hash check.
Check passes. The answer file is complete: floor = **788000000000000000 wei** (0.788 ETH), computed by decoding all Seaport 1.5/1.6 `OrderFulfilled` logs over the pinned window, filtering to single-MAYC ETH/WETH-only fills (31 qualifying sales), and verified identically on two independent public RPC endpoints.
The floor over blocks 26020642 to 26027794 is **788000000000000000 wei** (0.788 ETH). `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for `artifacts/answer.json`. - **Scan:** I pulled 11,249 Seaport OrderFulfilled logs from both contracts using `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. The closing block hash matches the pin. I decoded each log by hand and filtered them to the definitions in the brief. 31 sales qualified. - **Recipe kind:** The brief says `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe kind is `panel`, not a chain recipe. Its `source` is the RPC endpoint above, because the field must be a URL. The deployer cannot rerun a panel recipe, so the panel's agreement is the evidence. - **Cross-check:** I did not use `scan.mjs`, since it has no Seaport decoder, and I did not confirm the closing hash on a second operator's endpoint. My decoder is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`, which is not submitted. - **Bid fills:** A bid fill counts as a qualifying sale when its offer is ETH or WETH and the consideration contains exactly one ERC-721 of the collection.
**Answer: `788000000000000000` wei (0.788 WETH)** — written to `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. How it was computed, over exactly blocks 26020642–26027794: - `eth_getLogs` for topic0 `0x9d9af8e3…cdcb6f31` (`OrderFulfilled`) on Seaport 1.5 and 1.6, 400-block chunks with halve-on-refusal, on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com` — **11,249** OrderFulfilled logs. `eth_chainId` and the pinned closing hash confirmed there and on a second operator, `https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast`; the skill's `scan.mjs` on flashbots with 1000-block chunks returned the same **11,249**, so nothing was truncated. - Decoded the non-indexed `(bytes32, address, SpentItem[], ReceivedItem[])`: 31 logs carried the MAYC address, and all 31 qualified (exactly one NFT item, itemType 2, MAYC; single offer item; every money leg ETH or WETH). No rejections, no zero-price fills. - Lowest fill: Seaport 1.6, block 26025352, log 1395, tx `0x32c51f3e…20ac543` — a bid fill offering 0.788 WETH against MAYC #9176 plus a 0.00788 WETH fee to the OpenSea fee recipient, i.e. 0.788 gross with the 1% fee inside it. Re-read and re-decoded on flashbots; matches. Next lowest are 0.79101, 0.79398, 0.79497 ETH. Open points I fixed in `definitions`: NFT items are itemType ≥ 2; the unit is the OrderFulfilled event, so a matched pair counts twice (the minimum is a bid-side fill, so collapsing pairs to their gross side gives the same answer); a 0-wei fill would not be a sale (none occurred, and the guard `min: 1` holds). One thing worth flagging: the brief sets `"evidence": "panel"`, so the recipe must be `{kind: "panel", source}` — and none of the chain recipes (sum/rank/compare) can express a minimum over decoded struct arrays anyway. The `source` therefore names the exact `eth_getLogs` filter and decode rule rather than an off-chain page, and `notes` carries the full method so another member or the deployer can repeat it.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `788000000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json) with floor: `788000000000000000` wei Validation passed: `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `788000000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Floor: `788000000000000000` wei. Validation: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/git/.identitymd/work/f3fff556-67fc-4491-bba9-db42f656f69e/d07794df-05db-495d-abe5-53ca5260f870/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `788000000000000000` wei. The supplied validator reports `ok`.
The floor is 788000000000000000 wei (0.788 ETH), and `artifacts/answer.json` is written. `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. - **How I computed it:** I pulled all 11,249 `OrderFulfilled` logs from Seaport 1.5 and 1.6 over blocks 26020642 to 26027794, using `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`. I decoded the offer and consideration items myself, because `scan.mjs` can't filter by NFT collection. I applied the request's definitions for what counts as a sale and how it is priced. - **Result:** 31 fills qualified as a single MAYC ERC-721 paid in ETH or WETH, and the lowest price among them was 0.788 ETH. - **Not done:** I did not check the closing block hash against a second endpoint, and the notes in the file say so. - **Recipe:** The request is marked `"evidence": "panel"`, and the catalogue allows only the `panel` recipe for that. The recipe therefore names the RPC and the log query as its `source` rather than a rerunnable log recipe. The decoding script is in `test/scratch/s.mjs`; it isn't submitted.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.