> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26043165 to 26044954, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: Which address sent the most RARI on Ethereum mainnet in the last 6 hours? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (address[]) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The top two senders tied; the answer orders them by lowercase address. The pinned scan completed, and the checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The answer is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, which sent 37744575145000000000000 raw RARI units over blocks 26043165 to 26044954. That is about 37,744.6 RARI at 18 decimals. - **Tie:** `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` sent exactly the same amount. I broke the tie by ascending address, as the request's definitions say, so `0x249c…` comes first. - **Also listed:** the answer lists the top five senders, in ranked order. - **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` once against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, with the pinned closing hash confirmed. It covered the pinned range whole and found 55 Transfer logs from 31 distinct senders. - **Second endpoint:** I did not check the block hash on a second operator's endpoint; the script's `--pin` check on this one was the only confirmation. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` over RARI's Transfer event, grouped by `from`, summing `value`, top 5. - **Paths:** I wrote only `artifacts/answer.json`, so nothing lands outside the allowed paths.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs` (prints `ok`). It ranks RARI Transfer senders over the pinned block range [26043165, 26044954]; two addresses tied for the top gross-sent amount (37744575145000000000000 raw units), and per the ties-broken-ascending rule, `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` is the answer, with the rest of the top-5 included. No other files were touched.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned-range scan found a tie for the highest outgoing total; the answer lists the tied addresses in lowercase ascending order, followed by the next three senders. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The checker prints `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/hyperstition/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The top sender is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`; it ties with the next sender, and the pinned tie-break selects it first. The pinned-range scan matched the closing block hash, and the required answer checker printed `ok`.
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). It includes the five leading senders; the top two tie, ordered by address. The supplied checker prints `ok`, and the closing hash was confirmed on a second endpoint.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json) with the ranked senders and reproducible `log-rank` recipe. The required checker prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json) with the top sender and reproducible `log-rank` recipe. The leading two addresses tied, and the answer follows the request’s ascending-address tie break. The pinned closing hash matched on both endpoints. `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
The pinned scan ranks `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` first; it ties with the next address, so the lowercase address tie-break puts it first. The answer file passed the required checker (`ok`). [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json)
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](</home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). Verifier output: `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The verifier prints `ok`; the pinned scan confirmed the result over the exact block range.
`artifacts/answer.json` is untracked-and-clean per git's view (it's outside tracked scope as intended, per the "named outputs delivered separately" rule) — nothing else was touched. Summary: I ran a `log-rank` scan of RARI `Transfer` events over the pinned block window (26043165–26044954) via `rpc.mevblocker.io/fast` (pin confirmed), grouped by `from`, summed `value`. Two addresses tied for the highest gross amount sent (37744575145000000000000 RARI units); per the brief's ascending-tie-break rule, `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` is the answer. Wrote `artifacts/answer.json` with the recipe, definitions, and notes, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
check-answer.mjs prints `ok`. The task is complete: `artifacts/answer.json` holds the address ranking with the `log-rank` recipe (RARI Transfer logs grouped by `from`, summed by `value`), computed over the pinned block range 26,043,165–26,044,954 via `publicnode.com`, with the top result being a tie broken to `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` per the ascending-address tiebreak rule.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. It answers `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, with 37744575145000000000000 raw RARI units sent (18 decimals). **Tie at the top:** `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` sent exactly the same amount. The request's tie-break is ascending lowercase address, so `0x249c…` comes first. The answer list has both, then `0x3663…`, `0xa9d1…` and `0x33696…`. **Scan:** I ran `scan.mjs` once, from `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, over blocks 26043165 to 26044954 inclusive. It confirmed the pinned closing hash and returned 55 RARI Transfer logs, grouped by the `from` address. I did not check the hash on a second endpoint. **Recipe:** the answer uses a `log-rank` recipe on the RARI contract at `0xfca59cd816ab1ead66534d82bc21e7515ce441cf`. It groups the Transfer event by `from`, sums `value`, and takes the top 5. The scan command and the tie are also written in `notes`. **Earlier rejection:** this attempt wrote nothing outside `artifacts/answer.json`, so it avoids the earlier path violation (a stray `err.log`).
Task complete — no further action needed on that monitor.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The scan confirmed the pinned closing hash; the top two senders tied, so the lowercase-address tie-break places `0x249c…` first. The required checker printed `ok`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written: the top RARI sender over the pinned window is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, tied in raw sent amount with `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` and resolved by ascending-address tiebreak per the request's own selection rule, computed via `scan.mjs`'s `log-rank` over RARI `Transfer` logs on `eth-mainnet.public.blastapi.io` and verified against the pinned closing-block hash.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/Users/zhuminquan/.identitymd-2/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json) with the leading sender, `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, and a reproducible log-ranking recipe for the pinned blocks. The required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created `artifacts/answer.json` with the ranked RARI senders and reproducible `log-rank` recipe. Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). It contains the top five senders; the leading address is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, tied for the highest total and first by the specified tie break. The supplied scanner confirmed the pinned block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd1/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned scan found a tie for the highest outgoing RARI total; the answer lists both senders first, ordered by lowercase address. The required checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. I wrote nothing outside `artifacts/answer.json`, so the earlier `err.log` path violation shouldn't recur. The answer is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, which sent 37744575145000000000000 raw RARI units (18 decimals) over blocks 26043165–26044954. - **Tie:** `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` sent exactly the same amount. The brief breaks ties by lowest lowercase address, so `0x249c…` comes first. - **Scan:** I ran one `scan.mjs` scan on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the pinned closing block hash matched. It found 55 Transfer logs across 31 sending addresses. I did not run a second scan or check the hash on a second endpoint. - **Recipe:** it is a `log-rank` grouped by `from`, summing `value`, with `topN` 5. The answer lists the top five senders, and the `definitions` block records the brief's terms for sent, denomination, window and ties. The checker first rejected the file because the `window` keys have to be in the brief's order (`toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`). I reordered them.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The scan returned `pinned: true`; `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. The top two senders tie, so the answer lists the lower address first as specified. I noted in the file that separate direct block lookups returned a different hash than the completed scan.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned scan found two senders tied for the lead; the address order follows the request’s lowercase ascending tie-break. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The scan matched the pinned closing hash, and the required checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/identitymd3/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The top two senders tied, so the lower address is first. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned-window scan found two senders tied for the highest total; the answer applies the requested lowercase address tie-break. The required checker printed `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/lucas/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The top total is tied between two senders; the first address is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`. The pinned-window scan matched the closing block hash, and the answer checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). Validation passed: `check-answer.mjs` printed `ok`.
wrote outside the task's allowed paths: err.log
FAILURE: path_violation
Wrote [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The top two senders tied at `37744575145000000000000` raw RARI units; they’re ordered by lowercase address. The supplied checker printed `ok`.
Check passes. The answer: `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` sent the most RARI (tied with another address at 37744575145000000000000 raw units, resolved by ascending address tie-break), computed via `log-rank` over the RARI Transfer logs in the pinned block range, written to `artifacts/answer.json`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`. Two addresses tied for the most RARI sent, each with 37,744,575,145 × 10^18 raw units. The tie-break is ascending lowercase address, so the answer is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`. The runner-up is `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758`, and the third entry is `0x3663fb840d9ce642c60e1346b238609a6bd334a0`. I ran `scan.mjs` once over blocks 26043165 to 26044954 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash matched the pin. It found 55 Transfer logs from the RARI contract, grouped by the `from` address. I did not run a second scan or check the hash on a second operator. The recipe is a `log-rank` on `Transfer` with `groupBy` set to `from`, `sumArg` set to `value` and `topN` set to 5. The answer lists three entries, more than the request's `head` of 1. The `window` object's keys have to be in the order `toBlock`, `fromBlock`, `toBlockHash`. The checker rejected my first draft for writing them in a different order, and I fixed it.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the leading answer `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` (tied at 37,744,575,145,000,000,000,000 raw RARI units with `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758`, tie broken by ascending address), computed via a `log-rank` scan of RARI Transfer logs over the pinned blocks 26043165–26044954 on `ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, confirmed against the pinned closing block hash.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the top RARI-sending address `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` (tied at the top with another address, tie broken by ascending address per the definitions), computed via a `log-rank` scan over the pinned block range against RARI's Transfer event, pin-verified against the given block hash.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned-range scan found two senders tied for the highest outgoing RARI total; they’re ordered by lowercase address. The checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/worker/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Completed [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). Validated successfully: `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The top total is tied; ascending address order puts `0x249c…` first. The supplied checker printed `ok`.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The pinned-window scan ranked the top two senders equally; the answer lists them in the required ascending address order. The answer checker printed `ok`.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written and passes `check-answer.mjs`. Ranked RARI senders by gross outgoing `Transfer.value` over blocks 26043165–26044954 (inclusive), with `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` as the top answer (tied with `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` at 37,744,575,145,000,000,000,000 raw units; tie broken by ascending address per the request's tiebreak rule). Verified with the `log-rank` recipe via `scan.mjs` against `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and the closing block hash cross-checked on `https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast`.
Check passes with `ok`. `artifacts/answer.json` is written: the top RARI sender over the pinned window is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, tied exactly with `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` at 37744575145000000000000 raw units and broken by ascending address per the tie-break rule.
Created [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/f6352cde-d08d-4c00-bbd3-ee844f46d754/301a0156-a382-4791-8630-01ccffc73fa0/artifacts/answer.json). The top two senders tie at 37,744,575,145,000,000,000,000 raw RARI; the address list applies the requested ascending-address tie break. The answer checker printed `ok`.
Check-answer prints `ok`. The answer is written to `artifacts/answer.json`: RARI's top sender over blocks 26043165–26044954 is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` (tied at 37,744,575,145 RARI raw-value with another address, broken by ascending address), computed via a `log-rank` scan of RARI's Transfer logs grouped by `from`.
Check passes. `artifacts/answer.json` is written with the top RARI senders over the pinned window (blocks 26043165–26044954), leader `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2` tied with `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` at 37744575145000000000000 raw units, using a `log-rank` recipe over `Transfer` logs from the RARI contract, verified with the pinned block hash.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. The address that sent the most RARI is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`, at 37,744,575,145,000,000,000,000 raw units (18 decimals). `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758` sent exactly the same amount, so the tie goes to the lower address, as the request's ranking rule says. The third entry in the answer list is `0x3663fb840d9ce642c60e1346b238609a6bd334a0`. I ran `scan.mjs` once over blocks 26043165 to 26044954 on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, and it confirmed the pinned closing hash. It found 55 Transfer logs from 31 distinct senders. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The recipe is a `log-rank` on the RARI contract, grouped by `from` and summing `value`. The tie rule and the raw-units denomination are stated under `definitions`. I had to reorder the `window` keys in the file (`toBlock` first) because the checker requires the exact key order from `oracle.json`.
I wrote `artifacts/answer.json`, and `check-answer.mjs` prints `ok` for it. Two addresses tied for the most RARI sent. Each sent 37,744,575,145 RARI (`37744575145000000000000` in raw units). Ties break by ascending address, so the answer's first entry is `0x249c4677896d969e2fec3ad2c405fb4be3bad4d2`. The runner-up is `0x46340b20830761efd32832a74d7169b29feb9758`, and the third entry is `0x3663fb840d9ce642c60e1346b238609a6bd334a0`. I ran `scan.mjs` once on `https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com`, over blocks 26043165 to 26044954 inclusive. It confirmed the pinned closing hash and found 55 Transfer logs from the RARI contract. The scan summed value per `from` address. I did not cross-check the closing hash on a second endpoint. The recipe in the file is a `log-rank` on Transfer, grouped by `from`. Its `topN` is 5, but I listed only the top three addresses in `answer`.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.