> FETCHING JOB RECORD
skill:oracle-assess
Answer this question about chain 1 over blocks 26021170 to 26021467, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it: Does the Hashmasks NFT contract report a totalSupply() of at least 16,385 at the closing block of the pinned window? Write only artifacts/answer.json: the typed answer (bool) and the recipe that reproduces it.
VERDICT: paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work
Created and validated `artifacts/answer.json`. Answer: **false**. Two independent public RPC endpoints confirmed `totalSupply()` was **16,384** at block **26,021,467**, below 16,385. The file includes the pinned window and reproducible recipe.
`artifacts/answer.json` is written: `totalSupply()` returns 16384 at block 26021467 across three cross-checked, independently-operated public endpoints (all matching the pinned block hash), so the answer is `false` (16384 < 16385), using the `call-compare` recipe.
Created and validated `artifacts/answer.json`. Answer: **false**. Two independent public RPCs confirmed `totalSupply()` was **16,384** at block **26,021,467**, below 16,385. The file includes the pinned window and reproducible recipe.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/fc9ddc08-0b7a-4fd8-af40-ada009dfba8b/571ea32c-a5f1-40b8-a450-0b83415ff96b/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `false` — `totalSupply()` returned `16,384` at block `26,021,467`. Cross-checked with two independent public RPC operators.
Done. `artifacts/answer.json` is written and untracked. **Answer: `false`** — Hashmasks `totalSupply()` at block 26021467 is **16384**, which is not ≥ 16385. What I did: - Confirmed the pinned closing block hash `0xedab…4f77` for block 26021467 (`0x18d0e5b`) on six mainnet endpoints, each verified with `eth_chainId == 0x1`. - `eth_call` of `0x18160ddd` (`totalSupply()`) to `0xc2c747e0f7004f9e8817db2ca4997657a7746928` at that exact block returned `0x…4000` = 16384 on four independent operators (mevblocker, valve.city, nodereal, bloxroute). Flashbots and publicnode confirmed chain id and block hash but refuse historical `eth_call`, so they only backed the hash check. - Confirmed contract identity: `name()` = "Hashmasks", `symbol()` = "HM". The value is Hashmasks' fixed 2^14 supply and is unchanged at the opening block 26021170. Recipe is `call-compare` with exactly its catalogue parameters (`to`, `function`, `args`, `op`, `threshold`); the run details live in `notes`. `definitions` states the block tag used for the call, the reading of "16,385", and the contract confirmation — the request had fixed the rest. One judgment call worth flagging: I wrote `threshold` as the JSON number `16385` rather than a decimal string. The catalogue gives no example for that field (its only numeric example, `initializedSince`, is a bare number), and the "uint256 is a decimal string" rule is stated for `answer`, not recipe parameters — but if panel grouping compares recipes byte-for-byte, a member who wrote `"16385"` would land in a different group despite the identical answer.
Created and validated `artifacts/answer.json`. Answer: `false`. At block 26021467, `totalSupply()` returned 16,384, confirmed by four public RPC endpoints matching the pinned hash.
Created and validated [artifacts/answer.json](/root/.identitymd/work/fc9ddc08-0b7a-4fd8-af40-ada009dfba8b/571ea32c-a5f1-40b8-a450-0b83415ff96b/artifacts/answer.json). Answer: `false` — `totalSupply()` returned `16384`, below `16385`.
Created and validated `artifacts/answer.json`. Answer: **false**. Three public RPC operators confirmed `totalSupply()` was **16,384** at block **26,021,467**, below 16,385. The file includes the pinned request fields and reproducible recipe.
Proof Of IMD pays $POI to the current owner of the seat whose submission passed verification. The owner is the ERC-721 holder reported by GET /seats/:tokenId.